Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 Direct Dark Matter Searches- Exploiting its Various Signatures J.D. Vergados J.D. Vergados University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEWS: Nuclear Emulsion Wimp Search
Advertisements

Week 10 Dark Matter Reading: Dark Matter: 16.1, 16.5d (4 pages)
Abstract Dark matter is a generic term for an exotic class of particles that might provide sufficient gravity to explain the observed movements of stars.
Physics of Masssive Neutrinos Milos 20-24/05/08 Direct Dark Matter Searches- Can Solar neutrinos be a background? J.D. Vergados* J.D. Vergados* Cyprus.
Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
Particle Physics and Cosmology Dark Matter. What is our universe made of ? quintessence ! fire, air, water, soil !
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Arlington LC Workshop January 2003.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine American Linear Collider Physics Group Seminar 20 February 2003.
The Milky Way Galaxy James Binney Oxford University.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
6/2/07GLCW8 1 Detecting galactic structure via the annual modulation signal of WIMPs Christopher M. Savage Fine Theoretical Physics Institute University.
12/9/04KICP - Spin Dependent Limits 1 Can WIMP Spin Dependent Couplings explain DAMA? Limits from DAMA and Other Experiments Christopher M. Savage University.
Computational Lab in Physics: Final Project Monte Carlo Nuclear Collisions: Glauber Model.
I. Giomataris NOSTOS Neutrino studies with a tritium source Neutrino Oscillations with triton neutrinos The concept of a spherical TPC Measurement of.
A Direction Sensitive Dark Matter Detector
The Dark Side of the Universe What is dark matter? Who cares?
Dark Matter Search with Direction sensitive Scintillator Ⅱ Department of Physics, School of Science The University of Tokyo Y. Shimizu, M. Minowa, Y. Inoue.
Applications of Micro-TPC to Dark Matter Search 1. WIMP signatures 2. Performance of the Micro-TPC 3. WIMP-wind measurement 4. Future works 5. Conclusions.
Dark Matter Search with Direction Sensitive Scintillators NOON2004 Work Shop February 14, 2004, Odaiba H. Sekiya University of Tokyo M.Minowa, Y.Shimizu,
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario (LHS) The scenario is consistent with  particle physics experiments Particle mass b → sγ Bs →μ +
PDDM (ILIAS) Matalascanas, Spain 10-12/09/07 Predicted Special Signatures for Direct Dark Matter Detection J.D. Vergados J.D. Vergados Technical University.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Future work Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind oh the earth NEWAGE ~ Direction Sensitive Direct Dark Matter Search ~ Kyoto University Hironobu Nishimura
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
09/15/10Waye State University1 Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio October, 2005 Wayne.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
09/10/2005NSTAR Graal collaboration1 The Graal collaboration results and prospects Presented by Carlo Schaerf Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” and.
The Tokyo Dark Matter Experiment NDM03 13 Jun. 2003, Nara Hiroyuki Sekiya University of Tokyo.
Directional Statistics for WIMP direct detection Anne Green Astro-Particle Theory and Cosmology Group University of Sheffield Ben Morgan, AMG and Neil.
A Lightning Review of Dark Matter R.L. Cooper
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
Black Holes in Other Galaxies. The giant elliptical galaxy M87 is located 50 million light-years away in the constellation Virgo. By measuring the rotational.
Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014 Lecture 30: Dark Matter Revisted…..
I. Giomataris NOSTOS a new low energy neutrino experiment Detect low energy neutrinos from a tritium source using a spherical gaseous TPC Study neutrino.
Dark Matter Search with Direction Sensitive Scintillators The10th ICEPP Symposium February 16, 2004, Hakuba H. Sekiya University of Tokyo.
Daily Modulation of the Dark Matter Signal in Crystalline Detectors Nassim Bozorgnia UCLA TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
09/10/2005NSTAR Graal collaboration1 The Graal collaboration results and prospects Presented by Carlo Schaerf Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” and.
V. Bertin - CPPM - MANTS Paris - Sept'10 Indirect search of Dark Matter with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind on the earth NEWAGE Direction-sensitive direct dark matter search with μ-TPC * 1.Dark.
Symmetries and the Spin Praha, July 28th, 2005 On the Direct Detection of SUSY Dark Matter On the Direct Detection of SUSY Dark Matter J.D. Vergados University.
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
The Milky Way Galaxy 02/03/2005. The Milky Way Summary of major visible components and structure The Galactic Rotation Dark Matter and efforts to detect.
Dipole radiation during collisions LL2 Section 68.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Identification of Dark Matter with Directional Detection Julien Billard, F. Mayet, D. Santos, O. Guillaudin, C. Grignon (MIMAC Collaboration) Laboratoire.
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Lab Frame and Center of Mass Frame 2.Relativistic.
Dhevan Gangadharan UCLA STAR Collaboration DNP meeting 10/25/08 1.
Xenon100 collaboration gives a stringent constraint on spin-independent elastic WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section. Ton-scale detectors for direct detection.
Dark Matter Detectors and the Neutrino Wall Malcolm Fairbairn IDM 2016 Sheffield.
Keiko Nagao (National Institute of Technology, Niihama College, Japan)
Christopher M. Savage Fine Theoretical Physics Institute
The Milky Way Galaxy 1/30/03.
UK Dark Matter Collaboration
Sterile Neutrinos and WDM
Irina Bavykina, MPI f. Physik
Outline Find a signal, have champagne Calculating the (relic) density
Direct Detection of Dark Matter
John Kelley IceCube Journal Club 27 February 2008
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Christopher M. Savage University of Michigan – Ann Arbor
Search for Dark Matter physics 805 fall 2008.
Dark Matter Search with Stilbene Scintillator
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Leptophilic Dark Matter from ATIC and Pamela
Directional Detection Rates of Dark Matter (WIMPs)
Dark Matter Detection,Models and Constraints
Presentation transcript:

Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 Direct Dark Matter Searches- Exploiting its Various Signatures J.D. Vergados J.D. Vergados University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece. University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Dark Matter Exists! Galaxies (rotational velocities); gravitational Lensing (cluster 1E , DM in blue); WMAP5 Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

The nature of DM can be unraveled in direct experiments  Elastic scattering of dark matter particles with nuclei  recoil The number of events during time t is given by: The number of events during time t is given by:Where: t coh, h coh depend on nuclear physics, the WIMP mass and the velocity distribution. We assume here the standard M-B velocity distribution. α the phase of the Earth t coh, h coh depend on nuclear physics, the WIMP mass and the velocity distribution. We assume here the standard M-B velocity distribution. α the phase of the Earth ρ(0): the local WIMP density≈0.3 GeV/cm 3. ρ(0): the local WIMP density≈0.3 GeV/cm 3. σ S p,χ : the WIMP-nucleon cross section. It is computed in a particle model. σ S p,χ : the WIMP-nucleon cross section. It is computed in a particle model. It can be extracted from the data once f coh (A,m χ ) is known It can be extracted from the data once f coh (A,m χ ) is known

A: The coherent event rates for zero threshold energy ( σ p,χ =10 -7 pb) Heavy( 127 I, 131 Xe ) Light( 19 F, 23 Na ) Heavy( 127 I, 131 Xe ) Light( 19 F, 23 Na ) NaI NaI Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

Threshold effect on coherent event rates for threshold energy of 5 keVee ( σ p,χ =10 -7 pb) Heavy( 127 I, 131 Xe ) Light( 19 F, 23 Na ) Heavy( 127 I, 131 Xe ) Light( 19 F, 23 Na ) NaI NaI Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

B: Novel approaches: Exploitation of other signatures of the reaction The modulation effect: The seasonal, due to the motion of the Earth, dependence of the rate. The modulation effect: The seasonal, due to the motion of the Earth, dependence of the rate. Detection of other particles (electrons, X-rays), produced during the LSP-nucleus collision (it will not be discussed to-day). Detection of other particles (electrons, X-rays), produced during the LSP-nucleus collision (it will not be discussed to-day). The excitation of the nucleus (in some cases : heavy WIMP, low excitation energy etc.) and detection of the subsequently emitted de-excitation γ rays. (it will not be discussed to-day). The excitation of the nucleus (in some cases : heavy WIMP, low excitation energy etc.) and detection of the subsequently emitted de-excitation γ rays. (it will not be discussed to-day). Asymmetry measurements in directional experiments (the direction of the recoiling nucleus must also be measured)--> Asymmetry measurements in directional experiments (the direction of the recoiling nucleus must also be measured)--> DIURNAL VARIATION. DIURNAL VARIATION.

Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 The cross section depends on the relative velocity of the WIMP with the target v June =235+15=250km/s v Dec =235-15=220km/s The cross section depends on the relative velocity of the WIMP with the target v June =235+15=250km/s v Dec =235-15=220km/s

Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 BI: THE MODULATION EFFECT (in standard recoil experiments) Goodman & Witten (1985) Total Rates: Total Rates: (α is the phase of the Earth; α=0 around June 3nd) (α is the phase of the Earth; α=0 around June 3nd) R 0 =average rate,The 2nd term is the modulated rate. h=relative modulation amplitude. R 0 =average rate,The 2nd term is the modulated rate. h=relative modulation amplitude. The percentage difference between the minimum and the maximum is 2h The percentage difference between the minimum and the maximum is 2h The location of the maximum depends on the sign of h The location of the maximum depends on the sign of h

BIc: The total Relative modulation amplitude (As a function of WIMP mass in GeV) Light System (e.g. A=32, A=19) Heavy system (e.g. A=127) Note sign change Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

Light WIMPs: Motivated by exclusion plots. Possible in some models: Cerdeno (this workshop),Cao-Hikasa-Wang-Yang Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

BII: Relatively light WIMPS: Focus on the differential event rate (1+H cosα), relative mod. Amp. (1+H cosα), relative mod. Amp. Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

BIIb: The coherent differential rate for σ N =10 -7 pb (constant) Q in keVee Heavy (e.g. 127 I, 131 Xe) Light (e.g. 19 F, 23 Na) Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

BIIc: The coherent differential mod. rate for σ N =10 -7 pb (constant) Q in keVee Heavy (e.g. 127 I, 131 Xe) Light (e.g. 19 F, 23 Na) Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

BIIIb: The relative (differential) Modulation amplitude It is independent of the nucleon cross section. Example NaI From left to right top to bottom : Q=1,2,5,6 keVee Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

C: Directional Experiments* (Measuring both the energy and direction of the recoiling nucleus) We will show that the observed events: We will show that the observed events: will exhibit asymmetry due to the motion of the Sun will exhibit asymmetry due to the motion of the Sun On top of this they will exhibit characteristic annual modulation due to the annual motion of the Earth On top of this they will exhibit characteristic annual modulation due to the annual motion of the Earth Both of these will exhibit periodic diurnal variation due to the rotation of the Earth. Both of these will exhibit periodic diurnal variation due to the rotation of the Earth. * DM-TPC, NEWAGE, DRIFT, MIMAC (Review: S. Ahlen et al, arXiv: ) * DM-TPC, NEWAGE, DRIFT, MIMAC (Review: S. Ahlen et al, arXiv: ) *Also gaseous TPC detectors (3-D reconstruction arXiv: (atro-ph.CO) *Also gaseous TPC detectors (3-D reconstruction arXiv: (atro-ph.CO) Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

WIMP flux,“ The solar wind” (towards the Cygnus constellation), Spergel (88), vergados (02), Morgan-Green-Spooner (04). Flux variation Flux variation Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 Morgan-Green-Spooner (04).

CI: The directional event rate (The direction of recoil is observed) The calculation will proceed in two steps: The calculation will proceed in two steps: A) Evaluation of the event rate as a function of (Θ,Φ) taking the sun’s direction of motion as polar axis (polar angle Θ) A) Evaluation of the event rate as a function of (Θ,Φ) taking the sun’s direction of motion as polar axis (polar angle Θ) Φ is measured on a plane perpendicular to the sun’s velocity from x (radially out of the galaxy). The direction of recoil is Φ is measured on a plane perpendicular to the sun’s velocity from x (radially out of the galaxy). The direction of recoil is - due to the Sun’s motion the time average rate depends only on Θ --> Asymmetry. -due to the Earth’s annual motion it will show a modulation, dependent on (Θ,Φ) with very characteristic signature. -due to the Earth’s annual motion it will show a modulation, dependent on (Θ,Φ) with very characteristic signature. B) The direction of observation fixed in the lab. B) The direction of observation fixed in the lab. -Then Diurnal variation due to the rotation of the Earth -Then Diurnal variation due to the rotation of the Earth Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

Comparison of the usual (R) and directional (dR/dΩ) total rates Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

The directional event rate (The direction of recoil is observed) The event rate as a function of the direction angles (Θ,Φ) is: The event rate as a function of the direction angles (Θ,Φ) is: d R/dΩ=(κ/2π)R 0 [1+h c cosα+h c cosα], κ=t /t dir d R/dΩ=(κ/2π)R 0 [1+h c cosα+h c cosα], κ=t /t dir R 0 is the average usual (non-dir) rate R 0 is the average usual (non-dir) rate α the phase of the Earth (as usual) α the phase of the Earth (as usual) h m :h m cos(α+α 0 )=h c cosα +h s sinα is the total modulation amplitude (it strongly depends on the direction of observation): α 0 is the shift in the phase of the Earth (it strongly depends on the direction of observation) h m :h m cos(α+α 0 )=h c cosα +h s sinα is the total modulation amplitude (it strongly depends on the direction of observation): α 0 is the shift in the phase of the Earth (it strongly depends on the direction of observation) κ/2π is the reduction factor (it depends on the direction of observation, but it is independent of the angle Φ). This factor becomes κ, after integrating over Φ. d R/dΩ-> d R/d(cosΘ) κ/2π is the reduction factor (it depends on the direction of observation, but it is independent of the angle Φ). This factor becomes κ, after integrating over Φ. d R/dΩ-> d R/d(cosΘ) κ, h m and α m depend only slightly on the particle (e.g. SUSY) parameters and the reduced mass μ r κ, h m and α m depend only slightly on the particle (e.g. SUSY) parameters and the reduced mass μ r

The parameter κ vs Θ (Directional rates with Ch. Moustakidis) Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

The modulation amplitudes vs Φ for m χ =10 GeV for a light target For 19 F For 19 F Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 For 127 Ι For 127 Ι

Modulation vs the phase of the earth. Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

CII:The Diurnal variation of the rate in Directional Experiments We have seen that: We have seen that: the parameters κ and h m depend on the direction of observation relative to the sun’s velocity the parameters κ and h m depend on the direction of observation relative to the sun’s velocity In a directional experiment the direction of observation is fixed with respect to the earth. In a directional experiment the direction of observation is fixed with respect to the earth. Due to the rotation of the Earth during the day this direction points in different parts of the galactic sky. So the angles (Θ,Φ) change and the rate becomes time dependent. It will thus show a periodic behavior. Due to the rotation of the Earth during the day this direction points in different parts of the galactic sky. So the angles (Θ,Φ) change and the rate becomes time dependent. It will thus show a periodic behavior. Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

From the celestial (α=ascention,δ=inclination) to galactic coordinates Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

Diurnal Variation of the rate (κ) 19 F Target & Fully Directional WIMP MASS 10 GeV WIMP MASS 10 GeV WIMP MASS 50 GeV Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

CONCLUSIONS I: Non-directional The relative modulation amplitude h : The relative modulation amplitude h : is small, less than 3%, and depends strongly on the LSP mass. is small, less than 3%, and depends strongly on the LSP mass. It depends on the velocity distribution It depends on the velocity distribution It may increase as the energy threshold increases, but at the expense of the number of counts. It may increase as the energy threshold increases, but at the expense of the number of counts. Its sign is also uncertain. it is positive for light systems, but it may become negative for intermediate and heavy nuclei and heavy WIMPs (for both M-B and Realistic velocity distributions). Can this be exploited to extract the WIMP mass? Its sign is also uncertain. it is positive for light systems, but it may become negative for intermediate and heavy nuclei and heavy WIMPs (for both M-B and Realistic velocity distributions). Can this be exploited to extract the WIMP mass? The time behavior of the differential event rates at low energy transfers exhibits characteristic dependence on the WIMP mass. The time behavior of the differential event rates at low energy transfers exhibits characteristic dependence on the WIMP mass. The spin modulation exhibits a similar behavior The spin modulation exhibits a similar behavior

Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 CONCLUSIONS II: Non modulated rates in directional Experiments A useful parameter is κ the reduction factor relative to the non directional rate A useful parameter is κ the reduction factor relative to the non directional rate κ strongly depends on the polar angle Θ ( the angle between the direction of observation and the sun’s velocity) κ strongly depends on the polar angle Θ ( the angle between the direction of observation and the sun’s velocity) κ≈1 in the most favored direction (Θ≈π in ΜΒ) κ≈1 in the most favored direction (Θ≈π in ΜΒ) As the Earth rotates the detector samples a different angle Θ-> As the Earth rotates the detector samples a different angle Θ-> The event rate (κ ) exhibits a diurnal variation (periodic variation with a period of 24 hours). The event rate (κ ) exhibits a diurnal variation (periodic variation with a period of 24 hours). The form of the variation depends on the WIMP mass The form of the variation depends on the WIMP mass The amplitude of this variation depends on the inclination of the line of observation. It can be quite large. The amplitude of this variation depends on the inclination of the line of observation. It can be quite large. The variation persists, even if the sense of direction is not known. Then, however, the effect is smaller The variation persists, even if the sense of direction is not known. Then, however, the effect is smaller

Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 CONCLUSIONS III : The modulation in directional Experiments (preliminary) The modulation amplitude in the most favored direction (κ≈1 ) is 0.05<h m <0.15 (bigger than in non- directional case) depending on the WIMP mass. The modulation amplitude in the most favored direction (κ≈1 ) is 0.05<h m <0.15 (bigger than in non- directional case) depending on the WIMP mass. In plane perpendicular to the sun’s velocity (κ≈0.3) h m is much bigger: In plane perpendicular to the sun’s velocity (κ≈0.3) h m is much bigger: | h m | ≈0.25 (50% relative difference between maximum and minimum). | h m | ≈0.25 (50% relative difference between maximum and minimum). Both its magnitude and its sign depend on the azymouthal angle Φ Both its magnitude and its sign depend on the azymouthal angle Φ We are currently computing its time variation. Preliminary results show a weak but spectacular signal (it cannot be mimicked by other seasonal effects) We are currently computing its time variation. Preliminary results show a weak but spectacular signal (it cannot be mimicked by other seasonal effects).

A new way to settle controversies! Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

Was it a fair deal? Mullah Nasrudin did not know how to sum up infinite series. However: Mullah Nasrudin did not know how to sum up infinite series. However: Vergados DSU11 29/09/11

THE END THE END