Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A look inside…. What is the Texas Cancer Plan? A statewide blueprint for cancer prevention and control A consensus-based, strategic document for public-
Advertisements

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a State Clean Indoor Air Law -New York- Ursula E. Bauer, Ph.D. Director, Tobacco Control Program NYS Department.
CONNECTICUT SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY 2013 PLANNING NINA ROVINELLI HELLER PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT.
Results Introduction Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Wisconsin and the United States. Given the risk of smoking initiation during.
Board Goals. Goals for Presentation Restate Board Goals (short) Why Long-Range Planning is Essential Nancy et al on details of planning (processes, resources,
Arizona Adult Tobacco Survey Response to Health Professional Query Behavior Richard S. Porter, MS Bob Leischow, MPH Arizona Department of Health Services.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP): Current Progress and Future Action Temeika L. Fairley, Epidemiologist Comprehensive Cancer Control.
BACKGROUND US Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline: Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence PHS Guideline recommends four evidence- based.
Natasha M. Jamison, MPH, CHES Health Scientist, Epidemiology Branch Office on Smoking and Health TM Utility of Key Outcome Indicators: Future Directions.
Office of Health Promotion Tobacco Use Prevention Program The Kansas Tobacco Use Prevention Program provides resources, technical assistance and education.
Texas Tobacco Laws. Senate Bill Texas Legislature Tobacco-Free Schools Sec TOBACCO ON SCHOOL PROPERTY The Board of Trustees of a school.
Program Evaluation in Public Health California’s Efforts to Reduce Tobacco Use David Hopkins Terry Pechacek.
Public Health Nursing Practice: Finding Evidence to Apply to Environmental Health Issues Searching for Smoke-Free Air.
Basics: 2As & R Clinical Intervention Artwork by Nancy Z. © 2010 American Aca0emy of Pediatrics (AAP) Children's Art Contest. Support for the 2010 AAP.
SAH Year 2: CHANGE Reassessment Shannon Griffin-Blake, Ph.D. Team Lead, Program Services and Evaluation CDC’s Healthy Communities Program National Center.
Taking a Public Health Approach to Tobacco Control
The Use of Commercial Tobacco Among Minority Populations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Sydney Lee.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Global Tobacco Surveillance System Accomplishments and Opportunities Samira Asma Associate Director Global Tobacco Control Office on Smoking and Health.
Make the Move: Implementation of the U.S. Physical Activity Plan National Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity (NCPPA) A Roadmap to Get America Moving.
COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION GRANT (CTG) NOVEMBER 12, 2012 Makeda Harris, MPM Director, Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation Louisville Metro Department.
Ban Forms of Tobacco Advertising. Background Misuse and Abuse of Tobacco Increase rates of cancer – Lung cancer Heart disease Poor circulation – asthma.
The California Tobacco Control Program: A Model for Change TOBACCO CONTROL SECTION California Department of Health Services March 2001 c.
Washington Communities for Tobacco Prevention Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health September 27, 2012.
Edward Anselm, MD Medical Director Public Health Perspectives of Accountable Care: Opportunities for Alignment.
Students Working Against Tobacco SWAT 101. SWAT is Florida's statewide youth organization working to mobilize, educate and equip Florida youth to revolt.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
New Pathways, New Connections: Tobacco and Behavioral Health Frances M. Harding, Director SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National Conference.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Enhanced Implementation of CDC Guidelines for School Tobacco Programs: Results of a Statewide Evaluation Shelly A. Greller, MS Wisconsin Department of.
Economics of Tobacco Use and Help-Seeking Behavior Bishwa Adhikari, Ph.D., Economist Office on Smoking and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Tobacco Control: How is Michigan Doing? Ron Davis, M.D. Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Henry Ford Health System Tobacco-Free Michigan.
1 States’ Capacity for Comprehensive Nutrition and Physical Activity Programming Nutrition and Physical Activity Workgroup (NUPAWG)
Angela Trosclair, MS Statistician Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Epidemiology Branch OSH/CDC Tobacco Use Supplement.
Changing the social climate of tobacco control in Mississippi: Collaborations Matter APHA 2002 Robert McMillen 1 Bonita Reinert 2 Julie Breen 1 SSRC 1.
4 Years Later: Progress to date advancing goals within the MA Strategic Plan for Asthma CHNA 22 April 5, 2013 Stonehill College Laurita Kaigler-Crawlle,
Designing the Age Friendly Worksite1 Module 5: Focus on the Individual Health Promotion & Disease Prevention.
Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle,
A Fresh Start for WIC: Tailoring Smoking Cessation for WIC Participants and Their Families Laura A.Van Dyke, CSW Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers.
Asthma Disparities – A Focused Examination of Race and Ethnicity on the Health of Massachusetts Residents Jean Zotter, JD Director, Asthma Prevention and.
The National Social Climate of Tobacco Control, Robert McMillen Julie Breen Arthur G. Cosby Social Science Research Center Mississippi State.
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Asthma in Kentucky Kids Tricia McLendon, MPH Asthma Program Manager Kentucky Department for Public Health October 17, 2003.
On the Road to a Tobacco-Free Ghana Edith Koryo Wellington Senior Research Officer Ghana Health Service.
Community Assessment For CX 1 Round 2. Community Assessment Measures what is going on in tobacco control in your community Measures what is going on in.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
Why Indicators Matter Using Outcome Indicators to Plan and Evaluate Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Todd Rogers, PhD California Tobacco Control.
The National Connection for Local Public Health Developing your Community Action Plan May 10, 2012.
Equity Impact Review Guide American Public Health Association November 5, 2013.
* * The National LGBT Tobacco Control Network July 2006.
TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B ASSIST Evaluation.
Citizens of Harvestland Against Tobacco (CHAT) Coalition Harvestland, Missouri Teaming Up To End Tobacco Use.
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Smoke-Free Families National Dissemination Office University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North.
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Shifting Social Climate of Tobacco Control in Mississippi, 2000 to 2004 Robert McMillen SSRC Social Science Research Center Mississippi State University.
Changing Clinical Norms: Tobacco Intervention in Pediatric Care Settings Shann Hauck Wyoming Department of Health Substance Abuse Division 2003 National.
Environmental and Social Influences on Tobacco Use Among 18 to 24 Year-Olds in Idaho Dr. John Hetherington Clearwater Research, Inc. Influences on Young.
Tobacco Disparities: Issues of Inequity & Social Injustice
A Comprehensive Plan for Tobacco Reduction University of Wisconsin Oshkosh.
®® Effects of Print Media on Attitudes Toward Smoking: Results From the Indiana Media Tracking Survey and Newspaper Tracking Systems Alec Ulasevich, PhD.
1 Maintaining downward pressure on smoking prevalence Robert West University College London All Party Parliamentary Group on Smoking September 2015.
TOBACCO Control: Progress and Priorities Charles Gardner, MD, CCFP, MHSc, FRCPC MOH, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit March, 2014.
Tobacco Free Florida Coalition Training Day 2. Welcome to Day 2 Source:
Paul Hunting, MPH Health Education Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health TM Session #: EVAL 111 National Conference.
BUILDING TEAMS: A TOBACCO EVALUATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM Leah Ranney, PhD: Tobacco Prevention Evaluation Program, UNC School of Medicine Leigh Welper.
Smokeasy: A case study of enforcement and penalties of smoke-free indoor air bans in workplaces and restaurants in three states Ryan Patrick, J.D. and.
Edith Cabuslay, MPH Community Health Promotion Unit, BHRS
Presentation transcript:

Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State Department of Health

Objectives To track community coalition progress towards annual workplan goals and objectives. To develop a reporting mechanism that links coalition activities to performance standards.

Background Sustained tobacco control programs that utilize community resources have been shown to be effective in reducing tobacco use. Successful comprehensive programs address tobacco control issues in multiple ways within a given community.

References – American Cancer Society’s Communities of Excellence in Tobacco Control: A Community Planning Guide, – Fawcett, S.B., Sterling, T.D., Paine-Andrews, A., Harris, K.J., Francisco, V.T., Richter, K.P., Lewis, R.K., and Schmid, T.L. (1995). Evaluating community efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.

Measures of Success Community indicators (CIs) are community level objectives that measure what is occurring in a community in the areas of tobacco control. Each objective is associated with recommended strategies and expected outcomes. Coalition activities are linked to CIs to measure changes at the community level.

Community Indicators 38 community indicators are categorized into 4 major priority areas: 1. Eliminate Secondhand Smoke Exposure 2. Prevent Youth Initiation – School-based Prevention Indicators – Reduce Youth Access to Tobacco Products Indicators 3. Promote Tobacco Cessation Services 4. Reduce Tobacco Industry Influence – Tobacco Marketing and Deglamorization Indicators – Economic Indicators

Example Community Indicators: “Eliminate Secondhand Smoke Exposure” Proportion of local communities with clean indoor air policies for public buildings, private worksites, restaurants, and day care centers Proportion of homes with a smoker in the household who report their home is smoke free

Example Community Indicators: “Prevent Youth Initiation” Proportion of schools that provide intensive tobacco use prevention instruction Enforcement/compliance with tobacco retail licensing requirements

Example Community Indicators: “Promote Tobacco Cessation Services” Extent of the availability and use of culturally and linguistically appropriate behavior modification-based tobacco cessation services in the community Proportion of public school districts that provide cessation support for students and all staff who use tobacco

Example Community Indicators: “Reduce Tobacco Industry Influence” Extent of in-store tobacco advertising and promotions Extent of tobacco advertising outside retail stores Extent of tobacco advertisements in magazines, newspapers and other print media

Methods 1. Coalitions incorporate community indicators in workplan goals and objectives. Workplan Goal: to eliminate exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Objective: to have 500 smokers sign a smoke-free home/car pledge via an ETS multi-media campaign. Community Indicator(s): Proportion of homes with a smoker in the household who report their homes/vehicles are smoke free.

Methods - continued 2. Coalitions document program activities into the Local Program Monitoring System (LPMS). The LPMS is a database management system for tracking major coalition activities and accomplishments (process evaluation). Activities are coded into the following categories:Planning Products (PP), Media (M), Services Provided (SP), Community Actions (CA), Community Changes (CC), Impact Rating.

Methods - continued 3. Data is submitted for analysis, quarterly reports are produced. - Activity tabulation reports by community indicator summarize process events for each coalition. - Impact ratings are averaged by activity category. - Cumulative activity charts highlight activity month to month.

LPMS Activity Codes Planning Products (PP) – results of planning activities within the coalition. Example: development of a mission statement, action plans, surveys, hiring staff, grant preparation. Media (M) – local media coverage of the coalition or its projects. Example: media campaigns developed by the coalition.

LPMS Codes - continued Services Provided (SP) – events that inform or educate community members. Example: classes, program, workshops Community Actions (CA) – actions taken to bring about change in the community. Example: meeting with directors of health clinic to discuss availability of cessation services to youth, other advocacy activities.

LPMS Codes-continued Community Changes (CC) – changes in programs, policies or practices of governmental bodies, agencies, businesses and other sectors of the community. Example: health clinic offers new cessation services for youth, community restricts smoking in bars Impact Rating – a measure of the effect of a coalition’s activities within the community. Includes breadth of the community affected and degree of movement towards workplan objectives. Examples: Low Impact - Healthfairs Moderate Impact – write letters to local/state representatives High Impact – County ban on advertising

New York State Results: January-June, coalitions documented 1,708 activities that were coded to a specific community indicator 41% of activities statewide were linked to CI #24: “appropriate behavior modification-based tobacco cessation services in the community”. 26% of activities were linked to CI #9: “schools that provide intensive tobacco use prevention instruction”. 11% of activities were linked to CI #1: “clean indoor air policies”.

Cumulative Statewide Activity Chart, 2002

Individual Coalition (#01) Report Community Indicator #PP#M#SP #attendees #CA#CC CI #1: Clean indoor air policies CI #4: Smoke free homes CI #9: Tobacco prevention instruction 444 2,04817 CI #24: Cessation services Impact ratings (average) N/A2.31.9N/A2.41.9

Cumulative Coalition (#01) Activity Chart – Clean Indoor Air Policies

Cumulative Coalition (#01) Activity Chart – Smoke Free Homes

Cumulative Coalition (#01) Activity Chart – Tobacco Prevention Instruction

Cumulative Coalition (#01) Activity Chart – Cessation Services

Results The area of “Cessation Services” require direct services be provided to the public and have resulted in increased opportunities for smokers who want to quit. Significant planning products, media and community actions are necessary to result in expanded services to the community. Community changes have resulted in programs, policies and practices being offered at new sites, businesses and governmental agencies within the community.

Conclusions Quarterly reports summarize process events related to a given community indicator. Coalitions can identify if they are meeting given targets of a specific objective documented in their workplan. Reports provide the ability to identify areas of greatest activity and highest impact to the community.