NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA AIR QUALITY PROGRAM CRAIG KREMAN ASSISTANT ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTOR QUAPAW TRIBE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE 2014 National Tribal Forum.
Advertisements

Although this monitor is owned and operated by the State of Missouri, significant research was conducted with this technology for fence-line monitoring.
Presented by: Joaquin Bustamante Recycling Program Manger.
How Will Georgia-Florida Wildfires Affect Regional Air Quality Planning? Wes Younger Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
AMTAC April 12 th, 2011 Meredith Kurpius EPA R9 1.
Working together for clean air Approved Regional Method (ARM) Demonstration Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Mike Gilroy, Erik Saganic Puget Sound Clean Air.
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Working Together for Clean Air PM 2.5 Continuous Methods Lynnwood, Washington Site.
Smoke Management Updates Air Quality Regulations Refresher – National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Non-Attainment Areas – Visibility Protection.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
General Overview as Outlined in 2013 GAP Guidance Desirae Roehl – ANTHC Healthy Village Env. Program
Particulate Matter Monitoring in the Eastern Sierra Region A Brief History Presented by Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)
MONITORING Jim Russell Pacific Northwest Region and Washington/Oregon State Office BLM.
Introduction to BGI Instruments
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP, TAMS Center Tribal Air Monitoring and QA Requirements for NAAQS- Comparable Data.
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Air Quality Program Environmental Protection & Natural Resources.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
Quality Control/ Quality Assurance Annabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
Emissions Inventory Case Study Kris Ray, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.
EPA Region 9 Meredith Kurpius August 19, Status of Tribal Air Monitoring Value of tribal monitoring Used to protect public health on tribal land.
CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.
1 Quality Assurance Project Plans Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP/TAMS Center.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Air Quality Program Environmental Protection & Natural Resources Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Community Development Department (CDD) Environmental.
OAR Perspective on Air Sensors Kristen Benedict National Tribal Forum on Air Quality 5/13/14.
Ondrea Barber GRIC DEQ Executive Director
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Air Quality in Grand Forks - Getting Started Playing catch up Making do Presented to the Clean Air Forum March 2008 By Chris Moslin, Chair BAQC.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Janice Lam Snyder, SMAQMD December 11, 2015
Open Dump Fires on Indian Reservations still exist, Why? The Colville Tribes is struggling to resolve this issue and this is our story. Presented by: Kathy.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Quality Management Plans (QMPs) and Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) Danny France and Greg Noah EPA Region 4, SESD December 6, 2006.
Qualitative Forecasting Fire duration/size/impacts? -multiple fire starts close together* –acres burned per day above some threshold* -valley topography.
Ozone Data and Outreach Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Air Quality Program.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Sunnyside Elementary School Air Toxics Monitoring Program Southern Ute Indian Tribe Air Quality Program 2011 National Tribal Forum Spokane Washington.
Assessing Ambient Air Quality James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Phoenix Metropolitan Area Urban Nephelometer Program Mike Sundblom Arizona Department of Environmental Quality April 13, 2005.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Dr. James Conner Fairbanks North Star Borough November 8, 2012 Dr. James Conner Fairbanks North Star Borough November 8, 2012.
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
Air Pollution Control Program Regulation Update Presented to City Council Public Safety and Health Subcommittee Mamie Colburn, M.S, R.S. Missoula.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Metro’s Natural Areas: Maintenance Strategy Needed
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation

Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 1.4 Million Acres 12 Bands 7,587 residents 3.5 people per square mile Major employers - Tribal, County, State and Federal governments Lands in both fee (20%) and trust (80%) status

The Paper Chase

MY BOSS COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP EPA MY REPLACEMENT Write for Your Audiance

Establish the Need to Monitor Technical Guidance for the Development of Tribal Air Monitoring Programs, EPA-456/B , August, 2007 Identifying goals and objectives Costs for operations Funding sources Monitoring Implementation Data acquisition, management and reporting Data analysis and interpretation

ASSESSMENTS NEED TO INCLUDE 1. BACKGROUND 2. AIRSHED DESCRIPTION 3. AIR POLLUTION SOURCE 4. DATA SUMMARY, WHAT IS KNOW 5. DEGRADATION OF VISIBILITY 6. RECOMMENDATIONS Guidance for Conducting Tribal Air Quality Assessments, Region 10

Goals and Objectives Determine if air quality affects the health of the communities by comparing with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter 2.5 microns To serve as baseline data so that changes in air quality can be tracked To provide pollution levels when calling burn bans on the Reservation

Unlock EPA Funds Convince the EPA Costs of a Monitoring Network Conference calls Document preparation Know the subject better than EPA

Community Assessments Air Quality Assessment Inchelium Monitor Feasibility and Evaluation September 28, 2009 And Air Quality Assessment Nespelem Monitor Feasibility and Evaluation December 29, 2010

Criteria for Choosing a Monitor Permanent Continuous monitor PM 2.5 Cost FRM or FEM Data Logger Automatic Span Checks Filter Change Time Measurement Range Resolution Precision Frequency of Site Visits Enclosure Type

Comparison of Air Quality Monitor Models, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Characteristics Met One Instruments Inc. BAM 1020 Thermo Scientific FH 62 C14 Series Thermo Scientific Monitor, Model 5014i Beta Thermo Scientific SHARP Monitor, Model 5030 Thermo Scientific TEOM 1405 American Ecotech Aurora 1000 Integrating Nephelometer American Ecotech Aurora 2000 PM Correlation Nephelometer American Ecotech Aurora Wavelength Nephelometer American Ecotech Aurora 4000 Polar Nephelometer Radiance Research Nephelometer Type of MonitorBAM Duel - BAM & Nephelometer TEOMNephelometer Nephelometer with interface to BAM possible Nephelometer FEMYes YESYesNo FRMNo Measures Non-Volatile PM 2.5Yes Measures Volatile PM 2.5Yes ?Yes Continuous ReadingsNoYes Permanent installationYes YESYes Data loggerYes YESYes Embedded FTP Server Yes Outdoor enclosure neededYes YESYes Humidity RegulationYesOptionYESYes Frequency of site visits30 daysLong termYearlyLong term Automatic span checksHourly Option Yes Option WDOE Filter Change Time60 DaysLong time Air Pump TypeVacuum Data Averaging Times1 & 24 Hour Measurement Range 0 – mg/m3 ( μg/m3) 0 to 5,000 μg/m3 or 0 to 10,000 μg/m3 0 to 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 10.0mg/m 3 ; 0 to 100, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000, 10,000µg/m 3 0 to 1,000 μg/m3 and 0 to 10,000 μg/m3 0 to 1 g/m ,000 Mm-1 0 to > 1 km-1 Resolution0.1 μg/m3 ± 1 μg/m3 (instantaneous) 0.1 μg/m3 <0.5 2 (1-hour time resolution) 0.1 µg/m3 Precision ± 2 μg/m3 (24- hour) ±2.0µg/m 3 80µg/m 3 (24-hour average +/- 2 μg/m3 80μg/m3 ±2.0 µg/m3 at 1 hour and ±1.0 µg/m3 at 24 hours Accuracy for Mass Measurement Exceeds US-EPA Class III PM2.5 FEM standards for additive and multiplicative bias ±5% using NIST- traceable mass foil set +/- 5% (compared to 24 hour FRM) ±0.75% Weight54 lbs.50 lbs.40 lbs.50 lbs.75 lbs.25 lbs.26.5 lbs.25 lbs. 6 lbs.

What was need after EPA Approved Funding  Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)  Approved May 2012  Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)  BAM 1020  Meteorological Sensors

The Network Now Omak – Radiance Research Nephelometer  Cooperative with Washington State Department of Ecology  Use their QAPP and SOPs  Began operation in 2010 Nespelem – Met One BAM 1020  Purchased in 2005  Began operation in 2009  Permanent setup in 2012 Inchelium – Met One BAM 1020  Purchased in 2011  Permanent setup in 2012 E-BAM – Met One  Purchased in 2012  Selected locations

Site Construction Permission for site Electricity to site Fence construction Build platform Install cabinet Install monitor Trial operation

What do the Monitors Pickup Wildfire Smoke Saw Mill Wood Stove Smoke Asphalt Batch Plant Dump Fires

HOW THE DATA IS USED OmakNespelem Inchelium AQIHours% % % Good 31960%27653%43996% Moderate 11121%13626%174% Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups 9518%6613% Unhealthy 31%234% Very Unhealthy 163% Hazardous 41% Total Hours

Use of Monitoring Data

Questions Contact: Kris Ray Air Quality Program Manager Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation