PREPARING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Sponsored by Office of the President Office of the Provost Office of Strategic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Advertisements

CLA Curriculum Review. Process Overview Fall 2014: Review the Curriculum November 3 Deadline Submit Recommendations for Curriculum Revision.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Presented by: Dr. Jodi Levine Laufgraben Dr. Stephanie Grace Schull Temple University.
Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Connecting Work and Academics: How Students and Employers Benefit.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
Professional Development Day August 19, 2014 Dr. Lori Baker, Self-Study Coordinator.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Mapping Student Learning Outcomes
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Senior Honors Thesis Program Office of Undergraduate Research.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
CONVENING OF TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PLANNING Tuesday, January 11, 2005 Denton, Texas.
San Antonio College SAC SCORES: PROGRAM ASSESSMENT Presented By: Dr. Kris Clark Cynthia Price, M.A Dr. Franc Solis.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
From Cyclical to Continuous Improvement: Assessment Feedback and Program Metrics Derek J. Herrmann, Coordinator of University Assessment Services Kristen.
Improving the Institutional Effectiveness Process 1.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
Office of Academic Programs Orientation for Academic Program Reviews.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Small Changes, Big Rewards: Integrating the Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education Carol Burton, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Undergraduate Studies.
Assessment & Program Review President’s Retreat 2008 College of Micronesia - FSM May 13 – 15, 2008 FSM China Friendship Sports Center.
Does Your Academic Program Make a Difference? Knowing What Your Students Learned Rosslyn M. Smith (moderator) Katherine A. Austin Valerie Osland Paton.
Texas Tech University PROGRAM-LEVEL ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP WRAP-UP SESSION FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11,
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Moving Successfully Toward SACS Reaffirmation: An Introductory Discussion Presenters Dr. Cathy Fleuriet Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness.
Preparing the Annual Assessment Reports: Guidelines and Suggestions T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning.
DEFINING AND REFINING LEARNING OUTCOMES UK Office of Assessment.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
PATIENCE IS KEY: INTEGRATING ORIENTATION, TRANSITION & RETENTION Brett Bruner, Director of First Year Experience/Persistence & Retention Fort Hays State.
Senior Honors Thesis Program
IT Governance Planning Overview
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Senior Honors Thesis Program
Assessment at Northeastern University
Cyclical Program Review
Presentation transcript:

PREPARING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Sponsored by Office of the President Office of the Provost Office of Strategic Planning Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING Two boys are walking down the street. The first boy says, “I’ve been really busy this summer. I’ve been teaching my dog to talk.” His friend responds, “Wow! I can’t wait to have a conversation with your dog.” The first boy shakes his head. “I said I’ve been teaching him. I didn’t say he learned anything.” M.J. Allen Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING PURPOSES To develop program specific assessment plans for academic programs. To integrate program assessment into the ongoing, annual planning and assessment reporting process.

PROVOST WILLIAM MARCY Significance of Academic Program Assessment

Presentation Overview Program-level outcomes and assessment Key concepts related to outcomes and assessment Course-level outcomes and assessment (reflected in a syllabus) Questions and Discussion

Learning Outcomes and Assessment Texas Tech University is striving to incorporate expected learning outcomes and methods for assessing those learning outcomes into the courses and degree programs offered at the institution

Program-Level Learning Outcomes and Assessment The term “program-level” refers to learning outcomes and assessment methods related to a degree program Program-level assessment investigates what the students are learning in their degree programs Program-level learning outcomes and assessment are reflected in the Strategic Plan

Program Purpose The first step in writing and assessing program-level learning outcomes is determining the purpose of the degree program It is important to engage faculty in this (and all subsequent) steps in the process

Program Purpose Questions to ask to help determine the course purpose include: What role does this program play in the department or college? What is unique or special about this academic area/degree program? What will the students “do” with their degrees?

Expected Learning Outcomes Once the program’s purpose has been established, specific learning outcomes can be developed A program-level expected learning outcome is a formal statement of what the program’s faculty expects students to learn in a particular degree program

Expected Learning Outcomes Expected learning outcomes define: What faculty expect students to know at the end of the degree program AND What faculty expect students to be able to do at the end of the degree program

Possible Example for a History Degree Program Recipients of degrees in this program will be able to: Identify and describe the significant people, events, ideas and developments in history

Program-level Assessment Once the learning outcomes for a degree have been established, a variety of methods are used to assess if the students’ learning matches those expected outcomes.

Assessing Expected Learning Outcomes Assessment of Expected Learning Outcomes can be defined as the process of investigating: 1.what students are learning and 2.how well they’re learning it.

Assessment Plans Departments should develop assessment plans that outline how and when they will be investigating how well both the current students and students who have graduated have learned/mastered the program-level learning outcomes

How to Assess Program- Level Learning Outcomes Methods to Assess Current Students’ Learning Capstone courses Review of senior projects Focus groups Students’ performance on comprehensive exams

How to Assess Program- level Learning Outcomes Methods to Assess Graduated Students’ Learning Graduate follow-up surveys Performance on licensure exams Job placement data Exit interview/surveys

Course-Level Learning Outcomes and Assessment The term “course-level” refers to outcomes and assessments methods related to courses that are offered at Texas Tech Course-level learning outcomes and assessment methods are reflected in the course syllabus

Course-Level Learning Outcomes and Assessment The Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center (TLTC) has developed some resources to assist faculty with creating expected learning outcomes statements and assessment methods

Questions and Discussion

What issues do you expect to encounter as you work to develop program assessment plans?

One question to anticipate: Who uses the program assessment reports? Two questions to answer the above: Who is responsible for the quality of the department’s academic programs? Who receives the reports when they are submitted?

This morning’s task: To examine selected drafts of assessment plans To develop program purpose statements To identify expected outcomes

TEAM (table) WORK Focus first on the purpose statement for the degree program Then develop statements of expected outcomes Work with others at your tables Reeve, McCourt, and Paton are facilitators (if needed)

Morning Session Wrap-up QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS LUNCH!

TEAM WORK CONTINUES Afternoon tasks: Assessment Audit Worksheet (brainstorming) Identifying methods of assessment for each learning outcome

Late afternoon wrap-up Strategies for developing assessment plans: Engage the faculty Begin with discussions at first faculty meetings of the year Use committees to draft materials and share with all faculty Use available resources (TLTC and Office of Strategic Planning – see websites) Create a timeline to meet the December 15 deadline

Late afternoon wrap-up Strategic Planning and Program Assessment Two related but different processes –SP – usually long term goals with benchmarks, objectives and strategies – addresses all aspects of department –PA – continuous (incremental) program improvement based on performance against expected outcomes Integration of the planning and reporting – one common reporting process and one cycle

Late afternoon wrap-up FUTURE WORKSHOPS September – Dr. Doug Eder, Director of Undergraduate Assessment and Program Review, SIU-E. November 11 – Assessment Workshop – Preparing for submission of Assessment Plans

THANK YOU!