Geodetic Deformation, Seismicity and Fault Friction Ge277- 2007 Sensitivity of seismicity to stress perturbations, implications for earthquakes nucleation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Community Geodetic Model (CGM): What is it and how does it relate to studies of lithospheric rheology? Jessica Murray, David Sandwell, and Rowena Lohman.

Advertisements

An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.

GPS & Seismic Studies of Episodic Tremor & Slip on the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica Timothy H Dixon MARGINS Lecturer February/March 2009.

Static stress changes-- Coulomb. SPRINGBRICKWINCH Force Balance – Brick will not move until: Force on spring Force resisting motion (its length change.

GE177b- Objectives Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere and fault slip history. Introduce.

1992 M=7.3 Landers shock increases stress at Big Bear Los Angeles Big Bear Landers First 3 hr of Landers aftershocks plotted from Stein (2003)

Ge Stress in the crust Implications for fault mechanics and earthquake physics Motivation Basics of Rock Mechanics Observational constraints on.

Volcano Deformation Constraints on continued episodic inflation at Long Valley Caldera, based on seismic and geodetic observations (Feng et al.) The 1974.

GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 05 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 7 Nov: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Tharsis example Is the Tharsis province.

Earthquake swarms Ge 277, 2012 Thomas Ader. Outline Presentation of swarms Analysis of the 2000 swarm in Vogtland/NW Bohemia: Indications for a successively.

Active Folding within the L.A. Basin with a focus on: Argus et al. (2005), Interseismic strain accumulation and anthropogenic motion in metropolitan Los.

16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.

Appendix: On the use of the ‘Elastic Dislocations’

Yingdi LUO02/15/2012Ge169/277. Chang et al Chihshang Fault: 35km long Reverse fault mm/yr Chihshang Fault: 35km long Reverse fault mm/yr.

Evaluation of the Potential of Large Aftershocks of the M9 Tohoku, Earthquake Yo Fukushima, Manabu Hashimoto (DPRI, Kyoto Univ.) Shin’ichi Miyazaki (Grad.

Tidal triggering of earthquakes: Response to fault compliance? Elizabeth S. Cochran IGPP, Scripps.

Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Deformation Through the Seismic Cycle Jeff Freymueller University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Stress, Strain, Elasticity and Faulting Lecture 11/23/2009 GE694 Earth Systems Seminar.

Remote Seismicity following Landers Earthquake Steve Kidder.

Omori law Students present their assignments The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.

Observing an Earthquake Cycle Within a Decade

Geodetic monitoring of subduction zones Some idea of the kinematics of the subduction interface can be inferred from surface deformation measured from.

TOPIC 2: How does the challenge of predicting hazards differ between earthquakes - at plate boundaries -In plate boundary zones -within plates?

Static stress changes-- Coulomb. Key concepts: Source faults Receiver faults Optimally oriented faults Assume receiver faults are close to failure Triggering.

Ge 277- ‘From rock mechanics to seismotectonics’ Objective of seminar Review major results form rock mechanics laboratory experiments and discuss how these.

Aftershocks tend to fall preferentially in area of static Coulomb stress increase but there are also earthquakes in area of decrease Coulomb stress Aftershocks.

Omori law The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.

The Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors 18 Sep. 2013, C. Marone, Geosc500 Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Stick-slip dynamics and Instability. Introduction.

 ss=  * +(a-b) ln(V/V * ) a-b > 0 stable sliding a-b < 0 slip is potentially unstable Correspond to T~300 °C For Quartzo- Feldspathic rocks Stationary.

I. Introduction II. Methods in Morphotectonics III. Methods in Geodesy an Remote sensing IV. Relating strain, surface displacement and stress, based on.

IV. The seismic cycle IV. 1 Conceptual and kinematic models IV.2 Comparison with observations IV.3 Interseismic strain IV.4 Postseismic deformation IV.5.

The use of earthquake rate changes as a stress meter at Kilauea volcano Nature, V. 408, 2000 By J. Dietrich, V. Cayol, and P. Okubo Presented by Celia.

The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.

IV. The seismic cycle Taiwan Lab.

Intraplate Seismicity Finite element modeling. Introduction Spatial patterns (Fig. 1) –Randomly scattered (Australia) –Isolated “seismic zones” (CEUS)

Interseismic deformation with aseismic stress-dependent fault slip Eric A Hetland, Mark Simons, Ravi Kanda, Sue Owen TO brown-bag – 03 April 2007 a very.

NE Caribbean and Hispaniola = major plate boundary, 2 cm/yr relative motion Strike-slip + convergence partitioned between 3 major fault systems Apparent.

March 2006 WGCEP Workshop Ruth A. Harris U.S. Geological Survey.

Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Norman H. Sleep & Michael L. Blanpied Ge 277 – February 19, 2010.

Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence Jim Dieterich, UC Riverside.

Coulomb Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes

Using GPS and InSAR to study tectonics, deformation, and earthquakes GPS displacements, velocities (and transients) InSAR displacements.

GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 15 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Oct: T&S Last Time: RHEOLOGY Dislocation creep is sensitive to: Temperature.

Yuehua Zeng & Wayne Thatcher U. S. Geological Survey

The Mw 7.6, Kashmir Earthquake of October 8, 2005.

What can we learn about dynamic triggering in the the lab? Lockner and Beeler, 1999.

Simulating big earthquakes Accessing the inaccessible with models.

Earthquake Statistics Gutenberg-Richter relation

A Post-Loma Prieta Progress Report on Earthquake Triggering by a Continuum of Deformations Presented By Joan Gomberg.

California Institute of Technology

Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class- Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere.

EART 118 Seismotectonics MWF D250 9:30-10:40 am; Th D250 2:00-4:00 pm Prof.: Thorne Lay, C382 E&MS, Office Hours 11:00-12:00 MWF TA: Lingling Ye, Office.

Conceptual model on how to relate geological structures to co-seismic deformation King et al., JGR 1988 and Stein et al., JGR 1988 Seminar 1, October,

‘At present there is no possibility of earthquake prediction in the popular sense; that is no one can justifiably say that an earthquake of consequence.

The Time-Predictable Recurrence Model The original models (Shimazaki & Nakata 1980) Complications and pitfalls (Thatcher 1984) Modern examples Relevance.

Investigating earthquakes nucleation from the resposne of Himalayan seismicity to the Monsoon Thomas ADER, Kristel Chanard Nadia LAPUSTA, and Jean-Philippe.

Southern California Earthquake Center The Community Geodetic Model (CGM) Jessica Murray, U.S. Geological Survey (SCEC4) Rowena Lohman, Cornell University.

From Subduction to Collision : Taiwan from Angelier.

Mechanical behavior and the degree of localization in large displacement faulting experiments N. M. Beeler and T. E. Tullis, Brown University, Providence,

GeoFEM Kinematic Earthquake Cycle Modeling in the Japanese Islands Hirahara, K. (1), H. Suito (1), M. Hyodo (1) M. Iizuka (2) and H. Okuda (3) (1) Nagoya.

Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich

A possible mechanism of dynamic earthquake triggering

Rock mechanics view of a seismogenic fault zone

Ge 277- ‘From rock mechanics to seismotectonics’

Samik Sil (1) and Jeffrey T. Freymueller(2)

Viscoelastic-coupling model for the earthquake cycle driven from below

學生：林承恩(Cheng-en Lin) 指導老師：陳卉瑄(Kate Huihsuan Chen)

Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class-

On the relation between Geodetic strain, Seismicity and fault frictional properties Nepal Sumatra Taiwan.

SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008

Presentation transcript:

Geodetic Deformation, Seismicity and Fault Friction Ge Sensitivity of seismicity to stress perturbations, implications for earthquakes nucleation

Key Observation : Seismicity rate and Geodetic strain rate are generally proportional, and both decays as t -1 following an earthquake Aftershocks and postseismic relaxation following the : –Mw7.6, Chichi earthquake (1999) –Mw 7.2 Landers Earthquake (1992) –Mw 8.1, Peru earthquake (2001) –Mw 8.7, Nias earthquake (2005) Background seismicity in the Nepal Himalaya

(Svarc and Savage, 1997) CPA analysis show that all GPS stations follow about the same time evolution f(t) Postseismic Displacements following the Mw Landers Earthquake

Comparing aftershocks and afterslip following Landers EQ

(Perfettini and Avouac, 2004a) Seismicity and Postseismic displacements follow the same relaxation curve consistent with the Omori Law.

Velocities relative to India (Bettinelli et al, 2006) Geodetic deformation across the Nepal Himalaya

Creeping Zone  17-18mm/yr Locked Fault Zone, width  110km

Seismicity and Coulomb stress change due to interseismic stress accumulation (Bollinger et al, JGR, 2004) Seismicity coincides with the area where Coulomb stress increases by 4-6 kpa/a

Conceptual Model

Seismicity and Coulomb stress change due to interseismic stress accumulation (Bollinger et al, JGR, 2004) Seismicity coincides with the area where Coulomb stress increases by 4-6 kpa/a

Winter seismicity rate is twice as large as summer seismicity rate

Detrend GPS time-series Seasonal variation of Horizontal Displacements

Water level in Ganges Basin determined from TOPEX-POSEIDON and GRACE GUMBA-SIMRA

TOPEX-POSEIDON GRACE

Displacements induced by surface water level variations in the Ganges basin Summer Winter

Finite Element Modeling

Seasonal variations of seismicity and water level in the Ganges Basin

Compression Extension

Strain induced by surface water level variations in the Ganges basin Summer: Extension Winter: Compression

Seasonal Coulomb stress variations Coulomb stress variations are estimated to about 500 pa (<earth tides, 2-3kPa for T=12h and 14 days)

Coulomb stress rate Seasonal variations of geodetic displacements reflect deformation due to water level variations in the Ganges basin Interseismic Coulomb stress increase by 4-5 kPa/yr is modulated by seasonal variations of 500pa (corresponding to stress rate variation of 2-3kPa/yr) modulating the seismicity rate by a factor of 2. Seasonal variation of Coulomb stress rate 6 kPa/yr 8 kPa/yr With secular term added 10 kPa/yr

In these examples: –Seismicity rate and stress rate are approximately proportional –The characteristic time associated with the stress variations is of the order of 1 yr.

Standard Coulomb failure - seismicity rate obeys : - so, for periodic loading : Assuming,

(Lockner and Beeler, 1999; Heki, 2003)

Standard Coulomb failure For periodic loading : Seismicity rate should be much more sensitive to earth tides. This is not observed, probably because rupture is a time- dependent process, as suggested by rock mechanics experiments.