By Emily, Veronica, and Shelby (Group #1). Assignment n To develop a few hypothesis about the Fourmile watershed, in order to demonstrate our knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recall How can we monitor air, water and soil pollution?
Advertisements

The Great Miami Loramie Watershed Neelu, Jasmine, and Cassie.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Upper Paint Creek By Group 3 : Tina Liu, Elli Schwartz, Bailey Eckerle.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
An Internet/GIS-Based Tool to Assist Community Planners Bernie Engel Jon Harbor Don Jones and many others.
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
Dry Run Creek: Urban vs. Rural Surficial Water Quality Variability Nick Bosshart and Austin Cox.
Future of the Big Darby Watershed Steven Gordon December, 2001.
Water Pollution.
Hydrosapiens GIV eSAT of Vermont: Water Group 2013 Ben DeJong, Nina Brundage, Caitlin Beaudet, Julie Rickner, Mariah Ollive, Hannah VanGuilder, Heather.
It’s Not Easy Being Green Jill Buerck, Southeast Missouri State University Gretchen A. Koch, Goucher College Sarah Schubert, Southeast Missouri State University.
Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Rivers and Streams Ohio EPA 2006.
Effects of Human Activity on Water Quality Studies on the Upper Paint Creek Watershed By Emily Daniels Mary Estock and Ashley Hooper.
The Great Miami River Created By: Vidya Misra, Ke’Avonna Williams, and Kristin Cummings.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
By : Caroline Oldstone – Moore, Devina Mehta, Jillian Frost
What is the scientific method?
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Great Miami & Loramie Creek By: Dominique Cummings Meg Gulick Elizabeth Stein.
Stillwater River Watershed Paige Ruppel, Esther Wong, and Kelsie Keen YWSI 2003.
Water Pollution. Questions for Today: What are examples of point and nonpoint pollution sources for water? What are examples of point and nonpoint pollution.
Watersheds What is a watershed? 93 watersheds in Ohio.
Scioto Bokes Watershed By: Akanksha, Annalese, and Madison.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
 245 miles long  Area is mostly agricultural  Some urban land: Bellefontaine, Indian Lake  Has greatly improved over last few decades.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
By: Hannah, Natalie, and Brittany. Location  Western Ohio The Stillwater Watershed drains 673 square miles in Western Ohio (including 32 square miles.
R OCKY R IVER W ATERSHED Is this watershed healthy or unhealthy? If it is unhealthy, what are the main impairments? By: Laura Hagy, Lydia Gray, and Elizabeth.
Upper Scioto Watershed By: Nina Zalenski Alice Beckman-Jamison Kathryn Reilly.
Stillwater River Watershed Group 5 Deepthi Thumuluri Caitlyn Baird Sonia Pattisam.
THE WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY, AND HOW TO DETERMINE SAMPLING SITES IN A WATERSHED; AND EVALUATING THE APPROPRIATE PROTOCOL FOR DATA, RECORDS, AND COLLECTION.
Lower Olentangy Watershed
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Miami Loramie Watershed Our watershed is located in western Ohio north of Dayton.These areas are rural and have lots of agriculture. Our watershed has.
By Laura Pierce, Sarah Magness, and Morgan Black.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Lab: Benthic Bugs and Bioassessment
Did you know??? One of the most popular rivers in northeast Ohio. One of the most popular rivers in northeast Ohio. Has 112,144 acres and 664 stream miles.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Presented by: Julia: Marietta Area Liz: Bowling Green Sophia: Athens How healthy is the Rocky River Watershed?
5.2 Detection and monitoring of pollution. Direct methods of monitoring pollution – Air pollution Measure the acidity of rain water to determine pH Measure.
Great Miami and Loramie Creek By: Kathryn Reed, Sarah Ambach, and Xiaojing Wu Great Miami Loramie Creek By: Kathryn Reed, Xiaojing Wu, and Sarah Ambach.
The Big Walnut Watershed By: Taylor Krebs Ariel Sims Holly Finchum.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
*Stillwater watershed project* By: Group 2 Meah Kee Tiffany Yang Lesley Preece Teacher: Melanie.
Topic 4: Water and aquatic food production systems and societies Topic 4.4: Water Pollution Starter: 1) List as many sources of water pollution as you.
Topic 4.4: Water Pollution
Adapted From Ms. Hasan Mr. Aguilar Uteach Step 2 Lesson 3, 2012
What Are the Problems of the East Fork Little Miami Watershed?
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
Water quality indexing – surface water
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Sewage Treatment Mav Mark.
Nebraska Water Quality Index
A Comparison of Riparian Vegetation Structures
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
The Upper Paint Creek Watershed
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
Scientific Method.
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
MSDGC Integrated Prioritization System (IPS)
Topic 4.4: Water Pollution
Presentation transcript:

By Emily, Veronica, and Shelby (Group #1)

Assignment n To develop a few hypothesis about the Fourmile watershed, in order to demonstrate our knowledge of Watersheds and water quality issues

Methodology Day 1- Chemical Test Water Samples, Watershed Lecture Day 2- Visited Big Darby Watershed, Ran Chemical Tests, Measured ICI And IBI. Demonstration Of Electro Fishing By Ohio EPA Day 3- Model It (Independent Vs. Dependent Variables) Excel Spreadsheets Gathered Information About The Fourmile Watershed

Day 4- Learned Power Point Presentation Compared Fourmile and Darby Watershed on Spreadsheets Made Three Hypotheses by Comparing Data to Station Location Makes Graphs of the Data Day 5- Presentation Skills Power Point Project Create Web Site Women of Achievement Panel Day 6- Practice Presentations Complete Web Site Complete Power Point Project Methodology 2

Definition Page 1 IBI = Index biotic integrity ICI = Invertebrate community index QHEI = Qualitative habitat evaluation index DO = Dissolved Oxygen TSS = Total Suspended Solids Station ID = Number representing where the tests were done

Point Source Pollution = A known source of pollution Non Point Source Pollution = An unknown but suspected source of pollution Riparian Zone = A type of habitat associated with lush vegetation Meander = a natural curve or turn in a creek or river bed BOD = Biochemical Oxygen Demand Definitions page 2

Hypothesis n H1: When the QHEI (Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index) increases, the ICI (Invertebrate Community Index) and the IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) increase n H2: The closer the creek is to the city the lower the ICI and the IBI n H3: The TSS (Total Suspended Solids) increases in agricultural areas

Hypothesis #1

Station I.D. vs ICI,IBI, QHEI Station I.D. Amount ICIQHEIIBI Hypothesis #2

Hypothesis #3

Results n H1:The hypothesis is correct. When the QHEI increased the ICI and IBI increased. n H2: The hypothesis is correct. Due to the location of an urban setting the ICI and IBI levels decrease near the city and increase near the rural areas. n H3: The hypothesis is correct. This hypothesis was also based on location and the TSS level was higher if it was near a rural area, rather than an urban area. n Refer to map of Station I.D.( )

Station ID and Land use map

Conclusion We tested our hypotheses and we concluded that, according to our research, our hypotheses were all correct. All of our graphs based on our research showed that we came up with the correct hypotheses about our watershed.