Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SOME OF THE MOST COMMON TESTING MISTAKES MADE BY TECHNICIANS PERFORMING VERIFICATIONS TO CAN/ULC The reason I know some of them is because I have.

Advertisements

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)

Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.

Extreme Deviations Herds with large percentage of their cows on Elite List may have two management systems in their herds: High producers Low producers.

Correlation of transcriptomic and phenotypic data in dairy cows. Zaneta Park, David Pacheco, Neil Cox, Alan McCulloch, Russell Smithies, Richard Spelman,

HERD TESTING IN THE US AND THE ROLE OF QC– SIEVERT 2010 Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA/DHIA Services Manager, Quality Certification.

Chapter 7 Introduction to Sampling Distributions

Developing Dairy Producer Peer Groups in Kansas Kristen Schulte Kevin Dhuyvetter Mike Brouk Rich Llewelyn Kansas State University.

1 Determining Mass Mass is a direct measurement of the amount of matter in a sample.

of Experimental Density Data Purpose of the Experiment

Selecting and Judging Dairy Cattle

2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA

Derivation of Factors to Estimate Daily Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score from One Milking of Cows Milked Three Times Daily M. M. Schutz* 1 and H. D.

Understanding the National Dairy Herd Improvement Program Uniform Operating Procedures (Code of Ethics & Uniform Data Collection Procedures) April 2014.

India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,

Average Atomic Mass of Beanium

G. R. Wiggans, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD M. A. Faust ABS Global,

Chap 6-1 A Course In Business Statistics, 4th © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Course In Business Statistics 4 th Edition Chapter 6 Introduction to Sampling.

Metrology Adapted from Introduction to Metrology from the Madison Area Technical College, Biotechnology Project (Lisa Seidman)

Flashback Convert 2.58 m to kilometers. Accuracy and Precision Accuracy- the closeness of measurements to the correct value of the quantity measured.

Error Analysis Monday, August 17 th. Do Now  Complete the following calculation. Make sure you use the correct amount of sig figs:  x174.5  Once.

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission (1) A.H. Sanders 2002 Ashley H. Sanders AIPL on the Web Accessing Data and aipl.arsusda.gov Animal Improvement Programs.

General Confidence Intervals Section Starter A shipment of engine pistons are supposed to have diameters which vary according to N(4 in,

Mean and Standard Deviation of Grouped Data Make a frequency table Compute the midpoint (x) for each class. Count the number of entries in each class (f).

REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,

Teacher Resources  Chapter 4 Color Teaching Transparency —Ch 4.2Ch 4.2  Laboratory Black line Masters Laboratory Black line Masters  Electronic Book.

2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.

Farming: Aim – to look at pastoral and arable farming methods.

Control Measures for Non Sampling Errors 1. Sampling Errors arise due to: POPULATION SPECIFICATION ERROR—when the researcher does not understand who (s)he.

Trends in Noncompliance with Milk Quality Standards for Dairy Herd Improvement Herds in the United States H. D. Norman*, J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.

GENERAL MEASUREMENT CONCEPTS ELEMENTS OF SCORE ANALYSIS TYPES OF SCORES COMMON UNIT OF MEASURE THREE STEPS OF ANALYZING A SET OF SCORES CALCULATORS AND.

2001 NAAB DSEC, April 2002 (1) Revision and Use of Termination Codes PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

Computer Controlled Parlours & Feeders. & A Totally Integrated Solution!

Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,

A.H. Sanders 2002 AIPL on the Web Accessing Data and aipl.arsusda.gov Ashley H. Sanders Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.

John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.

J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,

Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.

Rachel Martin Displacement and Density. Introduction Animals are dosed by being given a specific volume of a test item (or control) formulation.

Percent Error Tax/Commission/tip = % Original / Total 100 Mark up/down = % Original 100 Is = % Of 100 Part = % Whole 100 Difference = % Original 100 Difference=

Prediction of Service Sire Fertility M.T. Kuhn 1 *, J.L. Hutchison 1, and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agriculture Research Service,

Data Collection. Data Capture This is the first stage involved in getting data into a computer Various input devices are used when getting data to the.

2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.

Effect of natural feed additive APC RZ2000 on performance of high yielding Holstein cows.

Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.

Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Percent Error Difference = % Original 100 Difference = % Correct Value 100 Is = % Of 100 Part = % Whole 100.

1 Probability and Statistics Confidence Intervals.

Chapter 7 Introduction to Sampling Distributions Business Statistics: QMIS 220, by Dr. M. Zainal.

Cornell Waste Management Institute Using Dairy Manure Solids (DMS) as Bedding: Properly managed DMS can provide an economic benefit without compromising.

8.2 Estimating a Population Proportion Objectives SWBAT: STATE and CHECK the Random, 10%, and Large Counts conditions for constructing a confidence interval.

Technology in Agricultural Science By: Barbara Reichard.

Manure nutrients are managed on a basis of phosphorus not nitrogen. Most crops use 3 times more nitrogen than they do phosphorus. Example: Fertilizer recommendations.

Chapter 6 Sampling and Sampling Distributions

Control Charts Definition:

Auditing Procedures for Meter Centers and Technicians

Measurement to Management- Recording Heifer Weights

Calibration of Portable Scales

Protocol for on-farm testing trial for RiceAdvice-WeedManager

Speed, Velocity and Acceleration

What was the purpose of this lab?

Unit 1: Matter & Measurement

Speed & Velocity.

Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.

Meter Center & Technician Update

Provider, Supervision & QC Codes

Denmark – DHI technical update

Field Service Update Field Service Advisory Committee March 5, 2019

Experimental design.

MILK YIELD AND COMPOSITION VARIATIONS OF LATVIAN BREED GOATS DEPENDING ON THE LENGTH OF THE KIDS SUCKLING PERIOD Kristīne Piliena, Daina Jonkus Latvia.

Presentation transcript:

Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.

Milking Frequency What milkings are weighed? What milkings are sampled? Who did the work? Supervisor? Dairyman? Partially Supervised Test? Milking Times Use of Electronic Meters or Portable Meters Verification Test?

Proper A/P Factoring Proper Calculation of Lactation Totals Proper Data Collection Rating Calculation Separate DCR for Milk and Components Each cow gets her own DCR Herd DCR is weighted average of individual cow DCRs Potential inaccuracies noted in Idaho DHIA herds

Errors in reporting: Milkings weighed Milkings sampled EMM use Recording days

Errors in reporting: Milkings weighed Milkings sampled EMM use Recording days

What to Change if NeededWhat not to Change Milking Frequency Who did the work Milking Times Which milkings weighed Which milkings sampled Milk Shipped weights Comments to DRPC Test Plan Make sure test plan is right Use test plan that describes the majority of test days Herd Code/Name

Two Types of Factoring Factor to Milk Shipped weights A/P factoring Field Technicians should NOT be factoring milk weights at the farm! DRPC are responsible for proper A/P factoring DRPC have formula to factor for milking periods longer than 24 hours (i.e. is take 26 hour to complete three milkings)

Dairyman wants test day weight to match milk shipped weights Dairyman wants 24-hr weight before supervisor leaves farm Dairyman wants 24-hr component results from laboratory quickly

Did you start with accurate milk shipped weights? Did you use the correct A/P factors? Different factors in different computer programs Simple factoring (milk weight x 3) – WRONG! Different factors for yield and components Are the weights factored more than once? I have seen milk weights factored on the dairy, then factored by field tech and a third time by the DRPC Are factored weights/components reported to DRPC as weighed/sampled from all milkings? Inaccurate reporting and inflated DCR

Questions?