Topics Survey data comparisons to “old” model Bluetooth OD data findings Freight model design Q & A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Advertisements

Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
1Chapter 9-4e Chapter 9. Volume Studies & Characteristics Understand that measured volumes may not be true demands if not careful in data collection and.
Lec 8, Ch4, pp :Volume Studies Know the definitions of typical volume study terms Know typical volume count methods (through reading) Be able to.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
Opportunities & Challenges Using Passively Collected Data In Travel Demand Modeling 15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic.
An Application of Mitigating Flow Bias from Origin/Destination Surveys in a Transit System Jamie Snow (AECOM) David Schmitt (AECOM) May 20, 2015.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived External Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Conference.
Example of Poisson Distribution-Wars by Year Number of wars beginning by year for years Table of Frequency counts and proportions (458 years):
Utilizing Big Data Methods for a Long-Distance Automobile Origin-Destination Study May 19, 2015 Presented by Polly Ramsey 15 th TRB National Transportation.
KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.
Development of the Idaho STDM Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data
Analysis of Truck Route Choice using Truck-GPS Data
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
KY Module 3: Geocoding and GPS. What is the single hardest information to get from a travel survey? Location, location, location What is the address of.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived Travel Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study Texas A&M Big Data Workshop February 13, 2015 Ed Hard.
Population Movements from Anonymous Mobile Signaling Data An Alternative or Complement to Large- Scale Episodic Travel Surveys?
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
A Caution on GPS Truck Data Presented at 15 th Applications Conference Atlantic CityMay 2015 William G. Allen, Jr., PE Consultant, Windsor, SC.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
Urban Freight Data Collection 1 Jeffrey Wojtowicz VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Southeast Florida Model Users Group presented by Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Sample Expansion for Transit Rider Surveys Experiments with Two Rail Systems.
Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney.
Part 2 Processes and approaches associated with the FHWA method 1 1 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Transportation Engineering (CIVTREN) notes of AM Fillone, DLSU-Manila
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Enlarging the Options in the Strategy-based Transit Assignment TRB Applications Conference Reno 2011 Isabelle Constantin and Michael Florian INRO.
Florida’s First Eco-Sustainable City. 80,000+ Residential Units 10 million s.f. Non-Residential 20 Schools International Clean Technology Center Multi-Modal.
Marketing Research Process
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Estimating Travel Patterns on I ‐ 95 with Automated Technology NCAMPO Conference - Asheville, NC May 3, 2012 Taruna Tayal (M/A/B) Brian Wert (M/A/B) Bill.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY Dr. Shahram Tahmasseby Transportation Systems Engineer, The City of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, CANADA.
Lessons Learned from Intersection Improvements on U.S. Highway 280 PMI Central Alabama Chapter Darrell B. Skipper, P.E.
Applications in Mobile Technology for Travel Data Collection 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, Texas November, 13, 2012.
Big Data and Advanced Models on a Mid-Sized City’s Budget:
Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
Example of Poisson Distribution-Wars by Year
Example of Poisson Distribution-Wars by Year
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Chattanooga Transportation Data Collection Review
Design of Florida’s Turnpike’s State Integrated Land-Use Travel Demand Model Thomas Adler Resource Systems Group Youssef Dehghani Parsons Brinckerhoff,
Transit Survey White Paper
Presentation transcript:

Topics Survey data comparisons to “old” model Bluetooth OD data findings Freight model design Q & A

Survey Data Comparisons Survey data processing –Trip linking (removing stops for “change mode” activities) –Identification of trips with one external end –Coding trip purpose –Identification of production vs attraction end –Expansion of transit trips (trips = 1/boardings)

Trip Rate Comparisons

Trip Length Comparisons Home-Based Work

Trip Length Comparisons Home-Based Shop

Trip Length Comparisons Home-Based Other

Trip Length Comparisons Non-Home-Based Other

Mode Summaries

Bluetooth Data 19 locations –10 on Seward Highway –9 within or near Mat-Su Borough Collected August 14 – August 20 th 2014 Vehicle trajectories cleaned and expanded to AADT counts at or near locations –AM period (7-9 AM), PM period (3-6 PM), Daily Some data analysis performed –More to follow during model validation Some disadvantages to Bluetooth data –Trip purpose, market segment, and ultimate origin- destination not identifiable

Station Locations Anchorage Mat-Su

Data Cleaning and Expansion Shortcomings addressed by data cleaning & expansion –Multiple trips from same Bluetooth device –Multiple recordings from same station\trip –Trajectories adjusted by probability of observation (account for short trip bias) –Expanded to traffic counts using iterative proportional fitting

Data Expansion Goodness-of-Fit Excellent match to counts across all expanded Bluetooth traces for each period

Data Analysis (so far) 62% of total internal to Anchorage 27% of total internal to Mat-Su 11% of total between Anchorage and Mat-Su Approximately 70% of trips are less than 5 miles from begin to end station

Commercial Vehicle Models Freight –Eight weeks of American Traffic Research Institute (ATRI) 2013 truck GPS traces purchased, processed and geocoded –To be expanded to classification counts –Trip rates and trip length frequency distributions to be calculated from data –FAF data obtained for internal\external and through flows Non-freight commercial vehicles –Three-step quick response model to be developed