Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice
Advertisements

Chapter Four Utility. Preferences - A Reminder u x y: x is preferred strictly to y.  x  y: x and y are equally preferred. u x y: x is preferred at least.
Chapter 2 BUDGET CONSTRAINT. 2.1 The Budget Constraint Consumers choose the BEST bundle of goods they can AFFORD. Budget set: affordability Consumption.
Tastes/Preferences Indifference Curves.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2x2 x1x1 Budget constraint is p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 = m. m /p 2 m /p 1.
Budget Constraints  The bundles that are only just affordable form the consumer’s budget constraint. This is the set { (x 1,…,x n ) | x 1  0, …, x n.
Chapter Four Utility. Utility Functions   A utility function U(x) represents a preference relation if and only if: x’ x” U(x’) > U(x”) x’ x” U(x’)
Consumer Theory Consumers choose the best bundles of goods they can afford. 1.Can afford – Budget constraints. 2.“Best” – according to preferences. Why.
Utility.
Chapter Three Preferences.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Chapter Two Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice.
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.
Chapter Four Utility. Utility Functions u A preference relation that is complete, reflexive, transitive and continuous can be represented by a continuous.
SF Intermediate Economics 2005/06 Francis O’Toole.
Chapter Two Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice.
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.
Chapter Four Utility.
Utility. Utility Functions u Utility is a concept used by economists to describe consumer preferences. u Utility function is a function that assigns a.
Course: Microeconomics Text: Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics 1.
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: An economic decisionmaker always chooses her most preferred alternative from.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Course: Microeconomics Text: Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics 1.
Chapter 2 Budget Constraint uRequired reading: whole chapter uExercises: 1.Review Questions #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 on p.32.
Chapter 2 Budget Constraint. 2 Consumption Theory Economists assume that consumers choose the best bundle of goods they can afford. In this chapter, we.
Microeconomics A Marek Giergiczny Office hours: Thu 1415, room 306.
Chapter Three Preferences 偏好. Structure 3.1 Preference relations 3.2 Assumptions about preferences 3.3 Graphical representation of preferences—indifference.
Chapter 5 Choice.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 4 Utility. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Preferences - A Reminder u x y: x is preferred strictly to y.  x.
Chapter 4 Utility.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Choice. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that.
Rationality in Economics Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives. So.
Course: Microeconomics Text: Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics 1.
Chapter 3 Preferences.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3 Preferences.
1 Preferences Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 4 Utility. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Preferences - A Reminder u x y: x is preferred strictly to y.  x.
Chapter Three Preferences. u Consumer behavior is best understood in three distinct steps: 1. Consumer Preferences: The first step is to find a practical.
L03 Utility. Big picture u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from the set of affordable alternatives. u Budget.
L02 Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from the set of affordable alternatives.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice.
Chapter Two Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice.
L03 Utility. Quiz How much do you like microeconomics A: I love it (unconditionally) B: I cannot live without it C: I would die for it D: All of the above.
UTILITY. Chapter 11 What is Utility? A way of representing preferences Utility is not money (but it is a useful analogy) Typical relationship between.
PREFERENCES. Rationality in Economics Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives.
BUDGET CONSTRAINT.
Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice
L02 Preferences.
4 Utility.
L03 Utility.
L03 Utility.
3 Preferences.
Chapter 2 Budget Constraint.
Chapter Three Preferences.
PREFERENCES.
L02 Preferences.
Chapter Four Utility.
L03 Utility.
BUDGET CONSTRAINT.
L02 Preferences.
Chapter 3 Preferences.
L03 Utility.
5 Choice.
L02 Preferences.
L02 Preferences.
L02 Preferences.
Presentation transcript:

Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

Consumption Choice Sets A consumption choice set is the collection of all consumption choices available to the consumer. What constrains consumption choice? Budgetary, time and other resource limitations.

Budget Constraints A consumption bundle containing x1 units of commodity 1, x2 units of commodity 2 and so on up to xn units of commodity n is denoted by the vector (x1, x2, … , xn). Commodity prices are p1, p2, … , pn.

Budget Constraints Q: When is a consumption bundle (x1, … , xn) affordable at given prices p1, … , pn?

Budget Constraints Q: When is a bundle (x1, … , xn) affordable at prices p1, … , pn? A: When p1x1 + … + pnxn £ m where m is the consumer’s (disposable) income.

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m. m /p2 m /p1 x1

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m. m /p2 m /p1 x1

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m. m /p2 Just affordable m /p1 x1

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m. m /p2 Not affordable Just affordable m /p1 x1

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m. m /p2 Not affordable Just affordable Affordable m /p1 x1

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m. m /p2 the collection of all affordable bundles. Budget Set m /p1 x1

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commodities x2 p1x1 + p2x2 = m is x2 = -(p1/p2)x1 + m/p2 so slope is -p1/p2. m /p2 Budget Set m /p1 x1

Budget Constraints For n = 2 and x1 on the horizontal axis, the constraint’s slope is -p1/p2. What does it mean?

Budget Constraints For n = 2 and x1 on the horizontal axis, the constraint’s slope is -p1/p2. What does it mean? Increasing x1 by 1 must reduce x2 by p1/p2. See Notes Notas: 1)Demostrar que los precios relativos (la pendiente de la recta de presupuesto) es una tasa de cambio, por ende es un costo de oportunidad.

Budget Sets & Constraints; Income and Price Changes The budget constraint and budget set depend upon prices and income. What happens as prices or income change?

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as income m increases? x2 Original budget set x1

Higher income gives more choice x2 New affordable consumption choices Original and new budget constraints are parallel (same slope). Original budget set x1

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as income m decreases? x2 Original budget set x1

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as income m decreases? x2 Consumption bundles that are no longer affordable. Old and new constraints are parallel. New, smaller budget set x1

Budget Constraints - Income Changes Increases in income m shift the constraint outward in a parallel manner, thereby enlarging the budget set and improving choice. Decreases in income m shift the constraint inward in a parallel manner, thereby shrinking the budget set and reducing choice.

Budget Constraints - Income Changes No original choice is lost and new choices are added when income increases, so higher income cannot make a consumer worse off. An income decrease may (typically will) make the consumer worse off.

Budget Constraints - Price Changes What happens if just one price decreases? Suppose p1 decreases.

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1 decreases from p1’ to p1”? x2 m/p2 -p1’/p2 Original budget set m/p1’ m/p1” x1

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1 decreases from p1’ to p1”? x2 m/p2 New affordable choices -p1’/p2 Original budget set m/p1’ m/p1” x1

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1 decreases from p1’ to p1”? x2 m/p2 New affordable choices Budget constraint pivots; slope flattens from -p1’/p2 to -p1”/p2 -p1’/p2 Original budget set -p1”/p2 m/p1’ m/p1” x1

Budget Constraints - Price Changes Reducing the price of one commodity pivots the constraint outward. No old choice is lost and new choices are added, so reducing one price cannot make the consumer worse off.

Budget Constraints - Price Changes Similarly, increasing one price pivots the constraint inwards, reduces choice and may (typically will) make the consumer worse off. The rate of exchange chance (see an example).

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes A uniform sales tax levied at rate t changes the constraint from p1x1 + p2x2 = m to (1+t)p1x1 + (1+t)p2x2 = m

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes A uniform sales tax levied at rate t changes the constraint from p1x1 + p2x2 = m to (1+t)p1x1 + (1+t)p2x2 = m i.e. p1x1 + p2x2 = m/(1+t). Case for tax quantity Case for tax on both sales tax and income

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes p1x1 + p2x2 = m x1

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes p1x1 + p2x2 = m p1x1 + p2x2 = m/(1+t) x1

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes Equivalent income loss is x1

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes Case for tax quantity Case for sales tax and income tax Quantity subsidy (see notes) Value Subsidy (see notes) Lump-sum tax or subsidy (see notes) Budget set with rationing (see notes)

Preferences

Rationality in Economics Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives. So to model choice we must model decisionmakers’ preferences.

Preference Relations Comparing two different consumption bundles, x and y: strict preference: x is more preferred than is y. weak preference: x is as at least as preferred as is y. indifference: x is exactly as preferred as is y.

Preference Relations Strict preference, weak preference and indifference are all preference relations. Particularly, they are ordinal relations; i.e. they state only the order in which bundles are preferred.

Preference Relations p p denotes strict preference; x y means that bundle x is preferred strictly to bundle y. p p

Preference Relations p p f ~ f ~ denotes strict preference so x y means that bundle x is preferred strictly to bundle y. ~ denotes indifference; x ~ y means x and y are equally preferred. denotes weak preference; x y means x is preferred at least as much as is y. p p ~ f ~ f

Assumptions about Preference Relations Completeness: For any two bundles x and y it is always possible to make the statement that either x y or y x. ~ f ~ f

Assumptions about Preference Relations Reflexivity: Any bundle x is always at least as preferred as itself; i.e. x x. ~ f

Assumptions about Preference Relations Transitivity: If x is at least as preferred as y, and y is at least as preferred as z, then x is at least as preferred as z; i.e. x y and y z x z. ~ f ~ f ~ f

Indifference Curves Take a reference bundle x’. The set of all bundles equally preferred to x’ is the indifference curve containing x’; the set of all bundles y ~ x’.

Indifference Curves x2 x’ ~ x” ~ x”’ x’ x” x”’ x1

Indifference Curves x2 z x y p p x z y x1

Indifference Curves I1 All bundles in I1 are strictly preferred to all in I2. x2 x z I2 All bundles in I2 are strictly preferred to all in I3. y I3 x1

Indifference Curves x2 x I(x’) I(x) x1 WP(x), the set of bundles weakly preferred to x. x I(x’) I(x) x1

Indifference Curves x2 x I(x) x1 WP(x), the set of bundles weakly preferred to x. x WP(x) includes I(x). I(x) x1

Indifference Curves x2 x I(x) x1 SP(x), the set of bundles strictly preferred to x, does not include I(x). x I(x) x1

Indifference Curves Cannot Intersect From I1, x ~ y. From I2, x ~ z. Therefore y ~ z. x2 I1 x y z x1

Indifference Curves Cannot Intersect From I1, x ~ y. From I2, x ~ z. Therefore y ~ z. But from I1 and I2 we see y z, a contradiction. x2 I2 I1 p x y z x1

Slopes of Indifference Curves When more of a commodity is always preferred, the commodity is a good. If every commodity is a good then indifference curves are negatively sloped.

Slopes of Indifference Curves Good 2 Two goods a negatively sloped indifference curve. Better Worse Good 1

Slopes of Indifference Curves If less of a commodity is always preferred then the commodity is a bad.

Slopes of Indifference Curves Good 2 One good and one bad a positively sloped indifference curve. Better Worse Analizar el ejemplo Bad 1

Utility Functions A preference relation that is complete, reflexive, transitive and continuous can be represented by a continuous utility function. Continuity means that small changes to a consumption bundle cause only small changes to the preference level.

Utility Functions f ~ p p A utility function U(x) represents a preference relation if and only if: x’ x” U(x’) > U(x”) x’ x” U(x’) < U(x”) x’ ~ x” U(x’) = U(x”). ~ f p p

Utility Functions Utility is an ordinal (i.e. ordering) concept. E.g. if U(x) = 6 and U(y) = 2 then bundle x is strictly preferred to bundle y.

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves Consider the bundles (4,1), (2,3) and (2,2). Suppose (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). Assign to these bundles any numbers that preserve the preference ordering; e.g. U(2,3) = 6 > U(4,1) = U(2,2) = 4. Call these numbers utility levels. p

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves An indifference curve contains equally preferred bundles. Equal preference  same utility level. Therefore, all bundles in an indifference curve have the same utility level.

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves So the bundles (4,1) and (2,2) are in the indiff. curve with utility level U º 4 But the bundle (2,3) is in the indiff. curve with utility level U º 6. On an indifference curve diagram, this preference information looks as follows:

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x2 (2,3) (2,2) ~ (4,1) p U º 6 U º 4 x1

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves Another way to visualize this same information is to plot the utility level on a vertical axis.

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves 3D plot of consumption & utility levels for 3 bundles Utility U(2,3) = 6 U(2,2) = 4 U(4,1) = 4 x2 x1

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves This 3D visualization of preferences can be made more informative by adding into it the two indifference curves.

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x2 Higher indifference curves contain more preferred bundles. x1

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves Comparing more bundles will create a larger collection of all indifference curves and a better description of the consumer’s preferences.

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x2 U º 6 U º 4 U º 2 x1

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves As before, this can be visualized in 3D by plotting each indifference curve at the height of its utility index.

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x2 U º 3 U º 2 U º 1 x1

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves The collection of all indifference curves for a given preference relation is an indifference map. An indifference map is equivalent to a utility function; each is the other.

Utility Functions There is no unique utility function representation of a preference relation. Suppose U(x1,x2) = x1x2 represents a preference relation. Again consider the bundles (4,1), (2,3) and (2,2).

Utility Functions U(x1,x2) = x1x2, so U(2,3) = 6 > U(4,1) = U(2,2) = 4; that is, (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). Definir transformación monótona (ver notas) p

Utility Functions p U(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). Define V = U2. p

Utility Functions p p U(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). Define V = U2. Then V(x1,x2) = x12x22 and V(2,3) = 36 > V(4,1) = V(2,2) = 16 so again (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). V preserves the same order as U and so represents the same preferences. p p

Goods, Bads and Neutrals A good is a commodity unit which increases utility (gives a more preferred bundle). A bad is a commodity unit which decreases utility (gives a less preferred bundle). A neutral is a commodity unit which does not change utility (gives an equally preferred bundle).

Goods, Bads and Neutrals Utility Utility function Units of water are goods Units of water are bads Water x’ Around x’ units, a little extra water is a neutral.

Some Other Utility Functions and Their Indifference Curves Instead of U(x1,x2) = x1x2 consider V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. What do the indifference curves for this “perfect substitution” utility function look like?

Perfect Substitution Indifference Curves x2 x1 + x2 = 5 13 x1 + x2 = 9 9 x1 + x2 = 13 5 V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. 5 9 13 x1

Perfect Substitution Indifference Curves x2 x1 + x2 = 5 13 x1 + x2 = 9 9 x1 + x2 = 13 5 Ver propiedad Propiedades V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. 5 9 13 x1 All are linear and parallel.