NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Providing High-Quality Written Feedback to Educators
Advertisements

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Professional Growth and
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Professional Growth and
Emerging Evidence and Promising Practices for Educator Preparation Programs June 18, 2014 Lenora Boehlert, Manhattanville College.
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Session Materials  Wiki
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
The Basic Components of Inter-Rater Reliability
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
Principals’ Conference CFN 204 Diane Foley, Network Leader Mary Barton, SATIF October 12,
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Focus Group on the Draft InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
To copy or adapt this material, see OpportunityCulture.org/terms-of-use Multi-Classroom Leadership Reviewing Instructional Practices.
Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Agenda: PD What drives PD? +/- of Traditional PD Analyzing Data/Categorizing Data Characteristics of Effective PD PAGES SWOT EQ: How can you create.
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Building Students’ Deep Understanding through a Common Core-Aligned Unit Session 1 – Setting the Stage Session 2 – Rigorous Tasks as Unit Drivers Session.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Framework In Action: Theory into Practice
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
CFN 201 High School Principals’ Meeting Thursday, September 27, :00 – 3:45 p.m.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
Curricular Focus Universal Design/Differentiated Instruction Lesson Planning Making Meaningful Accommodations Evaluation and Grading.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focus Lesson Guided Instruction “I do it” “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative Independent “You.
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Focus groups conducted: ▪ Teachers ▪ Board of education members ▪ Principals ▪ Union leaders ▪ Parents ▪ BPS.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Driving Improvement.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness D. Gather, Review and Sort Evidence 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Providing High-Quality Written Feedback to Educators
Professional Growth and
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Presentation transcript:

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1

Participants will:  Prioritize areas for feedback.  Articulate best practices for giving feedback on practice. Objectives 2

A collaborative cycle of observations and feedback drives teacher growth Observe The school leader gathers low-inference evidence of teacher practice. 2. Prepare and Share Feedback The school leader assesses practice; school leader and teacher prioritize and determine 2-3 next steps. 3. Develop The teacher implements next steps with support from the school leader.

Best Practices for Preparing and Sharing Feedback 4 Preparing 1.Align evidence to the rubric. Code evidence to the Danielson Framework for Teaching and determine the level of performance for each component observed. 2.Prioritize. Select one or two parts of the teacher’s practice on which to focus. Sharing 1.Invite dialogue. Welcome and value teacher input. 2.Refer to evidence. Discuss low-inference evidence from the observation and invite dialogue on the evidence or its alignment to the rubric. 3.Identify development areas. Define specific areas for development and invite the teacher to comment on those areas or to suggest additional areas. 4.Plan concrete action. Together, develop clear and measurable next steps, including resources and a plan for support. 5.Set a timeline. Agree on a plan for implementation and follow-up.

Practicing Prioritization 5 Based on the lesson and student work you observed: What strengths in the teacher’s practice do you want to highlight? What aspects of instruction most need to improve? Identify priority areas that will have the most substantial impact on student learning, as well as the evidence you will share to support them. (NOTE: You may choose to prioritize a component, or to select a priority that would address several components.) Priority Areas of Strength: Evidence: Priority Areas for Growth: Evidence: On your feedback preparation form, identify one area of strength and one area for growth.

Discussion 6 Where is this teacher’s practice strong? How do you know? What evidence do you have? Where should the teacher focus to improve practice? How do you know? What evidence do you have? 

7 Closing Activity: Questions and Next Steps Independently use the feedback preparation form: 1.Refer to your evidence and priority areas. 2.Draft questions you have for the teacher 3.Refer to the Best Practices for Sharing Feedback section to develop the next steps that will significantly impact student learning. Share your proposed next steps with a partner: 1.Ask one another, “If this were your classroom, would this feedback be useful to you?” 2.Make changes to strengthen questions and next steps.