MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 B-Physics Trigger in the TDR Demonstrate viable & affordable B-physics trigger based on the evaluation of two strategies:
Advertisements

ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 To do: di-muon & full-scan triggers 1) Di-muon trigger at L=2x10 ^33, introducing full scan at lower luminosity To do: Update.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
MICE TPG RECONSTRUCTION Tracking efficiency Olena Voloshyn Geneva University.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
New muon EF trigger with offline supertools Sergio Grancagnolo INFN Lecce & Salento University.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.
Requirements for a Next Generation Framework: ATLAS Experience S. Kama, J. Baines, T. Bold, P. Calafiura, W. Lampl, C. Leggett, D. Malon, G. Stewart, B.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
1 Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) and the HLT.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
Atlas CHEP‘2000 Padova, ITALY February 2000 Implementation of an Object Oriented Track Reconstruction Model into Multiple LHC Experiments.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Atlas ACAT2000 Batavia, IL, USA October 2000 More Performance and Implementation of an Object Oriented Track Reconstruction Model in Different OO.
A Level-2 trigger algorithm for the identification of muons in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alessandro Di Mattia on behalf of the Atlas TDAQ group Computing.
Moore/MUID validation with The MOORE group.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
Muon Trigger Software Status
integration in HLT-status and prospects
Samples and MC Selection
CHEP La Jolla San Diego 24-28/3/2003
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Presentation transcript:

MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and Identification of Muons Divided in two components : MuidStandAlone: MuidStandAlone:   Extrapolation of tracks reconstructed by MOORE to the interaction point. MuidComb: MuidComb:   Combination of tracks reconstructed inside the Muon Spectrometer with tracks reconstructed in the Inner Detector TrigMoore: Implementation of MOORE/MuID in the framework of High Level Trigger at the Event Filter stage. Wrapped Strategy- Allows to execute the offline reconstruction chain from the online environment, reconstructing the event by accessing at all the Spectrometer data. The implemented chain is composed by Moore and MuidStandAlone. Seeded Strategy – Uses the hypotesys formed at the previous stage in the trigger process, accessing only to subdetectors data that are of interest for the selected trigger regions. (By now only regions selected by the LVL1 trigger have been used).

Moore in HLT- a contact point between offline and online. Wrapped, Full event Reconstruction Seeded: Access only the RoI from the LVL1 p T (GeV/c) (msec) rms (msec) (msec) rms (msec) Atlas pcatr machine (2.4GHz) Atlas pcatr machine (2.4GHz) OPT build OPT build Timing package: TrigTools/TrigTime Timing package: TrigTools/TrigTime Strategies Seeded/wrapped Strategies Seeded/wrapped Conservative approach (i.e. data access and data preparation are included) Main ideas The algorithms operating in the High Level Trigger at the Event Filter stage should not operate only in a general purpose mode (reconstructing the event in full scan) but should be able to operate starting from hypothesys formed in the previous stages of the triggering process. Avoid the code duplication! Only the seeding has an ``ad hoc’’ implementation for the online environment. DC1 single Muons execution times In the table the average and rms is calculated on the events left after rejecting 5% of the events included in the high execution time tail In the table the average and rms is calculated on the events left after rejecting 5% of the events included in the high execution time tail

Wrapped strategy |  | < 1.05 Efficiency for the reconstruction of single Muons sample in wrapped strategy (event scan). This is equivalent to the execution of the offline version of the code. The analysis has been restricted to the barrel region. Resolution in wrapped and seeded strategy. Strategy seeded |  | < 1.05 Strategy wrapped |  | < 1.05

List of related papers ATLAS notes for more information: Moore as Event Filter in the ATLAS High Level Trigger ATL-SOFT , ATL-DAQ Track reconstruction in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer with MOORE ATL-SOFT