M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Nielsen1 Measuring Trigger Efficiency Important component of cross section measurement: it is NOT in general 1.0! Need to measure this from data because.
Advertisements

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
The ATLAS B physics trigger
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
14-sep-2004 Midwest Physics Group University of Indiana Triggering and Luminosity Scenarios Maris Abolins Michigan State University.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
1 Top Pair Production Cross Section with the ATLAS Detector A. Bangert, N. Ghodbane, T. Goettfert, R. Haertel, A. Macchiolo, R. Nisius, S. Pataraia Max.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Early Electroweak Measurements in CMS and ATLAS J. Alcaraz (CIEMAT - Madrid) XLII Rencontres de Moriond (EW), La Thuile 11 March 2007.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
26/07/2002C.Diaconu High Pt Multileptons at HERA 1 Cristinel Diaconu CPP Marseille On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaboration Lepton pair production in ep.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Summary of Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal, University of Udine Top Working Group, CERN October 29 th, 2003.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Model Independent Measurements Jon Butterworth University College London MCnet school Spa, Belgium September 2015.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
AOD Analysis of the DC2 Coannihilation Model Sample Davide Costanzo Nov 5 th 2004 V. 3.0.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
The University of Manchester
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Presentation transcript:

M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004

M. Gilchriese 2 References Physics and Detector Performance TDR High Level Trigger…. TDR Level 1 Trigger TDR Comparison of ATLAS and CMS Trigger Rates High Level Trigger…LHCC Review June ATLAS Trigger Menus for the LHC Start-up Phase From the ancient days…Supercollider Physics, EHLQ, Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 56, No. 4, October 1984

M. Gilchriese 3 Goal Introduction Nomenclature Basic rates –Electrons –Muons –Jets –Etc

M. Gilchriese 4 Very Rough Idea of Rates Old plot Remember there are uncertainties in the cross sections I have not been able to find a recent compilation of relevant cross section predictions…this would be useful to have Apologies for quality of some graphs…

M. Gilchriese 5 From Physics TDR

M. Gilchriese 6 Trigger Concept and Definition 75 kHz ~ 2 kHz ~ 200 Hz Rate Target processing time ~ 2 s ~ 10 ms 2 μs High Level Triggers (HLT) Level-2 + Event Filter Software trigger Level-1 Hardware trigger

M. Gilchriese 7 High Level Trigger(HLT) Level2 HLT Data Flow Software HLT Selection Software  Framework ATHENA/GAUDI  Reuse offline components  Common to Level-2 and EF Offline algorithms used in EF

M. Gilchriese 8 Trigger Selection Example LVL1 muon LVL2 calo isol LVL2 tracking EF muon LVL2 muon Muon EF calo isol EF tracking

M. Gilchriese 9 HLT Trigger Objects Selection2x10 33 cm -2 s -1 Rates (Hz) Electrone25i, 2e15i ~40 Photon  60i, 2  20i ~40 Muon  20i, 2  10 ~40 Jetsj400, 3j165, 4j110 ~25 Jet & E T miss j70 + xE70 ~20 tau & E T miss  35 + xE45 ~5 b-physics 2  6 with m B /m J/  ~10 Otherspre-scales, calibration, … ~20 Total ~200 Wont talk about these Note 2x10 33 is the nominal max luminosity for the initial running…optimistic

M. Gilchriese 10 HLT Nomenclature From the HLT TDR, section 4.4 In the subsequent sections, the use of labels with the form ‘NoXXi’ to identify specific trigger items will be used. The meaning of the labels is the following: ‘o’ indicates the type of the selection (‘e’ for electron, ‘γ’ for photon, ‘µ’ for muon, ‘τ’ for a τ hadron, ‘j’ for jet, ‘b’ for a b-tagged jet, ‘xE’ for missing transverse energy, ‘E’ for total transverse energy and ‘jE’ for the total transverse energy obtained using only jets); ‘XX’ gives the threshold in transverse energy (in units of GeV); ‘N’ the number of objects; and ‘i’ indicates an isolation requirement. As an example, 2µ20i refers to the requirement of two muons, with a pT threshold of 20 GeV each, fulfilling isolation criteria. The thresholds indicate the true value above which the selection has good efficiency. The exact value for the efficiency obtained depends on the implementation of the algorithm and the details of the criteria applied. Note that there is a different, but similar, nomenclature for the LVL1 trigger objects.

M. Gilchriese 11

M. Gilchriese 12 Efficiency Example

M. Gilchriese 13 Single Electrons/Photons LVL1 The rate of the LVL1 electron/photon triggers is dominated by misidentified jets. The ET-threshold scale in the plot is defined so that the efficiency for selecting genuine electrons with transverse energy equal to the quoted value is 95%.

M. Gilchriese 14 Electron/photon pairs LVL1

M. Gilchriese 15 Getting HLT Rate OriginContribution e from b,c decays25 % e from conversion17 % W  e decays 17 % Z  ee decays 7 % others34 % From HLT TDR Update this year e25i Fraction of final rate

M. Gilchriese 16 Muons

M. Gilchriese 17 Muon Cross Sections

M. Gilchriese 18

M. Gilchriese 19 Jets

M. Gilchriese 20 More Jets

M. Gilchriese 21 Jet Rates

M. Gilchriese 22 Missing ET + 1 jet

M. Gilchriese 23 SUSY Example Ongoing studies of full simulation of SUSY events in “co- annihilation region”. See recent talks by Pavel Or Davide Soft leptons – see next page Desire to trigger on these events with missing ET+1jet trigger

M. Gilchriese 24 Lepton Spectra p T distribution for leading and soft electrons that are used to calculate dilepton invariant mass. p T distribution for leading and soft muons that are used to calculate dilepton invariant mass. leading e soft e leading muon soft muon p T for leading and soft electronsp T for leading and soft muons

M. Gilchriese 25 SUSY Example Event#xEJet 1Jet 2Jet 3Jet j70 + xE70j400, 3j165, 4j110

M. Gilchriese 26 Possible Future Topics? Trigger algorithms for specific objects eg. what is an electron –Just reading but educational –Straightforward to do from various TDRs and presentations Cross sections and simple spectra (d  dE T ) –Many pieces, each by someone? –Generators, simulation….needed –Non-trivial amount of work….need to understand better what is already done or underway