DØRACE Workshop Jae Yu Feb.11, 2002 Fermilab Introduction DØRACE Progress Workshop Goals Arrangements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Software change management
Advertisements

4/2/2002HEP Globus Testing Request - Jae Yu x Participating in Globus Test-bed Activity for DØGrid UTA HEP group is playing a leading role in establishing.
Network Redesign and Palette 2.0. The Mission of GCIS* Provide all of our users optimal access to GCC’s technology resources. *(GCC Information Services:
1 Technology Readiness Maryland /2015 Admin Schedule 2 AssessmentOnline/CBT Testing Dates PARCC - PBAMarch 2 – May 8 MSA ScienceApril 13.
WRAP Technical Support System Project Update AoH Call October 19, 2005.
Assessments Available Online Resources Available for Administrators –Manuals and Guides –Training Resources available for students Accommodations available.
Section 01Resources1 HSQ - DATABASES & SQL 01 Resources And Franchise Colleges Name :MANSHA NAWAZ room :G 0/32
70-293: MCSE Guide to Planning a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network, Enhanced Chapter 14: Problem Recovery.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
For more notes and topics visit:
Introduction to Information System Development.
ArcGIS Workflow Manager An Introduction
HEPiX Catania 19 th April 2002 Alan Silverman HEPiX Large Cluster SIG Report Alan Silverman 19 th April 2002 HEPiX 2002, Catania.
The D0 Monte Carlo Challenge Gregory E. Graham University of Maryland (for the D0 Collaboration) February 8, 2000 CHEP 2000.
DØ IB Meeting, Nov. 8, 2001 J. Yu, UTA, Remote Analysis Status Remote Analysis Coordination Computing hardware is rather inexpensive –CPU and storage media.
High Energy Physics At OSCER A User Perspective OU Supercomputing Symposium 2003 Joel Snow, Langston U.
Data management in the field Ari Haukijärvi 2nd EHES training seminar.
W.Smith, U. Wisconsin, ZEUS Computing Board Zeus Executive, March 1, ZEUS Computing Board Report Zeus Executive Meeting Wesley H. Smith, University.
Alexandre A. P. Suaide VI DOSAR workshop, São Paulo, 2005 STAR grid activities and São Paulo experience.
Remote Production and Regional Analysis Centers Iain Bertram 24 May 2002 Draft 1 Lancaster University.
Usability Issues Documentation J. Apostolakis for Geant4 16 January 2009.
03/27/2003CHEP20031 Remote Operation of a Monte Carlo Production Farm Using Globus Dirk Hufnagel, Teela Pulliam, Thomas Allmendinger, Klaus Honscheid (Ohio.
3rd Nov 2000HEPiX/HEPNT CDF-UK MINI-GRID Ian McArthur Oxford University, Physics Department
Configuration Management (CM)
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
DOSAR VO ACTION AGENDA ACTION ITEMS AND GOALS CARRIED FORWARD FROM THE DOSAR VI WORKSHOP AT OLE MISS APRIL 17-18, 2008.
A Design for KCAF for CDF Experiment Kihyeon Cho (CHEP, Kyungpook National University) and Jysoo Lee (KISTI, Supercomputing Center) The International Workshop.
Jan. 17, 2002DØRAM Proposal DØRACE Meeting, Jae Yu 1 Proposal for a DØ Remote Analysis Model (DØRAM) IntroductionIntroduction Remote Analysis Station ArchitectureRemote.
DØ RAC Working Group Report Progress Definition of an RAC Services provided by an RAC Requirements of RAC Pilot RAC program Open Issues DØRACE Meeting.
NUOL Internet Application Services Final Presentation 24 th of May, 2004.
DØ RACE Introduction Current Status DØRAM Architecture Regional Analysis Centers Conclusions DØ Internal Computing Review May 9 – 10, 2002 Jae Yu.
Summary, Action Items and Milestones 1 st HiPCAT THEGrid Workshop July 8 – 9, 2004 Univ. of Texas at Arlington Contact Jae Yu or Alan.
Status of UTA IAC + RAC Jae Yu 3 rd DØSAR Workshop Apr. 7 – 9, 2004 Louisiana Tech. University.
F. Rademakers - CERN/EPLinux Certification - FOCUS Linux Certification Fons Rademakers.
Spending Plans and Schedule Jae Yu July 26, 2002.
D0RACE: Testbed Session Lee Lueking D0 Remote Analysis Workshop February 12, 2002.
March 11, 2008 USCMS Tier-2 Workshop Oh Dear God Alain made a PowerPoint presentation 1.
DØSAR a Regional Grid within DØ Jae Yu Univ. of Texas, Arlington THEGrid Workshop July 8 – 9, 2004 Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
MIS 105 LECTURE 1 INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER HARDWARE CHAPTER REFERENCE- CHP. 1.
HEPiX FNAL ‘02 25 th Oct 2002 Alan Silverman HEPiX Large Cluster SIG Report Alan Silverman 25 th October 2002 HEPiX 2002, FNAL.
From DØ To ATLAS Jae Yu ATLAS Grid Test-Bed Workshop Apr. 4-6, 2002, UTA Introduction DØ-Grid & DØRACE DØ Progress UTA DØGrid Activities Conclusions.
GridPP11 Liverpool Sept04 SAMGrid GridPP11 Liverpool Sept 2004 Gavin Davies Imperial College London.
6/23/2005 R. GARDNER OSG Baseline Services 1 OSG Baseline Services In my talk I’d like to discuss two questions:  What capabilities are we aiming for.
THEGrid Workshop Jae Yu THEGrid Workshop UTA, July 8 – 9, 2004 Introduction An Example of Existing Activities What do we want to accomplish at the workshop?
Seattle Community Colleges District IT Advisory Committee Information Technology Services Customer Service Survey Results Fall, 2009 Information Technology.
UTA Site Report DØrace Workshop February 11, 2002.
Paperless Timesheet Management Project Anant Pednekar.
HEPiX 2 nd Nov 2000 Alan Silverman Proposal to form a Large Cluster SIG Alan Silverman 2 nd Nov 2000 HEPiX – Jefferson Lab.
UTA MC Production Farm & Grid Computing Activities Jae Yu UT Arlington DØRACE Workshop Feb. 12, 2002 UTA DØMC Farm MCFARM Job control and packaging software.
Feb. 14, 2002DØRAM Proposal DØ IB Meeting, Jae Yu 1 Proposal for a DØ Remote Analysis Model (DØRAM) Introduction Partial Workshop Results DØRAM Architecture.
CD FY09 Tactical Plan Status FY09 Tactical Plan Status Report for Neutrino Program (MINOS, MINERvA, General) Margaret Votava April 21, 2009 Tactical plan.
Remote Institute Tasks Frank Filthaut 11 February 2002  Monte Carlo production  Algorithm development  Alignment, calibration  Data analysis  Data.
Feb. 13, 2002DØRAM Proposal DØCPB Meeting, Jae Yu 1 Proposal for a DØ Remote Analysis Model (DØRAM) IntroductionIntroduction Partial Workshop ResultsPartial.
DØRACE Workshop Agenda Feb. 11, 2002 (Morning – 1West) 8:30 Registration at High Rise next to 1 West Conference room 9:00 Welcome (John W.) - Session Chair:
DØRACE Workshop Agenda Feb. 11, 2002 (Morning – 1West) 8:30 Registration at High Rise next to 1 West Conference room 9:00 Welcome Womersley 9:10-9:30 DØRACE.
1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Tempus JEP – – 2006 Supporting and facilitating active uptake to Information and Communication Technologies for University.
Apr. 25, 2002Why DØRAC? DØRAC FTFM, Jae Yu 1 What do we want DØ Regional Analysis Centers (DØRAC) do? Why do we need a DØRAC? What do we want a DØRAC do?
July 10, 2002DØRACE Status Report, Jae Yu DØ IB Meeting, OU Workshop 1 DØ RACE Status Report Introduction Software Distribution (DØRACE Setup) Hardware.
1 Policy Based Systems Management with Puppet Sean Dague
Accessing the VI-SEEM infrastructure
Belle II Physics Analysis Center at TIFR
News & Action Items Automatic Release Ready notification system is in place and working (Thanks Alan!! ) Needs refinements!!! New Fermi RH CD-Rom released.
UM D0RACE STATION Status Report Chunhui Han June 20, 2002
DØRACE Workshop Summary
Remote Analysis Coordination
DØ Internal Computing Review
Remote SAM Initiative (RSI) – Proposed Work Plan
DØ RAC Working Group Report
Proposal for a DØ Remote Analysis Model (DØRAM)
News New Updated DØRACE setup instruction to reflect the download split available on the web Three new sites are at various stages Princeton: Phase IV.
Presentation transcript:

DØRACE Workshop Jae Yu Feb.11, 2002 Fermilab Introduction DØRACE Progress Workshop Goals Arrangements

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 2 What is DØRACE, and Why Do We Need It? DØ Remote Analysis Coordination Efforts In existence to accomplish: –Setting up and maintaining remote analysis environment –Promote institutional contribution remotely –Allow remote institutions to participate in data analysis –To prepare for the future of data analysis More efficient and faster delivery of multi-PB data More efficient sharing processing resources Prepare for possible massive re-processing and MC production to expedite the process Expedite physics result production

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 3 DØRACE Cont’d –Maintain self-sustained support amongst the remote institutions to construct a broader bases of knowledge –Alleviate the load on expert by sharing the knowledge and allow them to concentrate on preparing for the future –Improve communication between the experiment site and the remote institutions –Minimize travel around the globe for data access –Sociological issues of HEP people at the home institutions and within the field. Primary goal is allow individual desktop users to make significant contribution without being at the lab

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 4 Difficulties –Having hard time setting up initially Lack of updated documentation Rather complicated set up procedure Lack of experience  No forum to share experiences –OS version differences (RH6.2 vs 7.1), let alone OS –Most the established sites have easier time updating releases –Network problems affecting successful completion of large size releases (4GB) takes a couple of hours (SA) –No specific responsible persons to ask questions –Availability of all necessary software via UPS/UPD –Time difference between continents affecting efficiencies From the Nov. Survey

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 5 What has been done? Regular bi-weekly meetings every on-week Thursdays –Remote participating through video conferencing (ISDN)  Moving toward switching over to VRVS per VCTF’s recommendation –Keep up with the progress via site reports –Provide forum to share experience DØRACE home page established ( hep.uta.edu/~d0race) hep.uta.edu/~d0race –To ease the barrier over the difficulties in initial set up –Updated and simplified instructions for set up available on the web  Many institutions have participated in refining the instruction –Tools to make DØ software download and installation made available –More tools identified and are in the works (Need to automate download and installation as much as we can, if possible one button based operation)

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 6 Release Ready notification system activated –Success is defined by institutions –Pull system  you can decide whether to download and install a specific release Build Error log and dependency tree utility in preparation (See Gordon’s talk) Effort initiated by Alan and release managers for alleviating unstable network dependencies SAM station set up in progress in many institutions All speakers’ talk slides have been put on the web prior to meetings, so far, every time –A more systematic way of doing this in the works (See Mark’s talk)

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 7 Categorized remote analysis system set up by the functionality –Desk top only –A modest analysis server –Linux installation –UPS/UPD Installation and deployment –External package installation via UPS/UPD CERNLIB Kai-lib Root –Download and Install a DØ release Tar-ball for ease of initial set up? Use of existing utilities for latest release download –Installation of cvs –Code development –KAI C++ compiler –SAM station setup DØRACE Strategy Phase I Rootuple Analysis Phase 0 Preparation Phase II Executables Phase III Code Dev. Phase IV Data Delivery

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 8 Progressive Nov. Survey Present

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 9 Where are we? DØRACE is entering into the next stage –The compilation and running –Active code development –Propagation of setup to all institutions Instructions seem to take their shape well Need to maintain and to keep them up to date Support to help problems people encounter There is the DØGRID group –Need remote institutions’ participation –Prepare SAM and other utilities for this –More efficient resource sharing necessary We will need to establish regional analysis centers

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 10 Central Analysis Center (CAC) Regional Analysis Centers RAC …. Institutional Analysis Centers Desktop Analysis Stations DAS …. DAS …. Store & Process 10~20% of All Data IAC …. IAC …. IAC Normal Interaction Communication Path Occasional Interaction Communication Path Proposed DØRAM Architecture

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 11 Regional Analysis Centers A few geographically selected sites that satisfy requirements Provide almost the same level of service as FNAL to a few institutional analysis centers Analyses carried out within the regional center –Store 10~20% of statistically random data permanently –Most the analyses performed on these samples with the regional network –Refine the analyses using the smaller but unbiased data set –When the entire data set is needed  Underlying Grid architecture provide access to remaining data set

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 12 Regional Analysis Center Requirements Become a Mini-CAC Sufficient computing infrastructure –Large bandwidth (gagibit or better) –Sufficient Storage Space to hold 10~20% of data permanently and expandable to accommodate data increase >30TB just for Run IIa RAW data –Sufficient CPU resources to provide regional or Institutional analysis requests and reprocessing Geographically located to avoid unnecessary network traffic overlap Software Distribution and Support –Mirror copy of CVS database for synchronized update between RAC’s and CAC –Keep the relevant copies of data bases –Act as SAM service station

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 13 What Do I Think We Should Do? Most the students and postDocs are at FNAL, thus it is important to provide them sufficient computing and cache resources for their analysis.  The Current suggestion for backend analysis clusters should be built!! In the mean time, we should select a few sites as RACs and prepare sufficient hardware and infrastructure –My rough map scan gives FNAL+3RACs in the US, and a few in Europe Software effort for Grid should proceed as fast as we can to supplement the hardware –We cannot afford to spend time for Test beds –Our set ups should be the Test Bed and the actual Grid A committee to determine number of RAC sites, their requirements, and select RACs within the next couple of months.

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 14 Workshop Goals Primary goals: –Establish as many institutions as possible with remote analysis, code development, and data delivery as possible through the afternoon “hands-on” session. –Identify available resources within the collaboration –Identify what each institution are working on for better coordination –Identify missing or anticipated to be missing pieces for exploiting remote resources –Identify tasks that need to be prepared for expediting data analysis at remote sites –Set common goals, task lists and schedules Distribute tasks –Identify issues in communication and in sociological barriers and come up with possible solutions Establish clear road map for the future

Feb. 11, 2002Jae Yu, DØRACE Workshop Introduction 15 Some Workshop Arrangements Today’s afternoon session will be held at the computer training center located at the old Fixed target operation’s center at 2pm. –Your package has the map to the center –There are 16 computers + 15 Ethernet cables in the small room –Additional 10 Ethernet cables + Wireless access point in the large room next to the training room –Instruction booklet are made and ready for your use at the session –Coffee break at the training center at 3:30pm –Parking is limited. Please share the rides as much as you can. Fermi RH 7.1 CD-Rom to be available at the registration desk. One per institution please MC Farm regular meeting will be in the RACE track (WH7X) beginning 4pm The banquet is at 7pm, Tokyo Restaurant. See the map and the directions included in your packet.  You need to pay now at the registration for convenience (Tip is included) Tomorrow morning’s session begins at 9am here in 1West. Afternoon sessions are in 1 West and 1 North.