Mini Overview Peter Kasper NBI 2002. The MiniBooNE Collaboration University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Bucknell University, Lewisburg University of California,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Miami 2010 MINIBOONE  e e  2008! H. Ray, University of Florida.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
(Status of ) The search for nm to ne oscillations at MiniBooNE
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 7 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
1 MiniBooNE and Sterile Neutrinos M. Shaevitz Columbia University WIN 05 Workshop Extensions to the Neutrino Standard Model: Sterile Neutrinos MiniBooNE:
8/5/2002Ulrich Heintz - Quarknet neutrino puzzles Ulrich Heintz Boston University
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
1 Neutrino Possibilities at the SNS 2 Motivation For me as an experimentalist motivation is two fold On this workshop we have nice theory talks about.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Results from Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Huaizhang Deng University of Pennsylvania.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Carolina Neutrino Workshop Prospects for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source Vince Cianciolo, ORNL for the SNS Collaboration.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
05/09/2011Teppei Katori, MIT1 Teppei Katori Massachusetts Institute of Technology Phenomenology 2011 symposium (Pheno11), Madison, WI, May 9, 2011 Test.
Monday, Feb. 24, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #11 Monday, Feb. 24, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Brief Review of sin 2  W measurement 2.Neutrino.
MiniBooNE - Booster Neutrino Experiment Andrew Green Indiana University DPF 2002May 27, 2002.
Sterile Neutrino Oscillations and CP-Violation Implications for MiniBooNE NuFact’07 Okayama, Japan Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University August 10, 2007.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
June 10 & 11, 2002Jonathan Link, Columbia Fermilab Users Meeting The Physics and Status of MiniBooNE Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Annual.
Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #6 Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2.Neutrino.
MiniBooNE : Current Status Heather Ray Los Alamos National Lab.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Mineral Oil Tests for the MiniBooNE Detector Jennifer L. Raaf University of Cincinnati November 8, 2001 Overview of MiniBooNE Experiment Detector Event.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
DOE Review 3/18/03Steve Brice FNALPage 1 MiniBooNE Status Steve Brice Fermilab Overview Beam – Primary Beam – Secondary Beam Detector – Calibration – Triggering.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
,,,,, The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Liangjian Wen On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Daya Bay Detectors.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Monday, Mar. 3, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12 Monday, Mar. 3, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Measurements 1.Atmospheric.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. MiniBooNE: Current Status.
Gordon McGregor Saturday, November 8, NBI03, Tsukuba, Japan. The Neutrino Flux At MiniBooNE.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
Future Sterile Neutrino Searches from Stopped Pions and Muons SNAC 11 VPI September 26-28, 2011 Gerry Garvey Los Alamos Nat. Lab.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Presentation transcript:

Mini Overview Peter Kasper NBI 2002

The MiniBooNE Collaboration University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Bucknell University, Lewisburg University of California, Riverside University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati University of Colorado, Boulder Columbia University, Nevis Labs, Irvington Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Indiana University, Bloomington Los Alamos National Laboratory Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Princeton University, Princeton

MiniBooNE Goals MiniBooNE’s primary goal is to unequivocally confirm or refute the LSND oscillation signal for   eMiniBooNE’s primary goal is to unequivocally confirm or refute the LSND oscillation signal for   e Similar L/E ~ 1 to LSND but ~10x higher energySimilar L/E ~ 1 to LSND but ~10x higher energy –E ~ GeV –L = 500 m Experimental signatures and backgrounds are completely different from LSNDExperimental signatures and backgrounds are completely different from LSND –provides a truly independent test of their result. If the signal is confirmed, a second detector will be built...If the signal is confirmed, a second detector will be built... –i.e. full BooNE

LSND and KARMEN Results KARMEN limitsKARMEN limits – Solid curve calculated with the Feldman & Cousins approach – Dashed curve is experiment’s sensitivity LSND signal region LSND signal region –  90% Lmax - L < 2.3 –  99% Lmax - L < 4.6

The LSND Signal Signal discrimination is encapsulated into a variable R Signal discrimination is encapsulated into a variable R  –Ratio of likelihood that e + and  are correlated to likelihood that  is accidental ± 22.4 ± 6.0 event excess consistent with  e p  e + n followed by n p  d  ± 22.4 ± 6.0 event excess consistent with  e p  e + n followed by n p  d . –4 times the expected rate from beam  e `s signal

LSND Implications What we know from other experimentsWhat we know from other experiments –Atmospheric  ’s oscillate at  m 2 ~ with maximal mixing ( e.g. SuperK )    favored    favored –Solar e ’s oscillate at  m 2 < ( e.g. SNO )    e favored    e favored LSND results has  m 2 ~ for    eLSND results has  m 2 ~ for    e –hence require  4 neutrino mass states Only 3 active flavors ( LEP )Only 3 active flavors ( LEP ) –hence sterile ’s are required OR –neutrino masses  antineutrino masses

An Experimentally Allowed Model Bimaximal mixing in modelsBimaximal mixing in models –W. Krolikowski HEP-PH/ – R.N.Mohapatra Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) ,      m 2 LSND  m 2 Solar  m 2 Atm. e   s

An Alternative Model Maximal CPT violation in Dirac mass termsMaximal CPT violation in Dirac mass terms –Barenboim, Borissov, Lykken & Smirnov HEP-PH/ –Generates independent masses for ’s and  ’s –Motivated by branes with extra dimensions     m 2 LSND  m 2 Solar  m 2 Atm. e        

Proton Beam MiniBooNE’s neutrino beam will be produced with a high intensity ( 5 Hz ) 8 GeV proton beam from the Fermilab Booster.MiniBooNE’s neutrino beam will be produced with a high intensity ( 5 Hz ) 8 GeV proton beam from the Fermilab Booster. The Booster cycles at 15 Hz and produces 1.6  sec beam pulses.The Booster cycles at 15 Hz and produces 1.6  sec beam pulses. New construction Proton beam line Target Hall Decay pipe Detector building

Beam Layout Beam Layout Civil construction for the 8 GeV Beamline, Target Hall, and Decay Pipe began in June  50m long decay pipe

Beam Line Construction Civil Construction is complete and component installation is well advanced. Ready for beam tests this April.Civil Construction is complete and component installation is well advanced. Ready for beam tests this April. 24-Jan-02

Target Hall Construction Civil and target pile construction is complete. Horn installation is scheduled to start in early May.Civil and target pile construction is complete. Horn installation is scheduled to start in early May. 24-Jan-02

Decay Pipe Construction Two absorbers at 25m (removable) and 50m (fixed) provide a cross check of the intrinsic e component in the beam. 13-Nov-00 50m absorber with muon counters 25m absorber 24-Jan-02 Air heat exchanger for cooling berm

The Target A 65cm, air cooled Be target will be inserted inside a single focussing horn Hadroproduction studies will be done for our energy and target. (BNL910 and HARP) 7-Feb-02

The Horn A single horn system will be used ( proposal had two )A single horn system will be used ( proposal had two ) Less flux but also less background from high energy (>1 GeV) neutrinos than the original 2 horn designLess flux but also less background from high energy (>1 GeV) neutrinos than the original 2 horn design Horn has been built and tested for > 10 7 pulsesHorn has been built and tested for > 10 7 pulses 20-Jun-01

The Neutrino Beam Intrinsic e contamination can be.. – –Inferred from  events – –Simulated using hadroproduction measurements – –Measured using muon counters in and around the decay pipe – –Checked by comparing 50m and 25m absorber results

The Detector The detector is a 40ft (12.2m) diameter sphere filled with 800 tons of pure mineral oil and instrumented with ~1500 8” PMTs.The detector is a 40ft (12.2m) diameter sphere filled with 800 tons of pure mineral oil and instrumented with ~1500 8” PMTs. It is housed underground in order to provide some cosmic ray shielding.It is housed underground in order to provide some cosmic ray shielding.

The Detector (cont.) It will consist two optically separated regions...It will consist two optically separated regions... –An inner sphere with 1280 PMTs viewing a 445 ton fiducial volume ( 10% photocathode coverage) –An outer veto shell 35cm thick monitored by 240 PMTs.

Detector Status The detector enclosure was completed in December 2000.The detector enclosure was completed in December The PMT installation was completed in October 2001.The PMT installation was completed in October Oil fill started early January and the detector is now 60% full.Oil fill started early January and the detector is now 60% full. Detector Enclosure Jan 2001 PMT installation Sept. 2001

A Possible Stopping Cosmic Ray Muon

Event Reconstruction MiniBooNE will reconstruct quasi-elastic e interactions by identifying the characteristic Cerenkov rings produced by the electrons...MiniBooNE will reconstruct quasi-elastic e interactions by identifying the characteristic Cerenkov rings produced by the electrons...

Approximate # of Events after 1-2 Years

MiniBooNE Sensitivity: 2 yr’s of  The major backgroundsThe major backgrounds –misid  ’s from CC  – misid  0 ’s from NC  Uncertainties in these rates to be < 5% in each case.Uncertainties in these rates to be < 5% in each case. e ‘s Intrinsic to the beam have a different energy distribution than oscillation e ‘s e ‘s Intrinsic to the beam have a different energy distribution than oscillation e ‘s –Event energy can be measured using scintillation light

Summary All civil construction projects for MiniBooNE are essentially complete.All civil construction projects for MiniBooNE are essentially complete. The detector instrumentation is complete and the oil fill is well under way.The detector instrumentation is complete and the oil fill is well under way. MiniBooNE is on schedule for taking first data later this summer.MiniBooNE is on schedule for taking first data later this summer. The biggest issue facing the experiment at this point is the Booster’s ability to deliver the required number of protons.The biggest issue facing the experiment at this point is the Booster’s ability to deliver the required number of protons. –The limits will be due to radiation levels both in the tunnel and above ground.