Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nevada Open Meeting Law
Advertisements

In recognition of the fact that a representative government is dependent upon an informed electorate, it is declared to be public policy of this state.
The Public Records Act -R.C  …To be interpreted liberally to facilitate broader access  …Exceptions to be strictly interpreted in favor of disclosure.

Through 2008 Season Barry Bonds 762 Home Runs Roger Clemens 354 Wins Alex Rodriguez 553 Home Runs.
Lisa Endres General Counsel Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Fundamentals of the Brown Act Student Governing Bodies Presented by the Office of General Counsel April 2010.
A Baker’s Dozen: 13 Issues Regarding the Open Meetings Law 2004 IARC Staff Retreat May 14, 2004 Ames, IA David Vestal General Counsel Iowa State Association.
Open Records from the OAG Perspective Amanda Crawford Division Chief Open Records Division.
The Public Information Act Rights and Responsibilities of a Governmental Body Local Government Seminar January 29, 2015 Presented by: Barry Gaines.
BOARD OF VISITORS LEGAL ISSUES ORIENTATION September 5, 2012.
Government in the Sunshine and UNF Student Government.
Meeting in Vermont Vermont Department of Libraries.
North Dakota Open Records & Meetings Law Government in the Sunshine.
USF Office of the General Counsel (813)
Common Sense Approach to Wisconsin Open Meetings Law.
Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 7 Freedom of Information Act Open Meetings/Open Records.
NRS Chapter 241 OPEN MEETING LAW. Legislative Intent  All public bodies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business.  Deliberations must be.
Indiana’s Open Door Law Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana State Library Indiana State Library Director Workshop August 6 and.
Guidelines for Conducting Training and Procedures Reporting Safety Loss Loss Control Committee Meetings.
OPEN MEETING LAW GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 39, SECTIONS 23A-D.
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FOIA Topics of Discussion Public Meetings Closed Meetings Meeting Notices & Agendas Electronic Communication.
By Bob Bass Allison, Bass & Associates, LLP
CHANGES TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW Prepared and presented by: Brian W. Riley, Esq. Kopelman and Paige, P.C.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Open Meetings & Public Records JOSH LAWSON, PIO TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 2015.
ACADEMIC SENATE ORIENTATION 9/3/09 Welcome New and Returning Senators!
The Open Meetings Act The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq.
1 THE KENTUCKY OPEN MEETINGS ACT KRS – [T]he basic policy of KRS to is that the formation of public policy is public business.
Open and Public Meetings Act Training Revised 1/12.
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT Eva Rooks, MA Health Services Administrator/Trainer Health Systems Quality Assurance Division Washington State Department of Health.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
Basic Legal Requirements for the Budget and Audit Bill Longley TML Legal Counsel.
1 CONFIDENTIALITY. 2 Requirement Under IDEA 34 CFR Sec (c) All staff collecting or using personally identifiable information in public education.
Indiana’s Open Door Law Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Presented to Fort Wayne Housing Authority Fort Wayne Housing Authority Board.
The Basics of Open Meetings Office of the Attorney General Mary Kae Kelsch.
Sunshine Law, Public Records Law, State and Local Gift Law, and State and Local Code of Ethics (Voting Conflicts & Disclosure) Dana Crosby Assistant County.
Knowing When and How the Public Gets a Seat at the Table.
OPEN MEETINGS ACT General Provisions Article, Sections through 3-501, Annotated Code of Maryland 1.
Setting up a Public Information Coordinator (PIC) System Lauren Downey, Office of the Attorney General Cary Grace, City of Austin Bob Davis, Texas Department.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
School District Records Lindsay Hale David Wheelus Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
L ITIGATION UNDER THE P UBLIC I NFORMATION A CT Kimberly Fuchs, Chief, PIA Litigation Section Rosalind Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, PIA Litigation.
Texas Open Meetings Act 2015 Legislative Update Charlotte M. Harper Deputy Division Chief Opinion Committee.
Practical Tips Question and Answer Neal Falgoust Tamara Strain Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter,
Illinois Freedom of Information Act The Basics of FOIA 2015.
2015 Legislative and Litigation Update Neal Falgoust Matt Entsminger Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General Views expressed are those.
Open Meetings Act Basic Training Jennie Hoelscher Division Chief Opinion Committee Charlotte Harper Deputy Division Chief Opinion Committee.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Indiana Association of Cities and Towns.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
Ann MacNeille Assistant Attorney General Maryland Attorney General’s Office Counsel, Open Meetings Compliance Board John S.
Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman Office Overview Open Meetings Law Presented by: Angela McBride Assistant Ombudsman for Public Records, Open Meetings, and Privacy.
Lawrence J. Bohlen Manager Member Services & Education Local Government Insurance Trust __________________________________ MACO Winter Conference January.
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
1 Brown Act Workshop  Seal Beach City Council Craig Steele, City Attorney May 9, 2016.
North Dakota Open Record & Meeting Law
North Dakota Open Record & Meeting Law
Ian Marquand Montana Board of Medical Examiners
Complying with Maryland’s Open Meetings Act
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
An Introduction to Public Records Office of the General Counsel
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
MEETINGS Seth Grigg – IAC Executive Director
West Virginia Economic Development Council Open Meetings Act Training 2018 Derek Knopp Staff Attorney West Virginia Ethics Commission.
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
SDASBO Conference April 24, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee

 Difference Between Open Meetings Act (OMA) and Public Information Act (PIA)  Specific Documents Background packets Handouts and other documents Documents used during an executive session Minutes of open meetings Certified agenda or recording of executive session Personal notes  Rights and responsibilities of governmental bodies Topics to be Covered

 OMA (Gov’t Code ch. 551) and PIA (Gov’t Code ch. 552) have a similar goal – making government accessible  Exceptions to public access also similar – examples: Personnel matters Property matters Competition or bidding Legal matters OMA vs. PIA - similarities

 But exceptions to public access, while similar, are not interchangeable Fact that document is discussed in a closed meeting does not make it confidential under the PIA An exception to disclosure under PIA does not provide a basis for holding a closed meeting to discuss that document OMA vs. PIA - differences

 Academic teaching institutions, university systems, and junior college districts must post the written agenda and “supplemental written materials” that are provided to governmental body members for their use during the meeting “as early as practicable in advance of the meeting” on the governmental body’s website - Gov’t Code § , § (OMA)  Does not include material certified by general counsel as confidential or permitted to be withheld under the PIA  Requires only Internet posting, not hard copies Background packets – duties of certain governmental bodies

 Do other governmental bodies have to post or link, on their websites, the background packets that are provided to governmental body members for their use during the meeting? When OMA specifies that certain governmental bodies must provide Internet access to background documents in advance, presumption is that others do not But nothing in the OMA prohibits such voluntary posting or linking Background packets – duties of other governmental bodies

 If a governmental body voluntarily provides background packet material on its website: Be consistent – if there is regular Internet posting, this should not change just because particular agenda contains controversial topics Be complete – with the exception of confidential material, provide access to all the documents Be timely – provide access as soon as possible in advance, every time Background packets – voluntarily posting or linking

 Does a governmental body have to make available at the meeting hard copies of background packets, handouts or PowerPoint presentations that will be made or discussed at a meeting? OMA rights of the public include attendance at, and recording of, a meeting OMA rights do not extent to getting copies of materials used or mentioned at meetings Duty to provide copies is potentially triggered only if request is made in writing under the PIA Handouts and other documents at meetings

 Neither the OMA nor the PIA prohibit the voluntary disclosure of public information that is not otherwise confidential or prohibited by law from being disclosed  If a governmental body chooses to provide a particular document, it must provide access to that particular document to anyone who asks  Gov’t Code § (PIA) Documents at meetings – voluntarily providing

 Are handouts, PowerPoints, and other such documents of third parties automatically “public information” documents by virtue of being presented at a meeting? No. Documents must independently meet the definition of “public information” in the PIA  Example - information written or produced in connection with the transaction of official business for a governmental body and the governmental body has a right of access to the information - Gov’t Code § (PIA)  Inquiry will be fact specific Documents of third parties at meetings

 Are documents used in an executive session cloaked with confidentiality by sole virtue of the executive session? No. “That a matter can be discussed in closed meetings does not mean that all documents involving the same matter are exempt from public access. Otherwise, any document, regardless of its content and regardless of whether it would be otherwise available to the public under the Public Information Act, would be exempt from disclosure just because it could be considered in a closed meeting.” City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, 22 S.W.3d 351, 367 (Tex. 2000) Documents used in executive session

 Governmental body “shall prepare and keep minutes or make a recording of each open meeting.” - Gov’t Code§ (a) (OMA)  Minutes must state the subject of each deliberation and indicate each vote, order, decision, or other action taken - Gov’t Code § (b) (OMA) Minutes of open meeting - requirements

 Minutes and recordings of an open meeting are public records and shall be available for public inspection and copying on request to the governmental body’s chief administrative officer or the officer’s designee – Gov’t Code§ (OMA) Provision does not require first making a written request pursuant to the PIA Items included in the minutes as attachments must be disclosed under section even if PIA exception applies (see York v. Tex. Guaranteed Student Loan Corp., 408 S.W.3d 677, 687–88 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, no pet.) Minutes of open meetings – public access

 Handwritten notes or recordings made to aid in the preparation of minutes are generally public information Doesn’t matter if personal recording equipment is used or if notes are in the personal possession of a single person – JM-1143 (1990) at 2–3, ORD 635 (1995) at 4  Draft minutes awaiting adoption vote by the governmental body are generally public information – ORD 225 (1979) at 2–3 PIA exception covering “deliberative process privilege” ( ) not applicable to material reflecting only facts Are public records when made, regardless of form Minutes of open meetings – preparation

 OMA requires a governmental body to make and keep either a “certified agenda” or a recording of each executive session (except for a closed meeting held to consult with an attorney under Gov’t Code§ ) Attending while aware of noncompliance is a Class C misdemeanor  Must keep for at least two years after date of meeting  Must preserve certified agenda or recording while any legal action is pending  Gov’t Code§ , § (OMA) Certified agenda or recording of executive session – requirements

 Certified agenda must include: subject matter of each deliberation record of any further action taken Indication of date and time by presiding officer at the beginning and end of executive session  Presiding officer must certify that agenda is a true and correct record of the executive session  Gov’t Code § (OMA) Certified agenda - preparation

 Certified agenda or recording of an executive session may NOT be disclosed to the public except under a court order issued under Gov’t Code§ (b) Disclosure is a Class B misdemeanor and also can subject one to civil liability - Gov’t Code §  Prohibition on disclosure is “to the public” Certified agenda or recording of executive session – limited access

 Does anyone outside of the governmental body members who were in the executive session have access to the certified agenda or recording of an executive session? Current members who were absent – yes Current members who were not yet members at the time of the executive session – yes Former members who were members at the time of the executive session – no Non-members who were present at the meeting – no Certified agenda or recording of executive session – certain access

 If not made for record-keeping, OMA likely does not address  PIA definition of “public information” includes: information that is written, produced, collected, assembled, or maintained... in connection with the transaction of official business... by an individual officer... in the officer's... official capacity and the information pertains to official business of the governmental body  Thus, personal notes made as mere memory aids are subject to disclosure under the PIA unless exception applies – ORDs 635 (1994), 626 (1994), 327 (1982), 120 (1976) Personal notes made by governmental body members during a meeting

 Public access to meeting documents mandated by the OMA in only two instances: online background materials of an academic teaching institution, university system, or junior college district minutes (including attachments) of open meetings  Public access to meeting documents in other instances will be governed by the PIA  When in doubt, ask your legal counsel Summary

Open Government Hotline Toll Free (877) OPEN-TEX (877) OAG website Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not constitute legal advice, and are not official opinions of the Office of the Texas Attorney General. Questions and Assistance