Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University Super Star Clusters Starburst galaxies Ultra-Luminous X-Ray Sources Elliptical.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University Super Star Clusters Starburst galaxies Ultra-Luminous X-Ray Sources Elliptical."— Presentation transcript:

1 X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University Super Star Clusters Starburst galaxies Ultra-Luminous X-Ray Sources Elliptical galaxies

2 Chandra observations of XRBs - some of the puzzles - How does XRB formation and evolution depend on star-formation history and metallicity ? Do Super Star Clusters form High-Mass XRBs ? What determines the shape of X-Ray Luminosity Functions (XLF) ? Is it due to a blend of different XRB populations ? What is the nature of Ultra-Luminous X-ray Sources (ULX) ?

3 Super-Star Clusters (SSCs) Compact, young analog to globular clusters Found frequently in starburst environments Masses range from ~10 4 to ~10 6 M o Ages range from a few to tens of Myr

4 Kaaret et al. 2004 L x ≥ (0.5-3)x10 36 erg/s Distribution of X-Ray point sources < 1 XRB per cluster!

5 Kaaret et al. 2004 L x ≥ 5x10 35 erg/s Distribution of X-Ray point sources XRBs closely associated with star clusters Median distance ~30-100 pc < 1 XRB per cluster! M82 N5253 N1569 50% Is this all due to Supernova Kicks ?

6 Theoretical XRB Distributions cluster mass: ~5x10 4 M o L X > 5x10 35 erg/s average of 1,000 cluster simulations Significant age dependence < 1 XRB per cluster Models: Population Syntheses of XRBs and Kinematic Orbit Evolution in Cluster Potential Sepinsky et al. 2005, ApJL

7 Conclusions XRB models without cluster dynamics appear in agreement with observations Mean XRB number per SSC < 1 and spatial distribution: M < 10 5 M o and 10-50Myr or more massive and ~50Myr Results do not appear sensitive to binary evolution assumptions, but extended parameter study is needed. Explore role of dynamics for more massive and older clusters Supernova kicks: eject XRBs @ D > 10pc especially for M < 10 5 M o

8 NGC 1569 (post-)starburst galaxy at 2.2Mpc with well-constrained SF history: > ~100Myr-long episode, probably ended 5-10Myr ago, Z ~ 0.25 Z o > older population with continuous SF for ~ 1.5Gyr, Z ~ 0.004 or 0.0004, but weaker in SFR than recent episode by factors of >10 Vallenari & Bomans 1996; Greggio et al. 1998; Aloisi et al. 2001; Martin et al. 2002 courtesy Schirmer, HST courtesy Martin, CXC,NOAO

9 Belczynski, VK et al. 2004, ApJL NGC 1569 XLF modeling Hybrid of 2 populations:  underlying old  starburst young Old: 1.5 Gyr Young: 110 Myr SFR Y/O: 20 Old: 1.5 Gyr Young: 70 Myr SFR Y/O: 20 Old: 1.3 Gyr Young: 70 Myr SFR Y/O: 40

10 Conclusions on Starbursts Current understanding of XRB formation and evolution produces XLF properties consistent with observations Model XLFs can be used to constrain star-formation properties, e.g., age and metallicity Shape of model XLFs appear robust against variations of most binary evolution parameters

11 Ultra-Luminous X-ray Sources  First discovered with Einstein X-ray telescope  Extragalactic sources with L X ≥ 10 39 erg/s  Later observations determined many are off- nuclear & not associated with supernovae  What is the origin of these sources?  Intermediate-Mass Black Holes? (50 - 1000M o )  Strongly Anisotropic XRB emission ?

12 IMBH Binaries ? Cluster core simulations with binary evolution and multi-body dynamical interactions Do IMBH acquire mass-transfering binary companions in cluster cores ? Blecha, Ivanova, VK et al. 2005

13 IMBH Companions Mass distribution Orbital separation distribution

14

15 Conclusions on IMBH Binaries Optimal IMBH mass range: 100-200 M o MT is relatively rare; highest incidence at 100M o about 3-5% of cluster lifetime with MT IMBH binary MS mass-transferring companions are more common & spend more time in MT BUT ARE THEY ULXs? Blecha, Ivanova, VK et al. 2005

16 Brightest XRBs in Elliptical Galaxies Upper-end XLF slope (L X : from ~0.5 - 2 10 39 erg/s) : footprint of accreting BH mass spectrum modified by probability of XRB detection due to transient mode of accretion Ivanova & VK 2005, ApJ

17

18 What to Expect in the Future ? For example: * Long-term time monitoring will become possible; identification of X-ray transients and clues to ULX nature * Bigger source samples will allow probing the rare brightest sources and questions of BH formation * Systematic modeling of galaxy samples will reveal sensitivity to SFR and Z …


Download ppt "X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University Super Star Clusters Starburst galaxies Ultra-Luminous X-Ray Sources Elliptical."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google