Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On the nature of magnetosheath FTEs A.Roux, P.Robert, O.Le Contel, D.Fontaine, P.Canu (LPP) J.M. Bosqued, P. Louarn (IRAP) 1 Roux-Robert, IAGA 2013, Merida.
Advertisements

Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
Cluster, THEMIS, & Geotail Conjunction Event on 11 July 2008 Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA.
Formation of the Magnetosphere 1 Solar Wind. Formation of the Magnetosphere 2 Solar Wind Bow Shock Magnetosheath.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,
Cusp Radiation Source: A Challenge for Theory and Simulation Jiasheng Chen, Theodore A. Fritz, Katherine E. Whitaker, Forrest S. Mozer, and Robert B. Sheldon.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Studying Solar Wind Magnetic Reconnection Events using the Cluster 4-point Measurement Capability A.C. Foster 1, C.J. Owen 1, A.N. Fazakerley 1, C. Forsyth.
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California,
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather An inter-hemisphere asymmetry of the cusp region against the geomagnetic dipole tilt Jiankui Shi Center for Space.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
& Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of.
Location of the High-Latitude Reconnection Site on 14 February 2003 S. Eriksson 1, M. M. Kuznetsova 2, M. W. Dunlop 3, and H. Reme 4 1 LASP, University.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Hamrin, M., Norqvist, P., Marghitu, O., et al. Department of Physics, Umeå University, Sweden Nordic Cluster.
What DMSP Data Tell us About the Thermosphere Response to Solar Wind Forcing Delores Knipp CU Aerospace Engineering Sciences and NCAR HAO With Assistance.
On the importance of IMF |B Y | on polar cap patch formation Qinghe Zhang 1, Beichen Zhang 1, Ruiyuan Liu 1, M. W. Dunlop 2, M. Lockwood 2, 3, J. Moen.
Location of Magnetopause Reconnection S M Petrinec 1, S A Fuselier 1, K J Trattner 1, and J Berchem 2 1 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
The First Two Years of IMAGE Jim Burch Southwest Research Institute Magnetospheric Imaging Workshop Yosemite National Park, California February 5-8, 2002.
Magnetic Field and Plasma Responses in the Near-Earth Magnetotail and Magnetospheric Boundary Layer During an Encounter of Heliospheric Current Sheet Motoharu.
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
EISCAT Svalbard Radar studies of meso-scale plasma flow channels in the polar cusp ionosphere Y. Dåbakk et al.
University of Colorado 1 ; Delft University of Technology 2 ; University of Alaska 3 ; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales 4 ; National Center for Atmospheric.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
9 May MESSENGER First Flyby Magnetospheric Results J. A. Slavin and the MESSENGER Team BepiColombo SERENA Team Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico 11 May.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja Satellite M. Yamauchi 1, L. Eliasson 1, H. Nilsson 1, R. Lundin 1, and O. Norberg 2 1.Swedish Institute of Space.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Energy conversion at Saturn’s magnetosphere: from dayside reconnection to kronian substorms Dr. Caitríona Jackman Uppsala, May 22 nd 2008.
07/11/2007ESSW4, Brussels1 Coupling between magnetospheric and auroral ionospheric scales during space weather events M. ECHIM (1,2), M. ROTH(1) and J.
Cluster observations of a reconnection site at high- latitude magnetopause Y. Khotyaintsev (1), A. Vaivads (1), Y. Ogawa (1,2), M. André(1), S. Buchert(1),
Conjugate response of the dayside magnetopause and dawn/dusk flanks using Cluster-THEMIS conjunctions and Ground based observations M W Dunlop, Q-H. Zhang.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F.
Group A: S. Bale(Tutor), B. Engavale, W.L. Shi, W.L. Teh, L. Xie, L. Yang, and X.G. Zhang 13,May rd COSPAR Capacity Building Workshop3 rd COSPAR.
Cluster and SuperDARN observations during a positive B y period D. Ambrosino, E. Amata, M.F. Marcucci, I. Coco Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario,
Mass Transport: To the Plasma Sheet – and Beyond!
Adjustable magnetospheric event- oriented magnetic field models N. Yu. Ganushkina (1), M. V. Kubyshkina (2), T. I. Pulkkinen (1) (1) Finnish Meteorological.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
Particle precipitation has been intensely studied by ionospheric and magnetospheric physicists. As particles bounce along the earth's magnetic fields they.
© Research Section for Plasma and Space Physics UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Daytime Aurora Jøran Moen.
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
SS Special Section of JGR Space Physics Marks Polar’s 5th Anniversary September 4, 1996 This April special section is first of two Polar special sections.
Energy inputs from Magnetosphere to the Ionosphere/Thermosphere ASP research review Yue Deng April 12 nd, 2007.
Magnetotail Reconnection T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology Harry Petschek Symposium on Magnetic Reconnection March 22, 2006 Wednesday 12:00 – 12:30.
1 NSSC National Space Science Center, Chinese academy of Sciences FACs connecting the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere: Cluster and Double Star Observations.
R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, D. Fontaine 3, A. Teste 4, C. Jacquey 5 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA); 2 Institute.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
Dynamics of the auroral bifurcations at Saturn and their role in magnetopause reconnection LPAP - Université de Liège A. Radioti, J.-C. Gérard, D. Grodent,
Data-Model Comparisons
Global MHD Simulations of Dayside Magnetopause Dynamics.
Cluster science at IRFU
Evidence for Dayside Interhemispheric Field-Aligned Currents During Strong IMF By Conditions Seen by SuperDARN Radars Joseph B.H. Baker, Bharat Kunduri.
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
THEMIS Dayside Lessons learned from the coast phase and the 1st dayside season Current plans for the 2nd dayside season and the extended phases.
Presentation transcript:

Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China

Outline Introduction IMF and SW from ACE The orbit of Cluster and TC1 in GSM a) XZ-plane b) XY-plane Magnetic field feature of the FTE in LMN (MAV) a) Cluster FGM data b) TC1 FGM data Particles feature of the FTE

Introduction Magnetic reconnection is the predominant mechanism by which solar wind energy and momentum are transmitted into the earth magnetospheric cavity. The first in-situ observations of transient reconnection in the vicinity of the high-latitude dayside magnetopause were reported by Haerendel et al.(1978) using HEOS-2 and Russell and Elphic(1978,1979) using ISSE-1 and -2. Termed “flux erosion events” by Haerendel et al. and “flux transfer events” (FTEs) by Russell and Elphic.

Introduction Cluster's multi-point measurement capability has revealed new insights into the scale and location of the reconnection region, but the following questions are still not clear. --What is the evolution of a flux tube (FTE), from its generation at the magnetopause to its disappearance in the global magnetospheric convection? --With the tetrahedron configuration of Cluster, is it possible to measure the electrodynamics of an FTE, especially the distribution of the field-aligned currents (with the Cluster curlometer) and the ionospheric closure of the currents (with Ground-based observations)?.... Recently, many authors presented their researches about FTEs coordinated satellites and ground-based observations, such as Wild et al. (2001,2003,2005a,b), Lockwood et al. (2001a,b),and so on.

Introduction Characters of FTEs: a) bipolar signatures in the field component normal to the magnetopause (Bn) positive-negative in the northern hemisphere and negative-positive in the southern hemisphere. b) increases in total |B| Location: vicinity of the magnetopause Scale: ~Re Lasted: few minutes

IFM and SW from ACE --- from CDAWEB Have detracted the delay : ~64.5 mins

The orbit of Cluster and TC1 in GSM Using Tsyganenko-96 model Input the real-time parameters: Pram: 1.61 Pa Dst: -6 nT IMF By: -1.81nT IMF Bz: -9.66nT

FGM feature of the FTE in LMN (MAV) For Cluster: a) In the exterior cusp b) The outward magnetopause normal determined by minimum variance analysis (MVA) of Cluster 1 data during the interval of 11:10-11:20UT. N= (0.59,0.25,0.77);

Typical bipolar structure in the Bn component positive- negative with |B| increased, the time at the core: 11:33:25

FGM feature of the FTE in LMN (MAV) Using Cluster multi-point measurements: Assume the flux tube as an interface and it almost does not vary when Cluster pass. The order : Cl1 Cl2 Cl4 Cl3 We assume that the interface is a planar with an average normal velocity U (see right side figure).

FGM feature of the FTE in LMN (MAV) Using: Obtained the typical FTE: speed: Un =224.0km/s direction: n=(-0.65,0.74,-0.19)

FGM feature of the FTE in ijk For TC1: a) In the magnetosheath b) First use MVA determine the N, get L,M Then rotates the LMN to local boundary normal coordinate (ijk) make the magnetic field bipolar structure only focus on the k component (McWilliams, et al.,2004). k=(-0.22,-0.56,-0.73)

Typical bipolar structure in the Bk component negative- positive with |B| increased, the time at the core: 11:32:29

Particles feature of the FTE In the tube,there are higher energy particles than the background. Figure from CSDSWEB.

Particles feature of the FTE In the tube,there are higher energy particles than the background. Figure from CSDSWEB

a) increases in the tailward speed of the plasma; b) little decreases in plasma number density; c) increases in the plasma temperature. Figure from UK Cluster data centre.

Summary and following work The typical FTE show the bipolar structure in the Bn component positive-negative in the northern hemisphere and negative- positive in the southern hemisphere with |B| increased. There also show the tailward moving characters of the flux tube. In the tube, there are frozen higher speed and hotter protons, electrons and ions than the background. If the Cluster and TC1 observed the typical FTE was in the same magnetic field line before reconnected, we can determine the reconnection site. We will find the evidence of the ionospheric signatures by coordinating the ground-based observations.

Thank you for your attention