K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, 2010 1 FY11 Target System Budget Proposal K. McDonald Princeton U. (November 1, 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Advertisements

1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) -Chicane & Absorber David Neuffer C. Rogers, P. Snopok, C. Yoshikawa, … January 31, 2012.
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Presentations.com POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Presentations.com Outlet Inlet n’=375 n=150 n φ =75 (dφ=1.2 ⁰ ) Extra Terms.
K. McDonald LEMC Workshop 22 Apr 2008 From MERIT to a Muon Collider (Front End) K.T. McDonald Princeton U. Low Emittance Muon Collider Workshop Fermilab,
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
Simulation of High-Intensity Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo
K. McDonald 2 nd Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop 6 Nov 2008 High-Power Targets for Superbeams and Neutrino Factories (and Muon Colliders) K.T. McDonald.
MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Targetry R&D in the 5-Year Plan Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.
Primary Target Systems for a Muon Collider / Neutrino Factory. What has the experimental effort taught us thus far. N. Simos, H. Kirk, S. Kahn, P. Thieberger,
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.
MERcury Intense Target (MERIT) Experiment – or nTOF-11 Mercury System Safety Review Ilias Efthymiopoulos Adrian Fabich (CERN - AB-ATB-EA) Hg-system Safety.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The High-Power Target Experiment at CERN Muon Collaboration Meeting LBNL February 16, 2005.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
MUON COLLIDER: R&D Status & Opportunities for Participation FNAL, February 24, 2011   1.Motivation & OverviewSteve Geer 2.Accelerator R&DVladimir.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Materials for the Target System Internal Shield K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 27, 2010) Iron Plug Proton.
1.Sep.2004A.Fabich, CERN AB/ATBORNL target workshop Workshop on high power targets at ORNL A.Fabich CERN AB/ATB 1. August 2004 message from the research.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
Muon Acceleration Program Technology Development A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009 It is not a Project!
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
CERN/BENE meeting, July Marcos Dracos Collection system for future neutrino beams horn and target integration 2 LoI's sent –CERN –Strasbourg Who.
Proton Delivery to Target Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP 2012 Winter Meeting March 7, 2012.
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer May 31, Initial Design Overview For design purposes, the following is assumed –H - beam comes from PIP II and follow-on.
10/9/2007 Global Design Effort 1 Optical Matching Device Jeff Gronberg / LLNL October 9, 2007 Positron source KOM - Daresbury This work performed under.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Program Collaboration Meeting Columbia University June 11, 2003.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
H. Haseroth Friday, August 31, 2001 MUG Meeting 1 Overview of the CERN Neutrino Factory Machine Studies H. Haseroth for the Neutrino Factory Working Group.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The E951 Targetry Program Targetry Meeting CERN September 19, 2003.
Simulation of High-Power Mercury Jet Targets for Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider R. Samulyak, 1,2 H.C. Chen, 1 H.G. Kirk, 2 K.T. McDonald 3 1 Stony.
1 February 07, 2008 Simulation Status of Mercury Jet Target HeeJin Park.
1 NFMCC Friday Meeting January 4, 2008 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment at CERN HeeJin Park.
ICHEP Conference Amsterdam 31st International Conference on High Energy Physics 24  31 July 2002 Gail G. Hanson University of California, Riverside For.
Proposal Preparation. Documents for June PAC  Full Proposal  Starting point is LOI + updates in EOI  Project Definition Report  Cost estimate  Excel-based.
MCS meeting 20/11/2015 S. Guiducci. Introduction Yesterday meeting has shown an interest in a large physics community to incremental development of muon.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.
BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Summary of WP3 J. Pozimski.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
Outline: Why now ? What ? How ?
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Presentation transcript:

K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, FY11 Target System Budget Proposal K. McDonald Princeton U. (November 1, 2010)

K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, Overview The concept of the target system for a Muon Collider was enunciated in 1995 by Palmer et al. To collect  and  of both signs, use a solenoid-magnet capture system with a free mercury jet target, and a 4-MW proton 15 Hz. This concept is also appropriate for the target system of a Neutrino Factory based on muon beams (with a proton beam rep rate of 50 Hz). This concept has been validated by the MERIT experiment (CERN, 2007). However, this concept remains very conceptual, and little effort has been made to explore it in detail since Neutrino Factory Feasibility Study II (2001). Example: Already in 1995 it was realized that the use of a high field solenoid around the target, with field tapering down to a lower value in the  /  transport channel, would result in a reduction of the RMS emittance of the beam (cooling!). But, no systematic study of this desirable feature has ever been performed. In fact, only last Friday was the first plot produced that showed how the target system “cools” the  /  beam, and by 1/3 as much as the official cooling system of the Neutrino Factory (far downstream).  Substantial effort remains to explore the basic concept of the target system. It is desired that the MAP establish a program-wide baseline in the immediate future. The target system baseline can be defined at present only as a “reasonable guess” as to the many interrelated parameters of this system. To define a baseline that represents a detailed technical understanding of this complex system will require significant effort beyond that to date. (Naïve cost estimate for the target system: $1B, not $100M)

K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, FY11 Budget Proposal 1.Nozzle development (SUNYSB Grad student support) 50k This is an ongoing commitment. This money goes to BNL, where is it considered M&S used for a subcontract with Stony Brook. It could be listed under item on the spreadsheet. 2.MHD simulations (SUNYSB Grad student support) 50k [running sum = 100k] This is an ongoing commitment This money goes to BNL, where is it considered M&S used for a subcontract with Stony Brook. It could be listed under item on the spreadsheet. 3.MERIT Analysis; target studies management 10k [running sum = 110k] This is for Princeton, and is something of an ongoing commitment It could be under as "scientist." 4,Energy deposition calculations (Post-Doc) 100k [running sum = 210k] This is a new commitment -- for Nicholas Souchlas who is now in a temporary position sponsored by Stony Brook, paid for by BNL M&S. The goal is to make this a BNL Post-Doc position. The work by Nick would also include target optimization, and magnet configuration optimization. It could be under as Target System Design Simulation. 5. Magnet Engineering 50k [running sum = 260k] This is a new commitment. We do not have a candidate identified here. It would probably go under Thermal Hydraulic Engineering 50k [running sum = 310k] This is a new commitment. We have in mind M&S support for the Peles group at RPI. It would probably go under Target Station Infrastructure 50K [running sum = 360k] This would be for ORNL, Van Graves et al., and so is something of an ongoing commitment. It would probably go under Total for WBS category 1 = 100k Total for WBS category 2 = 260k