The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
Advertisements

Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory Niek.
Error budget for the PRIMA conceptual design review Bob Tubbs, Richard Mathar, Murakawa Koji, Rudolf Le Poole, Jeff Meisner and Eric Bakker Leiden University.
Meeting of the Blue Dot Team, UCL, London, sept Single Aperture Concepts.
Brandoch Calef Wavelength Diversity. 2 Introduction Wavelength diversity = Imaging using simultaneous measurements at different wavelengths. Why should.
Anthony Boccaletti Observatoire de Paris LESIA. Several instruments dedicated to Exoplanet detection and characterization with High Contrast Imaging since.
Halftoning for High-Contrast Imaging P. Martinez 1 C. Dorrer 2, E. Aller Carpentier 1, M. Kasper 1, A. Boccaletti 3, and K. Dohlen 4 1 European Southern.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri1 Application of the pyramid wavefront sensor to the cophasing of large segmented telescopes F. Quirós-Pacheco,
Adaptive Optics for Wavefront Correction of High Average Power Lasers Justin Mansell, Supriyo Sinha, Todd Rutherford, Eric Gustafson, Martin Fejer and.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Optics in Astronomy - Interferometry - Oskar von der Lühe Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik Freiburg, Germany.
Pupil Remapping for high dynamical range imaging Olivier Guyon Subaru Telescope National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Hilo, HI Michelson.
TIGER The TIGER Instrument Overview Phil Hinz - PI July 13, 2010.
Recent & planned high-contrast work on the WCS and P3K Gene Serabyn Nov. 12, 2007.
Adaptive Optics Model Anita Enmark Lund Observatory.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
An Optimized Pupil Coronagraph: A New Way To Observe Extrasolar Planets This work was performed for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute.
Telescope Errors for NGAO Christopher Neyman & Ralf Flicker W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO Team Meeting #4 January 22, 2007 Hualalai Conference Room,
Cophasing activities at Onera
Blue Dot Team « Multi aperture imaging ». BDT sept MAI techniques High accuracy visibility measurement Differential interferometry Nulling.
Spectral Analysis of atmospheres by nulling interferometry Marc OLLIVIER Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale - Orsay.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
19 February 2009 Cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture optics applications First steps of the development of a cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture.
RAS E-ELT meeting 9th May 08 Fraser Clarke Towards EPICS; high contrast spectroscopy Fraser Clarke N Thatte, G Salter, M Tecza C Verinaud, M Kasper (EPICS.
Exoplanet Exploration Program Starshade and Coronagraph Technology Gaps and Paths to Close Them Peter Lawson and Nick Siegler Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Edimburg June 2006 Fast detectors 1 Fast detectors (for E-ELT AO) Philippe Feautrier INSU/CNRS-LAOG.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
1 A. Boccaletti Pasadena, Sept th Imaging EGPs with JWST/MIRI and VLT/SPHERE valuable experiences for TPF-C A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz D. Rouan + coronagraphic.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
From NAOS to the future SPHERE Extreme AO system T. Fusco 1, G. Rousset 1,2, J.-L. Beuzit 3, D. Mouillet 3, A.-M. Lagrange 3, P. Puget 2 and many others.
An Approach to Stabilizing Large Telescopes for Stellar Interferometry It shakes like a…. [G. Vasisht, 31 March 2006] N. Di Lieto J. Sahlmann, G. Vasisht,
High Contrast Imaging with Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing and PIAA for Subaru Telescopes Olivier Guyon Basile Gallet
Eric Pantin, Jean Schneider, A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz, R. Galicher, R. Gratton, D. Stam et al. Polarimetry and spectral imaging of mature Jupiter and super-Earth.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
Molecules in the atmosphere of extrasolar planets, Paris, nov Direct Imaging of Extrasolar Planets Overview of Ground & Space Programs Anthony.
Hubble Space Telescope Coronagraphs John Krist JPL.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
Lessons Learned from FQPM & AIC P. Baudoz, A. Boccaletti, D. Rouan, D. Mawet & Coronagraphy Observatoire de Paris-Meudon.
AO4ELT, Paris, 23 June 2009 EPICS, exoplanet imaging with the E-ELT Markus Kasper, Jean-Luc Beuzit, Christophe Verinaud, Emmanuel Aller- Carpentier, Pierre.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
A global approach to ELT instrument developments J.-G. Cuby for the French ELT WG.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Presenter: Alexander Rodack Mentor: Dr. Olivier Guyon Colleagues and Advisors: Dr. Johanan Codona, Kelsey Miller, Justin Knight Project Funded by NASA.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Simulations in the context of SPHERE Exoplanet Imaging Workshop David Mouillet Lecture 27 Feb 2012 Numerous contributors in the simulation work for SPHERE:
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
Surface Layer SLODAR J. Osborn, R. Wilson and T. Butterley A prototype of a new SLODAR instrument has been developed at Durham CfAI and tested at the Paranal.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
Development of Coronagraphs for Exoplanet Detection with SPHERE - direct detection and characterization of Extrasolar Giant Planets in the NIR among nearby.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
The High Contrast Performance Of An Optical Vortex Coronagraph By Dr. David M. Palacios Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
Optical Vortex Coherence Filter Lt Col Gregory Foo, USAF (Ret) Grover A. Swartzlander, Jr. Optical Sciences Center University of Arizona Tucson, AZ
Pathways, Barcelona, 16 Sep 2009 EPICS, exoplanet imaging with the E-ELT Raffaele G. Gratton, Markus Kasper (PI), Jean-Luc Beuzit, Christophe Verinaud,
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
© Fraunhofer IOSB 1 New physical constraints for multi-frame blind deconvolution Roberto Baena Gallé Real Academia de Artes y Ciencias de Barcelona Szymon.
Page 1 Lecture 16 Extreme Adaptive Optics: Exoplanets and Protoplanetary Disks Claire Max AY 289 March 7, 2016 Based in part on slides from Bruce Macintosh.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
MIRI Coronagraphs Patrice Bouchet
SPHERE – SAXO Performance status
M. Beaulieu, L. Abe, P. Martinez, P. Baudoz C. Gouvret
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Presentation transcript:

The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS P. Baudoz R. Galicher, M. Mas, J. Baudrand, G. Rousset, A. Boccaletti, F. Assemat

typical distance : few 10’s mas Context : Exoplanets Exoplanet detection is simple Potter et al., 2002, ApJ HD 130948 d=17.9 pcs 300 Myrs < 75 & 65 MJ @ 50 AU typical distance : few 10’s mas There See faint objects (M 30)

Need for High Contrast Imaging For Disks : Disk morphology: warp, spirals, offsets, brightness assymetry, clumps Removing SED ambiguities For Planets : Spectral characterization Temporal variability (atmosphere) Orbital parameters

EPICS - Planet Finder of the E-ELT Lessons learned from SPHERE and GPI studies (still to be confirmed) : If XAO is working as expected (raw contrast 104 to 106) Need calibration (102 to 103) but limitations: => residual speckles from static aberrations => residual speckles are chromatic (2nd order if careful optical design) Need : Phase measurement from final science focal plane. Need : Separate post-processing data reduction for each spectral bandwidth Self-Coherent Camera Instrument

Self-Coherent Camera (SCC) Self-Coherent Camera : Principle Telescope Slow Servo-loop (quasi-static aberrations) XAO (DM) Self-Coherent Camera (SCC) Beam splitting Spatial Filter Coronagraph Beam recombining (Fizeau Fringes) Image Processing Planet Detection Image

Simple set-up : SCC + Four Quadrant Phase Mask coronagraph (FQPM) =

Intensity in focal plane The SCC in 3 Planes coronagraphic pupil reference pupil D DR a Pupil plane Optical propagation + Intensity in focal plane FFT Pupil correlation Plane a

The SCC image processing I- = TF-1[P ** PR ] FFT-1 Ic = I + IR + Iplanet FFT-1 I+ = TF-1[ P * PR* ] FFT-1 Use I+ to mesure phase  (hidden in P ) (I+ is almost a linear function of  for small phase) Focal plane wavefront sensor (Galicher et al. 2008) Use I+ and Ic to detect Iplanet (Ic codes I and IR but not Iplanet) Planet detection instrument (not described here) (Baudoz et al. 2006, Galicher & Baudoz 2007)

Where is the phase in SCC image ? For coronagraphic image : P = eiΦ - with  pupil function and ~1 The phase is almost a linear function of the imaginary parts With small phase defects : P = iΦ linear function of P imaginary part real part Simulation: FQPM +SCC + phase only

Is SCC a real wavefront sensor ? No it is much better than that : It measures directly the complex amplitude of the field in the focal plane (including amplitude effects). BUT : Phase estimation at high frequency rate (exposure time shorter than coherent time) : Not competitive compared to other WFS (chromaticity) Long exposure time : Blurring of fringes for the residual speckles after XAO Only static speckles are fringed.

E-ELT (infinite exposure time) SCC + E-ELT (infinite exposure time) ELT 42m DSP (20 cm pitch - 64nm residual) 10 nm static defects Infinite exposure time + perfect coronagraph

SCC Phase versus time 10 ms 100 ms 1 s 10 s Static phase ELT 42m +perfect coronagraph DSP (20 cm pitch - 64nm residual) 10 nm static defects coherent time = 10 ms in H SCC Phase versus time 10 ms 100 ms 1 s 10 s Static phase

Noise level in the corrected area E-ELT 42m +perfect coronagraph DSP (20 cm pitch - 64nm residual) 10 nm static defects coherent time = 10 ms in H 90% of the corrected area 0.1 nm level These levels depends linearly on coherent time (10 ms) and quadratically on residual turbulent level (64 nm RMS) 1 nm level

Time evolution 2 layers, only temporal error = 1ms Fixed aberrations =5 nm 2 layers, only temporal error = 1ms 40x40 actuators, r0=1m @1.6 m, L0=20m, V0=10m/s About 35 nm on pupil

And if static are not static… Quasi-static aberrations: fully decorrelated after 20s 4.6 nm Simulation XAO sampling 1ms Sampling of SCC 1s 0.45 nm 0.25 nm

Limitations 1: Chromatism 1% 2% 5% bandwidth=15% Solution 1: Wynne corrector bandwidth=15% same +Wynne corrector effective bandwidth =0.75% Solution 2 : Chromaticity of residual speckles requires spectral resolution SCC coupled with IFS

Limitations 2: Reference « Zero » effect

Limitations 3: Coronagraph effects FQPM+SCC Matrix Zernikes Zernikes

Phase measurement with a Prototype FQPM SCC detector Pupil plane Lyot plane Defocus of the source to test the SCC with a theoretical amplitude of 1.8 nm Phase difference image for 1.8 nm

Test Bench Development Integration started in May 09 See Marion Mas (poster yesterday !!!)

Conclusion Phase estimation: Optimized for long exposure time (10s seconds to mesure 1nm level- EPICS case) Simple set-up with Lyot and phase mask coronagraph To be coupled with IFS because of chromatism (or need more advanced estimator) Deeper study on-going (closed loop, chromatism,…) Coupling with planet detection to be studied in more details (especially for the long exposure time case) Need more laboratory test