Riparian Wetland Restoration Site Selection Using GIS Dave Cour SSC 570 December 2, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wetland Types, Functions, and DCM’s GIS Wetland Data
Advertisements

Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Project Implementation.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part C – Assessment.
Constructed Wetland to Remove Nitrate: Wetland Design Hydrology By: Cibin Raj.
Watershed Characterization System (WCS) and its Modeling Extensions
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment University of.
EEP Watershed Planning Overview August 12, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Nationally recognized, innovative, non-regulatory program formed in July.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
GIS Tools Workflow of GIS Tools to Determine Properties Suitable for Migratory Bird Foraging Sites.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
2012 West Virginia GIS Conference The Nature Conservancy of West Virginia Ruth Thornton Conservation Information Manager.
North Carolina Forest Service North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services NC Forestry BMP Effectiveness Monitoring Watershed Study Virginia.
The Firewise Virginia Program John Miller - Chief, Resource Protection Virginia Department of Forestry.
Use of GIS in Determination of the Probable Maximum Flood at Nuclear Plant Sites Presented by: Monica Anderson, GISP Tennessee Valley Authority Carrie.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
GIS2: Geo-processing and Metadata Treg Christopher.
An Introduction to the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer (NHDE) Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner NC Natural Heritage Program North Carolina.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Select High Quality Natural Communities MLCCS Slope & Aspect Restoration Prioritization and Prediction Model (RePP) SUMMARY: In 2008, Ecological Strategies.
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
L'Anguille River Riparian Modeling Biological and Agricultural Engineering 2010 Non-Point Source Project Review Meeting Cooperative Extension Service Dharmendra.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
____________________________ Raster GIS & Modeling ( )
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
Using ArcGIS ModelBuilder for Conservation & Ag Drainage Projects Janell Weiss Nutrient Mgmt. Specialist/Ag Technician Darke Soil & Water Conservation.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.
LOCATION OF THE DAM ON KOSI RIVER USING GIS TECHNIQUES By Anil Kumar Hemant Singh Himanshu kashyap.
A Traditional vs. Ecosystem Services Approach to Surface Water Management September 16, 2010 PRESENTED BY Carol Murdock, Clackamas County WES Mark Anderson,
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Evaluation of New Jersey Land Use Change in Relation to Spatial Proximity to Wetlands David Tulloch, Rick Lathrop, and Eric Yadlovski Center for Remote.
Delineation of Ground water Vulnerability to Agricultural Contaminants using Neuro-fuzzy Techniques Barnali Dixon 1, H. D. Scott 2, J. V. Brahana 2, A.
Mapping of soil moisture content by SWAT and GIS programming Yuri Kim Jessica Jahnke GEOG 593.
Flood Zones in Wake County Georgia Ditmore University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill December 1, 2014.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County
Vector Analysis Ming-Chun Lee.
Dan Child CEE 5440/6440 Utah State University Fall 2003
National Hydro Data Programs
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
Drinking Water Mapping Application:
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
NJ-GeoWeb Interactive Basics Workshop
Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County
Green Infrastructure Tools for Planning & Management
Indiana Mitigation Matching Web Applications
Presentation transcript:

Riparian Wetland Restoration Site Selection Using GIS Dave Cour SSC 570 December 2, 2003

overview Introduction Materials Identifying Suitable Restoration Areas Advanced Processes Conclusions

introduction Recognition of wetland values (flood abatement, improving water quality, supporting biodiversity, etc.) has stimulated interest in protecting these ecosystems from further losses. Choosing the site is important because the conditions needed to form wetlands are complex and failure to meet wetland conditions is common.

introduction To try and minimize the time and expense required for fieldwork, geographic information systems (GIS) can be used to select and prioritize candidate restoration sites. The case study used as an example is in the lower Neuse River watershed in eastern North Carolina.

materials Soils data: This dataset should contain the hydric status of the soils. An “A” indicates primary hydric classification by the NRCS while a “B” denotes secondary hydric status. CGIA: Soils, Detailed County Surveys - North Carolina Center for Geographic Information & Analysis. Var dates. Hydrography: Riparian areas require a nearby channel. CGIA: Hydrography (1:24,000) - North Carolina Center for Geographic Information & Analysis Hydrologic Units: We will need to delineate the watershed we are interested in. For maximum flexibility, this dataset should include watershed delineations at HUC-8, HUC-11 and HUC-14 levels. CGIA: Hydrologic Units: Subbasins - North Carolina Center for Geographic Information & Analysis Land use/ Landcover (LULC): Restoration projects take place on impacted landscapes. We will identify potential project areas by looking at how land is utilized within the watershed. EPA BASINS: Landuse/Landcover Spatial Data of CONUS - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

identifying restoration areas 1. Select Area – Determine the extent of your search.

identifying restoration areas 2. Clip layers to area– Make sure all layers are set to the same extent. Select the GeoProcessing Wizard from the Tools menu. Clip Function Your input layer is the soils, hydrography or LULC layer you want to clip and the clip layer is boundary of your study area from step 1.

identifying restoration areas 3. Create a buffer around hyrdrography

identifying restoration areas 4. Create a hydric soil layer and impacted land use layer

identifying restoration areas 5. Select LULC that Intersect Buffer

identifying restoration areas 6. Convert Shapefiles to Rasterfiles and Classify Layers

identifying restoration areas 7. Combine Layers

identifying restoration areas 8. Calculate Area and Convert to Acres

identifying restoration areas 9. Delete Areas Less than Ten Acres

advanced processes Simple Method provides a mechanism to differentiate between subcatchments using LULC data L = (R)(C)(2.72) or L = [(P)(Pj)(Rv)/12](C)(2.72)A

advanced processes Simple Method

advanced processes Simple Method

conclusions Site selection is a vital step in the early planning process. The process outlined above does not eliminate the need for field data collection. This method provides the means for completing the analyses quickly and succinctly. The major limiting factor affecting the results will be the resolution of the data.

References Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink Wetlands: Third Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New YorK, NY. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Neuse River Basin Basinwide Assessment Report. Raleigh, NC. Zedler, J. B Wetlands at your service: Reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment.

questions?