How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
Advertisements

EOC PRACTICE JUDICIAL 3. EOC JUDICIAL 1.The Supreme Court ruled that an indigent defendant in a criminal trial has a fundamental right to the assistance.
CH. 14: CITIZENSHIP & EQUAL JUSTICE United States Government Unit 5: The Judicial Branch.
Section 3 Introduction-1
The American Legal System
Chapter 4 – The Rule of Law
Substantive vs. Procedural Law
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
Criminal Law Jeopardy Dr. Garcia. People The Principles The Bill of Rights Criminal Rights I Plead the Fifth
Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.
EOC Survivor Season 6 Law. Question 1 What was the first written code of law? (The Code of Hammurabi)
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
The Criminal Amendments: Rights of the Accused Trends Over Time
15.3 The American Legal System
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
Winning, until proven guilty …. Searches and Seizures The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Searches must be conducted.
Juvenile Law.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
5th/6th/7th Amendments (Due Process) By: Sam A Chris Koo Ethan Ng Paul Novak.
Call to Order These three officers were accused of taking two Baltimore teens out to the county, taking their shoes and cellphone batteries, and leaving.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
AP GOVERNMENT. CIVIL LIBERTIES  Civil Liberties are individual’s legal and constitutional protections against the government.  Although our civil liberties.
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.
An Overview of The Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Copyright 2010; The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC; By Atty. Brendon G. Basiga.
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.
Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.
Emily Coffman.  Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause.  The proper search.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
Criminal Trial Rights Tanner Powell and Eric Tate.
Rights of Criminal Defendants
The 5th 6th and 7th Amendments Zone Andrew Kwak..……….Mehek Desai Lena Gavenas………….Sharon Bae Benny Feldmann……..Mariela Carrillo.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
The Rule of Law & the Amendments They Protect. Two Types of Law: Criminal Law and Civil Law There are two types of law practiced in the United States:
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?
BELLWORK What are the three types of crime? (Page 430)
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.
Eliseo Lugo III. Two Types of Law: Criminal Law and Civil Law There are two types of law practiced in the United States: Criminal law Civil law.
LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.
Defendants’ Rights Characterize defendants’ rights and identify issues that arise in their implementation.
Rights of Criminal Defendants The 4 th, 5 th, and 6 th Amendments.
Warm-up List 5 types of laws and give an example of each.
Rights of the Accused (Due Process Rights)
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Criminal Law Jeopardy Dr. Garcia.
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights
Rights of Criminal Suspects
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
DUE PROCESS.
Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.
15.3 The American Legal System
Agenda- 1/25 Grab a chrome book and the worksheets!
October 18, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 The us legal system
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
The Warren Court AP US History.
DUE PROCESS.
Presentation transcript:

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases Protecting the Accused

Constitutional Amendments Fourth: no illegal search and seizure. Law enforcement must have a search warrant or probable cause. Fifth Amendment: Rights of the Accused 1. No one can be tried for a felony unless indicted by a grand jury 2. No double jeopardy 3. Protection against self-incrimination 4. Due Process: accused must receive all parts of legal process Sixth Amendment: Rights of People on Trial 1. Trial by jury 2. Speedy and public trial 3. Right to confront witnesses/accusers 4. Right to an attorney

Group Assignment Divide into 4 equal groups You will be assigned a specific Supreme Court case and you will become an expert on this case. You are to create a presentation to teach your classmates about these cases. Be sure to include: A brief overview of the case (Who, What, Where, When, Why) What constitutional right was being questioned? What was the ruling? Votes for and against. Who wrote the majority opinion, the dissenting opinion? Was the ruling based on a precedent or did it set a new precedent? What was the precedent? At least one picture Two multiple choice questions to ask the class

Cases Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Mapp was arrested for possessing pornography found in an illegal search. - Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in a trial. “Exclusionary rule” established. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Gideon arrested for robbery. He asks for a lawyer but the court refuses to provide one. - If a defendant cannot afford a lawyer, the state must provide one for them.

More Cases Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Miranda was arrested for rape and murder and confessed to the crime before being advised of his rights. - Accused criminals must be informed of their rights when arrested In re Gault (1966): Gerald Gault (15) was convicted of making an obscene phone call and sentenced to 5 years in a juvenile detention facility. - Juveniles must be afforded the same rights as adults, including: notifying parents, right to counsel, right to confront accusers, and protection against self-incrimination.