13/03/07Week 21 CENG334 Introduction to Operating Systems Erol Sahin Dept of Computer Eng. Middle East Technical University Ankara, TURKEY URL:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Advertisements

Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks (Continuation). 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7 th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
7.1 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts with Java – 8 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition, Lecture 12: Deadlocks (Chapter 7)
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013 Operating System Concepts – 9 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Lecture 7: Deadlocks, Deadlock Risk Management. Lecture 7 / Page 2AE4B33OSS Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Contents The Concept of Deadlock Resource-Allocation.
Deadlocks CS 3100 Deadlocks1. The Deadlock Problem A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held by another.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne  Operating System Concepts Chapter 8: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks.
1 Chapter 7: Deadlock. 2 The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadlock Prevention Deadlock Avoidance.
Chapter 8: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization
02/19/2008CSCI 315 Operating Systems Design1 Deadlock Notice: The slides for this lecture have been largely based on those accompanying the textbook Operating.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7 th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition, Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition, Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Deadlocks Gordon College Stephen Brinton. Deadlock Overview The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks.
Operating System Concepts with Java – 7 th Edition, Nov 15, 2006 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2007 Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
1 School of Computing Science Simon Fraser University CMPT 300: Operating Systems I Ch 7: Deadlock Dr. Mohamed Hefeeda.
What we will cover…  The Deadlock Problem  System Model  Deadlock Characterization  Methods for Handling Deadlocks  Deadlock Prevention  Deadlock.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7 th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Objectives Understand the Deadlock.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition Deadlocks.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne  Operating System Concepts Chapter 8: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks Adapted to COP4610 by Robert van Engelen.
System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadlock Prevention, Avoidance, and Detection Recovering from Deadlock Combined Approach.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013 Operating System Concepts – 9 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Chapter 7 Deadlocks. 7.2 Modified By Dr. Khaled Wassif Operating System Concepts – 7 th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Cosc 4740 Chapter 6, Part 4 Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held by another process.
Computer Architecture and Operating Systems CS 3230: Operating System Section Lecture OS-6 Deadlocks Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 AE4B33OSS Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock Characterization.
CHAPTER 8: DEADLOCKS System Model Deadlock Characterization
 The Deadlock Problem  System Model  Deadlock Characterization  Methods for Handling Deadlocks  Deadlock Prevention  Deadlock Avoidance  Deadlock.
Dr. Kalpakis CMSC 421, Operating Systems Deadlocks.
Operating System Concepts 7th Edition Abraham SilBerschatz Peter Baer Galvin Greg Gagne Prerequisite: CSE212.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 7: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods.
Lecture 12 Handling Deadlock – Prevention, avoidance and detection.
Mi-Jung Choi Dept. of Computer and Science Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2006 Operating System Principles Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition, Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Technology Education Lecture 7 Operating Systems.
Operating Systems Unit VI Deadlocks and Protection Department of Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology.
Chapter 8 Deadlocks. Objective System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadlock Prevention Deadlock Avoidance Deadlock Detection.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2CSCI 380 – Operating Systems Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling.
7.1 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock Characterization.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock.
CS307 Operating Systems Deadlocks Fan Wu Department of Computer Science and Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Spring 2012.
國立台灣大學 資訊工程學系 Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 資工系網媒所 NEWS 實驗室 Chapter Objectives To develop a description of deadlocks, which prevent sets of concurrent processes.
Chap 7 Deadlocks. Chapter Objectives To develop a description of deadlocks, which prevent sets of concurrent processes from completing their tasks To.
1 CS.217 Operating System By Ajarn..Sutapart Sappajak,METC,MSIT Chapter 6 Deadlocks Slide 1 Chapter 6 Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne  Operating System Concepts Chapter 8: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks.
Deadlocks Introduction to Operating Systems: Module 7.
7.1 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts with Java – 8 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter Objectives To develop a description of deadlocks, which.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock.
7.1 CSE Department MAITSandeep Tayal 7: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadlock Prevention Deadlock Avoidance.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7 th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Chapter 7: Deadlocks The Deadlock.
CSE Operating System Principles Deadlocks. CSE – Operating System Principles2 Overview System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadlock Prevention Deadlock Avoidance.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013 Operating System Concepts – 9 th Edition Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
G.Anuradha Ref:- Galvin
Outline Deadlocks, dead lock prevention, avoidance.
Deadlock Prevention Restrain the ways request can be made.
Chapter 7: Deadlocks.
Presentation transcript:

13/03/07Week 21 CENG334 Introduction to Operating Systems Erol Sahin Dept of Computer Eng. Middle East Technical University Ankara, TURKEY URL: Handling Deadlocks Topics: Deadlock prevention Deadlock avoidance Deadlock detection

2 A Deadlock ● P1 holds an instance of R2 and waits for R1. ● P2 holds R1 and and instance of R2, while waiting for R3. ● P3 holds R3 and waits for and instance of R2. ● P1, P2 and P3 have a circular wait condition, hence a deadlock. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

3 Deadlock Characterization Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously. Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a resource. Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other processes. No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process has completed its task. Circular wait: there exists a set {P 0, P 1, …, P 0 } of waiting processes such that P 0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P 1, P 1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P 2, …, P n–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P n, and P 0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P 0. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

4 Methods for Handling Deadlocks ●Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state. ●Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover. ●Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never occur in the system; used by most operating systems, including UNIX. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

5 Deadlock Prevention Restrain the ways request can be made. Ensure that at least one of the four conditions NOT HOLD! Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable resources; must hold for nonsharable resources, such as a printer. Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a process requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources. ●Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before it begins execution, or allow process to request resources only when the process has none. ●Low resource utilization; starvation possible. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

6 Deadlock Prevention (Cont.) No Preemption – ●If a process that is holding some resources requests another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all resources currently being held are released. ●Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which the process is waiting. ●Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting. ●Can be applied to resources whose state can be saved such as CPU, and memory. Not applicable to resources such as printer and tape drives. Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

7 Circular Wait - 1 Each resource is given an ordering: ●F(tape drive) = 1 ●F(disk drive) = 2 ●F(printer) = 3 ●F(mutex1) = 4 ●F(mutex2) = 5 ●……. Each process can request resources only in increasing order of enumeration. A process which decides to request an instance of Rj should first release all of its resources that are F(Ri) >= F(Rj).

8 Circular Wait - 2 For instance an application program may use ordering among all of its synchronization primitives: ●F(semaphore1) = 1 ●F(semaphore2) = 2 ●F(semaphore3) = 3 ●……. After this, all requests to synchronization primitives should be made only in the increasing order: ●Correct use: ●P(semaphore1); ●P(semaphore2); ●Incorrect use: ●P(semaphore3); ●P(semaphore2); Keep in mind that it’s the application programmer’s responsibility to obey this order.

9 Deadlock Avoidance Requires that the system has some additional a priori information available. Simplest and most useful model requires that each process declare the maximum number of resources of each type that it may need. The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never be a circular-wait condition. Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of available and allocated resources, and the maximum demands of the processes. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

10 Safe, unsafe and deadlock states ●If a system is in safe state  no deadlocks. ●If a system is in unsafe state  possibility of deadlock. ●Avoidance  ensure that a system will never enter an unsafe state. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

11 Safe State When a process requests an available resource, system must decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state. System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all processes. Sequence is safe if for each P i, the resources that P i can still request can be satisfied by currently available resources + resources held by all the P j, with j < i. ●If P i resource needs are not immediately available, then P i can wait until all P j have finished. ●When P j is finished, P i can obtain needed resources, execute, return allocated resources, and terminate. ●When P i terminates, P i+1 can obtain its needed resources, and so on. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

12 Example Maximum NeedsCurrent Needs P0105 P142 P292 The system has three processes and 12 tape drives. t=t0 The system at t0 is safe since the sequence exists.

13 Example Maximum NeedsCurrent Needs P0105 P142 P292 The system has three processes and 12 tape drives. t=t0 The system at t1 is no longer safe since ●P1 requests 2 more tape drives, finishes and releases 4 drives. ●However 4 drives are not sufficient for P0 or P2 complete its operation and would result in a deadlock. P2 requests one more drive Maximum NeedsCurrent Needs P0105 P142 P293 t=t1

14 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm Claim edge P i  R j indicated that process P j may request resource R j ; represented by a dashed line. Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a resource. When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge. Resources must be claimed a priori in the system. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

15 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm Claim edge P i  R j indicated that process P j may request resource R j ; represented by a dashed line. Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a resource. When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge. Resources must be claimed a priori in the system. Note that the cycle detection algorithm does not work with resources that have multiple instances. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides. Cycle => Unsafe

16 Banker’s Algorithm While giving credits, a banker should ensure that it never allocates all of its cash in such a way that none of its creditors can finish their work and pay back the loan.

17 Banker’s Algorithm Handles multiple instances of a resource. Each process must a priori claim maximum use. When a process requests a resource it may have to wait. When a process gets all its resources it must return them in a finite amount of time. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

18 Data Structures for the Banker’s Algorithm Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types. Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there are k instances of resource type R j available. Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process P i may request at most k instances of resource type R j. Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then P i is currently allocated k instances of R j. Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then P i may need k more instances of R j to complete its task. Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j]. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

19 Safety Algorithm 1.Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively. Initialize: Work = Available Finish [i] = false for 0 to n-1. 2.Find an i such that both: (a) Finish [i] = false (b) Need i  Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. 3.Work = Work + Allocation i Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4.If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe state. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

20 Resource-Request Algorithm for Process P i Request = request vector for process P i. If Request i [j] = k then process P i wants k instances of resource type R j. 1.If Request i  Need i go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim. 2.If Request i  Available, go to step 3. Otherwise P i must wait, since resources are not available. 3.Pretend to allocate requested resources to P i by modifying the state as follows: Available = Available - Request i ; Allocation i = Allocation i + Request i ; Need i = Need i – Request i ; If safe  the resources are allocated to Pi. If unsafe  Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state is restored Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

21 Example of Banker’s Algorithm 5 processes P 0 -P 4 ; 3 resource types – A (10 instances), – B (5instances, and – C (7 instances). snapshot at time T 0 : Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides. AllocationMaxAvailable ABCABCABC P P P P P

22 Example of Banker’s Algorithm Need = Max – Allocation; The system is in a safe state since the sequence satisfies safety criteria. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides. AllocationNeedAvailable ABCABCABC P P P P P

23 Example P 1 Request (1,0,2) Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence satisfies safety requirement. Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted? Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides. AllocationNeedAvailable ABCABCABC P P P P P Check that ●Request <= Available ●that is, (1,0,2) <= (3,3,2) true. After allocation

24 Deadlock Detection ●Allow system to enter deadlock state ●Detection algorithm ●Recovery scheme Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

25 Single Instance of Each Resource Type Maintain wait-for graph ●Nodes are processes. ●P i  P j if P i is waiting for P j. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides. Resource-Allocation GraphCorresponding wait-for graph

26 Single Instance of Each Resource Type ●Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle in the graph. ●An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an order of n 2 operations, where n is the number of vertices (that is processes) in the graph. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

27 Several Instances of a Resource Type ●Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of available resources of each type. ●Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of resources of each type currently allocated to each process. ●Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of each process. If Request [i j ] = k, then process P i is requesting k more instances of resource type. R j. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

28 Detection Algorithm 1.Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively Initialize: (a) Work = Available (b)For i = 1,2, …, n, if Allocation i  0, then Finish[i] = false; otherwise, Finish[i] = true. 2.Find an index i such that both: (a)Finish[i] == false (b)Request i  Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. 3.Work = Work + Allocation i Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4.If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1  i  n, then the system is in deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then P i is deadlocked. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides. Algorithm requires an order of O(m x n 2) operations to detect whether the system is in deadlocked state.

29 Detection-Algorithm Usage ●When, and how often, to invoke depends on: ●How often a deadlock is likely to occur? ●How many processes will need to be rolled back? ●one for each disjoint cycle ●If detection algorithm is invoked arbitrarily, there may be many cycles in the resource graph and so we would not be able to tell which of the many deadlocked processes “caused” the deadlock. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

30 Recovery from Deadlock: Process Termination ●Abort all deadlocked processes. ●Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is eliminated. ●In which order should we choose to abort? ●Priority of the process. ●How long process has computed, and how much longer to completion. ●Resources the process has used. ●Resources process needs to complete. ●How many processes will need to be terminated. ●Is process interactive or batch? Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.

31 Recovery from Deadlock: Resource Preemption ●Selecting a victim – minimize cost. ●Rollback – return to some safe state, restart process for that state. ●Starvation – same process may always be picked as victim, include number of rollback in cost factor. Adapted from Operating System Concepts (Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne) slides.