Educator Effectiveness Dr. Mark Kirkemier, Coordinator Dr. Alison Grizzle, Education Administrator Dr. Kisha Tolbert-Woods, Education Specialist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
Alabama Department of Education WebEx # 2 November 3, 2011.
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
DOCUMENTING STUDENT GROWTH: PORTFOLIOS  I can explain the student growth evidence collection process. The Proof is in the Performance.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Achievenj in 2016 and beyond
Recertification TEAM Teacher Evaluation Process.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Five Required Elements
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
EDD/581 Week 1.
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
State Department of Education
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Educator Effectiveness Dr. Mark Kirkemier, Coordinator Dr. Alison Grizzle, Education Administrator Dr. Kisha Tolbert-Woods, Education Specialist

A fresh perspective What’s the biggest budgetary expenditure of your school system? What percent of the budget does it repesent?

A fresh perspective What is the purpose for our existence as educators? Who knows the dynamics and context best?

A fresh perspective If shouldn’t we spend our time and attention growing and supporting them? If our biggest investment is in people (not stuff) – and they have the greatest impact on the purpose for our existence as an organization – shouldn’t we spend our time and attention growing and supporting them?

A fresh perspective Fall 2013 – State Design Team Spring 2013 – Alabama Design Complete – Field Testing 2015 – State-wide meetings with District Teams

DESIGN CHALLENGES IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES

A fresh perspective It is critical to understand the philosophical approach of the design team in the context of the intent of PLAN 2020!

How? Organizations are the product of the way the people in them think… Peter Senge

How? To Change – people have to have the opportunity to change the way they think and interact

The way we think – is defined by our capacity – (increase our capacity = change the way we approach our work) The way we think – is defined by our capacity – (increase our capacity = change the way we approach our work) The way we interact is structured by the context and environment we create = systems and processes The way we interact is structured by the context and environment we create = systems and processes

“ Organizations learn through individuals who learn.” Peter Senge

A New Model Flexibility and Freedom Framework Contextually Significant Process – Because context MATTERS!

Focus on Development No requirement to use pre-existing tools Focus on the process Focus on consensus building Focus on creating and validating tools and rubrics Not about final classifications “How well do tools and rubrics you choose or design differentiate for assessing quality of practice?”

Classifications How do we help to increase teacher practice? How do we help to identify where a teacher is in practice so that we can create a pathway for growth? Ineffective Developing Effective Exemplary

The things we truly value…. We will give our TIME, ATTENTION, ENERGY, & RESOURCES

Current Model EDUCATE Alabama Self Assessment Tool Two Observations

Current Process All evaluators and evaluatees must enter multiple types of supporting evidence on a regular basis throughout the year. Evaluators should complete and enter a minimum of two announced/ unannounced observations for evaluatees during the school year. Evaluatees are defined as all regular classroom educators, ARI coaches, school counselors, librarians, special educators, speech/language pathologists.

HISTORY PEPE Compliance Scripting Over Ranking EDUCATE Self Assessment Plan 2020 LEA Design Team to design components that align with a new framework

Alabama State Board of Education PLAN 2020

“Every child is taught by a well- prepared, resourced, supported and effective teacher” “Develop and implement a professional growth evaluation system for teachers and leaders that includes multiple measures of student growth and achievement”

Teaching Effectiveness Professional Commitment (1/3) Professional Practice (1/3) Impact on Engagement and Learning (1/3)

Graphic

Analysis of Teacher Impact Analysis of Teacher Practice Principal Training Evaluation Tools * Crucial Conversations

Professional Commitment (1/3) Self Assessment Conversation with Administrator Creation of a PLP Submission of Evidence

Professional Commitment Every Teacher Every Year 1/3 of overall classification Rubric Did they complete the self assessment? Was the PLP well designed and reflective? Does the provided evidence align with PLP? Was there growth in chosen indicators?

Professional Commitment EDUCATE Alabama with a Rubric

Professional Commitment Self- Assessment PLPEvidence Professionalism Total 7% 8% 30% Self- AssessmentPLPEvidenceTotal 10% 30%

A fresh perspective What are the most important things? What do we (as a school system) value most? What should we give priority?

Professional Practice (1/3) Observations Instructional Design/ Collaboration Professional Showcase

Professional Practice All non-tenured teachers 1/3 of all tenured teachers Tenured teachers – at least once every three years If ineffective, then must complete process following year 35% of overall classification Rubrics and tools for each of the components

Professional Practice 1. Two Observations (60 minutes of practice) 20% of overall classification Any Format Compilation of walk-throughs Unannounced Announced w/ pre and post conference Videotape with reflection

Professional Practice 2. Reflection on Instructional Design 10% of overall classification Action research Professional Learning Communities Data- team meetings Lesson studies Common assignments with work analysis

Professional Practice 3. Professional Showcase 5% of overall classification Art Show Band Competition High percentage of AP Scores Vertical teaming School Committees Mentoring Graduate courses

Professional Practice Two Observations Instructional Design Professional Showcase Total 20%10%5%35%

The things we truly value…. We will give our TIME, ATTENTION, ENERGY, & RESOURCES

Impact on Engagement and Learning Student/ Parent Surveys Student Growth Data

Impact on Engagement and Learning All non-tenured teachers 1/3 of tenured teachers 35% of overall classification Tenured teachers – at least once every three years If ineffective, then must complete process following year Actual data analyzed and discussed each year with respect to self assessment and PLP

Impact on Engagement and Learning Student/ Parent Survey Dependent on age LEA can choose survey tool Advanc_Ed offers survey tools Student Growth Data ACT / ASPIRE What data does the district use to assess student growth towards College and Career Ready Goals?

Impact on Engagement and Learning

SurveysStudent Growth Data Total 10%25%35%

Important Reminder Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things…

whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me…

The things we truly value…. We will give our TIME, ATTENTION, ENERGY, & RESOURCES

Teaching Effectiveness  Professional Commitment (Plan due Summer 2016) Self Assessment and Conversation; PLP and Evidence  Professional Practice (Plan due Summer 2016) 2 “observations” (60 minutes of practice) Analysis of Instructional Design Professional Showcase  Impact on Engagement and Learning (Plan due Summer 2017) Student/ Parent Surveys Student growth data

Teaching Effectiveness

Goal How can we own this process? How can we own this work? How can we own this process? How can we own this work? How can we engage teachers and community shareholders into the development phase so that all involved have buy-in? How can we engage teachers and community shareholders into the development phase so that all involved have buy-in? How do we make this about growing teachers and not about compliance? How do we make this about growing teachers and not about compliance? How do we take an existing tool and align it to standards? How do we take an existing tool and align it to standards? How do we refine our observations so that the data can be given a qualitative or quantitative ranking? How do we refine our observations so that the data can be given a qualitative or quantitative ranking?

Example Process “How would we define an “Effective Teacher”? “What is observable in teaching a lesson?” “What is observable in lesson design/ PLC?” “What does Effective look? Once defining effective, how does Exemplary? Developing? Ineffective look?” “How do we want to measure each of these categories?”

How do we measure our beliefs about effectiveness? What tool(s) should we use for observations? Is there an existing rubric for this tool? How do the tool and the rubric align to the standards? How are we going to train observers on this tool?

Example Rubric Observation Rubrics from Field Test School Systems

Existing Practice

Possible Questions Do you need to be able to explain how you will differentiate quality of the above components? Yes Do we have to use quantitative components in self- assessment process, observations, analysis of instructional design? No Do you need to have a well-defined and understandable system in the end? Yes Do you need to be able to discuss how the information will be used to aide teachers in refining and strengthening their crafts? Yes

Commercial Tool What if we want to use a tool that has been designed by an outside source, which has already been proven to be valid and reliable? Please don’t buy an “out of box” product! How have you created buy-in and consensus around the tool? How have you trained your evaluators?

Big Picture Think outside the box. Engage teachers, leaders, and stakeholders Think about the needs of your teachers – How will you grow teachers so that they can grow students? Create pathways and plans for growth. Create a process that is not about compliance but about the “work” Create a plan for your district to engage in conversations about growth using an accurate indication of a teacher’s current level of practice.

What are some ways we the ALSDE can help? Facilitate hands-on, interactive sessions with district work team to discuss rubrics and tools Seek out additional research to support your work Inform your team on tools to analyze or refine Serve as a thought partner in planning phase

Dr. Mark KirkemierDr. Kisha Tolbert-Woods Dr. Alison Grizzle