Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
Advertisements

Integrated Product Team (IPT) Process Training
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Chapter 2 The Analyst As Project Manager In Managing Information Systems 2.3.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
PROCEDURES FOR SELECTING THE CONTRACTOR
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Framework for the Service Acquisition Process Conduct Historical Analysis Define Stakeholder & Customer Needs 2. Review Current Strategy 3. Market Research.
SPAWAR HQ (General Fund) Navy ERP Implementation Lessons Learned – Comptroller View.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Procurement Engineering and Review Team (PERT) PEER REVIEW PROGRAM Patrick Marmo 2/7/2012 Independent Peer Review Program for Contractor’s Purchasing Systems.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
1 Navy Center for Earned Value Management (CEVM) January 2007.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Your Financial Work Defense Finance and Accounting Service DFAS Transformation Update March 2003.
1 Earned Value Management (EVM) Center ‘Moving Forward’ Presented by Mr. David Kester Director, Program Integration Division April 25, 2007.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
1 Project Management Introduction. 2 Chap 1 What is the impact? 1994: 16% of IT projects completed “On-Time” 2004 : 29% of IT projects “On- Time” 53%
PERT Overview Federal Perspective Annual PERT Workshop February 7-9, 2012 Nevada Site Office Evelyn Landini, Contracting Officer Brookhaven Site Office.
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Audit Planning Process
Get Your "Party" Started: Establishing a Successful Third-party Evaluation Martha Thurlow, Ph.D. & Vitaliy Shyyan, Ph.D.—National Center on Educational.
Earned Value Management Presented By: Steve Krivokopich May , 2006.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
CAPT Joe Spruill Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Logistics) September 29, 2005 Managing Obsolescence within a Performance Based Logistics.
2006 ANNUAL MEETING Arlington, Virginia INDUSTRY / UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTERS PROGRAM Pre-Session: ROLE OF EVALUATOR 8:00 - 9:00 am Thursday,
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mr. Daniel Carrasco Chief, Contracting Division USACE – LA District 13 OCT 2015.
Alpha Contracting Sole Source Negotiations between Government and Industry (13 CFR (c)(2))
1 Discussion Brief on the Center for Earned Value Management (CEVM)
Statewide Radio Feasibility Study (SIRN) Presented by Tom Harris SIEC Chair Mike Ressler.
Developing a Project Management Standard for Your Organization Francine DiMicele, PMP June 08, 2015 NC Piedmont Triad Chapter.
Acquisition and Assistance Management Review Entrance Briefing Name of office reviewed Date of Review.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
OUSD(AT&L) Systemic Analysis of Support Assessments 19 November 2003 Kristen Baldwin (703) x109 Scott Lucero (703) x114.
DAU MDAP Assist Capabilities Status Jess Stewart 16 November 2009.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
Capability Maturity Model. CS460 - Senior Design Project I (AY2004)2 Immature Organisations Software processes are often rigorously followed. Organisation.
Vanguard For Army Transformation PM BCT 1 Predicting What the Future Holds Risk Management PM Brigade Combat Team.
GAO’s Cost and Schedule Assessment Guides U.S. Government Accountability Office Applied Research and Methods Cost Engineering Sciences Jason T Lee, Assistant.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
Parts Management Plan Builder 26 July 07
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
PMRIPT Portal Team.
DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Use of CMMI in an Acquisition Context Using CMMI for Process Improvement at USAF Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) Dr. Jack R. Ferguson
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR)
Fertilizer Industry Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program
Presentation transcript:

Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006

Brief Outline  Background  Objectives  Process  Areas of Investigation  Team’s Ground Rules  Cost  What We Hope to Accomplish

Background –Oct 98: Tri-service Assessment Initiative (TAI) founded by OSD to address software acquisition issues Army selected as Executive Agent –May 00: Defense Science Board recommends independent assessments for all ACAT I-III programs –Jun 01: Independent Expert Program Reviews incorporated into DoD R ACAT IC/ID programs shall conduct an IEPR between MS B and CDR –Apr 04: OSD re-directed Systems engineering efforts toward Defense Acquisition Program Support (DAPS) and transferred TAI to DCMA for execution –Present: ASN (RDA) continues to perform IEPRs for Navy PM’s using TAI process

IEPR Objectives –Provide Assistance to Program Managers Identify specific program risks Provide PMs with actionable recommendations –Use the Total DoD Capability (expertise and tools) IEPR Teams leverage DoD, FFRDCs, academia, agencies, industry resources –Analyze Systemic Issues that Plague Projects Across Navy Make recommendations to acquisition leadership to improve Navy acquisition as a whole

Typical Assessment Process –Initiate & Plan Assessment Meet with PM, establish scope and initial issue areas Collect program information Assign appropriate team –Conduct Assessment Team meeting to review program information, strategy Team visits (Prime Contractor, Program Office, Other) –Integrate and Report Results Analyze issues Generate recommendations and report Provide IEPR Program Assessment consistent with RDA Reporting (e.g. Dashboard) Review with Program Office Finalize report Solicit customer feedback

Assessment Team Groundrules –Overall objective - contribute to program success –Non-Disclosure - confidentiality –Adherence to the defined Assessment Process Prepare questionnaires if necessary –Non-attribution interviews –Open and objective communication –Multiple perspectives –Consensus based recommendations

Assessment Issue Areas  Environment - Regulatory, Workplace, Political  Mission Requirements - Stability, Dependencies  Financial - Funding, Budget  Resources - Personnel, Facilities, Tools, Products  Management - Acquisition Strategy, Project Planning, Contracting/Subcontracting  Technical Process - Capability, Conformance, Enhancement  Technical Product - Product Line, Quality, Safety  Schedule - Progress, Dependencies  User / Customer - Satisfaction, Training  Project / Team Specific - Project/Team Defined

Cost IEPR are conducted on a reimbursable basis –DASN ACQ personnel travel costs only –Government Team Members DBOF activities on a Reimbursable Basis Other activity members for Travel only –Contractor/Consultant SME’s on a full Basis DASN ACQ will coordinate all required contracting actions Reimbursable funds provided to DASN ACQ via MIPR

What We Accomplish for a Program –Identify and Prioritize Program Issues: Use experience and expertise of the team members Build on knowledge gained from other IEPR assessments –Investigate and Evaluate Identified Issues: Discussions, Document Reviews, and Analysis Capitalize on different perspectives gained Cause and Effect, and Issue Inter-relationships –Deliver a comprehensive Assessment Report/Outbrief: Strengths Prioritized issues and associated risks Actionable recommendations and follow up activities Overall Assessment consistent with RDA reporting Provide PM the Knowledge to be Successful