Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015 Agenda Item #9.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Months of the year December January November October February
Advertisements

2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Kristy Morris PhD, Senior Scientist Council for Watershed Health Regional Watershed Monitoring Programs Examples of Community Involvement.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OCTOBER 8-9, 2013 Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.
Global Vibration Plastic Welder Industry Research Report 2015 Published By QYResearch Contact US: Web:
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
In a 16 mile corridor along I-82, from Granger to Grandview, 76 dairy facilities ranging from 2000 to head, began their operation.
COMPLIANCE & AWARDS MATRIX Robin Fenton, SCTE, Director of Chapter Support.
BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS IN BULL CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS Patrick Sejkora.
November 8, 2012 HIV PREVENTION PLANNING COUNCIL 2013 SCOPE OF WORK.
© 2003 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 MSHA FY 2008 Budget Review and Ongoing Activities.
Mississippi State Department of Health
Pollution Control Standards 1) Proposed 2012 PCS Revisions 2) Draft Variance Process 3) Consideration of PPG Variance Request 4) Potential Future Variance.
Why Water? Water is fundamental to life. It flows throughout our State, our community, and within each of us. IntroductionActionAwarenessAdvocacyPrograms.
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Drinking Water Program Anita Wolovick MassDEP, Environmental Analyst 2011 Spring Training Information.
Chapter 3.1 Measures of Central Tendency. Average  The word average is ambiguous, since several different methods can be used to obtain an average. 
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
2015 Environmental Trade Fair and Conference Jill Csekitz Technical Specialist TCEQ Monitoring & Assessment Section Devils River State Natural Area Image.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
InForEur exchange rate Joint Technical Secretariat Audit Seminar.
2013 Monitoring Activities: Summer Water Quality Conditions Technical Committee Meeting October 8-9, 2013 Agenda Item # 6.
OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, UPSTATE FRESHWATER INSTITUTE.
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
OHIO RIVER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT Program Overview.
2015 Monitoring Activities: Summer Water Quality Conditions Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015 Agenda Item #5.
TOTAL COLIFORM MONITORING 40 CFR TRANSIENT NON-COMMUNITY PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS.
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
Results and Discussion The above graph depicts FC colony plate averages for each sample site. Samples are ordered from upstream to downstream as indicated.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Adem.alabama.gov Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) AWWA Alabama-Mississippi Section ADEM Regulation Update February 26, 2014 George Cox (334)
WHAT’S COMING DOWNSTREAM? WATER QUALITY SHORT COURSE - APRIL 12, 2007 Elizabeth Grove Clarence Cannon Wholesale Water Commission.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
1 Cleaner or Smarter? Strategic Compliance with Federal Drinking Water Regulations Katrina Jessoe, Lori Bennear and Sheila Olmstead Camp Resources August.
Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) Community Systems Rychel McKenzie Jason Pushard December 2015.
30-Day Running Geometric Means for the Dana Point Harbor Stations for The following graphs provide the 30-day running geometric means for the.
218A Area and Division Governor Training Becoming Distinguished.
Rose Hill #2. Nitrate Concentrations Consumer Confidence Report Microbiological Contaminants Total Coliform BacteriaN1N/A0Presence of coliform bacteria.
Connecticut River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Update.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
OHIO EPA UPDATE ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Harmful Algal Blooms 1 Agenda Items 7a: Revision of HABs Response and Communications Plan 7b: HABs Stressor Response Data Assessment Strategy.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Total Coliform Rule (Old)vs. Revised Total Coliform Rule (New)
Level 2 Assessment. Abbreviations to Know RTCR – Revised Total Coliform Rule TCR – Total Coliform Rule TC – Total Coliform EC – E. Coli PN – Public Notice.
305B REPORT Biennial Assessment of Ohio River Water Quality Conditions.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Volunteer/State Partnerships Inspire Grassroots Action Cheryl Snyder Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
March 26, Monitoring Results Annual and Quarterly Review April 2012 – January 2013 MUN POTW Sacramento Valley Archetype Westside: Willows, Colusa.
Water Quality Analysis of The Lower Colorado River Paula Kulis CE 394K.1.
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Total Coliform Rule (TCR)
LTCPs and Water Quality Standards
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Community Consultative Committee November 2016
Agenda Project Overview
Which is best value for money?
Trade Fair 2017 Mia Gonzales and Jason Williams
Grading Guidelines - Gradebook
Water Quality Vocabulary October 11, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015 Agenda Item #9

On April 19, 1994 the CSO Policy was published and for decades Municipalities along the Ohio River have been trying to meet the Nine Minimum Controls and develop Long Term Control Plans. Municipalities have spent millions of dollars to achieve compliance with the Clean Water Act and meet Water Quality Standards. ORSANCO plans to use the historical bacteria data to look for possible trends at the six major CSO communities along the Ohio River where contact recreation sampling has taken place.

During there was a single site sampled May thru October at six major CSO communities along the Ohio River. All of the sites except for Pittsburgh had a sampling frequency of five samples a month to produce a Geometric Mean. In 2000, sites were added to include an upstream, downtown, and downstream sample in each CSO community. Pittsburgh also began a sampling frequency of five samples a month. In 2009, one site was dropped at each of the CSO communities and Colilert sampling began in Cincinnati. In 2013 the month of April was added to the sampling plan.

SiteFecalE.coli 1.4L M R

SiteYears of Data with FecalYears of Data with E.coli 1.4L99 1.4M14 1.4R

Contact Recreation Sites

Evaluate the temporal traits in the six CSO communities Compare the upstream sites to the downstream sites Look at previous fecal coliform trends assessment done in 1983 and compare with current assessment Use flow/precipitation to show possible seasonal trends

n=496 52% above 400 % Violation of WQS WQS 52% 38% 23% 36% 24% n=496 n=709 n=708 n=74 2 n=705 n=51 9