Using Pre- and Posttesting To Improve Programming and Student Achievement Anju Sidana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Title I, Part D Data: SY 2012−13 Data Preview, Data Quality, and Upcoming CSPR Clarifications Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC.
Advertisements

1 Title I, Part D Data Reporting and Evaluation: What You Need To Know Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC Karen Neilson, California Department of Education.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Reporting & Evaluation Workshop Lauren Amos, Liann Seiter, and Dory Seidel.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Data Base Reporting Dropout Prevention, At Risk and Neglected or Delinquent.
1 Introduction to State Logic Models and Related Planning Stephanie Lampron, NDTAC.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Taking the Fast Lane to High-Quality Data Sarah Bardack and Stephanie Lampron.
Richland School District 2013 EOY Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export.
Overcoming Common Challenges: Tips on Engaging Families at Juvenile Justice Facility Schools.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
1 Components of Educational Programming in Secure Long-Term Settings Tom O’Rourke, Consultant and NDTAC Expert Panelist; Victoria Rankin, AIR, NDTAC ND.
Pre-Post Assessment NDTAC April NDTAC’s Home on the Net:
LITERACY COACHES IN STATE OPERATED PROGRAMS MERILEE FOX DIRECTOR OF STATE OPERATED PROGRAMS VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’
TRACKING AND REPORTING PROGRESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AmeriCorps Program Directors’ Kickoff: 2015 –
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Data Collection Process: Roles and Responsibilities of LEAs GaDOE Data Collections Conference August 17, 2011 Athens,
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
NRS JEOPARDY! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Quiz Show.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Major Changes to Title I Regulations Public School Choice & Supplemental Educational Services Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
Adult Education Assessment Policy Effective July 1 st, 2011.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Directions: This is a Power Point presentation about ESL. The information is used for staff development and there is a short quiz at the end.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
American Institutes for Research
PoPs and MSGs How reporting will be affected in 17/18 based on new Period of Participation and Measurables Skills Gain tracking.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Alternative Education Programs
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
What are Federal Programs and How Can I be Involved?
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Presentation transcript:

Using Pre- and Posttesting To Improve Programming and Student Achievement Anju Sidana

 Gain a better understanding of o Part D requirements around and uses of pre-post testing o How to properly administer pre-post tests o How to do more with pre-post testing in your State o Some common challenges States face in relation to pre-post testing  Assess the status of pre-post testing in your State and think through next steps for reaching your goals (activity)  Learn where to go for more information about pre-post testing 2 Objectives

The practice of testing students using academic achievement tests that are intended to measure students’ academic progress between the beginning and end of a program or period of instruction. 3 What Exactly Does Pre- and Posttesting Refer To?

 Pretests: Shortly after the student enters the facility  Posttests: Upon exit from the facility or at regularly scheduled intervals (such as every 90 days) o Frequency is limited by… the number of unique versions of the posttest the amount of time needed between tests to demonstrate measurable progress 4 When Should Pre- and Posttests Be Administered?

 Title I, Part D, Section 1431 requires that all States measure the academic progress of students served by Part D dollars.  Tables / of the CSPR (Academic Performance in Reading and Mathematics) require States to report pre- and posttest results in reading and math for students enrolled 90 consecutive days or longer (long-term students).  Section of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that “Each State, in consultation with its LEAs, must implement a system of high-quality, yearly student academic assessments that includes, at a minimum, academic assessments in mathematics [and] reading/language…” 5 Part D and Federal Requirements

 For students o Allows for accurate placement o Allows students to see and track their own progress  For teachers o Allows teachers to track progress, catch problems early, and tailor instruction to individual student needs  For program managers and education directors o Allows aggregated data to be used for program evaluation and improvement o Allows for identification of effective/ineffective programs and direction of resources 6 Other Reasons To Pre- and Posttest (1)

 For State administrators: o Helps to identify model programs / struggling programs o Captures data on students that may be missed by State assessments o Affords an opportunity to share powerful education information with stakeholders o Facilitates accurate and efficient collecting and reporting of N or D data at the State level 7 Other Reasons To Pre- and Posttest (2)

Are your programs using tests appropriately? Ensure that your States are...  using tests intended to be administered as pre- and posttests  administering the tests at the appropriate intervals to measure progress  using tests designed specifically for the subject matter being tested  using tests that are appropriate for the population to whom they are administered 8 Is Pre- and Posttesting Being Done Properly in My State?

Are your programs pre- and posttesting the appropriate students?  Testing AT LEAST all students that have a length of stay in the facility for 90 days or longer (long-term students)  Testing all long-term students in AT LEAST reading and math 9 Is Pre- and Posttesting Being Done Properly in My State?

 Implement a common pre- and posttest  Ensure proper transfer and credit of testing information during transition  Assess more students than required  Think about your end goals to determine first steps 10 How Can I Do More?

Visit the NDTAC Data Corner at to find: A Brief Guide for Selecting and Using Pre-Post Assessments A Brief Guide for Selecting and Using Pre-Post Assessments Provides basic information about the ideal characteristics of a pre-post test and highlights important features to consider when requesting and evaluating information from test publishers. A Look at Legislation: Common Pre-Post Assessments A Look at Legislation: Common Pre-Post Assessments Discusses States that have mandated the use of a common or pre-approved pre-post assessment test for Title I, Part D, facilities and programs. 11 Resources for More Information

Visit the NDTAC Data Corner at to find : Common Assessments in Neglected or Delinquent (N or D) Programs Common Assessments in Neglected or Delinquent (N or D) Programs Lists pre-post tests and assessments used in neglected or delinquent programs across the country (compiled 2005). The NDTAC Assessment Toolkit: Measuring Student Academic Performance The NDTAC Assessment Toolkit: Measuring Student Academic Performance Designed to help State administrators and local program managers track and improve their academic assessment procedures and results for students who are neglected or delinquent. 12 Resources for More Information (2)

Assess the status of pre- and posttesting in your State and identify next steps 13 Activity