THE NESDIS TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION PROBABILITY PRODUCT: PAST PERFORMANCE AND FUTURE PLANS Andrea B. Schumacher, CIRA Mark DeMaria, NESDIS/StAR John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improvements to Statistical Intensity Forecasts John A. Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Fort Collins, Colorado, Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Fort Collins,
Advertisements

Improvements in Statistical Tropical Cyclone Forecast Models: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Andrea Schumacher 2, John.
Ryan Truchelut and Robert E. Hart Florida State University, Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science Florida State.
By: Andrew Lee. Kaplan and Demaria 2003 Paper Findings of Previous Studies Ocean’s impact on tropical cyclone (TC) intensity: Upwelling and vertical.
Further Development of a Statistical Ensemble for Tropical Cyclone Intensity Prediction Kate D. Musgrave 1 Mark DeMaria 2 Brian D. McNoldy 3 Yi Jin 4 Michael.
Microwave Imagery and Tropical Cyclones Satellite remote sensing important resource for monitoring TCs, especially in data sparse regions Passive microwave.
Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) 1 Near uniform spatial resolution of approximately 10 km. Coverage up to 52 deg latitude % flash detection day.
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 1 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Stan Kidder 2, Robert.
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Robert DeMaria 2, Andrea.
Development of a Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Genesis Prediction Scheme Jason Dunion1, John Kaplan2, Andrea Schumacher3, Joshua Cossuth4, & Mark DeMaria5.
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Tropical Cyclone Forecasting Where is it going and how strong will it be when it gets there.
A. Schumacher, CIRA/Colorado State University NHC Points of Contact: M. DeMaria, D. Brown, M. Brennan, R. Berg, C. Ogden, C. Mattocks, and C. Landsea Joint.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
OPERATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OBJECTIVE ANNULAR HURRICANE INDEX ANDREA B. SCHUMACHER 1, JOHN A. KNAFF 2, THOMAS A. CRAM 1, MARK DEMARIA 2, JAMES P.
Andrea Schumacher 1, Mark DeMaria 2, John Knaff 3, Liqun Ma 4 and Hazari Syed 5 1 CIRA, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 2 NOAA/NWS/NHC,
Tropical Cyclone Applications of GOES-R Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NESDIS/ORA, Fort Collins, CO John Knaff CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO Applications of Advanced.
The Impact of Satellite Data on Real Time Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
New and Updated Operational Tropical Cyclone Wind Products John A. Knaff – NESDIS/StAR - RAMMB, Fort Collins, CO Alison Krautkramer – NCEP/TPC - NHC, Miami,
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff, CIRA/CSU,
Andrea Schumacher 1, Mark DeMaria 2 and John Knaff 2 1. CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO 2. NOAA/NESDIS/StAR, Fort Collins, CO.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Predictions Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Status Report Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
USING THE ROSSBY RADIUS OF DEFORMATION AS A FORECASTING TOOL FOR TROPICAL CYCLOGENESIS USING THE ROSSBY RADIUS OF DEFORMATION AS A FORECASTING TOOL FOR.
Guidance on Intensity Guidance Kieran Bhatia, David Nolan, Mark DeMaria, Andrea Schumacher IHC Presentation This project is supported by the.
Continued Development of Tropical Cyclone Wind Probability Products John A. Knaff – Presenting CIRA/Colorado State University and Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS.
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity to Large-Scale Forcing in the 2008 HWRF model Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Fort Collins, CO Brian.
A Comparison of Two Microwave Retrieval Schemes in the Vicinity of Tropical Storms Jack Dostalek Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere,
A. FY12-13 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page version 25 October 2011 Title: Combining Probabilistic and Deterministic Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity.
Improving SHIPS Rapid Intensification (RI) Index Using 37 GHz Microwave Ring Pattern around the Center of Tropical Cyclones 65 th Interdepartmental Hurricane.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
Tropical cyclone products and product development at CIRA/RAMMB Presented by Cliff Matsumoto CIRA/CSU with contributions from Andrea Schumacher (CIRA),
Improvements to the SHIPS Rapid Intensification Index: A Year-2 JHT Project Update This NOAA JHT project is being funded by the USWRP in NOAA/OAR’s Office.
61 st IHC, New Orleans, LA Verification of the Monte Carlo Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update John A.
USING THE ROSSBY RADIUS OF DEFORMATION AS A FORECASTING TOOL FOR TROPICAL CYCLOGENESIS USING THE ROSSBY RADIUS OF DEFORMATION AS A FORECASTING TOOL FOR.
John Kaplan (NOAA/HRD), J. Cione (NOAA/HRD), M. DeMaria (NOAA/NESDIS), J. Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS), J. Dunion (U. of Miami/HRD), J. Solbrig (NRL), J. Hawkins(NRL),
Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP): Where do we stand after 3 years? Bob Gall – HFIP Development Manager Fred Toepfer—HFIP Project manager Frank.
Development of Probabilistic Forecast Guidance at CIRA Andrea Schumacher (CIRA) Mark DeMaria and John Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS/ORA) Workshop on AWIPS Tools for.
THE NESDIS TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION PROBABILITY PRODUCT: PAST PERFORMANCE AND FUTURE PLANS Andrea B. Schumacher, CIRA Mark DeMaria, NOAA/StAR John A.
A Global Tropical Cyclone Formation Probability Product Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Daniel Brown, NHC 64.
The Impact of Lightning Density Input on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasts Mark DeMaria, John Knaff and Debra Molenar, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort.
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
Tie Yuan and Haiyan Jiang Department of Earth & Environment, FIU, Miami, Florida Margie Kieper Private Consultant 65 th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference.
Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasting Using Lightning Data during the 2010 GOES-R Proving Ground at the National Hurricane Center Mark DeMaria.
1 1. FY09 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page Revised: June 17, 2008  Title: Tropical Cyclone Forecast Product Improvement with GOES  Project Type: Product.
Dynamic Hurricane Season Prediction Experiment with the NCEP CFS Jae-Kyung E. Schemm January 21, 2009 COLA CTB Seminar Acknowledgements: Lindsey Long Suru.
John Kaplan (NOAA/HRD), J. Cione (NOAA/HRD), M. DeMaria (NOAA/NESDIS), J. Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS), J. Dunion (U. of Miami/HRD), J. Solbrig (NRL), J. Hawkins(NRL),
1 The Asian-Australian Monsoon System: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Prediction Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP December 12,
Development of a Rapid Intensification Index for the Eastern Pacific Basin John Kaplan NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division Miami, FL and Mark DeMaria.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
Impact of Blended MW-IR SST Analyses on NAVY Numerical Weather Prediction and Atmospheric Data Assimilation James Cummings, James Goerss, Nancy Baker Naval.
TC Projects Joint Hurricane Testbed, Surface winds GOES-R, TC structure – TC Size TPW & TC size (Jack Dostalek) IR climatology – RMW/wind profile Proving.
Overview of CIRA and NESDIS Global TC Services Presented by John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch Fort Collins, CO USA For The.
The National Hurricane Center GOES-R Proving Ground Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO GLM Science Meeting, Huntsville, AL September 26,
2012 NHC Proving Ground Products Hurricane Intensity Estimate (HIE) Chris Velden and Tim Olander 1.
New Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Tools for the Western North Pacific Mark DeMaria and John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU.
1 Improvements in Real-Time Tropical Cyclone Products Mark DeMaria NESDIS/StAR/RAMM Branch Presented at.
Objective and Automated Assessment of Operational Global Forecast Model Predictions of Tropical Cyclone Formation Patrick A. Harr Naval Postgraduate School.
Munehiko Yamaguchi 12, Takuya Komori 1, Takemasa Miyoshi 13, Masashi Nagata 1 and Tetsuo Nakazawa 4 ( ) 1.Numerical Prediction.
Developing a tropical cyclone genesis forecast tool: Preliminary results from 2014 quasi- operational testing Daniel J. Halperin 1, Robert E. Hart 1, Henry.
Satellite Analysis Branch 2009 Year in Review Anthony Salemi with Michael Turk NOAA Hurricane Conference December 1, 2009.
Andrea Schumacher1, M. DeMaria2, and R. DeMaria1
Mark DeMaria and John A. Knaff - NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB, Fort Collins, CO
A Guide to Tropical Cyclone Guidance
Development and applications of a new genesis potential index
Development and applications of an index for tropical cyclone genesis
Anne Leroy Météo France, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Matthew C. Wheeler
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity
Tropical storm intra-seasonal prediction
Validation of CIRA Tropical Cyclone Algorithms
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Presentation transcript:

THE NESDIS TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION PROBABILITY PRODUCT: PAST PERFORMANCE AND FUTURE PLANS Andrea B. Schumacher, CIRA Mark DeMaria, NESDIS/StAR John A. Knaff, NESDIS/StAR Daniel Brown, NOAA/NWS TPC 61 st Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference,

Motivation  Need for objective, real-time TC formation guidance  NHC needs objective guidance to help make Tropical Cyclone formation forecasts  Numerical models provide objective guidance As resolution improves, forecast models gets better at handling TC formation However, still bias towards over-prediction (Beven 1999)

Approach  Compute 24-hour probability of TC formation over all 5º x 5º lat/lon grid boxes in domain by analyzing environmental & convective conditions

Approach  Compute 24-hour probability of TC formation over all 5º x 5º lat/lon grid boxes in domain by analyzing environmental & convective conditions “A Needle in a Haystack” Ratio of TC formation to non-formation points ~ 1:2000 Maximum climatological formation probability ~1.8% (E. Pacific)

Datasets  NHC/DOD Best Tracks  Atlantic, E. Pacific, Central Pacific & W. Pacific  Subtropical/Extratropical cases excluded  Unnamed depressions included since 1989  NCEP Global Model Analyses  Reanalysis (2.5 o grid)  Operational Analyses (1.0 o grid)  Geostationary Satellite Water Vapor Imagery (16 km Re- mapped Mercator projection)  GOES-E  GOES-W  GMS-5 / GOES-9 / MTSAT-1R

Parameters ABBREVParameter DescriptionSource LATLatitude ( ° )ATCF PLAND% land coverageLand covrge DSTRMDistance to nearest TC (km)ATCF CSSTClimatological sea surface temp ( ° C)Levitus VSHEAR hPa vertical shear (kt)NCEP GFS CIRC850 hPa circulation (kt)NCEP GFS THDEVVertical instability ( ° C)NCEP GFS HDIV850 hPa horizontal divergence (m/s)NCEP GFS PCCOLD% coverage by pixels colder than 40 CSat WV BTWARMAvg. cloud-cleared brightness temp ( ° C)Sat WV CPROBClimatological formation probabilityBest Track

Product Algorithm  Screening Step:  Remove all points where TC formation is highly unlikely  < 5% TCG points removed  75-80% non-TCG points removed

Product Algorithm  Linear Discriminant Analysis Step:  Uses developmental dataset parameter values  Solves for coefficients a 0,..,a n so that the distance between parameter means for each group (TCG and non-TCG) are maximized in standard deviation units  For each independent data point with parameter values x 1,…,x n, the LDF determines group membership, where LDF = a 0 + a 1 x 1 + … + a n x n  Deterministic (yes/no) *Perrone & Lowe (1986), Hennon & Hobgood (2003), Knaff et al. (2008)

Product Algorithm  Probability Determination Step:  Use dependent dataset to develop a relationship between LDF and TC formation probability  Coefficients and LDF/probability relationship defines the TCFP product

Recent Product Updates  Added 2004 & 2005 to dependent dataset  Expanded to cover Central and Western N. Pacific basins  Uses GOES-E, GOES-W and MTSAT-1R water vapor imagery, divides domain into 3 basins (below)  Added HDIV (850 hPa horiz. divergence) parameter  Scheduled to replace operational product by Summer 2008

Parameter Contributions By Basin ABBREVATLCEPACWPAC LAT PLAND DSTRM CSST VSHEAR CIRC THDEV HDIV PCCOLD BTWARM CPROB

Product Example: WP

Reliability Diagrams  Both dependent years (orange) and independent years (green) show good agreement between predicted and observed TC formation probabilities  E. Pacific basin diagram suggests the actual TC formation probability may be greater than what the TCFP product predicts at higher probabilities – may need correction

Verification – Relative Operating Characteristic and Brier Scores  Typical metrics are not valid for such rare events. However, we can use metrics that compare TCFP product to climatology  Brier Skill Score: BSS = 1 - BS/BS ref  ROC Skill Score: RSS = ROC/ROC ref - 1 Brier Score, BS = 1/N Σ i=1,n (p i -o i ) 2, where p i and o i are the predicted and observed probability for case i, respectively ROC is the area under the plot of hit rate vs. false alarm rate for various probability thesholds.

Skill Scores & Interpretation  BSS positive, but small  RSS for E. Pacific much smaller than others  hard to beat climatology in that basin Dependent YearsIndependent Years Basin: ATLCEPACWPACATLCEPACWPAC BSS All BSS > 0  skill over climatology RSS All RSS > 0  skill over climatology

Summary  The current TCFP has run operationally since 2004 and has shown skill with respect to climatology (not shown)  The TCFP has been successfully updated and extended to cover the Central and Western N. Pacific  2007 verification of the updated TCFP demonstrates it has skill above climatology alone in all 3 basins  Extended TCFP product to be implemented operationally by summer 2008

Future Plans & Improvements  Expand domain to include S. Hemisphere & Indian Ocean  Extend forecast period from 24 h to 48 h +  Use GFS forecast fields  Analyze global water vapor strip to identify upstream predictors, particularly convective signatures associated with tropical waves (Frank and Roundy 2006)  Identify new parameters to add to algorithm  TAFB invest locations and intensities (D. Brown)