Science Overview of ANC for MDL Visiting Forecasters Eric Nelson and Amanda Anderson NCAR-RAL MDL Training 4-14-2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Accessing and Interpreting Web-based Weather Data Clinton Rockey National Weather Service Portland, Oregon.
Stratus. Outline  Formation –Moisture trapped under inversion –Contact layer heating of fog –Fog induced stratus –Lake effect stratus/strato cu  Dissipation.
Mesoscale Convective Vortices (MCVs) Chris Davis (NCAR ESSL/MMM and RAL) Stan Trier (NCAR ESSL/MMM) Boulder, Colorado 60-h Radar Composite Animation (00.
ENHANCEMENTS OF THE NCAR AUTO-NOWCAST SYSTEM BY USING ASAP AND NRL SATELLITE PRODUCTS Huaqing Cai, Rita Roberts, Cindy Mueller and Tom Saxen National Center.
Thunderstorm Ingredients ©Oklahoma Climatological Survey EarthStorm 2009.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Visually Enhanced Composite Charts for Severe Weather Forecasting and Real-time Diagnosis Josh Korotky NWS Pittsburgh PA NROW Annual Meeting 2002.
Danielle M. Kozlowski NASA USRP Intern. Background Motivation Forecasting convective weather is a challenge for operational forecasters Current numerical.
Chapter 9 Vertical Motion. (1) Divergence in two and three dimensions. The del “or gradient” operator is a mathematical operation performed on something.
A Compare and Contrast Study of Two Banded Snow Storms Part I – January 6 th, 2002.
A brief synopsis of Johnson and Mapes: Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather From Severe Convective Storms sections 3.3b, 3.3c.1, 3.4 By Matt.
Stability & Skew-T Diagrams
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather Richard H. Johnson and Brian E. Mapes Presentation by Chris Medjber Severe Convective Storms, Meteorological.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
All the wind. Today Homework in Friction wind Observing the wind Some special winds.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Scientific Overview for MLB ANC Demonstration Eric Nelson and Amanda Anderson NCAR-RAL.
Hongli Jiang, Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Zoltan Toth
Wednesday, November 16th Attendance Attendance Go over Unit Test 3 Go over Unit Test 3 Make-up work and/or weather dvd Make-up work and/or weather dvd.
Data Integration: Assessing the Value and Significance of New Observations and Products John Williams, NCAR Haig Iskenderian, MIT LL NASA Applied Sciences.
Determining Key Predictors for NCAR’s Convective Auto-Nowcast System Using Climatological Analyses Thomas Saxen, Cindy Mueller, and Nancy Rehak National.
The NWS/NCAR “Forecaster Over the Loop” Fort Worth Operational Demonstration Human Enhancement of a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System Eric Nelson, Rita Roberts,
Weather Forecasting Elisabeth (Lis) Cohen. Motivation Foxtrot Comic Strip.
Update on NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Juneau, AK. The Auto-Nowcaster System An expert system which produces short-term (0-1 hr) forecasts of thunderstorm initiation,
NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Convective Weather Group NCAR/RAL.
Precipitation Hydrology (Spring 2013) Illinois State University Instructor: Eric Peterson.
A Thunderstorm Nowcasting System for the Beijing 2008 Olympics: A U.S./China Collaboration by James Wilson 1 and Mingxuan Chen 2 1. National Center for.
What causes vertical motion? In confined fluids, vertical motion is always accompanied by rotation. For example (click):
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Materials Adapted from The University of Georgia
T he Man-In-The-Loop (MITL) Nowcast Demonstration: Forecaster Input into a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System R. Roberts, T. Saxen, C. Mueller, E. Nelson,
Short Term Convective Mode Evolution along Synoptic Boundaries Greg L. Dial, Jonathan P. Racy and Richard L. Thompson Storm Prediction Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Nowcasting Trends Past and Future By Jim Wilson NCAR 8 Feb 2011 Geneva Switzerland.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
Weather Variables and Forecasting Modified from National Weather Service
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
NOAA-MDL Seminar 7 May 2008 Bob Rabin NOAA/National Severe Storms Lab Norman. OK CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Challenges in Remote Sensing to.
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
GII to RII to CII in South Africa Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Senior Scientist.
Recent and Planned Updates to the NCAR Auto-Nowcast (ANC) System Thomas Saxen, Rita Roberts, Huaqing Cai, Eric Nelson, Dan Breed National Center for Atmospheric.
Developers: John Walker, Chris Jewett, John Mecikalski, Lori Schultz Convective Initiation (CI) GOES-R Proxy Algorithm University of Alabama in Huntsville.
GOES Sounder Hyper-spectral Environmental Suite (HES) Data from the HES will revolutionize short-term weather forecasting Impact on short-term weather.
Conditions for Convection The Ingredients Method.
Gridded WAFS Icing Verification System Matt Strahan WAFC Washintgon.
Case study of a gust front passing the Danish island Funen on 9 November 2008 Majken Demant Meteorologist, aviation forecaster, DMI Eumetcal.
Cirrus anvil cumulonimbus T (skewed) LCL (Lifting Condensation Level) LFC (Level of Free Convection) EL (Equilibrium level) p overshooting CAPE Sounding.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
High-Resolution Polarimetric Radar Observation of Snow- Generating Cells Karly Reimel May 10, 2016.
Class #26: Friday October 30 Thunderstorms 1Class #26: Friday, October 30, 2009.
Forecaster-Over-The-Loop Demonstration Forecaster CWSU Auto-nowcaster Rita Roberts 28 November 2007 Goals: Science and Operational Debrief NWS Program.
How to forecast the likelihood of thunderstorms!!!
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
ASAP Convective Weather Research at NCAR Matthias Steiner and Huaqing Cai Rita Roberts, John Williams, David Ahijevych, Sue Dettling and David Johnson.
ABC’s of weather forecasting NOAA/NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WFO BALTIMORE / WASHINGTON OPEN HOUSE – APRIL 30-MAY 1, 2016 RAY MARTIN –– Lead Forecaster.
Investigations of Using TAMDAR Soundings in the NCAR Auto-Nowcaster H. Cai, C. Mueller, E. Nelson, and N. Rehak NCAR/RAL.
60 min Nowcasts 60 min Verification Cold Front Regime
Nic Wilson’s M.S.P.M. Research
IHOP Convection Initiation And Storm Evolution Studies
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Nowcast guidance of afternoon convection initiation for Taiwan
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Forecast Verification time!
Forecast Verification time!
Presentation transcript:

Science Overview of ANC for MDL Visiting Forecasters Eric Nelson and Amanda Anderson NCAR-RAL MDL Training

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Training Topics Overview / Human InteractionOverview / Human Interaction AWIPS ANC ProductsAWIPS ANC Products Fuzzy Logic, FWD Predictors and RegimeFuzzy Logic, FWD Predictors and Regime Polygon / Nudging examplesPolygon / Nudging examples

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Routine (5mins) short-term (0-1hour) forecasts of thunderstorm initiation, growth and decay. Uses fuzzy logic to combine observations, NWP and forecaster input to generate nowcasts. Growth & Decay Initiation Forecasts

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Interaction Boundary Entry Polygon Entry Init Field Nudging Regime Selection Forecaster-Entered Boundaries Moving Boundary

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. ANC 60min Initiation Final Fuzzy logic output for likelihood for initiation at 60min. Warmer colors indicate higher likelihoods Values of.7 and higher (salmon/red) interpreted as threshold for storm initiation at 60mins.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. ANC 60min Initiation No Nudge Differs from Initiation Final No Nudging or Polygons used Boundary Predictor Fields still included Shows the Init60 field before human edits for comparison No Nudge Final

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nowcast Final Combined Growth/Decay and Initiation likelihood field Blue colors are arbitrary thresholds of initiation likelihood Warm colors are Growth/Decay of existing echoes. Existing echoes been filtered to remove stratoform precipitation

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Adjoint Sfc Wind Wind barbs for 250m from VDRAS Derived from background model field and radar data assimilation Other layers available through volume browser VDRAS – Variational Doppler Radar Assimilation System

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Boundary Relative Steering Flow Interest Steering Flow relative to human entered boundary Used to determine whether updrafts will stay anchored on boundary

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Max Reflectivity Interest Field Maximum observed reflectivity extrapolated 60mins

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. 35dbz Growth Rate Interest Normalized Area Growth Rate for 35dbz echoes (advected)

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. 45dbz Growth Rate Interest Normalized Growth Rate for 45dbz echoes (advected)

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. 60min Verification Shows the T-60min forecast valid NOW. Green are Hits (good forecasts) Blue are missed forecast areas Red are incorrect forecast areas

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. NoHuman 60min Verification Validation field for forecasts not including any human interaction No Boundaries, Nudges, or Polygons, and only using Mixed regime.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Fuzzy Logic Fuzzy Logic ingests predictor fields and applies a membership function to the field values to produce individual interest maps. X =

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Fuzzy Logic Each Interest map is then multiplied by a weight X 0.20

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Fuzzy Logic All the weighted interest maps are then summed to produce the Init60 field … =

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. 60min Initiation Likelihood

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Cape – RUC Most Unstable Cape 900mb- 500mb.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors CIN – Mean CIN between 975mb-900mb

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Frontal Likelihood – Fuzzy logic field that uses RUC convergence, vorticity, and theta-e gradients to identify broad frontal zones.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Relative Humidity – Layer average between 875mb-625mb. Intended to assess mid-level moisture.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors VertSumInterest – A field derived from the RUC that looks for contiguous unstable layers. Interest is weighted based on CIN and wind shear.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Vertical Velocity – RUC 700mb Vertical Velocity. Applies negative interest in strong downward VV’s

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Boundary Relative Steering Flow – This field assesses the likelihood of updrafts to remain close to boundary (if they form)

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Max W – Upward motion along human entered boundary computed from VDRAS winds.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Init Locations – Identifies areas along human boundaries close to storms that have initiated that are conducive for additional initiation.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Boundary Collisions – Identifies areas of interest that are swept out by two intersecting boundaries.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Satellite Clear – Adds large negative interest to areas detected as having no cloud present. No positive interest from this field.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Satellite Cu – Satellite detection of Cu and CuCongestus. Only positive interest from this field.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors IR-ROC – Infrared cloud top temperature rate of change, masked to Cu/CuCongestus detection areas.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Lifted Index – Computed from current sfc obs and RUC soundings.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Sfc Convergence – Objectively analyzed sfc mass convergence using standard metars and other mesonet obs.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors Theta-e gradient – calculated on 5 th hybrid level of RUC Only used in DL regime.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. FWD Predictors 3hr Accumulated Precipitation

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes at FWD Cold Front Dryline Mixed Airmass Storms No Storms Advect MCS Warm Front / Stationary Front

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: Cold Frontal Regime This regime is meant to be used when a cold- front is expected to be the primary focus for thunderstorm initiation. Forecast logic places emphasis on human entered boundaries and frontal likelihood field.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Cold Front Regime Components 0.20Cape ( mb MAX) 0.18CIN ( MEAN) 0.25Frontal Likelihood 0.12Vertical Summed Interest (instability depth) 0.18Mean RH ( mb) 0.08Vertical Velocity (RUC) 0.14Boundary Steering Flow 0.14Max W 0.08Storm Init Locations 0.12Boundary Collisions 0.40Satellite Clear 0.12Satellite Cu identification 0.14IR Rate of Change 0.15Convergence (SFC) 0.20Lifted Index 0.253hr Precip Accumulation

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: Dry Line Regime This regime is meant to be used when the dryline is the primary focus for initiation. Special emphasis is placed on the presence or lack of theta-e gradients Human entered boundaries important to forecast logic as well.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Dryline Regime Components 0.20Cape ( mb MAX) 0.20CIN ( MEAN) 0.20Frontal Likelihood 0.12Vertical Summed Interest (instability depth) 0.18Mean RH ( mb) 0.08Vertical Velocity (RUC) 0.16Boundary Steering Flow 0.16Max W 0.12Storm Init Locations 0.12Boundary Collisions 0.40Satellite Clear 0.12Satellite Cu identification 0.10IR Rate of Change 0.15Convergence (SFC) 0.20Lifted Index 0.253hr Precip Accumulation 0.15Theta-e Gradient

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: Advecting MCS This regime is meant to be used for time periods when there is an existing MCS moving into the forecast domain. Final forecast is primarily a growth/decay forecast. If any initiation that is forecast is limited to any leading gust front area.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Advecting MCS regime Components 0.15Cape ( mb MAX) 0.15CIN ( MEAN) 0.10Frontal Likelihood 0.08Vertical Summed Interest (instability depth) 0.12Mean RH ( mb) 0.08Vertical Velocity (RUC) 0.20Boundary Steering Flow 0.15Storm Initiation Locations 0.10Boundary Collisions 0.40Satellite Clear 0.10Satellite Cu identification 0.10IR Rate of Change 0.10Convergence (SFC) 0.20Lifted Index

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: No Storms Expected This regime is meant to be used for days when the other regimes do not make sense and no storms are expected to occur. Initiations are possible in this regime, but the required threshold values are not easily attained. The choice of this regime type implies that the forecasters will probably not be actively interacting with the system.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. No-storms Expected regime 0.15Cape ( mb MAX) 0.18CIN ( MEAN) 0.15Frontal Likelihood 0.10Vertical Summed Interest (instability depth) 0.15Mean RH ( mb) 0.08Vertical Velocity (RUC) 0.18Boundary Steering Flow 0.20Storm Init Locations 0.12Boundary Collisions 0.40Satellite Clear 0.12Satellite Cu identification 0.12IR Rate of Change 0.10Convergence (SFC) 0.20Lifted Index

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: Pulse/Air-Mass Type This regime is meant to be used for time periods when there is no large scale forcing and the expected storm type is isolated in nature. Initiation forecasts result when rapidly growing cumulus clouds are detected. This regime should not be used when there is any high or mid-level type of cloud cover since we need to be able to observe any growing Cu/Cug clouds. Can also be used effectively on severe clear days when there is a chance of any storms breaking the cap.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Pulse Storm Regime 0.12CIN 0.19Boundary Relative Steering Flow 0.10Boundary Collision 0.10Satellite Clear 0.30Satellite Cu identification 0.45IR Rate of Change 0.17Lifted Index 0.20Convergence

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: Warm/Stationary Front Regime This regime is meant to be used when there is a warm or stationary front laying across the forecast domain. In this regime the initiation field does not focus as much on the frontal feature as was the case with the cold front and dry line regimes. Storms in this regime are oftentimes elevated in nature

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Warm / Stationary Frontal Regime 0.20Cape ( mb MAX) 0.12CIN ( MEAN) 0.20Frontal Likelihood 0.12Vertical Summed Interest (instability depth) 0.18Mean RH ( mb) 0.08Vertical Velocity (RUC) 0.20Boundary Steering Flow 0.15Storm Init Locations 0.12Boundary Collisions 0.40Satellite Clear 0.12Satellite Cu identification 0.10IR Rate of Change 0.12Convergence (SFC) 0.20Lifted Index

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Regimes: Mixed Regime This regime is meant to be used on days when there are multiple synoptic triggering mechanisms in the forecast domain. This regime is also the preferred choice for days when the situation does not readily match the other regime types and storms are expected to develop.

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Mixed Regime Components 0.20Cape ( mb MAX) 0.12CIN ( MEAN) 0.22Frontal Likelihood 0.12Vertical Summed Interest (instability depth) 0.18Mean RH ( mb) 0.08Vertical Velocity (RUC) 0.18Boundary Steering Flow 0.20Storm Init Locations 0.12Boundary Collisions 0.40Satellite Clear 0.12Satellite Cu identification 0.10IR Rate of Change 0.10Convergence (SFC) 0.20Lifted Index

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Table of Predictor Weights DrylineCFMXMCSWF/SFPULSENS CAPE X0.15 Frontal Likelihood X0.15 VertSum X0.1 RH X0.15 CIN VV0.08 X BRSF Max W XXXXX InitLocations X0.2 Bdry Collision Sat Clear Sat Cu IR-ROC Lifted Index Convergence Precip Accumulation0.25 XXX0.15X Theta-e Grad0.15XXXXXX

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Performance Considerations and Expectations 8 predictor fields are dependant on RUC data 4 predictors are associated with human entered boundaries 3 predictor fields are based on the NRL Cloud Classification algorithm Missing any of the 3 datasets above will compromise the ANC’s ability to produce good nowcasts for initiation

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Human Added Value Since the Initiation and Nowcast fields are products for external users, the nudge and polygons can compensate for missing or bad data

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Which to use? Nudging can be used when the shape of the field is ok, but values are too low or too high Polygons are best for addressing localized deficiencies in the Initiation field

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Boundaries: When to Interact? Synoptic Boundaries (Fronts and Drylines) should always be entered. Speed and location should be monitored regularly Smaller scale boundaries should be entered as workload permits AND Boundary is expected to exist for >60mins

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygons and Nudging: Philosophy Very Subjective!!! Highly dependant on forecaster skill and experience with ANC Finesse: Only compensates for input deficiencies, letting other predictors do the work Brute Force: Forecaster actively dictates forecast initiation zones with strong polygon and nudge weights; overrules system logic

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygons: When to Interact? Polygon interest should be applied to small areas where specific initiation interest adjustments are needed Can be used to enhance or suppress interest Commonly needed if frontal or dryline position in RUC is out of phase with obs Can be used if cloud detection algorithm struggling with high/mid overcast Needs to be closely monitored and removed as soon as reasonable Elevated convection initiation may need large polygons

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Whole Field Nudges: When to Interact Whole field nudges used when character of Initiation Likelihood is reasonable, but magnitude is deficient Commonly used if RUC is not representing instability or CAP adequately May need to suppress interest if atmosphere is unstable and overcast is present

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: Init60

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: Radar Mosaic

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: Cape Interest

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: CIN Interest

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: SatClear Interest

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: SatCu Interest

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: SW-IR and SatCu Int

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: LW-IR and SatClr Int

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: Where To Draw

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon example: Radar Initial and Validation Times

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Polygon Example: Real-time Verify60

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. To Nudge or Not to Nudge?

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudging: IR at Forecast Time

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudging: Radar at Forecast Time

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudging: Cape and CIN Int

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudging: SatClr and SatCu Int

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudging: Radar Initial and Valid Time T=0T+60

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudging: Init60 and Radar Validation

UCAR Confidential and Proprietary. © 2008, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. Nudges and Polygons No hard and fast rules when to use each tool Amount of interest to add or suppress relies on judgment of forecaster Nudges and polygons MUST be monitored closely and removed when corrective interaction no longer needed Use of polygons and nudges are not required during FTW validation experiment