Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Advertisements

Air Pollution Control Program: Proposed Changes Presented to the Air Pollution Control Board April 2009.
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal.
Preserve Sudbury 35 ARTICLE 35 SUDBURY CITIZENS' RESOLUTION TO POSTPONE ADVANCEMENT ON THE PROPOSED BRUCE FREEMAN RAIL TRAIL WHEREAS: the “Character of.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Section 18 Final Rule Overview Presentation originally given by EPA at Emergency Exemption Process Revisions Workshop, revised by Laura Quakenbush.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Indiana Energy Association Environmental Issues Impacting Coal Fired Power Plants September 12, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
North Dakota’s Approach to a Periodic Review to Determine the Status of Consumption of PSD Class I Sulfur Dioxide Increments WESTAR Fall Technical Conference,
GA EPD Air Protection Branch AWMA Southern Section August 2015.
MERCURY POLICIES: A VIEW FROM THE ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR Michael T. Rossler Indiana Energy Conference September 16, 2004.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
Deemed Exports Overview and the Inspector General’s Report Presentation for : Alex Lopes Director, Deemed Exports and Electronics Division Office of National.
IS THERE LIFE AFTER 2007?. WHERE DO TRIBES WANT TO GO WITH THE WRAP?
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
An Overview of Environmental Issues Affecting the Energy Industry December 13, 2010 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2013 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality (800)
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear Skies Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report.
Life After Class I Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest County Potawatomi NTF 2011.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
1 Chapter Twenty-one Environmental Policy. 2 The Controversies Environmental policy creates both winners and losers –Losers could be those who pay but.
NSR and Title V Activities WESTAR Business Meeting May 2005.
Overview of Transboundary Air Management in North America Gothenburg Protocol and Review 20 September 2006 Nav Khera and Kimber Scavo.
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY PROJECT GREEN FIRE Jeff Crawford Attorney General Forest County Potawatomi Community.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
PSD Permitting Process Nancy Mayer EPA OAQPS. 2 Topics Find technical resources for permit review Describe how permits are constructed Describe what to.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
Treatment as a State Willard Antone III, (Air Quality Specialist) Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
Addressing the Oklahoma DEQ v. EPA D.C. Circuit Decision: Implementation Plans in Indian Country National Tribal Forum – May 2015 EPA Outreach and Information.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary.
EPA Proposed Ground-level Ozone (O 3 ) NAAQS Rich McAllister National Tribal Air Association Policy Advisory Committee Hobbs Straus Dean & Walker.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Proposed EPA Power Plant Cooling System Regulations.
Concept – 15A NCAC 2D.0535 Start-up, Shutdown, Malfunction SSM SIP Call EMC – Air Quality Committee January 13, 2016.
Chapter Twenty-one Environmental Policy. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.21 | 2 The Controversies Environmental policy creates.
Department of Environmental Quality
Topic 5: Public Policy Instruments
Airborne Particulate Sampling using Direct Reading Instruments around Frac Sand Facilities Bloomer, WI Jacob Kentnich and Ella Keenan| Environmental.
New Source As defined in the CAA, construction of a new source, or modification of an existing source, that will produce a significant increase in emissions.
Preparing for Permit Review
UNECE WG PM Berlin May 2005 Duncan Johnstone
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Tribal Roles in Minor NSR by: Joy Wiecks, Fond du Lac Band
Department of Environmental Quality
Clean Air Act of 1963 By: Brian Bae Period 4.
EMC – Air Quality Committee March 9, 2016
15A NCAC 2D Start-up, Shut-down, Malfunction SSM SIP Call
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
John Bunyak National Park Service
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Presentation transcript:

Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections to FCPC’s Class I request. Wisconsin issues regarding FCPC Class I.

EPA Class I Determination After several years, on April 29, 2008, EPA formally released its decision to grant FCPC Class I status. EPA also formally recognized the Wisconsin/FCPC Class I agreement, but stated that to the extent it limits Class I, Wisconsin needs to revise its SIP. EPA rejected all of Michigan’s arguments against FCPC Class I.

Basics regarding how Class I Works Tribes and states can request redesignation to Class I status. Applies primarily to new or modified major sources. Limits available increment of additional pollution above baseline in area. Allows Tribe to raise concerns regarding impacts to air quality-related values (AQRVs).

Sources Primarily Impacted by Tribal Class I Status Generally only new or modified major air pollution sources. 100 tons per year for any of 28 listed categories. 250 tons per year for all other Sources. Tribe can raise concerns regarding impacts to increment and to AQRVs. If dispute between state and Tribe, EPA ultimately resolves dispute to protect increment and AQRVs.

What is an Increment?  Increment – maximum allowed increase in concentration of a pollutant above baseline (concentration as of baseline date) in an area Increment per Area Classification (µg/m³) Averaging Period PollutantIIIIII AnnualPM SO²22040 NO² hrPM SO² hrSO²  Increments exist for 3 pollutants (PM, SO², and NO²) and vary based on averaging periods and area classifications:  Class I – national parks and other natural areas  Class II – nearly all other areas in the US  Class III – areas targeted for industrial development

What is an AQRV? AQRVs are resources that the Class I area manager wishes to protect and that may be impacted by air emissions. To date, FCPC has established following categories: –aquatic systems –water quality Other AQRVs can include protection of visibility, protection of vegetative species, etc.

Importance of Tribal Class I Status Powerful, unique tool to influence siting of polluting sources (e.g., coal-fired generation, mining operations, chemical plant operations, quarry operation, etc.). Important tool to preserve unique natural environment of Tribal Reservation and related cultural assets. Because Class I helps to preserve and protect the natural environment, it is important to area tourism. Class I can enhance tribal reputation as ombudsman to protect environment. FCPC Class I helps other tribes achieve Class I status, since EPA rejected its numerous objections to Class I.

Michigan and FCPC Class I Because EPA rejected all of Michigan’s objections, FCPC has full Class I rights with respect to Michigan sources. Recently, Michigan petitioned for appellate review of EPA’s Class I determination. The court’s decision should further clarify Class I issues, including the use of a FIP to reclassify area.

Wisconsin Issues regarding FCPC Class I FCPC Class I is subject to provisions of Wisconsin/FCPC agreement. EPA accepted agreement as-is. DNR needs to revise its SIP if it wishes to ensure enforcement of limitations in Wisconsin/FCPC agreement.

Key Terms of Wisconsin/FCPC Agreement Limits Class I increment analysis to sources within 10-miles of reservation, as shown on draft DNR map. FCPC receives notice of all major sources proposed to be located within 62-miles of reservation. FCPC has ability to object to a major source if it will adversely affect AQRVs.

Key Terms of Wisconsin/FCPC Agreement continued FCPC has right to review and object to BACT/MACT determination for all sources: –Within 10 miles of reservation. –Within 62 miles that have a modeled impact exceeding 1 microgram per cubic meter for 24-hour period. Scientific review panel, comprised of at least two experts selected by FCPC and state, attempts to resolve all disputes on AQRV and BACT/MACT issues. If not resolved, EPA decides.

Class I Summary FCPC Class I first redesignation since Class I status provides tribal control of air impacts on reservation from off- reservation sources. Class I increment substantially more strict than Class II increment. Class I can help tribes protect natural and cultural resources on reservation.