Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Need to check (e.g., cov) and pretty-up: The LISREL software may be obtained at Other software packages include Eqs (
Advertisements

1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 290 Lecture 6 – LISREL Nov 2, 2009.
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview P. Paxton.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Sakesan Tongkhambanchong, Ph.D.(Applied Behavioral Science Research) Faculty of Education, Burapha University.
Structural Equation Modeling
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Standard Error of the Estimate Goodness of Fit Coefficient of Determination Regression Coefficients.
Statistics II: An Overview of Statistics. Outline for Statistics II Lecture: SPSS Syntax – Some examples. Normal Distribution Curve. Sampling Distribution.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
When Measurement Models and Factor Models Conflict: Maximizing Internal Consistency James M. Graham, Ph.D. Western Washington University ABSTRACT: The.
LECTURE 5 TRUE SCORE THEORY. True Score Theory OBJECTIVES: - know basic model, assumptions - know definition of reliability, relation to TST - be able.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Structural Equation Modeling
Measurement Models and CFA Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
G Lecture 51 Estimation details Testing Fit Fit indices Arguing for models.
LECTURE 16 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING.
G Lect 31 G Lecture 3 SEM Model notation Review of mediation Estimating SEM models Moderation.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Structural Equation Modeling Continued: Lecture 2 Psy 524 Ainsworth.
LECTURE 6 RELIABILITY. Reliability is a proportion of variance measure (squared variable) Defined as the proportion of observed score (x) variance due.
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
MEASUREMENT MODELS. BASIC EQUATION x =  + e x = observed score  = true (latent) score: represents the score that would be obtained over many independent.
Confirmatory factor analysis
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Purpose ● Takes factor analysis a few steps further. ● Impose theoretically interesting constraints on.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
SEM: Testing a Structural Model
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Highlights for Quiz 2.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Aron, Aron, & Coups, Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course (3e), © 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter 12 Making Sense of Advanced Statistical.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
G Lecture 3 Review of mediation Moderation SEM Model notation
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
The general structural equation model with latent variates Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Evaluation of structural equation models Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Latent variable path analysis Combination of CFA and observed variable path analysis More parameters estimated, so need to have a larger sample size Chief.
SEM with AMOS1 Christian A. Klöckner. 2 Agenda Expectations What is Structural Equation Modelling? What is AMOS? A simple regression A multiple regression.
Presentation on AMOS Analysis of MOment Structures By James Bowers, Jr., MA Ben Jarrett, BS from the Applied Research Lab.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
The SweSAT Vocabulary (word): understanding of words and concepts. Data Sufficiency (ds): numerical reasoning ability. Reading Comprehension (read): Swedish.
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
Structural Equation Modeling using MPlus
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Making Sense of Advanced Statistical Procedures in Research Articles
Writing about Structural Equation Models
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
SOC 681 – Causal Models with Directly Observed Variables
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
Causal Relationships with measurement error in the data
Structural Equation Modeling
Lecture 20 Two Stage Least Squares
Presentation transcript:

Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009

Measurement is Everything Nothing can be done with wrong or unreliable measurements. “Measurement is Everything”. In research presentation or paper submission, measurement is the part being challenged the most.

Latent Variables are everywhere in research “The true power of SEM comes from latent variable modelling “ “Variables in psychology and other social science are rarely (never?) measured directly” the effects of the variable are measured Intelligence, self-esteem, depression Reaction time, diagnostic skill Democracy, Socio-Economical Status Legitimacy, Management Skill (soul, angels, … - hypothetical construct)

Beyond Validity and Reliability: Between concept and indicators Validity: Measures what it intends to measure. Reliability: Consistency Precision repeatability

Latent Vars and Observed Indicators What to be studied is: L1L1 X 3.1 X 4.1 X 5.1 X 2.1 X 1.1 L2L2 X 3.2 X 4.2 X 5.2 X 2.2 X 1.2 Latent Variable Indicator3Indicator1 vs. Latent Observed E 1.1E 2.1E 3.1E 4.1E 5.1E 1.2E 2.2E 3.2E 4.2E 5.2

Exploratory Factor Analysis SPSS For Data Reduction Factor analysis GIGO

Confirmative Factor Analysis 1) Equations & Diagrams: model representation 2) Identification & Estimation 3) Errors and Evaluation: assumptions & fit indexes 4) Explanation

1) Equations & Diagrams: model representation X 1.1 = Ø 1 L1 + e 1.1 X 2.1 = Ø 2 L1 + e 2.1 X 3.1 = Ø 3 L1 + e 3.1 X 4.1 = Ø 4 L1 + e 4.1 Loadings - Ø 1 … X ~ similar to endogenous variables L ~ similar to exogenous variables

More on Equations X = L+ e Measured True Score Error Relationship between Measured true score Observed latent variable Indicator construct or factor Unique factor

Diagram representation L1L1 X 3.1 X 4.1 X 5.1 X 2.1 X 1.1 L2L2 X 3.2 X 4.2 X 5.2 X 2.2 X 1.2 E 1.1 E 4.1 E 5.1 E 3.1 E 2.1 E 1.2 E 2.2 E 3.2 E 4.2 E 5.2 Knowing SEM Research Presentation Assignment Report Classroom Participation e1 e2 e3 Co-vary X 1.1 ~ X 5.1 load on L 1

Types of Measurement Models Uni-dimensional (each indicator loads only on one factor, error terms independent from each other) Multi-dimensional Single-factor Multifactors L1L1 X 3.1 X 4.1 X 2.1 X 1.1 L2L2 X 3.2 X 4.2 X 2.2

Non-recursive Type Education Income Occupation Socio-economical Status ?

2) Identification and Estimation Parameters <= Observations Scale for every factor Single factor & >= 3 indicators 2 or more factors & 2 or more indicators per factor Less than 2 indicators for one or more factors --- ??? Not an issue As recursive In literature, 3 indicators or 2 with 2 correlated factors or sample size > 200

a) How to scale the latent variable 1) fix variances as a constant 2) fix one loading as 1

b) How to count # parameters = # loadings + vars & co-vas of factors + vars & co-vas of errors # obs = v(v+1)/2 ~ number of observed variables

Examples A A A X1 X2 X3X2X1 X4X3X1X2 B 1.0 E1E1 E2E2 E1E1 E4E4 E3E3 E2E2 E1E1 E2E2 E3E3 4, 6, 9

Identification of EFA GIGO ?

Estimation Methods ML – most often used Generalized least squared Un-weighted least squared

3) Errors and Evaluation: Assumptions Multivariate normality

Fit Indices All the fit indices for path analysis applied to CFA Chi squared / df < 3 GFI (Goodness Fit Index), AGFI close to 1 SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual) close to 0

4) Explanation: Factor loadings Un-standardized coefficients (similar to regression coefficients) Standardized coefficients

R 2 Proportion of explained variances (1 – measurement error variance / observed variances) 1-R 2 ~ proportion of unique variances

Example: The Model Representation Hand Movements Photo Series Number Recall Word Order Gestalt Closure Triangles Spatial Memo Matrix Analogies Sequential Simultaneous 1 1

Example: Results R 2 Chi Square Chi-square = Df = 19 ~ 2-factor model For one factor (df=20) IndicatorR2R2 Hand.25 Number.65 Word.65 Gestalt.25 Triangle.52 Matrix.43 Spatial.35 Photo.61

Example: Diagram to Rep Results Hand Movements Photo Series Number Recall Word Order Gestalt Closure Triangles Spatial Memo Matrix Analogies Sequential Simultaneous 8.71 (.75) 2.01 (.34) 2.92 (.34) 3.50 (.39) 5.13 (.56) (.65) 3.44 (.47) 5.45 (.75) 1.0 (.50) 1.0 (.50) 1.73 (.78) 1.39 (.81) 1.15 (.81) 1.45 (.73) 1.21 (.66) 2.03 (.59) Standardized coefficients inside parenthesis

Example: Explanation Standardized & Un-standardized coefficients & variances (8.71 / = 8.71 / =.75).5 2 = IndicatorSD Hand3.4 Number2.4 Word2.9 Gestalt2.7 Triangle2.7 Matrix4.2 Spatial2.8 Photo3 Hand Movements Number Recall Sequential 8.71 (.75) 2.01 (.34) 1.0 (.50) 1.15 (.81)

Hybrid Models – Combination of Measurement and Structure Models

1) Equations and Diagram: Model representation of Hybrid Model 6 Types of Terms Observed Exogenous - X Observed Endogenous - Y Latent Exogenous - K Latent Endogenous - E Error Terms for Exogenous Obs – e Y Error Terms for Endogenous Obs - e X

Diagram representation K X E Y eXeX eYeY 1, LY 2, LX 3, BE 4, GA 5, PH 6, PS 7, TE 8, TD eEeE

More on Diagram representation K X E1 Y1 eXeX eYeY 1, LY 2, LX 3, BE 4, GA 5, PH 6, PS 7, TE 8, TD E2 Y2Y3Y4 eYeY eYeY eYeY e E1 e E2

Model Representation NY = # observed endogenous NX = # observed exogenous NE = # latent endogenous NK = # latent exogenous

Model representation K X E Y eXeX eYeY 1, LY (NY X NE) 2, LX (NX X NK) 3, BE 4, GA 5, PH 6, PS 7, TE (NY X NY) 8, TD eEeE

2) Identification and Estimation Number of parameters <(p+q)(p+q+1)/2 Two-Step Rule - Measurement Model Identification - Structural Model Identification

Estimation Methods ML again

3) Errors & Model Evaluation Fit Indexes Chi-squares

4) Explanation path coefficients and loadings

Example: Model Parental Psychopathology Low Family SES ReadingArithmeticSpelling Extroversion Familial Risk Cognitive Ability Scholastic Achievement Classroom Adjustment Emotional Stability Memory Visual- Spatial Verbal Scholastic Motivation Harmony e e e e e e e e e e e e

Example: Identification Parental Psychopathology Low Family SES ReadingArithmeticSpelling Extroversion Familial Risk Cognitive Ability Scholastic Achievement Classroom Adjustment Emotional Stability Memory Visual- Spatial Verbal Scholastic Motivation Harmony e e e e e e e e e e e e Familial Risk Cognitive Ability Scholastic Achievement Classroom Adjustment D D D

Example: Errors & Fix Indexes for Evaluation Better chi square/df for 3-factor measurement model (cognitive & scholar merger) (2.05 vs. 3.92) (also GFI and SRMR better) Good chi square/df for hybrid model (2.05)

Example: results explanation Parental Psychopathology Low Family SES ReadingArithmeticSpelling Extroversion Familial Risk Cognitive Ability Scholastic Achievement Classroom Adjustment Emotional Stability Memory Visual- Spatial Verbal Scholastic Motivation Harmony e e e e e e e e e e e e