Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop November 9, 1999 Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop November 9, 1999 FNew and/or Revised Test Procedures Volumetric Phase.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Assumptions: Incompressible substance, B. Negligible heat transfer

Advertisements

Charging. Charging Step 1 Should the lineset length of an installation exceed the charge supplied with the outdoor unit, additional charge will be required.

Presented by: Yasra Adowar Petroleum Industry Regulatory Team

Why Recover Petrol Vapour in Petrol Filling Stations?

1 of Emission Control Theory Support Automotive – Engine Performance Topics covered in this presentation: Types of Emissions Emission Control Devices.

June 16, 2010 California Air Resources Board LaMar Mitchell1 Basic Guide to Gasoline Vapor Recovery at the Gasoline Dispensing Facility Gasoline vapor.

Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop October 1, 1999 FPerformance Standards and Performance Specifications. FIncreased stringency of pressure integrity of.

ELECTRONIC FUEL INJECTION. Introduction Strict emission standards require precise fuel delivery Computers used to calculate fuel needs EFI very precise,

Jet-A Vaporization In an Experimental Tank Part II: Experimental Results at Atmospheric and Sub-Atmospheric Pressures Robert Ian Ochs Rutgers, The State.

1 Why Recover Petrol Vapour in Petrol Filling Stations? Petrol contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that evaporate in fuel tanks During unloading.

Vapor Recovery Emissions Reductions Mr. Luke Howard ARID Technologies, Inc

November 14, 2003 Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery.

Liquid Nitrogen (LN2) Fire Extinction - Phase II

Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.

Georgia Environmental Protection Division Stage II Vapor Recovery Decommissioning Testing 1. Test Notification & Protocols 2. Test Procedures.

VAPOR RECOVERY, VACUUMS AND YOU Heather Peters, Environmental Specialist.

Pat Bennett Engineering Evaluation Section Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board AST EVR WORKGROUP MEETING July 23, 2002.

MICHELLE WILSON ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 Stage II Vapor Recovery Update.

Boat Refueling Standard The Environmental Protection Agency has promulgated regulations regarding the evaporative and diurnal emissions for gasoline spark.

California Air Resources Board Enhanced Vapor Recovery.

MassDEP Stage I Vapor Recovery Program

Adsorption Refrigeration System. INTRODUCTION  Adsorption refrigeration system uses adsorbent beds to adsorb and desorb a refrigerant to obtain cooling.

Chapter 27 Gas Chromatography 1. Principles

California Air Resources Board December 12, 2002 Enhanced Vapor Recovery Technology Review.

Control Volume Analysis Using Energy

Enhanced Vapor Recovery Amendments Workshop June 18, 2002 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.

Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop January 19, 2000 Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop January 19, 2000 FNew Test Procedures Spillage(TP-201.2C) “Dripless”

1 ENHANCED VAPOR RECOVERY An Update Presented by Laura McKinney at the Petroleum Equipment Institute’s CONVEX2000 October 2, 2000 California Environmental.

Vandenberg Air Force Base E-85 Fueling Facility California Air Resources Board E-85 Workshop Presented by Stu S. Webster Metcalf & Eddy 02 February 2006.

Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation C.E. Polymeropoulos Robert Ochs Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.

ONLINE GENERAL PERMITS NJDEP October 9, 2013 ACE Academy.

California Air Resources Board Workshop November 3, th Street, Room 202 1:30 - 3:30 p.m. Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery.

Proposed Amendments to Enhanced Vapor Recovery Regulations November 18, 2004 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Air Resources Board California Environmental.

Enhanced Vapor Recovery Amendments Workshop September 9, 2002 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.

ANL Bubble Chamber Superheated Active Target System B. DiGiovine N 2 O and C 2 F 6 as Active Fluids.

Evaporative Emissions Control Systems (EVAP)

Chapter 4 Control Volume Analysis Using Energy. Learning Outcomes ►Distinguish between steady-state and transient analysis, ►Distinguishing between mass.

Cargo Tank Program Emissions and Regulation Development Public Workshop March 2, 2005 ARB, MLD 1st Floor Conference Room th Street Sacramento, CA.

MLD - Proposed TP Proposed Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP DYNAMIC PRESSURE PERFORMANCE Public Workshop, June 20, 2001 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES.

Chapter 4 Control Volume Analysis Using Energy (continued)

Section 4 Ancillary Equipment Section 4 Ancillary Equipment Definition Dispensers & Under Dispenser Containment Vapor Recovery Drop Tube & Fill Port.

The Dripless Nozzle Saving the Environment One Drop at a Time Matthew D. Millard.

Nitrous Oxide Properties Temperature (ºC) Vapor Pressure (Bar Abs.) Liquid Density (kg/m 3 )

A presentation for by ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting and Management International Petroleum Environmental Conference 22.

Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project Monitoring and Laboratory Division June 28, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.

Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation Robert Ochs and C.E. Polymeropoulos Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.

Control Volume Analysis Using Energy

Engineering Evaluation Unit Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board (916) ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANK (AST) VAPOR RECOVERY.

AST Stakeholder Meeting California Air Resources Board Stakeholder Meeting February 17, th Street, Room :00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

General The construction is changed to comply with the LEV-II evaporative emission regulations -A Charcoal Canister Canister Close Valve Vapor Pressure.

Presented at the Fifth Annual California Unified Program Conference February 6, 2003 Enhanced Vapor Recovery Cindy Castronovo Air Resources Board Cal-EPA.

Pat Bennett Engineering Evaluation Section Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board AST EVR WORKGROUP MEETING April 17, 2002.

 To discuss MassDEP’s draft revisions to the following regulations:  Stage II – 310 CMR 7.24(6)  Stage I – 310 CMR 7.24(3)  Definitions – 310 CMR.

Phase II Enhanced Gasoline Vapor Recovery and In-Station Diagnostics

Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Expanding LDAR Technology to Tank Vents and Compressor Seals Michael Webb,

1 Pat Bennett Engineering Evaluation Section Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor.

FLASH EMISSIONS JIM COOPER, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION.

Regional Transportation Center (RTC) San Diego, California.

UNIT INJECTOR SYSTEM.

Introduction to Overfill Prevention for USTs

ELECTRONIC FUEL INJECTION

PCV and EVAP Emission Control Systems

CCE and CVD results The usual PVT measurements on gas condensates are

EGR and Air Injection Systems

Phase Transition Example

NEW COMPLIANCE REGULATIONS

CCE and CVD results The usual PVT measurements on gas condensates are

Flash Distillation Flash distillation is the simplest method of separation. A feed stream is “flashed” into a chamber or “flash drum” and the liquid and.

Automotive Technology Principles, Diagnosis, and Service

Presentation transcript:

Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop November 9, 1999 Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop November 9, 1999 FNew and/or Revised Test Procedures Volumetric Phase I(TP-201.1) Fugitive Emissions(TP-201.2F) Liquid Retention(TP-201.3E) P/V Valve Integrity(TP-201.2B, Appx. 1)

Volumetric Phase I (TP-201.1) Current Procedure Volumetric Efficiency  95% No Emission Factor New Procedure Volumetric Efficiency  98% Emission Factor -HC  0.17 lbs./1000 gallons

Fugitive Emissions (TP-201.2F) No Current Procedure In Place New Procedure Modified 2” Decay Test Measure HC Concentration In UST Ullage Record UST Pressure For Given Amount of Time Calculate Mass Emission Factor Based On HC Concentration and Avg. UST Pressure

Liquid Retention (TP-201.3E) Quantifies Liquid retained in the: Nozzle Spout Vapor path (of nozzle and/or hose) Aspirator port and associated chambers Also quantifies Spitting Defined as liquid expelled from a nozzle when the lever of a nozzle of an inactive dispenser is squeezed.

PV Valve Integrity (TP-201.2B) Current Methodology 300 Gallon Tank Simulates a UST Size Needed to Dampen Out Pump Pulsation Immobile, Requires Components To Be Brought In For Testing New Procedure Mobile - Can Be Used in Parts Houses and In the Field Measures Both Vacuum and Pressure Stds.

Test Procedures Under Construction Nozzle Vapor Check(TP-201.2B, Appx. 2) Valve Integrity 2” Pressure Decay(TP-201.3) (Include Drop Tube Flow Test) Phase II Certification(TP-201.2) Includes Vent Sleeve Change From Efficiency Based To Mass Based Spillage(TP-201.2C) “Dripless” Nozzles(TP-201.2D)

Questions?