Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
BEST PRACTICES: IMPLEMENTATION OF PREA IN THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice April 6, 2008 Washington,
PREA Employee Training Notification of Curriculum Utilization August 2014 The enclosed PREA Employee Training curriculum was developed by The Moss Group,
Idaho Department of Correction Prison Rape Elimination Act Brent D. Reinke, Director.
STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Statewide Transition Plan for Compliance with Home and Community-Based Setting Final Rule 1 Public.
Massachusetts Department of Correction Bridgewater State Hospital Luis S. Spencer, Commissioner.
THE PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT. OF 2003, 115
VA Support for Justice-Involved Veterans Sean Clark, JD National Coordinator, Veterans Justice Outreach September 5, 2014.
1 Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) These materials were developed by The Moss Group, Inc.under cooperative agreement #03P21G1Y4.
MCSO Department of Corrections Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Review 2008.
Iowa Department of Corrections For Contractors and Volunteers PREA.
OJA Board Meeting 5/10/13 Prevention, detection, response, and monitoring of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
PREA Prison Rape Elimination Act Community Confinement Audits.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
: This project is supported by Award No RP-BX-K001, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of.
How the PREA Standards for Lockups Impact Local Law Enforcement November 5, :00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. EST Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer.
Who Must Comply? ProgramProgram General Medical Facility EmergencyEmergency Qualified Service Organization Communication EmergencyEmergency ResearchResearch.
Who Must Comply? When is a patient authorization NOT required?  As needed for the protection of federal and state elective constitutional officers and.
Legal Obligations of the Juvenile Justice System for Limited English Proficient Youth Sam Jammal Legislative Staff Attorney MALDEF.
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Women and Corrections: A Model Program By Vanessa Alleyne,PhD.
The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program.
Policy Development. Objectives What makes a good policy? Definitions Challenges and dilemmas. Writing policy and procedure. Triage your agency’s policies.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 The National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law July 10-15, 2005 Investigating Allegations of.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003: Implications for Juvenile Justice Agencies Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody Kentucky Department.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 11-16, 2004.
Model Training Components for Staff and Inmates National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law March 9-14, 2003.
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Operational Practices/Strategies in Investigations and Vulnerability in Operations.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections American University Washington.
Developed by Brenda Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct.
Developed by Brenda V. Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders.
PREA Employee Training Notification of Curriculum Utilization August 2014 The Moss Group Inc. 1 The enclosed PREA Employee Training curriculum was developed.
Policy Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice Lexington, KY.
Army Family Advocacy Program 1 of R APR 06 Restricted Reporting Policy for Incidents of Domestic Abuse.
1 FACILITY MONITORING October 30, 2008 Presenter: Theresa Gálvez, Chief Patients’ Rights Advocate Riverside County.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act Overview and Update Responding to Inmate on Inmate Sexual Violence.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
JJDPA Reauthorization 2009: An Update DMC Action Network Annual Meeting May 15, 2009.
RCMP ‘K’ Division Police Based Victim Services 1.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
November 14, 2012 Models for Change Cross-Action Network Meeting
Prison Rape Elimination Act PREA A Brief Overview.
1 Investigating Fraud & Abuse Violations in Medical Research Janet Rehnquist, Esq. Venable LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
1 Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines Jane Horvath Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
[JAIL NAME] Prison Rape Elimination Act Pamphlet This brochure was produced with support from Grant No RP-BX-0001 awarded by the Bureau of Justice.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Corrections Department FY Budget Worksession July 15, 2013.
Children's Rights Protection System in Russia 19 federal and many regional agencies are responsible for the safety and protection of children’s rights.
Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Health Systems Mike Pemble Director Joint Provider Surveyor Training September 14, 2010.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
1 PARCC Data Privacy & Security Policy December 2013.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Task Force on Public Safety Oregon Criminal Justice Commission November 22, 2013.
New Jersey Department of Corrections
Melanie McNeil, Esq. State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Basics: What RSAT Programs Need to Know RSAT Webinar.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 13-18, 2003.
Lets Talk About PREA NO!! Capacity Building Preventing Responding Monitoring Oregon and PREA More Oregon Statistics NPR-WORK OPR-WORK National PREA Conference.
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) & Victim Advocacy
The Prison Rape Elimination Act: Survivors and Advocates
2017 VOCA National Training Conference Washington, DC
Mental Health in the Correctional System
Denise Matthews , Georgia Department of Community Health
Presentation transcript:

Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community

The Prison and the Community Introduction What to cover PREA has been around for awhile Most attention just recently In a group like this- multiple levels Not a introduction, but a review

The Prison and the Community Goals Overview of the PREA LAW Overview of the PREA Standards Understanding the impact on all types of facility. Introduction to the Audit Process

Prison Rape Elimination Act The 2 Parts The Law The Standards

The 1 st Part: The Law Into Law by bi-partisan support on September 4 th In effect for 12 + years Driven by Victim Advocates

The Law’s Reach  All Federal, State and local institutions Act was named poorly-  Prisons, Jails, Community Corrections, Police lock-ups, holding facilities…  Public / Private, Male / Female, Adult / Juvenile  Not just inmates- all staff, volunteers, contractors, etc…

The “Why” of the Law found offender rape caused  Higher levels of violence directed at inmates & staff’  Health and mental health care expenditures  Reduces the effectiveness of prevention programs

The “Why” of the Law Congress found  Legal liabilities  Public Relations Risks  Risk of recidivism, civil strife and violent crime

The Purpose of the Law  Establish ‘ZERO TOLERANCE’  Makes PREVENTION a top priority  Implementation of National STANDARDS

The Purpose of the Law  Increases the ACCOUNTABILITY of officials. o Establishes protection under the 8 th ADMENDMENT  COLLECTION & DISSEMINATION of information

The Law What was going on?

Questions about the Law

The 2 nd Part: The Standards  DOJ opened the process up for public comment in 2010  Final DOJ Standards released in May 2012  Draft version proposed by Commission in 2009

What was going on? The Standards Set-up

The Types of Standards  Community Corrections.  Juvenile Corrections.  Adult Prisons & Jails.

The Standards cover:  Response & Planning.  Training & Education.  Prevention  Screening  Contracting

The Standards cover:  Investigations / Disciplinary  Official Response  Reporting  Medical & Mental Health Response.

The Standards cover:  Audits  Audit Process & Corrective Action  Data Collection  State Compliance

The Standards Reach  Stated purpose of the Law is to develop and implement National Standards.  The law directs the Attorney General to publish rule adopting National Standards.  The Standards apply to the same agencies/organizations as the Law.

The Standards Reach  Federal Agency – Federal Law Bureau of Prisons  Any agency / facility the BOP contracts with to house inmates

The Standards Reach  PREA Non-compliance impact on certain Federal funding State Agencies / Facilities  Any agency / facility the State contracts with to house inmates  Increased liability outlined in the law.

The Standards Reach  Any contracts with Federal of State offender housing Local / Private Facilities…etc  Increased liability outlined in the law.

The Standards Reach  Accreditation of Federal, State, local or private prisons, jails or other penal facilities. Accreditation Organizations  Must adopt PREA Standards as a part of their standards  To be eligible to receive any new Federal Grant

Questions about the Standards

Preparing for PREA Audits Number 1 resource

Resource information : At the National PREA Resource Center The PREA Law The Standards Adult Prisons & Jails Lock ups* Community Juvenile FAQ from the DOJ

Training & Technical Assistance : At the National PREA Resource Center Basic PREA Training Specialty Training Current and archived Webinars Examples of other agencies / facilities

Audit Information : At the National PREA Resource Center List of DOJ Certified Auditors The Audit Instruments and Tools Interview guides Layout of the Audit process

Disclaimer: Suggestions only –no guarantees. Notes from a PREA Auditor Do your research – know what applies Auditors do not judge ability to comply – only that there is compliance Do a point by point policy review with the relevant Standards (definitions)

Disclaimer: Suggestions only –no guarantees. Notes from a PREA Auditor Documentation of everything. Staff Training and review by staff. Inmate/resident information

Disclaimer: Suggestions only –no guarantees. Notes from a PREA Auditor Written agreements (MOU’s) with outside agencies Document attempts. PREA should not be one person’s responsibility

Questions about Audits