Formative Assessment Project Webinar #2 - May 29, 2012 - 2-3 pm Welcome Focus: Field Test.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Formative Assessment Margaret Heritage CRESST/UCLA CORE Institute Berkeley, CA June 19, 2012.
Formative Assessment A Maryland Race to the Top Initiative Denise Hunt NCSA June 2013.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.
P ROFESSIONAL L EARNING C OMMUNITIES : Using written curriculum to design effective instruction The professional learning community model is a grand design.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
“O N THE R OAD TO S UCCESS ” Implementing the Common Core and Essential Standards Randolph County Schools Common Core and Essential Standards Implementation.
Formative Assessment Project Webinar #1 - May 15, pm Welcome.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Improving Assessment Literacy School-wide. School and System Improvement Improvement by Contract -external threats and rewards Improvement by Culture.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
Session 3: Submitting Quality Resources DATE 2013.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
“Every Child a Graduate” Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction SPECIAL EDCATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Life-long learning and continuous.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
KSU Faculty Retreat Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Professional Learning Communities Making Written Curriculum an Instructional Reality “The professional learning community model is a grand design - a powerful.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Using Formative Assessment and the Digital Library.
Academic Parent Teacher Teams APTT – Palm Beach County Building Capacity for Effective Family Engagement in Palm Beach County.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Necessary Conditions. Washington Education Association Educational Service Districts Association of Washington School Principals Washington Association.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
To Test or Not to Test?...that is the question! By: Sandy Church and Linda Lerch.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
NC FALCON Training in the use and design of Formative Assessment.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
1 INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITATOR ORIENTATION August 15, 2011.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome to the 2015–16 CAASPP Institute! California Assessment.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Assessment in education is the process of gathering, interpreting, recording, and using information about pupils’ responses to an educational task.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
Presentation transcript:

Formative Assessment Project Webinar #2 - May 29, pm Welcome Focus: Field Test

Formative Assessment Project Project Sponsor: Carolyn M. Wood, Ph. D. Assistant State Superintendent for Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems Formative Assessment/Assessment for Learning Team: *Denise Hunt-Program Manager Joshua Dorsey Starrette Galanis Deborah King Melissa Schropp Gregory Sucre

Agenda Assessment for Learning Project Overview ✓ Level of Commitment Needed Process for Applying Field Test Overview Benefits for Field Test Participants

Formative Assessment / Assessment for Learning refers to PROCESS not a test "Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students' achievement of intended instructional outcomes.” CCSSO 2007

STUDENTSTUDENT Minute by Minute / Daily Weekly Unit Quarterly/ Interim Annual Summative Formative Assessment Practices Assessment for Learning Summative Assessments Assessment of Learning Balanced System of Assessment Standards Balanced Assessment System

Three Central Questions Where am I going? Where am I now? What are my next steps?

AfL Online Resource System Teacher Resources Professional Learning Administrator Resources Collaboration AfL Online Resource System

Lesson-planning tools Instructional resources in the form of videos, documents, simulations, etc. Mobile applications for SmartPhones and tablets Research and publications relevant to AfL Teacher Learning Modules Teacher Resources Back

Seven Teacher Learning Modules What is Assessment for Learning Establish a Collaborative Climate Share Learning Goals and the Criteria for Success Elicit and Use Evidence of Learning Use Descriptive Feedback Promote Self-Assessment Putting it All Together Independent Review Expert Training Back AfL Online Resource System – For Teachers

Sample for vendor: Actual sessions may be different. Back AfL Online Resource System – For Teachers

Suite of Leadership Resources A suite of multimedia tutorials, applications, and tools to assist schools that are... - Considering AfL - Starting AfL - Implementing AfL - Sustaining AfL These include videos, text documents, presentations, templates and rubrics focused on… - Learning about and applying the Assessment for Learning process - Leading a Professional Learning Community at each stage of implementation - Communicating AfL messages with district leaders, teachers, parents, and students AfL Online Resource System – For Administrators AfL Online Resource System – For Administrators

Field Test Overview Administrator Teacher Phase One: Administrator Teacher Phase Two: T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T

20 Schools: One Administrator and Two Teachers Administrator Review and provide feedback on Suite of Leader Resources Review and provide feedback on AfL video learning sessions Collaborate with other leaders implementing AfL Support teacher participants in planning for Phase 2 implementation Administrator Review and provide feedback on Suite of Leader Resources Review and provide feedback on AfL video learning sessions Collaborate with other leaders implementing AfL Support teacher participants in planning for Phase 2 implementation Teacher Review Objects in Online Resource System Attend 5Training Sessions (3 Hrs Each) Attend 4Webinars Plan for Phase 2 implementation Teacher Review Objects in Online Resource System Attend 5Training Sessions (3 Hrs Each) Attend 4Webinars Plan for Phase 2 implementation Back Field Test Phase

20 Schools: One Administrator and Two Teachers Field Test T T T T T T Administrator Use and provide feedback on Suite of Leader Resources Provide leadership to PLC Track and provide feedback on the progress of the initiative Administrator Use and provide feedback on Suite of Leader Resources Provide leadership to PLC Track and provide feedback on the progress of the initiative T T T T T T T T T T Teacher Use and provide feedback on AfL Online Resource System Facilitate a PLC Attend 5 Trainings (3 Hrs Each) Attend 4 webinars Teacher Use and provide feedback on AfL Online Resource System Facilitate a PLC Attend 5 Trainings (3 Hrs Each) Attend 4 webinars Phase 2 Field Test Phase

Benefits and Compensation Students Achievement Involvement Training Motivation Self-Regulation

Partnership in Resource Development Early Access Benefits and Compensation Students Involvement Training

AfL Online Resource System Benefits and Compensation Students Involvement Training Training Sessions with AfL Experts

Other Benefits and Compensation Students Involvement Training Travel/Substitute Reimbursement Possibility of CPD Credits Stipends Tablets

Phase One Phase Two Teachers Review & Provide Feedback: 60 Hrs/yr Training: 5 Sessions (3 Hrs Each) Review & Provide Feedback: 60 Hrs/yr Facilitate PLC: 60Hrs/yr Training: 5 Sessions (3 Hrs Each) Administrators Review & Provide Feedback: 20 Hrs/yr AfL Leaders Introductory Training Review & Provide Feedback: 10 Hrs/yr Lead PLC: 20 Hrs/yr AfL Leaders Introductory Training Time Commitment

At the conclusion of this webinar, the AfLContact will receive a follow up that includes: –A document providing information about the purpose, benefits, and commitments associated with the Field Test. –A flyer providing an overview of the Assessment For Learning Project –The Field Test Application Form –A sample cover letter for AfL Contact Person to send to principals Each school can submit one Field Test Application, but there is no limitation on the number of applications a district can submit. AfL Team AfL Contact Principals AfL Contact AfL Team Next Steps Sends Distribute applicationsComplete application Collect by June 29th

Q & A Thoughts Reflections Questions

THANK YOU!