Research & Education (R&E) Networking Warren Matthews (Georgia Tech).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Network & Services Overview June 2012 Jeff Ambern
Advertisements

Massachusetts SchoolSpeedTest Month: Using The SchoolSpeedTest to Assess Massachusetts K-12 Internet Readiness For Digital Learning Spencer Watson,
Access for Achievement California K-12 High Speed Network (K12HSN) A state-funded program to ensure network access for CA’s K-12 February 2007.
© 2011 Georgia Institute of Technology OpenFlow/SDN at Georgia Tech Russ Clark in collaboration with Ron Hutchins, Nick Feamster, and Matt Sanders July.
1 In VINI Veritas: Realistic and Controlled Network Experimentation Jennifer Rexford with Andy Bavier, Nick Feamster, Mark Huang, and Larry Peterson
Computer Networks Fall, 2007 Prof Peterson. CIS 235: Networks Fall, 2007 Western State College  What is “store and forward”?  What is a buffer / queue?
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Discussion Session for HTTP and DNS Wenbing Zhao
Presented By: Michael Pincott and Matt Vidal July 29, 2003.
A Criticism of: “Moving beyond end-to-end path information to optimize CDN performance” Gautam Bhawsar Alok Rakkhit.
Firewalls and VPNS Team 9 Keith Elliot David Snyder Matthew While.
Gigabit in the last mile panel discussion John Killebrew February 8, 2006.
CS332 Ch. 28 Spring 2014 Victor Norman. Access delay vs. Queuing Delay Q: What is the difference between access delay and queuing delay? A: I think the.
Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants Laurie Burns Director of Member Activities EDUCAUSE Gathering of.
SCINET The South Carolina Information Network A Gathering of State Networks St. Louis, Missouri April 17, 2000 Tom Fletcher Deputy Director Office of Information.
Direct-to-Discovery (D2D) Claudia Huff (F3/GTRI), Ed Morrison (BCS) and Warren Matthews (Georgia Tech).
1/36. 2/36 Towards Sustained Scalability of Communication Networks Mike P. Wittie
Innovating the commodity Internet Update to CENIC 14-Mar-2007.
Introduction 1-1 Lecture 3 Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 6 th edition Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley March 2012 CS3516: These slides.
Appropriate Telecom Systems for the Provision of Internet Connectivity to Remote Schools in Least Developed Countries 47 th FITCE Congress, London 2008.
1 Internet Society Creating an Enabling Environment for the Internet: Role of IXPs ENOG 8 – 9 September 2014, Baku Maarit Palovirta, European Regional.
OPTICAL NETWORKS. CONTENTS 1. History of Optical Networks 2. About Optical fiber. 3. Synchronous Optical Network 4. SONET Features 5. When Is a Separate.
Abilene Update Joint Techs Summer ’05 Vancouver, CA Steve Cotter Director, Network Services Steve Cotter Director, Network Services.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey EDC Network Status Architecture and Technology Program Mike Rechtenbaugh Raytheon 3/04/2002.
TASIM Trans Eurasian Super Information Highway Summary Presentation October 2010.
The Singapore Advanced Research & Education Network.
Florida International UniversityAMPATH AMPATH Julio E. Ibarra Director, AMPATH Global Research Networking Summit Brussels, Belgium.
Peering Policies - When to Peer, When not to Peer Quilt Peering Workshop October 2006 St Louis, Missouri.
1 NYSERNet Updates and the Next Generation Network Joint Techs Meeting Salt Lake City, Feb 2005 Bill Owens.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Identifying Application Impacts on Network Design Designing and Supporting.
Internet2 Fall Conference October 4, 2001 Partnering for Success MAX – Qwest Alliance Builds a High Performance Network in the Washington, D.C. Metro Area.
Case Study – Building A Regional Optical Network (RON) The Quilt Fiber Workshop June 21-23, 2004.
INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE. LANS WANS INTRANETS AND EXTRANETS WIRELESS NETWORKS.
CPR and GAMMON Deployment Experiences. Warren Matthews Georgia Institute of Technology.
Tele-immersion in eCommerce Saša Glasenhardt “Lošinjska plovidba - Brodarstvo”
The Future of the Internet and Internet2 IEC Executive 2001 Douglas E. Van Houweling President and CEO, UCAID IEC Executive
Abilene SEGP Update  Tennessee Statewide Network Planning Meeting  Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager May 13, 2003.
Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 2 CS 3830 Lecture 8 Omar Meqdadi Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of.
IT 210: Web-based IT Winter 2012 Measuring Speed on the Internet and WWW.
Five Essential Elements for Future Regional Optical Networks Harold Snow Sr. Systems Architect, CTO Group.
I-Light Network Caroline Weilhamer Manager of Services and Support June 28, 2012.
Advanced Networks: The Past and the Future – The Internet2 Perspective APAN 7 July 2004, Cairns, Australia Douglas Van Houweling, President & CEO Internet2.
Scalable Bandwidth on Demand: A New Model for the Era of Entitlement? Educause Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference January 17, 2003 Gregory D. Palmer Jennifer.
Measuring and Mitigating Web Performance Bottlenecks in Broadband Access Networks Srikanth Sundaresan, Nick Feamster (Georgia Tech) Renata Teixeira (Inria)
Boulder Research and Administration Network (BRAN), Front Range GigaPoP (FRGP), Bi-State Optical Network (BiSON) 1 Marla Meehl UCAR/FRGP/BiSON Manager.
Insight and Innovation for Technology Leaders October 15, 2010, Atlanta, GA The Hows and Whys of Web Conferencing Claudia H. Huff Fellow Information and.
4/17/00Georgia Board of Regents1 Gathering of State Networks (a.k.a. - A Confederation of Commiseration) Tom Maier Executive Director, OIIT.
Mark Johnson Current Organization Participants –Academic (Duke, UNC, NCSU, WFU) –Industry (Cisco, Nortel, IBM, Alcatel, Time-Warner, Interpath)
March 2001 CBCB The Holy Grail: Media on Demand over Multicast Doron Rajwan CTO Bandwiz.
Regional Optical Networks and Evolving US National Research and Education Networking Paul Schopis, OARnet Dale Smith, University of Oregon International.
Internet Connectivity and Performance for the HEP Community. Presented at HEPNT-HEPiX, October 6, 1999 by Warren Matthews Funded by DOE/MICS Internet End-to-end.
Abilene Overview and Connectivity Options NSF-HPNC Proposal Preparation Workshop Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager 12 April 2002.
The Egyptian Academic Research Network Dina Barakat EUN Vice Director Cairo - Egypt 4 Nov The Egyptian Academic Research Network Dina Barakat EUN.
Spring 2004 Internet2 Member Meeting NLR Service Center Update Dave Jent Indiana University.
7 May 2002 Next Generation Abilene Internet2 Member Meeting Washington DC Internet2 Member Meeting Washington DC.
Campus View of I2 Tim Sigmon Director, Advanced Technology University of Virginia
1 Backbone Performance Comparison Jeff Boote, Internet2 Warren Matthews, Georgia Tech John Moore, MCNC.
Utah Education Network Current Status February 2005.
05 October 2001 End-to-End Performance Initiative Network Measurement Matt Zekauskas, Fall 2001 Internet2 Member Meeting Network Measurement.
Internet2. Yesterday’s Internet  Thousands of users  Remote login, file transfer  Applications capitalize on underlying technology.
Abilene: Everything You’ve Always Wanted to Know, but Couldn’t Find on the Web Site Brown Bag Session Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager 13 August.
The Internet2 Network and LHC Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Given by Rich Carlson LHC Meeting 25.
Internet2 Applications & Engineering Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development.
June 11, 2002 Abilene Route Quality Control Initiative Aaron D. Britt Guy Almes Route Optimization.
Remote Instrumentation - Overview Presentation
AARNet Network Update IPv6 Workshop APAN 23, Manilla 2007 AARNet.
OneTenn: 21st Century Cyberinfrastructure for Tennessee
AARNet Network Update IPv6 Workshop APAN 23, Manilla 2007 AARNet.
The Internet and Its Applications
Wide-Area Networking at SLAC
Infrastructure Update
Presentation transcript:

Research & Education (R&E) Networking Warren Matthews (Georgia Tech).

What is R&E Networking? Internet for the Research and Education Community. – Research Universities – Colleges and Teaching Universities – Schools – Some commercial research labs (e.g. Microsoft Research). Often referred to as Internet2. 2

What is Internet2? National Backbone Network – also National Lambda Rail (NLR) Advanced Networking in General – Peachnet (Georgia State-wide R&E network) – Southern Crossroads (SOX) Gigapop and Regional Optical Network. Umbrella organization for applications communities – e.g. Philadelphia Orchestra 3

What R&E Networking isn’t. Not commercial, unless it is. – e.g. ticket sales. Not myspace/facebook, but sometimes. – SOX Peers with Google. Not to be confused with Web 2.0 4

National Lambda Rail (NLR) Internet2 Footprint is similar. 5

Peachnet Peachnet passeswithin 5 miles of 35school district offices. SOX connects most ofthe R&E institutes inthe South East toNational andInternationaldestinations. 6

SEGP Sponsored Education Group Participant. SOX sponsors Peachnet. Any K-12 District connecting to Peachnet will get connectivity to Internet2/NLR via SOX. Improve performance, enabling access to rich content. 7

Why not Internet1 (1/2)? EdTechNext mentions slow and unreliable connections, pop-up adds etc. 10 years ago, R&E community faced similar challenges. – lack of capacity, routing, etc led to formation of Internet2 organization, Abilene and regional gigapops. R&E Networking launched research into new era. 8

Why not Internet1 (2/2)? R&E is not competing with ISPs. – K-12 doesn’t “compete” with Universities – Large corporations build their own networks. We need AT&T, Level3, Qwest, AGL etc – Fiber providers But we want – Separate Layer 3 service with high capacity connections and direct routing between sites. 9

Capacity. Congestion causes packet loss and delay. Interactive applications are harder to use. Even non-interactive applications are slow. Bandwidth is required but not sufficient – Also latency, jitter, routing. 10

A Typical K-12 System in Georgia. Severely congested pipes mean long queues in routers. This graph show the delay (in milliseconds) between the clean room at Georgia Tech and a district central office. In the evenings and weekends, delay is 5 milliseconds. 11

A K-12 System Connected to Peachnet. 2.2 milliseconds 2.4 milliseconds 001e.4fbf.e53d This graph show the delay (in milliseconds) between the clean room at Georgia Tech and a district central office. 12

Utilization More capacity means less congestion Immediately see usage 2- 3x previous capacity. 13 District upgraded from 20 Mbps to 155 Mbps (Peachnet).

What is it Used For? 14

What Else Is It Good For? The applications mentioned on the MUSE site ( – videoconferencing (D2D) – teleimmersion/telepresence (Gray’s Reef) – remote control of scientific instrumentation (ORNL) – Sensors, simulations, haptics 15

Beyond the Bandwidth Barrier Additional capacity is just the first step. What becomes possible if there was almost unlimited bandwidth? R&E networking enables advanced applications for new learning experiences. Also see 16

Next Steps Equipment and Professional Development – To make optimal use of R&E networking, you need to have the classroom-side equipment and professional development for teachers who need to know how to use it to further learning. 17

Summary - What is R&E Networking? A network, advanced networking, and the applications it enables. Fourth Leg (for added stability) – Enthusiastic participants Key component of 21 st Century learning. Potential. 18

Links

Any Questions? 20