IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RWTÜV Fahrzeug Gmbh, Institute for Vehicle TechnologyTÜV Mitte Group 1 GRB Working Group Acceleration Pattern Results of pass-by noise measurements carried.
Advertisements

WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e short 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
2012/1/13 1 Gear shift analysis ~ Further Review on original JPN gear shift points ~ Prepared by Japan 13 January 2012.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Motorcycle Noise Emissions - The German Position – - ISO response - 4. GRB Informal Group Meeting 25./26. August 2005 Milwaukee.
Starting note on gearshift issues
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
WLTP-DHC Gear shift analysis Proposed by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Random Cycle Generator
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Analyses related to dynamic effects in vehicle speed and NOx emission measurements by H. Steven
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Presentation transcript:

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour for motorcycles By Heinz Steven

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 2 Mobilität Review of updated acceleration curves for ISO Figure 1a

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 3 Mobilität Review of updated acceleration curves for ISO Figure 1b

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 4 Mobilität Technical data of the Motorcycles Table 1

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 5 Mobilität Review of updated acceleration curves for ISO Table 2

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 6 Mobilität ISO Test results old Table 3a „Old“ means 1. acceleration curve, „new“ means latest acceleration curve

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 7 Mobilität ISO Test results new Table 3b „Old“ means 1. acceleration curve, „new“ means latest acceleration curve

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 8 Mobilität ISO Test results comparison Figure 2a „Old“ means 1. acceleration curve, „new“ means latest acceleration curve

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 9 Mobilität ISO Test results comparison Figure 2b „Old“ means 1. acceleration curve, „new“ means latest acceleration curve

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 10 Mobilität At the 41 st GRB meeting in February 2005 Germany presented an informal paper that showed that the driving behaviour on rural roads is characterized by significantly higher engine speeds compared to the driving behaviour on urban roads. Figure 3 shows a regression curve for average top engine speeds during acceleration phases at the boundaries of urban to rural roads (starting at speeds below 50 km/h and ending at speeds between 70 km/h and 100 km/h). This curve is based on the European part of the WMTC database. It was proposed to base a measurement method that represents rural driving behaviour on the ISO x method for N2 and N3 vehicles. ISO x requires a target engine speeds that must be reached at the end of the test track (BB’) during a wide open throttle acceleration test. The target engine speed should be a function of power to mass ratio. At the Rome meeting of Informal GRB R41 (April 2005) Germany promised to deliver a more specific proposal for such measurement method. This proposal is presented in this informal paper. Measurement method for rural driving behaviour

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 11 Mobilität In-use engine speeds and ISO 362 test speeds Figure 3a European data only

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 12 Mobilität In-use engine speeds and ISO 362 test speeds Figure 3b

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 13 Mobilität At present the proposal is based on the regression curve in figure 3, because it was not possible – due to lack of time – to reanalyse the whole WMTC database with respect to rural driving behaviour. When this will be finalised the regression curve needs to be updated adequately. Since the top speed normally creates the highest noise emission, the regression curve should represent the actual engine speed where the maximum noise level (Lmax) appeares. Normally, Lmax occurs somewhere between the microphone cross section (PP’) and the end of the test track (BB’). RWTUEV has a database of 14 motorcycles with a series of pass-by measurement results that allows to calculate Lmax for wide open throttle accelerations and an engine speed corresponding to the “rural” regression curve of figure 1. The technical data is shown in table 1. Measurement method for rural driving behaviour

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 14 Mobilität For these 14 vehicles the corresponding engine speeds at AA’, PP’ and BB’ were calculated on the basis of measured acceleration values in 2. gear. In order to simplify the calculation it was assumed that the maximum noise level occurs 5 m after PP’. The 2. gear was chosen in order to keep the vehicle speeds driveable for test tracks. The calculated vehicle and normalised engine speeds at AA’, PP’, BB’ and the calculated Lmax values are shown in table 4. Figure 2 shows n_norm_AA, n_norm_PP and n_norm_BB as functions of the power to mass ratio. The regression functions for n_norm_BB can be used as requirement for the test conditions to determine Lwot_rural. Measurement method for rural driving behaviour

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 15 Mobilität Proposal for a method to determine L_rural Figure 3a 14 TUEV vehicles

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 16 Mobilität Proposal for a method to determine L_rural Figure 3b 14 TUEV vehicles

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 17 Mobilität Proposal for a method to determine L_rural Figure 4 14 TUEV vehicles

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 18 Mobilität Proposal for a method to determine L_rural Table 4b, n_norm = *pmr Table 4a, n_norm = e *pmr

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 19 Mobilität This results in the following proposal with respect to a method to determine Lwot_rural: The normalised engine speed at BB is defined by the following equation:  n_norm_BB = 0,8731*exp( *pmr) old,  n_norm_BB = 3,4105*pmr -0,3315 new  pmr is the power to mass ratio index as defined in the new ISO standard (the value in kW/t without the dimension). This engine speed must be reached within a tolerance band of 0,95*n_norm_BB and 1,05*n_norm_BB (+/- 5%). The engine speed at BB is calculated by:  n_BB’ = n_norm_BB’*(s – n_idle) + n_idle, where s is the engine speed where the engine develops its maximum power and n_idle is idling speed The test has to be performed in 2. gear. The test results of 4 valid runs shall be averaged for each side of the vehicle. Lwot_rural is the maximum of these averages. Proposal for a method to determine L_rural

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 20 Mobilität It must be pointed out that the equations mentioned in this presentation need to be confirmed or modified by applying this method to a representative motorcycle sample including also less powerful vehicles. The intention of this paper is to outline the concept and the design of the method. Proposal for a method to determine Lwot_rural