An XMM-Newton View of the Luminous X-ray Source Population of M101 Leigh Jenkins Tim Roberts, Robert Warwick, Roy Kilgard*, Martin Ward University of Leicester, UK *Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, USA XMM-Newton EPIC Consortium Meeting, Palermo. October 14 th -16 th 2003.
Discrete Source Populations in Spirals X-ray Binaries – Black hole/neutron star + stellar companionX-ray Binaries – Black hole/neutron star + stellar companion –High State: dominated by thermal accretion disc emission –Low State: dominated by powerlaw emission (comptonization of accretion disc corona) Supernova RemnantsSupernova Remnants –Thermal emission from collisionally ionized gas Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs) Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs) –L X ≥ erg/s i.e. super-Eddington for a 1.4 solar mass neutron star True super-Eddington emission True super-Eddington emission Anisotropic (beamed) emission Anisotropic (beamed) emission Intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs) (L X ≥ 5x10 39 erg/s) Intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs) (L X ≥ 5x10 39 erg/s) –Link with star formation High Mass X-ray Binaries (HMXBs)?
M101 Grand design supergiant spiralGrand design supergiant spiral Nearby (D~7 Mpc)Nearby (D~7 Mpc) Face onFace on low foreground N Hlow foreground N H Ideal laboratory for studies of galactic X-ray emission Ideal laboratory for studies of galactic X-ray emission
EPIC 3-Colour Image X-ray Data 43 ks observation43 ks observation Encompasses entire D 25 ellipseEncompasses entire D 25 ellipse (23.8 arcmin) ~100 sources in field~100 sources in field Red = keV Green= keV Blue = keV
Source Selection Sufficient counts for spectral fitting (> 300 counts in the PN data)Sufficient counts for spectral fitting (> 300 counts in the PN data) 14 suitable sources (excluding 2 bright stars in field) 14 suitable sources (excluding 2 bright stars in field) − Intrinsic X-ray luminosities 3x10 38 – 3x10 39 erg/s i.e. ≥ Eddington limit for accretion onto a 1.4 neutron star Investigate their nature by studying their:Investigate their nature by studying their: –Locations –Spectral shapes –Timing properties variability accretion Amongst the first detailed spectroscopic studies of a large number of compact sources in a single spiral galaxy with XMM- NewtonAmongst the first detailed spectroscopic studies of a large number of compact sources in a single spiral galaxy with XMM- Newton
Source Locations Sources spread over galaxy Positions correlate with: Nucleus HII regions (star formation) Spiral arm structure Indicates that all sources are likely to be associated with M101 XMM EPIC DSS Optical
Source Locations Sources spread over galaxy Positions correlate with: Nucleus HII regions (star formation) Spiral arm structure Indicates that all sources are likely to be associated with M101
Spectra - Quality XMM-1 XMM-14 Brightest – 3800 counts Faintest – 300 counts
Spectral Models Absorbed single and two-component:Absorbed single and two-component: –Powerlaw Non-thermal emission from accreting objects Non-thermal emission from accreting objects –Multicolour Disc Blackbody Thermal emission from accretion disc in a high/soft state Thermal emission from accretion disc in a high/soft state –Blackbody Outflowing material – Black hole wind model Outflowing material – Black hole wind model –MEKAL Thermal emission from collisionally ionized gas (e.g. stellar winds, supernovae) Thermal emission from collisionally ionized gas (e.g. stellar winds, supernovae)
Spectral Fits – Single-component 9 sources with single- component fits:9 sources with single- component fits: 4 Disc Blackbody (T in = keV) 1 Supersoft ( T in =0.16 keV) 3 Disc Blackbody or Powerlaw 1 Powerlaw (nucleus) Г = 2.2 Consistent with all sources except nucleus being X-ray binaries in the high-soft state Nucleus Г ~ 2.2 XMM-1 T in = 1.3 keV
Spectral Fits – Two-component 5 sources require two- component fits: 5 sources require two- component fits: – Hard powerlaw (Γ = 1.5 – 2 ) + soft excess Cool Disc Blackbody (~ keV) Cool Disc Blackbody (~ keV) IMBH (T in α M -1/4 ) Cool Blackbody (~ keV) Cool Blackbody (~ keV) Ouflowing material (black hole wind) MEKAL thermal plasma MEKAL thermal plasma Hot (~1 keV) photoionized plasma surrounding high-mass star Cool (~0.2 keV) thermal emission related to star formation activity Underlying continuum of 3 sources can also be modelled by a keV disc blackbody Underlying continuum of 3 sources can also be modelled by a keV disc blackbody XMM-2 PL + DISKBB XMM-5 PL + MEKAL
Source Hardness vs. Luminosity No distinction between sources above and below ULX thresholdNo distinction between sources above and below ULX threshold Implies same source population Power law ● DISKBB Supersoft PL+MEKAL PL+DISKBB/BBODY
Source Variability - Methods Short-term variabilityShort-term variability –Chi-squared test Large-amplitude variability –K-S test Gradual small-amplitude variations Long-term variabilityLong-term variability –Archival data spanning ~11-23 years Einstein, ROSAT, Chandra, XMM Einstein, ROSAT, Chandra, XMM –Observed fluxes normalized to the keV band
Lightcurves – Example (XMM-2) Short-termShort-term –P var > 99.9% over duration of XMM observation Long-termLong-term –Increase by factor of ~30 in XMM observation
Variability - Results Short-termShort-term –11 of 14 sources show some short-term variability ( > 95% level) Long-termLong-term –Majority vary between factor of 2-4 –Transient varies by factor of ~30 –No grouping of sources with certain spectral types Power law ● DISKBB Supersoft PL+MEKAL PL+DISKBB/BBODY
Spectral Changes Compare source hardness in XMM observation to Chandra data for 9 sources (~2 years earlier)Compare source hardness in XMM observation to Chandra data for 9 sources (~2 years earlier) General trend is softening with increasing luminosity – same as behaviour of many Galactic XRBs e.g. Cyg X-1General trend is softening with increasing luminosity – same as behaviour of many Galactic XRBs e.g. Cyg X-1
What does this mean? Spectral shapes/variability/locations/spectral behaviour consistent with all sources (except nucleus) being accreting BH X-ray binary systemsSpectral shapes/variability/locations/spectral behaviour consistent with all sources (except nucleus) being accreting BH X-ray binary systems Intrinsic X-ray luminosities imply black hole masses of ~2-23 M (i.e. stellar-mass) if Eddington limitedIntrinsic X-ray luminosities imply black hole masses of ~2-23 M (i.e. stellar-mass) if Eddington limited Likely to be looking at the high-luminosity end ofLikely to be looking at the high-luminosity end of X-ray binary source population – no requirement for IMBHs −Supported by fact that cumulative X-ray luminosity functions of compact sources in star-forming galaxies extend to ULX luminosities – no break at erg/s