Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment & Technology UH-M COLLEGE OF EDUCATION COE Outreach & Technology.
Advertisements

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
Conceptual Framework of McDaniel College. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Agenda Brief introductions Overview of the Secondary Dual Educator Program (SDEP) Q & A with SDEPPERS Admission process & requirements Financial aid &
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Teacher Education Advisory Council University of South Carolina Beaufort May 5, :00 p.m.
Dr. Mary Ariail Georgia State University Teacher Education in the United States Mary Ariail, Ph.D. Department of Middle and Secondary Education College.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
2.3.4 MVNU Annual Education Unit & Program Assessment Part I.
NCATE / DESE Joint Visit March 28,  Welcome and introductions  Governance  Historical context  Video presentation  Recent developments impacting.
Agenda Brief introductions Overview of the Secondary Dual Educator Program Q & A with SDEP teacher candidates and grads Admission process & requirements.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Using PACT Data for National Accreditation Gladys L. Benerd School of Education University of the Pacific Presenters: Betsy Keithcart, Assessment Coordinator.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
New York Institute of Technology
NCATE Vocabulary Candidates--university/college students
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Agenda Brief introductions Overview of the Secondary Dual Educator Program (SDEP) Q & A with SDEPPERS Admission process & requirements Financial aid &
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Prince William County Public Schools Strategic Plan “Providing a World-Class Education” Superintendent’s Advisory Council on Instruction November 14, 2013.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
NJCU College of Education
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
February 21-22, 2018.
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Presentation transcript:

Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010

Overview of the College of Education and Health Professions Educator Preparation Programs Mission: “... To achieve excellence by guiding individuals as they develop the proficiency, expertise, and leadership consistent with their professional roles.” By creating opportunities for excellence, the College of Education prepares highly qualified teachers, counselors, and leaders who promote high levels of learning for all P-12 students by demonstrating excellence in teaching, scholarship, and professionalism.

College of Education Organizational Chart (under revision) Dean College of Education Associate Dean (Programs & Services) Assistant Dean (Assessment, External Funding, Outreach) Chairs, COE Standing Committees Chairs/Designees, COE University Committees Directors, COE Initiatives / Centers Chair, Department of Counseling, Foundations, and Leadership Chair, Department of Teacher Education Program Coordinators FacultyStaff Director, COE Office of Services and Field Experiences Coordinator of Student Teaching AdvisorsStaff Chair, Educator Preparation Program Council Director, COE Graduate Studies CSU Teacher Education Faculty Program Coordinators FacultyStaff Coordinator, Partner School Network Partner Schools Chair, Department of Physical Education and Exercise Science Program Coordinators FacultyStaff

COEHP Educator Preparation Faculty and Students 36 full-time faculty  7 minority (19.4%)  21 female (58.3%) 1060 undergraduate students (Fall 2008)  325 minority (30.7%)  800 female (75.5%) 507 graduate students (Fall 2008)  153 minority (30.2%)  395 female (77.9%)

COEHP Initiatives Partner School Network STEADY Program (Sustained Teacher Education Advisement for the Defining Years) Center for Reading and Assessment Outreach programs through the Center for Quality Teaching and Learning, Columbus Regional Mathematics Collaborative, CSU Coca Cola Space Science Center, Oxbow Meadows Math and Reading Services (MARS) Center COEHP.tv and specialized classroom with capability to record classroom presentations and edit/video stream in real time COEHP.tv

Educator Preparation Conceptual Framework

Teaching Excellence in teaching embodies the use of best practices to improve student learning at all levels. Faculty model best practices for candidates. Candidates apply best practices during field experiences.

Candidate Learning Outcomes Related to Teaching Teachers and other school personnel employ best practices which lead to improved student learning. Teachers and other school personnel use technology to enhance teaching and learning. Teachers and other school personnel use a variety of tools and strategies to address the needs of diverse learners. Teachers and other school personnel continually reflect on their practice. Teachers and other school personnel collaborate within communities of learning. Counselors and leaders create and maintain safe and supportive school environments that promote accomplished teaching and high levels of learning.

Sample Best Practices Collaboration/Social Interaction Authentic Learning Experiences Reflective Teaching and Learning Technology-Enhanced Instruction Teaching All Students

Scholarship Scholarship is systematized knowledge that is accurate, authoritative, and thorough.

Candidate Learning Outcomes Related to Scholarship Teachers and other school personnel know their fields and are able to apply their knowledge to help all students learn. Teachers and other school personnel continually construct, examine, and reflect upon knowledge and use that knowledge to improve teaching and learning. Teachers and other school personnel are members of multiple learning communities. Teachers and other school personnel understand and build upon the diversity of students, families, and communities.

Professionalism Professionalism comprises a body of knowledge, set of beliefs, an array of actions or behaviors, and ethical standards that members of a profession agree are the core of their practice. INTASC’s Model Standards for Beginning Teacher Licensing, Assessment and Development

Candidate Learning Outcomes Related to Professionalism Teachers and other school personnel know and can explain important principles and concepts delineated in professional, state, and institutional standards. Teachers and other school personnel can apply professional and pedagogical knowledge and skills delineated in professional, state and institutional standards to facilitate student learning. Teachers and other school personnel reflect the dispositions delineated in professional, state, and institutional standards. Teachers and other school personnel are members of learned societies and professional organizations. Teachers and other school personnel focus on student learning.

Educator Preparation Programs Assessment System Candidates are assessed in multiple ways at 7 key transition points:  Gate 1: Admission to Teacher Education  Gate 2: Entry into Student Teaching  Gate 3: Exit from Initial Program  Gate 4: Induction  Gate 5: Entry into Advanced Program  Gate 6: Exit from Advanced Program  Gate 7: Induction for Advanced Degree Graduates, Counselors, and Leaders

Data Collected at Gate 1: Admission to Teacher Education Regents test results GACE Basic Skills test scores Overall and CSU GPA Completion of EDUC 2130 Exploring Teaching and Learning Background check

Data Collected at Gate 2: Entry into Student Teaching Overall and CSU GPA Grades in content courses Coursework completion MAP evaluations Dispositions evaluations

Data Collected at Gate 3: Exit from Initial Program Overall and CSU GPA MAP evaluations Dispositions evaluations GACE content test scores

Data Collected at Gate 4: Induction Graduate Survey Principal/Supervisor Survey

Data Collected at Gate 5: Entry into Advanced Program Undergraduate GPA Undergraduate transcripts Clear renewable teaching certificate or GRE scores Candidate interview (Counseling and Educational Leadership) Writing sample (Counseling and Educational Leadership)

Data Collected at Gate 6: Exit from Advanced Program GPA Grades in graduate courses (maximum of two C’s) GMAP or other performance assessment Dispositions assessment Research project or exit exam

Data Collected at Gate 7 Graduate Survey Principal/Supervisor Survey

CSU Integrated Student Information System (ISIS)

College of Education Menu Report 096: Undergraduate reports by term include enrollment, enrollment by race, enrollment by county, enrollment by class, average GPA, average CAAP scores, average age, average Praxis I/GACE scores, average Praxis II/GACE scores, enrollment by gender, transfer student enrollment, number applied for graduation, average CPE scores, average hours enrolled, enrollment in student teaching, SAT/ACT averages, and number admitted to teacher education. Report 097: Graduate reports by term include information similar to Report 096 for candidates in advanced programs. Report 098: Year End Reports provide summary information about graduates for a designated fiscal year which includes the number of graduates, the race, gender, and average GPA of the graduates, and their average Praxis II scores. MAP, GMAP, and Disposition Evaluation Forms

Use of Data for Program Improvement Program coordinators regularly examine data such as GPAs of students, average ratings for candidates on performance assessments, average ratings for candidates on dispositions evaluation, Praxis II or GACE pass rates for program completers, ratings on graduate surveys, and ratings on principal/supervisor surveys. Annual program reports include data about performance of candidates and graduates of the program, alignment of each program with the related specialty professional association, and data about the assessment of dispositions of the students. Annual program reports

Use of Data Program advisory committees annually review information about all aspects of the program and make recommendations for curricular and other changes for program improvement.

Exhibits Exhibit List by Standard Master Exhibit List ram%20Review%20Exhibits.asp