Philosophy of Mind materialism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2, Lecture 3 Dualism: mental events, substance vs. property dualism, four arguments.
Advertisements

Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body 1 Empiricism Empiricism claims that the only source of knowledge about the external world is sense experience.
John Coleman DACE LWP How to reach Functionalism in 4 choices (and 639 words) Pack your baggage – mine includes Pack your baggage – mine includes.
© Michael Lacewing Behaviourism and the problem of other minds Michael Lacewing
Summer 2011 Tuesday, 07/05. Dualism The view that the mind is separate from the physical/material world. Tells us what the mind is not, but is silent.
Section 2.4 There Ain’t No Such Things as Ghosts Mind as Myth.
Religious Views on Life after Death Philosophy of Religion Perspective
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 7: Eliminative Materialism and Review.
The Mind-Body Relation Dualism: human beings are composed of a material body and an immaterial mind which are distinct from each other (Descartes) Problems:
20 th Century Views on Mind and Body Logical Behaviorism (Gilbert Ryle): “mind” refers simply to a way of speaking about behaviors ( ) Mind-Brain.
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Physicalism The physicalist answer to the question of the relation between the mental and the physical: The mental.
The metaphysics of mind: an overview Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Body Debate. Mind-Brain Debate What is the relationship between mind and brain?
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
Logical behaviourism: objections
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Mental causation Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Logical behaviourism Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Life and Death Philosophical Perspectives. Two problems To discuss whether life after death is possible we need to understand two related philosophical.
Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader.
Paper 1 A Answer all three SAQs One hour App words Paper 1B Choose one of the three essays One hour App words.
Homework: ‘A loving God would not send people to Hell.’ AgreeDisagree.
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
This week’s aims: To set clear expectations regarding homework, organisation, etc. To re-introduce the debate concerning the mind-body problem To analyse.
Human Nature 2.3 The Mind-Body Problem: How Do Mind and Body Relate?
Learning objective: To be able to explain the claim that the mind is ontologically distinct from the body; To understand Descartes’ conceivability argument.
Philosophy of Mind - Mind/Body Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 4: Objections to Behaviorism The Identity Theory.
Learning objective: To understand the threat of solipsism for substance dualists; To evaluate whether substance dualism can solve the ‘problem of other.
This week’s aims To explain and analyse Bultmann’s approach to religious language To review the religious language unit To practise planning and writing.
Behaviourism Methodological Behaviourism In the early 20th C psychology used ‘introspection’ to study the mind. In the early 20th C psychology used ‘introspection’
Learning objective: To understand what is meant by epiphenomenalism and issues with it. epiphenomenalist dualism Causal redundancy.
PHL 203 Theories of Reality Lecture for January 11 & 13, 2011 Prof. Borrowdale.
Philosophy of Mind Panpsychism: All is mind/conscousness.
Property dualism Key Words Learning objective:
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 13 Minds and Bodies #2 (Physicalism) By David Kelsey.
Descartes’ divisibility argument
Learning objective: To understand what Ryle thinks is a ‘category mistake’ To understand how he defends logical behaviourism.
DUALISM: CAUSAL INTERACTIONISM Philosophy of Mind.
Blindsight, Zombies & Consciousness Jim Fahey Department of Cognitive Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 10/4/2007.
The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
This week’s aims To practise planning and writing answers to past questions To set out written work in a clear, integrated, logical form To explain and.
This week’s aims: To set two SMART targets based on formal assessment feedback and progress so far To understand basic ideas concerning each key theory.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Criticisms of Flew Possible responses Hare – religious statements are unfalsifiable and non-cognitive but still play a useful role in life (parable of.
This week’s aims To explain and evaluate Dawkins’ views on life after death To discuss whether belief in life after death helps to solve the problem of.
Blindsight, Zombies & Consciousness Jim Fahey Department of Cognitive Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 10/8/2009.
Topic 2: Mind-brain type identity theory
Ryle’s philosophical behaviourism
Philosophical behaviourism and consciousness
What is eliminative materialism?
The zombie argument: responses
What is the relationship between body and soul.
Body and Soul Key Words! In your group, write as many key words and definitions on this topic as possible!
What does it mean to say mental states are reducible
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
What does this mean? The SOS distress call literally means ‘save our souls’. When someone makes such a call, they are not asking for some invisible ghost-like.
PHL 203 Theories of Reality
What did I google to find this picture?
Analytically or Ontologically Reducible?
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
Connection between body + mind
What keywords have we used so far
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
What is good / bad about this answer?
Recap: What is multiple realisability? Why is it an issue for MBTIT?
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy of Mind materialism

This week’s aims To explain and evaluate Ryle’s behaviourism To introduce mind-brain type identity theory To develop evaluative skills

Ryle, The Concept of the Mind Introduction Ryle argues that: Dualism suggests that we can only know about mental states through introspection But this would make it impossible for us to use mental concepts at all Why? Let’s look on p.39

Ryle, The Concept of the Mind Why do you think Ryle calls substance dualism ‘the dogma of the ghost in the machine’? What does Ryle mean by a category mistake? Is he right that dualism rests on a category mistake?

Criticisms of behaviourism Can we really explain mental states in terms of behaviour alone? E.g. Belief it is raining = behaviour of looking for an umbrella What other mental states might be involved? Desire Fear Belief

Criticisms of behaviourism – p.40-42 Group 1: Dualist arguments Group 2: The difficulty of defining mental states accurately Group 3: The conceivability of mental states without associated behaviour Group 4: The asymmetry between self-knowledge and knowledge of other people’s mental states What is the criticism? How convincing is it?

Practice questions What is analytic behaviourism? (3) Briefly explain logical behaviourism (5) Briefly outline Ryle’s argument that dualism rests on a ‘category mistake’ (5) Briefly explain Putnam’s argument concerning super-Spartans (5) Outline and explain two criticisms of behaviourism (12)

Evaluation questions Can mental states be reduced to behavioural states? Does the multiple realisability of mental states show that materialist theories are inadequate? Relevant information / ideas from philosophers? What is their argument? Counter-arguments? What is your answer?

Mind-brain type identity theory – p.44 Mind–brain type identity theory: all mental states are identical to brain states (‘ontological’ reduction) although ‘mental state’ and ‘brain state’ are not synonymous (so not an ‘analytic’ reduction) This theory argues that mental states and processes are just neurological states and processes – that is, they are states and processes in the central nervous system. So according to this theory, the mind is identical to the brain.

Booklets, p.44 The idea is that any given mental state – e.g. your thought about your grandmother, the sensation of pain in your lower back, your memory of your last trip to London – is the exact same thing as the firing of such-and-such a clump of neurons in your brain. It is saying that your thought is such-and-such neurons firing. There is nothing more to the thought than that. If you were able to peer inside someone’s skull and somehow see the neurons firing, you would literally be looking at their thoughts

Booklets, p.44 Mind-brain identity theory claims that folk psychology can be reduced to neuroscience What does this mean?

Types and tokens ‘The cat is on the mat.’ How many words are in that sentence? The answer depends on whether you count the word ‘the’ once or twice. If we count ‘the’ as just one word we are counting it by type. If we count it twice we are counting it as tokens.

Types and tokens – p.45 The identity theory was originally intended as a ‘type-identity’ theory: it claimed that for each type of mental state (e.g. the belief that it is raining, the desire for a cookie, etc.) there could be matched, one-to-one, a specific type of brain state (e.g. neuronal firing pattern of type A, neuronal firing pattern of type B, etc.) Does this seem right to you?

Criticisms of identity theory – p.47-48 Group 1: Dualist arguments Group 2: The difficulty with providing the type identities (the multiple realisability of mental states) Group 3: The location problem: brain states have precise spatial locations which thoughts lack What is the criticism? How convincing is it?

Homework Log into Moodle and click on A2 Advanced Philosophy – Homework and Assignments Look at the eighth block that says 8: Mind–brain type identity theory Look at / read at least three links. At least one of them must be an article or website rather than just a YouTube link. Feel free to look at more links than this if you like.