Funding Formula University Funding Review. Purpose Outline an engagement process and position the review within the context of the government’s overall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The role of NEPAD in improving quality and effectiveness of aid for Agricultural development Amadou Allahoury Diallo Senior Water Specialist NEPAD.
Advertisements

1 POLICY ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY: M.B. WILLIAMS DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
“compacts …a significant structural reform designed to strengthen institutional autonomy, to encourage cultural change, and to boost the international.
MANDATE WORKING GROUP: DRAFT REPORT PRESENTED TO SENATE APRIL 27, 2012.
“Building Capacity in Northern Communities” Strategic Plan (Draft Document) NOSDA Annual General Meeting April 9, 2013 Presentation by Michael.
Funding Mechanisms to Ensure Stability, Innovation and Sustainability in Higher Education Arthur M. Hauptman IUA Symposium-21 st Century Universities Dublin,
STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
MerSETA Strategic Plan Derrick Peo General Manager : Innovation, Research & Development.
Promoting Degree Completion Through Financial Incentives Teresa Lubbers, Commissioner November 9, 2009.
Building for the Future David Sweeney 18 November, 2011.
1 1 Budget Context for Townhall March 7,
1 PRESENTATION TO OHIO SSI STUDY GROUP OVERVIEW OF FUNDING PRACTICES AND STATE EXAMPLES Brenda N. Albright September 29, 2005.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
Public Sector Perspective on CSR and Responsibility Who is Responsible for Responsibility? Santiago, Chile September 2005.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.
What’s driving the need for flexible curricula? How are our learners changing and what are their needs/expectations for flexible curricula? QAA Enhancement.
UNIVERSITY ACCOUNTABILITY An Ontario and New Zealand Perspective.
UNDP & the Business SectorBureau for Resources and Strategic Partnerships Business, sustainable development and the MDGs: A changing landscape.
Driving Better Outcomes: Aligning State Investments With Completion Needs Typology & Principles to Inform Outcomes-Based Funding Models Presented by: Martha.
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Alternatives to Performance-based Funding Symposium on Incentives, Performance and Funding Ontario Institute for Studies in Education May 15, 2015 George.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Annual Public Meeting 1 September, ASB Community Trust  Established in 1988 as a result of the sale of the Auckland Savings Bank  15 Trustees.
Regional Conference on Higher Education, Cartagena de Indias, 4-6 June 2008.
Strategic Commissioning
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Adult Care and Support Commissioning Strategies Sarah Mc Bride - Head of Commissioning, Performance and Improvement Ann Hughes – Acting Senior.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 Legislative Appropriations.
Lin Martin Vice-President, Deakin University. Low SES, regional and remote and Indigenous students TAFE will not help improve higher education equity.
Budget 2013/14 and Business Plan Town Hall March 7, 2013 ANNUAL BUDGET 2013/14.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
Employment Research and innovation Climate change and energy Education Fighting poverty.
Austerity, Higher Education Reform and the Year of Living Dangerously Glen A. Jones Ontario Research Chair in Postsecondary Education Policy and Measurement.
A Proposed Accountability Framework for California Higher Education Recommendations from the Advisory Group November 4, 2003.
PSE Developments May Conference. Stakeholder Update ONCAT - April 20 & 21 – Student Pathways Conference – Student Advisory.
Department of Innovation, Trade and Rural Development Municipal Symposium May 10, 2008.
The Function of Applied Research in Ontario Colleges and Communities: An Economic Imperative September 30, 2015 Dr. MaryLynn West-Moynes.
CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.
Widening participation to HE Linking London conference 2 nd July 2012 Victoria Waite Senior Policy Adviser – London and East
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Single Outcome Agreements
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Council of Ontario Universities Ontario’s Graduate Programs Outcomes Survey Presented to The Canadian Association for Graduate Studies Julia Colyar October.
Educational Master Plan Update Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) November 19, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Country Partnership Strategy FY12-16 Consultations with Civil Society The World Bank Group June 2, 2011.
Socially Sustainable Development, May 2002 Responsive, Reliable, Resilient Social Aspects of Sustainable Development Steen Lau Jørgensen Social Development.
Educational Master Plan Update Open Forum November 11, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Finance implications for students 2015 to 2019 Jovan Luzajic Senior Policy Analyst Universities UK.
Faculty Councils Brad Whittaker Director, Research Services and Industry Liaison Strategic Research Plan.
UCU Conference – 3 December 2009 A Presentation on the Findings of the Review of Governance in FE Allan Schofield
Responsibility Centered Management APAC Presentation August 26, 2013 Jim Florian, AVP Provost Office.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee for Public Works 14 August 2002.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
The Role of Higher Education in Promoting Stability in Afghanistan Joseph B. Berger Center for International Education (CIE) University of Massachusetts.
Building Strong Library Associations | Library Associations in Society: An Overview DAY 1 Session 3 What is the context of Library Associations in your.
Budget Context Senate April University Budget Development Process  Faculties and Divisions submitted budget requests in January 
Planning in the Context of Budget Reduction
THE SELF SUSTAINING NON-PROFIT Golden Lessons From the Development and Corporate Sectors 14th Eastern Africa Resource Mobilization Workshop Paper.
AIS Bursars Conference September 2017
ADB’s CORPORATE STRATEGY
CTI-CFF Development Partners
National Skills Development Plan (NSDP) Skills Planning and Research
Presentation transcript:

Funding Formula University Funding Review

Purpose Outline an engagement process and position the review within the context of the government’s overall plan for postsecondary education. Funding universities in a more quality-driven, sustainable and transparent way is part of the government’s economic plan for Ontario

Ontario’s Current Funding Model Universities Core Model: Enrolment Based Funding – 89% Basic Operating Grant ($2,699M) – 77% Undergraduate Accessibility Grant ($170.2M) – 5% Graduate Expansion Grant ($97.3M) – 3% Medical & Nursing Related ($150.2M) – 4% Performance Funding – 4% General Quality Grant and Performance ($154.3M) – 4% Special Purpose and Other Grants – 7% Northern Ontario Grant ($16M) -.5% Institution Specific Grant ($31.8M) – 1% Other Grant ($89.9M) – 3% Access (First Gen., Bilingualism, Aboriginal, Disabilities) ($100M) – 3%

Ontario’s Current Funding Model Universities

Ontario’s Current Funding Model Colleges Core Model: Enrolment Based Funding – 85% College Funding Formula ($1,134M) – 78% Health Related ($107M) – 7% Performance Funding – 4% CFF Holdback and Performance ($54M) – 4% Special Purpose and Other Grants (almost 40 Grants) – 11% Access (First Gen., Bilingualism, Aboriginal, Disabilities) ($84M) – 6% Small, Northern and Rural Grant ($61M) – 4% Other Grants ($6M) – 1%

Ontario’s Current Funding Model Colleges College Funding Formula $1,134 M (78%) Health Related $107M, (7%) Enrolment Based Funding Performance Funding Small, Northern and Rural Grant $61M, (4%) Other Grants $6M, (1%) Access (First Gen, French Language, Aboriginal, Disabilities) $84M, (6%) Special Purpose Grants CFF Holdback and Performance $54M (4%)

Funding Model Comparison Majority of the funding under both models is based on program-weighted enrolment. Both models have similar proportion of Performance Based funding.

Ontario’s Current Funding Model Operating Revenue of Ontario Universities, By Source MTCU Grants – 40% Domestic Tuition Fees – 36% International Tuition Fees – 10% Ancillary Fees – 6% Investment Income – 5% Other Ontario Grants – 2% Donations & Other – 1%

Funding Formula Questions General Funding Formula Questions

Funding Formula Questions 1. Within the next 15 years, what will be the greatest opportunities and/or challenges facing the college sector in Ontario?

Funding Formula Questions Enhancing quality and improving the overall student experience

Funding Formula Questions 2. What factors in the student experience are essential to facilitating positive student outcomes, such as equity, resilience and success?

Funding Formula Questions 3. How could the funding model better promote the improvement of college teaching quality in programs, and support innovative programming (e.g. experiential or entrepreneurial learning)?

Funding Formula Questions Supporting the existing differentiation process

Funding Formula Questions 4. How could the funding model be better aligned with Strategic Mandate Agreements and the Differentiation Policy Framework, in particular, in supporting differentiation among institutions?

Funding Formula Questions 5. How could the funding model better recognize regional geographic diversity and community partnerships?

Funding Formula Questions 6. What is the appropriate role for outcomes measurement in supporting differentiation?

Funding Formula Questions Addressing financial sustainability

Funding Formula Questions 7. What type of conditions or environment would be required for college to best support financial sustainability?

Funding Formula Questions 8. What incentives or measures could be prioritized through the funding model to help colleges promote a sustainable cost curve?

Funding Formula Questions Increasing transparency and accountability?

Funding Formula Questions 9. How could accountability and reporting relationships between colleges and the government be improved and structured to best demonstrate the achievement of key outcomes?

Funding Formula Questions 10. How could the funding model be redesigned to reflect greater transparency?

Funding Formula Questions Closing Funding Formula questions

Funding Formula Questions 11. In your view, how could the funding model best achieve the main principles identified in this consultation?

Funding Formula Questions 12. Are there any concerns or recommendations that you would like to add that were not previously covered?

QUESTIONS?

Ciara Byrne Director of Advocacy