Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Ex-Offenders and Housing
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Housing Innovation Marketplace January, 2011 Heather Armstrong Community Corrections Improvement Association.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH A NEW TOOL FOR AN OLD IDEA IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SEX OFFENDERS AND THE PREVENTION OF SEXUAL VICTIMIZATION The Importance.
END THE SILENCE. The Team Approach: A new tool for an old idea in the management or sex Offenders and the prevention of sexual victimization The Importance.
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Meeting The purpose of community notification is to provide information to protect you and your family,
ICAOS Mini Training Transfer Eligibility and Reporting Instructions Eligibility Presented by: Training Committee [Revision 3/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test.
Connecticut Criminal Justice Cross-Training Conference Collaborative Partners Assisting Crime Victims During the Offender Re-entry Process August 20, 2010.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Reentry Strategies for Tribal Communities Presented by: Tracy Mullins, Senior Research Associate & Kimberly Cobb, Research Associate American Probation.
Findings from a Dual Generic and Specific Risk Assessment Process for Domestic Violence Perpetrators in Connecticut Kirk R. Williams, Ph.D. Professor of.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Chapter 13 Parole Conditions and Revocation. Introduction Parole conditions determine the amount of freedom versus restriction a parolee has Accomplishment.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH COLLABORATION WITH LANDLORDS, VICTIM ADVOCACY, AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
END THE SILENCE. MAKING OUR WORK COUNT PROFESSIONALS FROM THE SEXUAL INCIDENT RESPONSE SYSTEMS SPEAK TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY ON THEIR WORK AND THE.
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
Megan’s Law.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
GPS Monitoring of High-Risk Sex Offenders Evaluation of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s San Diego County Pilot Program Jesse.
BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.
CSOM Training Curriculum: An Overview of Sex Offender Treatment for a Non-Clinical AudienceLong Version: Section 11 Goals of This Training To provide an.
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Legislative Update Summary of significant bills affecting the Records & Technology Division 7/31/07.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION IN COLLABORATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT & VICTIM SERVICES.
Sex Offenders Wyoming Department of Corrections: A Risk-Based Approach to Managing Sex Offenders.
Dr. Kurt Bumby Center for Effective Public Policy Panel Presentation at the United States Sentencing Commission’s Symposium on Alternatives to Incarceration.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Hartford Police Department Juvenile Investigative Division Sex Offender Registry Unit.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Assessment Tools and Community Supervision of Sexual Offenders Robin J. Wilson, PhD, ABPP Chris Thomson, M.A.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Nonresidential Intermediate Sanctions
Assessing Housing Barriers Donna Harrison Community Placement Coordinator Virginia Department of Corrections Welcome Home: Addressing Today’s Challenges.
ICAOS Training 101-Transfer & Reporting Instructions Eligibility [Revision 6/16/2015] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
An Overview of the Connecticut Sex Offender Registry Presented by: Sgt. Matthew Garcia.
11/18/20151Sex Offenders Notes - Kuzyk Notes on recidivism among Connecticut sex offenders: Male offenders released in 2005 CT OPM – Criminal Justice Policy.
BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening.
Thinking About A Risk-Based Registry. Sex offender risk assessments are most often employed in applied forensic settings for purposes of decision-making.
MN County Attorney Association’s Crime Prevention Tip The MCAA strives to bring current information regarding prevention topics to its members. The August.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
CSOM Long Version: Section 2
Summit County Probation Services
Educating the Community About Sexual Assault and About a Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Sex Offenders in the Community.
Toronto Child & Youth Advocacy Centre (CYAC)
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015

Special Management Unit n The Division of Parole and Community Services maintains a Special Management Unit (SMU) with a mission to protect the public by increasing the likelihood of successful reintegration of offenders requiring specialized supervision and treatment for problem sexual behavior. n The unit is responsible for the statewide supervision of approximately 295 paroled sex offenders.

Special Management Unit Supervision Criteria: n Prior criminal conviction or charge indicating behavior that may require supervision or treatment for problem sexual behavior; n Stipulated to participate in treatment for problem sexual behavior; n Current or previous Connecticut or out-of-state conviction(s); and n Required to register as a sexual offender.

Special Management Unit n SMU employs a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to manage sex offenders. n Focused on collaboration with treatment providers, victim advocates, law enforcement, and polygraph examiners. n The unit’s specially trained parole officers work closely with key stakeholders to form supervision teams to advance collective public safety goals.

Special Management Unit These stakeholders include: n Sex offender treatment providers and polygraph examiners from The Connection Inc., Center for the Treatment of Problem Sexual Behavior; n Victim advocates from Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis Services; n State Police from the Sex Offender Registry and Computer Crime Units; and n Local law enforcement..

Special Management Unit n SMU releases between sexual offenders each month to both private residences and contracted programs around the state. n More than half of all sex offenders under SMU supervision are serving a period of special parole, a mandatory period of supervision.

Special Management Unit n SMU strives to place offenders in or close to their community of origin, absent concerns related to victims, lack of housing, or offender safety. n Most sex offenders released to discretionary parole are placed with an approved sponsor while the majority of offenders released to special parole have no housing and require placement in contracted housing. n SMU has not placed a sex offender in a shelter in over 10 years.

Special Management Unit n SMU utilizes The January Center inpatient sex offender treatment facility and Chrysalis and REACH alternative housing programs. n The alternative housing program network is distributed throughout the entire state. n There have been no incidents of sexual recidivism in Chrysalis and REACH since their inception (2005 and 2008).

Special Management Unit SMU utilizes specialized techniques and interventions which include: n Validated sex offender risk assessments. n Facility interviews. n Offender-specific case management plans. n Registration. n Home investigations. n Targeted residency restrictions.

Special Management Unit n Offense specific cognitive-behavioral sex offender treatment. n Tiered supervision levels. n Continual monitoring of dynamic risk factors. n Home visits. n Compliance checks n Collateral contacts. n Appropriate responses to violations.

Special Management Unit n Computer monitoring n Office visits n Employment visits n Drug and alcohol testing in field and office. n GPS monitoring. n Routine searches.

Special Management Unit Critical Supervision Considerations: n Who would be the likely victims of a re- offense? n What is the probability of re-offense? n What degree of harm would most likely result from re-offense? n What are the conditions under which an offense is most likely to occur? n When is a re-offense most likely to occur?

Special Management Unit Acute Dynamic Risk Factors: n Rejection of Supervision n Victim access n Sexual Preoccupation n Substance Abuse n Hostility n Emotional Collapse n Collapse of Social Support

Special Management Unit n SMU officers routinely conduct compliance checks with state and local law enforcement to monitor adherence to sex offender registration requirements, parole conditions, and sex offender treatment restrictions. n SMU conducts hundreds of compliance checks each year. A thorough search of each offender’s residence and is performed during compliance checks.

Special Management Unit n SMU’s intensive supervision model includes an average of 100 sex offenders monitored with Global Positioning System (GPS) technology on a daily basis. n Active GPS units are used exclusively to enhance supervision and afford parole officers the ability locate offenders in a timely manner. n GPS tracking information is routinely shared with law enforcement for investigations.

Special Management Unit n Sex offender treatment has been shown to reduce sexual recidivism when combined with parole supervision. n Empirically validated cognitive-behavioral sex offender treatment is an intervention required of offenders supervised by SMU. n Treatment groups are held in numerous locations across the state including district parole offices in Hartford, New Haven, Waterbury, and Bridgeport.

Special Management Unit n SMU supervision has resulted in positive outcomes for the community and offender population. Sexual recidivism rates for offenders under SMU supervision has consistently been less than 1% annually. n Some years have seen sexual recidivism rates at 0% for offenders under SMU supervision.

Special Management Unit n “Since the overwhelming majority of sex offenders will likely be released into the community at some point and because research demonstrates that observed recidivism rates for sexual, violent, and non-violent crime are lower when sex offenders receive appropriate interventions, such as proper supervision and treatment, it is incumbent upon public safety agencies to provide services to offenders that can ensure the most effective management of these offenders in an effort to reduce future victimization.” (CSOM)