Improvements in throughput in 802.11n The design goal of the 802.11n is “HT” for High Throughput. The throughput is high indeed: up to 600 Mbps in raw.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 5: IEEE Wireless LANs (Cont.). Mobile Communication Technology according to IEEE (examples) Local wireless networks WLAN a.
Advertisements

CCNA – Network Fundamentals
OSI MODEL Maninder Kaur
1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Administration Issues  Take home Mid-term Exam  Assign April 2, Due April 7  Individual work is required 
Presented by Scott Kristjanson CMPT-820 Multimedia Systems Instructor: Dr. Mohamed Hefeeda 1 Cross-Layer Wireless Multimedia.
1 Version 3.0 Module 6 Ethernet Fundamentals. 2 Version 3.0 Why is Ethernet so Successful? In 1973, it could carry data at 3 Mbps Now, it can carry data.
Centre for Wireless Communications Opportunistic Media Access for Multirate Ad Hoc Networks B.Sadegahi, V.Kanodia, A.Sabharwal and E.Knightly Presented.
7C Cimini-9/97 RANDOM ACCESS TECHNIQUES ALOHA Efficiency Reservation Protocols Voice and Data Techniques - PRMA - Variable rate CDMA.
EE 4272Spring, 2003 Protocols & Architecture A Protocol Architecture is the layered structure of hardware & software that supports the exchange of data.
802.11n Sniffer Vladislav Mordohovich Igor Shtarev.
CS335 Networking & Network Administration Tuesday, April 20, 2010.
802.11g & e Presenter : Milk. Outline g  Overview of g  g & b co-exist QoS Limitations of e  Overview of.
1 A Comparison of Mechanisms for Improving TCP Performance over Wireless Links Course : CS898T Instructor : Dr.Chang - Swapna Sunkara.
TCP: Software for Reliable Communication. Spring 2002Computer Networks Applications Internet: a Collection of Disparate Networks Different goals: Speed,
Error Checking continued. Network Layers in Action Each layer in the OSI Model will add header information that pertains to that specific protocol. On.
Capacity of Ad Hoc Networks Quality of Wireless links Physical Layer Issues The Channel Capacity Path Loss Model and Signal Degradation MAC for.
MTBA and PSMP in n Abhay Annaswamy
Voice Traffic Performance over Wireless LAN using the Point Coordination Function Wei Supervisor: Prof. Sven-Gustav Häggman Instructor: Researcher Michael.
Semester 1 Module 8 Ethernet Switching Andres, Wen-Yuan Liao Department of Computer Science and Engineering De Lin Institute of Technology
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 22 - Wireless Networking.
Ethernet. Ethernet Goals Simplicity Low Cost Compatibility Address flexibility Fairness –All nodes have equal access to the network High speed Stability.
Opersating Mode DCF: distributed coordination function
Introduction to IT and Communications Technology Justin Champion C208 – 3292 Ethernet Fundamentals CE
Improvements in throughput in n The design goal of the n is “HT” for High Throughput. The throughput is high indeed: up to 600 Mbps in raw.
Packet Transmission (Part III) Local Area Networks (LANs)
Ch. 16 High-Speed LANs The Emergence of High- Speed LANs Trends –Computing power of PCs has continued to grow. –MIS organizations recognize the.
1 Chapter 16 Protocols and Protocol Layering. 2 Protocol  Agreement about communication  Specifies  Format of messages (syntax)  Meaning of messages.
Chapter 18 High Throughput and n n history MIMO HT Channels HT PHY HT MAC HT Operation.
ARQ support for Primary Management connection IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16maint-08/140 Date Submitted:
1 The Internet and Networked Multimedia. 2 Layering  Internet protocols are designed to work in layers, with each layer building on the facilities provided.
1 Data Link Layer Lecture 20 Imran Ahmed University of Management & Technology.
Efficient Framing and ARQ for High-Speed PLC Systems Srinivas Katar Larry Yonge (Intellon) Richard Newman Haniph Latchman (Univ.
November 4, 2003APOC 2003 Wuhan, China 1/14 Demand Based Bandwidth Assignment MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs Presented by Ruibiao Qiu Department of Computer.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 4 Switching Concepts.
Chapter 1 - Local Area Network Technologies. How IP Datagrams are Encapsulated IP datagrams are found at the OSI Network layer IP datagrams are sent to.
1 Message Delineation Identify the start and end of messages by: Identify the start and end of messages by:
CS3505: DATA LINK LAYER. data link layer  phys. layer subject to errors; not reliable; and only moves information as bits, which alone are not meaningful.
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Data Link Layer PART III.
Delay Bound Rich Image Delivery over WLANs Shira S. Krishnan Georgia Tech, ECE Multimedia Communications Laboratory.
Data Communications, Kwangwoon University12-1 Chapter 12. Multiple Access 1.Random Access 2.Controlled Access 3.Channelization.
Eighth Edition by William Stallings Chapter 7 – Data Link Control Protocols Data Link Control Protocols need layer of logic above Physical to manage exchange.
Forward Error Correction vs. Active Retransmit Requests in Wireless Networks Robbert Haarman.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0890r0 July 2012 Fei Tong, CSRSlide ah Multi-User Aggregation PDU Date: 2012-July-16 Authors:
Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong EE3900 Computer Networks Protocols and Architecture Slide 1 Use of Standard Protocols.
Data Link Layer and Ethernet COM211 Communications and Networks CDA College Theodoros Christophides
An SSCOP-based Link Layer Protocol for Wireless LANs Haoli Wang and Aravind Velayutham IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 1-5 December, 2003 San.
1 Version 3.1 Module 10 Intermediate TCP/IP (Layer 4)
Copyright © 2003 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Confidential, not for distribution to third parties. Wireless LANs Session
CWNA Guide to Wireless LANs, Third Edition Chapter 6: Medium Access Control Layer Standards.
1. Layered Architecture of Communication Networks: Circuit Switching & Packet Switching.
2. Data Link Layer: Medium Access Control. Scheduling.
SubmissionSlide 1 Discussions on adaptive frame length in MAC based on block ACK Date: Authors: Ningbo Zhang, Guixia Kang and Bingning Zhu.
Selected Topics in Modern Networks
Data link layer (LLC).
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Layered Architectures
Ken Gunnells, Ph.D. - Networking Paul Crigler - Programming
IOS Network Model 2nd semester
Chapter 4 Data Link Layer.
Provision of Multimedia Services in based Networks
Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation
Backwards compatibility
Max Frame Length Changes
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
Is the MAC sufficient for wireless high speed mesh LANs?
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Modified Delayed (Dly) Acknowledgement for.
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
Computer Networks: Wireless Networks
Error Checking continued
Presentation transcript:

Improvements in throughput in n The design goal of the n is “HT” for High Throughput. The throughput is high indeed: up to 600 Mbps in raw bit-rate. We intend to start with the maximum throughput of g (54 Mbps), and see what techniques n applies to boost it to 600 Mbps: I. Physical Layer Improvements (mbojombojo) 1. More subcarriers 2. FEC (Forward Error Correction) 3. Guard Interval 4. MIMO (Beamforming and Multipath) 5. Channel Bonding MAC Layer Improvements (Boris Todorov F38692 ) 1. MSDU Aggregation 2. MPDU Aggregation 3. Block Acknowledgement 4. Lower Overhead

MAC Enhancements There is only so much improvement that can be obtained in by increasing the data rate of the radio. There is a significant amount of fixed overhead in the MAC layer protocol, and in the interframe spaces and acknowledgements of each frame transmitted, in particular. At the highest of data rates, this overhead alone can be longer than the entire data frame. In addition, contention for the air and collisions also reduce the maximum effective throughput of n addresses these issues by making changes in the MAC layer to improve on the inefficiencies imposed by this fixed overhead and by contention losses.

Aggregation Every frame transmitted by an device has fixed overhead associated with the radio preamble and MAC frame fields that limit the effective throughput, even if the actual data rate was Infinite.

To reduce this overhead, n introduces frame aggregation. Frame aggregation is essentially putting two or more frames together into a single transmission n introduces two methods for frame aggregation: Mac Service Data Units (MSDU) aggregation and Message Protocol Data Unit (MPDU) aggregation. Both aggregation methods reduce the overhead to only a single radio preamble for each frame transmission.

MSDU (Mac Service Data Units) Aggregation Aggregation of multiple frames => improve system efficiency A-MSDU is aggregated with multiple MSDU – separate by a sub-frame header Only aggregation with other frame of the same address type Should not aggregate MSDUs of different values of priority

MPDU (Mac Protocol Data Units) Aggregation MPDU aggregation translates each Ethernet frame to format MPDU aggregation requires that all frames that constitute the aggregation frame have the same destination address. With MPDU aggregation, it is possible to encrypt constituent frame independently MPDU aggregation requires that all of the constituent frames be the same QoS level

Block Acknowledgement Block acknowledgement compiles all the acknowledgements of the individual constituent frames produced by MPDU aggregation into a single frame returned by the recipient to the sender. This allows a compact and rapid mechanism to implement selective retransmission of only those constituent frames that are not acknowledged. In environments with high error rates, this selective retransmission mechanism can provide some improvement in the effective throughput of a WLAN using MPDU aggregation over that of one using MSDU aggregation, because much less is retransmitted when an error affects some of the constituent frames of an MPDU aggregated frame as compared to an MSDU aggregated frame.

Lower Overhead: Reduced Interframe Space When aggregation of frames is not possible, n provide a mechanism to reduce the overhead The e extension for quality of service added the ability for a single transmitter to send a burst of frames durring a single, timed transmit opportunity. Reduced interframe space (RIFS)