Session SA33A : Anomalous ionospheric conductances caused by plasma turbulence in high-latitude E-region electrojets Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:40PM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lectures in Plasma Physics
Advertisements

Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Principles of Global Modeling Paul Song Department of Physics, and Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell Introduction Principles.
Particle Simulations of Magnetic Reconnection with Open Boundary Conditions A. V. Divin 1,2, M. I. Sitnov 1, M. Swisdak 3, and J. F. Drake 1 1 Institute.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
INTRODUCTION OF WAVE-PARTICLE RESONANCE IN TOKAMAKS J.Q. Dong Southwestern Institute of Physics Chengdu, China International School on Plasma Turbulence.
Alfvén-cyclotron wave mode structure: linear and nonlinear behavior J. A. Araneda 1, H. Astudillo 1, and E. Marsch 2 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad.
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
PLASMA TRANSPORT ALONG DISCRETE AURORAL ARCS A.Kullen 1, T. Johansson 2, S. Buchert 1, and S. Figueiredo 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of VLF Waves for Space Applications W.A. Scales Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of Plasma Turbulence for Radiation Belt Remediation Center for Space Science & Engineering Research Virginia.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Prob, % WinterSummer Probability of observing downward field-aligned electron energy flux >10 mW/m 2 in winter and summer hemispheres.
Damping of Whistler Waves through Mode Conversion to Lower Hybrid Waves in the Ionosphere X. Shao, Bengt Eliasson, A. S. Sharma, K. Papadopoulos, G. Milikh.
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
Carlson et al. ‘01 Three Characteristic Acceleration Regions.
Shock Wave Related Plasma Processes
The tribulations and exaltations in coupling models of the magnetosphere with ionosphere- thermosphere models Aaron Ridley Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic.
Relation Between Electric Fields and Ionospheric/magnetospheric Plasma Flows at Very Low Latitudes Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research University.
Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models of the Solar Wind Steven R. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
5. Simplified Transport Equations We want to derive two fundamental transport properties, diffusion and viscosity. Unable to handle the 13-moment system.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling through Plasma Turbulence at High- Latitude E-Region Electrojet Y. Dimant and M. Oppenheim Tuesday, April 13, 2010 Center.
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
Julie A. Feldt CEDAR-GEM workshop June 26 th, 2011.
How do gravity waves determine the global distributions of winds, temperature, density and turbulence within a planetary atmosphere? What is the fundamental.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey
Collisions and transport phenomena Collisions in partly and fully ionized plasmas Typical collision parameters Conductivity and transport coefficients.
Vytenis M. Vasyliūnas Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung,
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
University of Colorado 1 ; Delft University of Technology 2 ; University of Alaska 3 ; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales 4 ; National Center for Atmospheric.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
Electromagnetic and plasma disturbances caused by impact to the ionosphere Valery M. Sorokin Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and.
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Ionospheric Electrodynamics & Low-Earth Orbiting Satellites (LEOS) J-M Noël, A. Russell, D. Burrell & S. Thorsteinson Royal Military College of Canada.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © Ionosphere II: Radio Waves April 19, 2012.
Ionospheric Current and Aurora CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 12 Spring 2007 April 24, 2007 References: Prolss: Chap , P (main) Tascione: Chap.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
CEDAR 2008 Workshop Observations at the Plasmaspheric Boundary Layer with the Mid-latitude SuperDARN radars Mike Ruohoniemi, Ray Greenwald, and Jo Baker.
Response of the Earth’s environment to solar radiative forcing
Image credit: NASA Response of the Earth’s environment to solar radiative forcing Ingrid Cnossen British Antarctic Survey.
New Science Opportunities with a Mid-Latitude SuperDARN Radar Raymond A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Space Plasma Research at UTA J. L. Horwitz Department of Physics The University of Texas at Arlington.
First-principles-based modeling of geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) at mid- and low-latitudes Pulkkinen, A., N. Buzulukova, L. Rastaetter, M. Kuznetsova,
Simulations of turbulent plasma heating by powerful electron beams Timofeev I.V., Terekhov A.V.
IAEA-TM 02/03/2005 1G. Falchetto DRFC, CEA-Cadarache Association EURATOM-CEA NON-LINEAR FLUID SIMULATIONS of THE EFFECT of ROTATION on ION HEAT TURBULENT.
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
Lecture 15 Modeling the Inner Magnetosphere. The Inner Magnetosphere The inner magnetosphere includes the ring current made up of electrons and ions in.
30 April 2009 Space Weather Workshop 2009 The Challenge of Predicting the Ionosphere: Recent results from CISM. W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling: Alfven Wave Reflection, Transmission and Mode Conversion P. Song and V. M. Vasyliūnas Center for Atmospheric Research.
Recent progress in our understanding of E region irregularities
CEDAR Frontiers: Daytime Optical Aeronomy Duggirala Pallamraju and Supriya Chakrabarti Center for Space Physics, Boston University &
The Ionosphere and Thermosphere GEM 2013 Student Tutorial
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Wave Coupling as Revealed in Swarm Plasma Densities and Drifts Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University.
N. D’Angelo, B. Kustom, D. Susczynsky, S. Cartier, J. Willig
The ionosphere is much more structured and variable than ever predicted. Solar Driven Model Since 2000, we have seen more, very clear evidence that the.
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
Principles of Global Modeling
Magnetospheric Modeling
Introduction to Space Weather
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Energy conversion boundaries
Dynamic Coupling between the Magnetosphere and the Ionosphere
Three Regions of Auroral Acceleration
Presentation transcript:

Session SA33A : Anomalous ionospheric conductances caused by plasma turbulence in high-latitude E-region electrojets Wednesday, December 15, :40PM – 6:00PM Paper SA33A-2165 Anomalous ionospheric conductances caused by plasma turbulence in high- latitude E-region electrojets Y. S. Dimant and M. M. Oppenheim Center for Space Physics, Boston University 2012 AGU Fall Meeting Monday–Friday, December 3–7, 2012, San Francisco, California, USA

Abstract During periods of intense geomagnetic activity, electric fields penetrating from the Earth's magnetosphere to the high-latitude E-region ionosphere drive strong currents named electrojets and excite plasma instabilities. These instabilities give rise to plasma turbulence that induces nonlinear currents and strong anomalous electron heating observed by radars. This plays an important role in magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling by increasing the ionospheric conductances and modifying the global energy flow. The conductances determine the cross-polar cap potential saturation level and the evolution of field-aligned (Birkeland) currents. This affects the entire behavior of the near-Earth plasma. A quantitative understanding of anomalous conductance and global energy transfer is important for accurate modeling of the geomagnetic storm/substorm evolution. Our theoretical analysis, supported by recent 3D fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations, shows that during strong geomagnetic storms the inclusion of anomalous conductivity can more than double the total Pedersen conductance - the crucial factor responsible for magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling through the current closure. This helps explain why existing global MHD codes developed for predictive modeling of space weather and based on laminar conductivities systematically overestimate the cross-polar cap potentials by a factor of two or close.

Motivation Global magnetospheric MHD codes with normal conductances often overestimate the cross-polar cap potential (up to a factor of two). During magnetic (sub)storms, strong convection DC electric field drives plasma instabilities in the E region E-region instabilities create turbulence: density perturbations coupled to electric field modulations Anomalous conductance due to E-region turbulence could account for the overestimate of the cross-polar cap potential.

Location: Lower Ionosphere

Solar Corona Solar Wind Ionosphere Magnetosphere Energy flow in Solar-Terrestrial System

Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling

Anomalous conductivity Instability-driven plasma density irregularities coupled to turbulent electrostatic field: –1: Turbulent field gives rise to anomalous electron heating (AEH). Reduced recombination leads to plasma density increases. –2: Electron density irregularities and turbulent electrostatic fields create wave-induced nonlinear currents (NC). Both processes affect macroscopic ionospheric conductances important for Magnetosphere- Ionosphere current system.

Anomalous electron heating (Foster and Erickson, 2000) During magnetospheric storms/substorms, E- region turbulence at the high latitude electrojet heats up electrons dramatically, affecting ionospheric conductance. This temperature elevation is induced mainly by turbulent electric fields. The small turbulent field component parallel to B 0 plays a crucial role. 125 mV/m25 mV/m (at higher latitudes) T e > 4000K at E 0 =160 mV/m (Bahcivan, 2007) Recent observation:

(Stauning & Olesen, 1989, E 0 =82 mV/m)

Characteristics of E-region Waves Electrostatic waves nearly perpendicular to Low-frequency, E-region ionosphere (90-130km): dominant collisions with neutrals - Magnetized electrons: (E x B drift) - Unmagnetized ions: (Attached to neutrals) Waves are driven by strong DC electric field, Damped by collisional diffusion (ion Landau damping for FB)

Major E-region instabilities Farley-Buneman (two-stream) instability Caused by ion inertia Gradient drift (cross-field) instability Caused by density gradients Thermal (electron and ion) instabilities Caused by frictional heating Driven by large-scale DC electric field Ion kinetic effects are crucial: need PIC simulations Small parallel fields are important: need 3-D simulations!

Threshold electric field FB: Farley-Buneman instability IT: Ion thermal instability ET: Electron thermal instability CI: Combined (FB + IT + ET) instability 1: Ion magnetization boundary 2: Combined instability boundary High-latitude ionosphereEquatorial ionosphere [Dimant & Oppenheim, 2004]

AEH: Heuristic Model of Turbulence [Milikh and Dimant, 2003] E = 82 mV/m (comparison with Stauning and Olesen [1989])

Plasma Heating (PIC simulations)

Ionization-Recombination Mechanism Turbulent electric fields heat electrons. Elevated electron temperature does not affect conductivities directly, but … –Hot electrons reduce plasma recombination rate. –Reduced recombination (presumed given ionization source) increases E-region plasma density. Higher plasma density increases all conductivities in proportion. Not sufficient and slowly developing (tens of seconds) mechanism!

Test LFM Simulation with Modified Conductivities: Cross-Polar Cap Potential (Merkin et al. 2005) ANEL: ANomalous ELectron heating recombination-density effect on conductivities

Non-Linear Current 1.FB turbulence: electron density perturbations (ridges and troughs) with oppositely directed turbulent electrostatic fields. 2.E x B drift of magnetized electrons has opposite directions in ridges and troughs. 3.More electrons drift in ridges than in troughs. This forms an average DC current, mainly in the Pedersen to E 0 direction. The modified Pedersen conductivity is most important for current closure. Fast-developing and robust mechanism!

Quasi-stationary waves _ + _ + ___ ___ ____ IonsElectrons

Farley-Buneman Turbulence (PIC simulations)

Non-Linear Current

NC and M-I Energy Exchange (including Anomalous Heating) Energy deposition for E-region turbulence and heating: –Total energy input from fields to particles: –Normal Joule heating: –Saturated turbulence in a periodic box: –Turbulent energy: work by external field E 0 on wave- induced nonlinear current, Small turbulent fields parallel to B 0 are crucial for anomalous electron heating!

Anomalous Pedersen Conductivity 0: Undisturbed (“normal”) conductivity 1: Anomalous conductivity with nonlinear current (NC) 2: Anomalous conductivity with NC + AEH effect [Dimant and Oppenheim, 2011] (extreme convection field)

Anomalous Pedersen Conductivity 0: Undisturbed (“normal”) conductivity 1: Anomalous conductivity with nonlinear current (NC) 2: Anomalous conductivity with NC + AEH effect [Dimant and Oppenheim, 2011] (strong convection field)

Conclusions Convection field drives E-region instabilities: –Turbulent fields cause anomalous heating –Irregularities and fields create nonlinear current Both anomalous effects lead to increased conductances Can explain lower than in conventional models values of cross-polar cap potentials Should be included in global MHD models!