Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Welcomes ASU and the Town of Boone To Our Side of the Storm (How to manage the “perfect Storm”)
1 Stormwater Program Videoconference April 23, 2013 Bill Cole, Water Quality Standards Unit.
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Antideg and Municipal Stormwater Discussion Sept. 23, 2009.
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Nutrients and Ecosystems. Fertilizer Application Rates Lawns: kg N/ha/yr Athletic Fields: kg N/ha/yr Pastures (Dairy): kg N/ha/yr.
Stormwater Management/ MS4 Permitting International Municipal Lawyers Association 2014 Annual Conference Baltimore, Maryland Gene Tanaka
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
General Ag. Compliance & Chesapeake Bay Update. PA Clean Streams Law & General AG Compliance Prevent discharge of pollutants & water quality impairment.
Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Storm Water Retrofitting Dan Bogoevski, Ohio EPA September 2011.
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
Stormwater Master Plan University of North Carolina Peter A. Reinhardt Sharon Myers, L.G. Department of Environment, Health and Safety.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Water Quality Standards: Rulemaking Pipeline Adrienne Nemura Geosyntec Consultants US Conference of Mayors Water Council Washington, DC April 30, 2015.
Design for Water Quality CE 365K Hydraulic Engineering Design Spring 2015 David R. Maidment.
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Nutrient Management in the Urban Landscape Rebecca Kluckhohn, P.E. Watershed Engineer West Metro Water Alliance Forum, May 18 th 2011 W W e n c k Engineers.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
YOUR SCHOOL AND YOUR WATERSHED LORNA ROSENBERG- US EPA MID-ATLANTIC OCT 1-2, 2014 CHESAPEAKE BAY SCHOOLS WORKSHOP – SHEPHERDSTOWN, WVA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
MS4 Permitting Process William Creal Water Bureau Permits Section Chief.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Welcome! Medicine Lake Excess Nutrients TMDL Project Steering Committee Meeting #5 May 14, 2009 Photo by: Terrie Christian—President,
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
NC Phase I Perspective Steps undertaken by Charlotte for Post-Construction Controls SC Stormwater Forum May 8, 2007.
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
Resourceful. naturally. Burnsville Rainwater Garden (RWG) Efficacy Monitoring and Cost Evaluation West Metro Water Alliance May 31, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
Need for Advanced Stormwater Treatment at Lake Tahoe John E. Reuter & Dave Roberts Tahoe TMDL Research Program.
Public Workshop: RIPDES Draft Phase II Storm Water Regulations RI Department of Environmental Management RIPDES Storm Water Program July 25, 2001 Contacts:
Stormwater and GIS Eastern Panhandle WV GIS User Group Meeting September 2, 2015 Jennifer Klages - Sebastian Donner -
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
MPCA: An Agency & Legislative Update Brad Moore, Commissioner June 22, 2007.
Urban Runoff Greg Gearheart Christine Sotelo Eric Berntsen State Water Resources Control Board.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Is algae bad? No! Algae helps us by; taking in waste from the water (ex. Animal poop) providing oxygen and being a food resource for animals.
BMW Association 2006 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan ~ Brief History of the Reservoirs ~ Overview of the BMW Association ~ Outline.
County-Wide Act 167 Plan “County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA” was prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Protecting Georgia’s Waters Jennifer Welte Program Manager Regulatory Development & Regional Water Planning Georgia EPD – Watershed Protection Branch.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
TMDL Implementation: Now What?
Regulatory Requirements Background
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Protecting Non-Impaired Resources
Regulatory Update Public Roads Deicing Workshop September 24, 2015
MS4 = Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System
Presentation transcript:

resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company

resourceful. naturally. Outline MPCA has transitioned from individual TMDL studies to a watershed approach –Restoration of impaired waters to meet standards –Increased emphasis on water quality protection of non-impaired resources Updating Nondegradation rule to ensure that high quality waters do not deteriorate Implications for watershed organizations and NPDES permitted Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)

resourceful. naturally. Water quality standards

resourceful. naturally. Numeric water quality standards Sets a specific concentration for a certain pollutant in water that will allow maintenance of beneficial uses Use is a function or activity in a water that is supported by level of water quality/numeric criteria –By default, all surface waters are protected as Class 2B (aquatic life and recreation) –Other uses include drinking water (Class 1), trout waters Class 2A) and outstanding resource value waters (ORVWs) These criteria are regulatory basis for management actions, including attainment decisions, TMDLs and NPDES permits

resourceful. naturally. EcoregionTPChl-aSecchi (classification) ppb ppb meters NLF – Lake trout (Class 2A) NLF – Stream trout (Class 2A) NLF – Aquatic Rec. Use (Class 2B) CHF – Stream trout (2A) CHF – Aquatic Rec. Use (2B) CHF – Aquatic Rec. Use (2B) Shallow lakes WCP/NGP – Aquatic Rec. Use (2B) WCP/NGP – Aquatic Rec. Use (2B) Shallow lakes Numeric eutrophication standards

resourceful. naturally. Benefits of protecting high quality waters

resourceful. naturally. What level of protection is warranted?

resourceful. naturally. Watershed approach

resourceful. naturally. Nondegradation process for general permit

resourceful. naturally. Implications of Nondegradation for watersheds and draft MS4 permit Requirements for volume, rate, TSS and phosphorus loading –No increased loadings w/ five options for demonstrating compliance for new development –Net reduction in volume and pollutant loadings for redevelopments –Existing peak rates for 1, 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hr events Limitations for infiltration (off ramps/options) Mitigation requirements –For TSS & TP elsewhere in watershed

resourceful. naturally. Implications of Nondegradation for watersheds and draft MS4 permit

resourceful. naturally. Implications of Nondegradation for watersheds and draft MS4 permit

resourceful. naturally. Implications of Nondegradation for watersheds and draft MS4 permit

resourceful. naturally. Implications of Nondegradation for watersheds and draft MS4 permit Relative to 1988 baseline, it is likely that land use conversion in most watersheds have resulted in the following: –Increased volumes, runoff rates and TP loadings, depending on BMP implementation –TSS loading reductions would be expected, especially where detention BMPs were implemented Flow-weighted mean concentrations should go down with BMP implementation Receiving water monitoring and trend analysis is the true test of whether Nondegradation requirements are being met

resourceful. naturally. Implications of Nondegradation for watersheds and draft MS4 permit

resourceful. naturally. Thank you! Questions? Greg Wilson, PE Barr Engineering