Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE 353 N.W.2d 213 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) Case Brief.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Richard A. ALCORN and Steven Feola Supreme Court of Arizona, 202 Ariz. 62, 41 P.3d 600.
Advertisements

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SCHAFER Supreme Court of Washington, 149 Wash.2d 148,
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In the Matter of Stanley R. JUHNKE Kansas Supreme Court, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. Willard JOHNSON U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 327 F.3d 554 (2003) Case Brief.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION LAW AND MOTION.
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. BUTLER 19 Ohio St.2d 55, 249 N.E.2d 818 (1969) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. TWEEDY, Supreme Court of Oklahoma 2000.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. DECK v. MISSOURI 125 S.Ct (2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GEORGIA HS ASSN v. WADDELL 248 Ga. 542, 285 S.E.2d 7 (1981) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. POHLE v. CHEATHAM Court of Appeals of Indiana, 724 N.E.2d 655 (2000) Case Brief.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COHEN v. BAYSIDE S&L 62 Misc.2d 738, 309 N.Y.S.2d 980 (1970) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LUCY v. ZEHMER 196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PONDER v. GRAHAM 4 Fla. 23 (1851) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BLANTON v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 489 U.S. 538 (1989) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COLBY v. CARNEY HOSPITAL 356 Mass. 527, 254 N.E.2d 407 (1969) Case Brief.
Chapter 21 Juvenile Justice. Introduction Juvenile Delinquency – actions of a juvenile in violation of the criminal law. Juvenile Delinquency – actions.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GRIFFIN v. CALIFORNIA 380 U.S. 609 (1965) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BROWN v. SOUTHLAND 620 F.Supp (E.D.Mo. 1985) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MOSELEY v. ZIEG 180 Neb. 810; 146 N.W.2d 72 (1966) Case Brief.
29K: Discuss the American criminal justice system to include due process of law and functions of Grand and Petite Juries.
State Court System By: Ashanti, Glenn, Timmy, Julie.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. TRONCALLI v. JONES 237 Ga.App. 10, 514 S.E.2d 478 (1999) Case Brief.
Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 8 Transfer to Adult Court.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PENNSYLVANIA v. BRUDER 488 U.S. 9 (1988) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. Pamela L. PETERS Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 263 Wis.2d 475, 665 N.W.2d 171 (2003)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LYNCH v. LYNCH 164 Ariz. 127 (1990) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LOWE v. QUINN 27 N.Y.2d 397, 267 N.E.2d (N.Y. 1971) Case Brief.
Criminal Case. Civil Case Original Jurisdiction.
The Role of Federal Courts
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PEOPLE v. MITCHELL 58 N.Y.2d 368, 448 N.E.2d 121 (1983) Case Brief.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION APPEALS.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
CHAPTER 5 CONSTITUTIONAL REGULATION OF BUSINESS DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8 th Ed.)
Public Communications Law Lecture 13 Slide 1 Controlling Pre-Trial Publicity A court is obligated to try to make sure the defendant gets a fair trial.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Case Brief.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. STAFFORD 223 Kan. 62, 573 P.2d 970 (Kan. 1977) Case Brief.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. UNITED STATES v. JEWELL 532 F.2d 697 (2d Cir. 1976) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. GRAY Juvenile Court of Ohio, Cuyahoga County. 145 N.E.2d 162 (1957) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BUSBY v. STATE 894 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2004) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. HOFFMAN v. RED OWL STORES, INC. 26 Wis.2d 683, 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965) Case Brief.
Mass Media Law 18 th Edition Don Pember Clay Calvert Chapter 12 Free Press–Fair Trial: Closed Judicial Proceedings McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. WILLIAMS Supreme Court of Iowa 695 N.W.2d 23 (2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STUMP v. SPARKMAN 435 U.S. 349 (1978) Case Brief.
Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Juvenile Law By Toni Marsh, Esq.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. FINE v. DELALANDE, INC. 545 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. RIEMERS v. GRAND FORKS HERALD 688 N.W.2d 167 (N.D. 2004) Case Brief.
Courts. Topics to Cover Dual Court System Juries Civil Procedure Criminal Procedure.
STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCENARIO IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS
And Scholastic Journalism
MARTIN v. MARCIANO 871 A.2d 911 (R.I. 2005)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
American Government and Politics Today
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. v. WENTZ 172 F.2d 80 (3d Cir. 1948)
Chapter 6 Issue Identification
BROWN v. BROWN 300 So. 2d 719 (Fla. DCA 1974)
STATE v. KINGMAN 463 P.2d 638 (Wash. 1970)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Courts and Court Systems
Bell Ringer Vocabulary activity: Due Process
Chapter 14 External Memorandum
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER 53 Ill.App.2d 299, 202 N.E.2d 841 (1964)
Chapter 14 External Memorandum
Chapter 4 Case Law and Case Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE 353 N.W.2d 213 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) Case Brief

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE PURPOSE: This case is an example of the regulatory feature of appellate courts. While the trial court may regulate matters through the sanction of contempt of court, the appellate court has the authority to regulate the trial court, in this instance by way of a petition brought to it requesting a writ of prohibition.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE CAUSE OF ACTION: Petition for a writ of prohibition (to set aside contempt of court and vacate an order against publication).

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE FACTS: In June 1984, the trial court issued an order that all parties in what was presumably a juvenile dependency case cease and desist from publishing letters or statements having to do with the proceeding. Subsequently, the minor’s parents wrote two letters to the editor of a newspaper in the area. On July 27, 1984, the trial court, believing the letters to be a violation of its order, ordered a contempt hearing.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE ISSUE: Whether a court may issue an order forbidding publication of information about a juvenile case obtained from involved parties and enforce that order at a contempt hearing.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE HOLDING: No. Order against publication vacated.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE REASONING: A prior restraint of speech necessitates a compelling governmental interest, and must be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. In this case, the governmental interest in maintaining privacy in a juvenile proceeding is an important and substantial government interest, but does not rise to the level required to justify a prior restraint.

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.