Lecture 4: Liberty and Democracy: J. S. Mill The Foundations of Modern Social and Political Thought.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Advertisements

Introduction to Moral Issues
Which “ism” is it?  Click on the “ism” that best matches the ideas expressed in the quotation.  When you’ve selected the right idea, write the quote.
Why letting people be bad is good
Authority and Democracy
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Mill on the individual and society Michael Lacewing
Authority and Democracy Self-Determination. Analogy individual autonomy – state autonomy Christian Wolff: “Nations are regarded as individuals free persons.
Introduction to Political Theory
RECAP – TASK 1 What is utilitarianism? Who is Jeremy Bentham?
© Michael Lacewing Liberty: negative and positive Michael Lacewing
Utilitarianism.
In Defense of Liberty “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God,
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 5. TELEOLOGY Teleology: basic idea Humans’ deeds are purposive by nature; they aim at something. An attempt to ground.
 Humans are metaphysically free  Our choices define us and as a result our intuitions about the human condition are satisfied.  Dualism  Kant  Existentialism.
John Stuart Mill James Mill: (father) Bertrand Russell: (JSM’ s godson)
Mill on freedom Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
THE DEFENSE OF BASIC LIBERTIES II Mill. The Free Market Argument.
The natural condition of mankind is a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one’s life as one best sees fit, free from the interference of.
Seminar on Classical, Christian Education
THE DEFENSE OF BASIC LIBERTIES I Mill. Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion It will be convenient for the argument, if, instead of at once entering.
Exceptions to free speech. Free speech as an exercise of liberty: when are we justified in restricting it? According to Mill’s Harm Principle? “The only.
Roots, Ideas and Definition Lecture 2 May 17. Problem of Explaining Conservatism Goes back to Burke’s definition… –WHAT TO PRESERVE?
John Stuart Mill: On Liberty - 1
How Mill’s utilitarian perspective might be applied to the issue of embryo research.
UTILITARIANISM: A comparison of Bentham and Mill’s versions
Philosophy A philosophy is a system of beliefs about reality.
© Michael Lacewing Mill on democracy Michael Lacewing.
JOHN STUART MILL Who is he? What did he do four their country?
John Stuart Mill: On Liberty - 1 J. S. Mill ~ On Liberty zJohn Stuart Mill ~ On Liberty (1859) zChapter 1 yTwo kinds of liberty x“Liberty of the Will”
Ethical Theory and Business Chapter Two
What Should Be A Crime?. Recall: Two Main Perspectives 1. Achieving social order outweighs concerns for social justice. 2. CJ system goals must be achieved.
Proposal That all people willingly divest themselves of the power necessary to the ends for which they unite in civil society. The government, to which.
Unit 4 The Aims of Law. Aims of Law  The proper aims of law and the common good are not the same thing. The appropriate aims of law are those aspects.
Harm and Liberty. What is the harm principle? “The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community,
Sociology 125 Lecture 20 DEMOCRACY: HOW IT WORKS November 15, 2012.
John Stuart Mill Son of James Mill (both he and Jeremy Bentham stand as the theorists of Utilitarianism) Received an extraordinary (experimental)
Chapter 3 – Liberalism, Pt 2. Liberalism & the French Revolution ( ) The French Revolution was based on liberalism and on classical republicanism.
Utilitarianism. English Empiricism Hume held that what is commonly taken as “knowledge” is really a set of reasonable beliefs that are well founded because.
Justice John Stuart Mill. British Philosopher 1806 – 1873 Most Famous Works: Utiliarianism deals with ethics. On Liberty deals with political philosophy.
Liberalism -about maximizing the freedom of the individual Society is the sum of all the individuals who compose it Role of the state to protect the freedom.
“Why am I Exploited if I’m Paid but not if I’m Not Paid?”: Exploitation, Commodification and Commercial Surrogacy Tammy Johnson.
© Michael Lacewing Mill on the role of law Michael Lacewing
The Origins of Liberalism (Classical Liberalism) The only part of the conduct of anyone for which he is amenable to society is that which concerns others.
Moral Issues In Policing. Moral Issues in Policing Should police be held to the same or higher standards than other members of society? – Courage? – Fairness?
Nicole Pongratz Allisen Jacques Shannon Griese Amber Teichmiller 4/13/2010.
Lecture 5: Liberty and Democracy After Mill The Foundations of Modern Social and Political Thought.
Freedom, Autonomy, and Free Will “[T]he Actions of man are never free; they are always the necessary consequence of his temperament, of the received ideas,
 Mill believes liberty is needed for full development of human nature.  Having liberty and being able to make your free choice will flourish your capacity.
Political Theorists. Descriptions of Government “The Punishment which the wise suffer who refuse to take part in the government, is to live under the.
Policy Paradox: Liberty Chapter 5 Nicholas Perrone.
Whether Justice be a Natural or an Artificial Virtue AP 5.5: By: David Hakim.
J.S. Mill Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that.
Ethics in Public Life Administration in International Organizations 2015 TELEOLOGY.
The Origins of Liberalism The only part of the conduct of anyone for which he is amenable to society is that which concerns others. In the part which merely.
Article 19, 21and 22 chapter 111 of ICCPR Right to freedom of expression Right to Peaceful assembly Right to freedom of association.
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Sociology 125 Lectures 19 & 20 DEMOCRACY: HOW IT WORKS November 11 & 16, 2010.
NO HARM; NO FOUL In Search of a Principled Defense Of Freedom.
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau.
Liberalism John Stuart Mill 12 August 2014.
Liberalism John Stuart Mill 13 August 2011.
John Stuart Mill.
Chapter 3 – Liberalism, Pt 2
Bertrand Russell: (JSM’ s godson)
Chapter 3 – Liberalism, Pt 2
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Lecture 04: A Brief Summary
Should we legalize drugs?
TELEOLOGY AND VIRTUE ETHICS
Harm and Commercial Surrogacy in Australia
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 4: Liberty and Democracy: J. S. Mill The Foundations of Modern Social and Political Thought

Bentham, J. S. Mill and the Liberal Tradition

The Problem ‘The disposition of mankind, whether as rulers or as fellow citizens, to impose their own opinions and inclinations as a rule of conduct on others … is hardly ever kept under restraint by anything but want of power; and as the power is not declining, but growing, unless a strong barrier of moral conviction can be raised against the mischief, we must expect, in the present circumstances to see it increase.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 17.

Mill’s Complex Solutions Three Texts, Three Answers? The Right End of Government: Utility The Restriction on Government: Liberty The Design of Government: Democracy

‘One Very Simple Principle’ … the only purpose for which power can rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized community is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do something … because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise or even right.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 13.

On Social Progress ‘The beliefs which we have most warrant for, have no safeguard to rest on, but a standing invitation to the whole world to prove them unfounded … If the lists are kept open, we may hope that if there be a better truth, it will be found when the human mind is capable of receiving it.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 24.

Mill Beyond Utilitarianism ‘If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be in silencing mankind.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 20.

On Individual Difference ‘A man cannot get a coat or a pair of boots to fit him, unless they are either made to measure, or he has a whole warehouse to choose from; and is it easier to fit him with a life than with a coat, or are human beings more like one another in their whole physical and spiritual conformation than in the shape of their feet?’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 68.

On Individual Progress ‘Human nature is not a machine to be built after a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides, according to the tendency of the inward forces which make it a living thing.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 60.

The Scope of Social Action ‘As soon as any part of a person’s conduct affects prejudicially the interests of others, society has jurisdiction over it, and the question whether the general welfare will or will not be promoted by interfering with it becomes open to question.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 76.

Interference Beyond the Harm Principle ‘His voluntary choice is evidence that what he so chooses is desirable.. To him.. But by selling himself as a slave, he abdicates his liberty; he forgoes any future use of it beyond that single act. He therefore defeats, in his own case, the very purpose which is the justification of allowing him to dispose of himself … The principle of freedom cannot require that he should be free not to be free. It is not freedom, to be allowed to alienate his freedom.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 103.

Liberty, the State, and Progress ‘ … a State which dwarfs men, in order that they may be more docile instruments in its hands even for beneficial purposes - will find that with small men no great thing can really be accomplished; and that the perfection of machinery to which it has sacrificed everything, will in the end avail it nothing, for want of the vital power which, in order that the machine might work more smoothly, it has preferred to banish.’ J. S. Mill, On Liberty, 115.

The Goal of Government ‘The first element of good government … [is] the virtue and intelligence of the human beings composing the community, the most important point of excellence which any form of government can possess is to promote the virtue and intelligence of the people themselves … the degree in which it tends to increase the sum of good qualities in the governed, collectively and individually.’ Mill, Considerations, 227.

The Ideal Form of Government ‘…to judge of the merits of government, an ideal must be constructed of the form of government most eligible in itself, that is, which, if the necessary conditions existed for giving effect to its beneficial tendencies, would, more than all others, favour and promote not some one improvement, but all forms and degrees of it.’ Mill, Considerations, 236.

Government and the Development of Personality ‘… any education which aims at making human beings other than machines, in the long run will make them claim to have control over their own actions.’ Mill, Considerations, 243.

Democracy and Protection ‘The … proposition that each is the only safeguard of his own rights and interests is one of those elementary maxims of prudence … in the absence of its natural defenders, the interest of the excluded is always in danger of being overlooked; and, when looked at, is seen with very different eyes from those of the persons whom it directly concerns.’ Mill, Considerations, 246.

Democracy and Education in Individuality ‘ … the passive type of character is favoured by the government of one or a few, and the active self-helping type by that of the Many … Endeavour is even more effectually constrained by the certainty of its impotence, than by any positive discouragement. Between subjection to the will of others, and the virtues of self-help and self-government, there is a natural incompatibility.’ Mill, Considerations, 253.

Mill On Liberty: A Critique From Individuality to Individualism The Limits of Protection: State Action and Freedom