1 G89.2228 Lect 13a G89.2228 Lecture 13a Power for 2 way ANOVA Random effects Expected MS Mixed models Special case: one entry per cell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 2 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE: AN INTRODUCTION
Advertisements

Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
ANOVA Demo Part 2: Analysis Psy 320 Cal State Northridge Andrew Ainsworth PhD.
2013/12/10.  The Kendall’s tau correlation is another non- parametric correlation coefficient  Let x 1, …, x n be a sample for random variable x and.
FACTORIAL ANOVA Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 12: Analysis of Variance: Differences among Means of Three or More Groups.
1 G Lect 14b G Lecture 14b Within subjects contrasts Types of Within-subject contrasts Individual vs pooled contrasts Example Between subject.
1 Multifactor ANOVA. 2 What We Will Learn Two-factor ANOVA K ij =1 Two-factor ANOVA K ij =1 –Interaction –Tukey’s with multiple comparisons –Concept of.
Part I – MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Some more theory and alternative problem formats. (These are problem formats more likely to appear on exams. Most of your time in.
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Lecture 10: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects: Practice! Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 17: Repeated-Measures ANOVA.
MAE 552 Heuristic Optimization Instructor: John Eddy Lecture #18 3/6/02 Taguchi’s Orthogonal Arrays.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Computing the analysis of variance for simple experiments (single factor, unrelated groups experiments).
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Computing the analysis of variance for simple experiments (single factor, unrelated groups experiments).
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA.
Comparing Several Means: One-way ANOVA Lesson 14.
Lecture 13: Factorial ANOVA 1 Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Outline Single-factor ANOVA Two-factor ANOVA Three-factor ANOVA
Chap 10-1 Analysis of Variance. Chap 10-2 Overview Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) F-test Tukey- Kramer test One-Way ANOVA Two-Way ANOVA Interaction Effects.
Overview of Meta-Analytic Data Analysis
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Factorial Treatments & Interactions.
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS: Analysis Of Variance ANOVA
Introduction ANOVA Mike Tucker School of Psychology B209 Portland Square University of Plymouth Drake Circus Plymouth, PL4 8AA Tel: +44 (0)
Statistical Power 1. First: Effect Size The size of the distance between two means in standardized units (not inferential). A measure of the impact of.
Two-way ANOVA Introduction to Factorial Designs and their Analysis.
One-Factor Analysis of Variance A method to compare two or more (normal) population means.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Experimental Design and Analysis of Variance Chapter 10.
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
One-Way Analysis of Variance … to compare 2 or population means.
Testing Hypotheses about Differences among Several Means.
1 G Lect 14a G Lecture 14a Examples of repeated measures A simple example: One group measured twice The general mixed model Independence.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
STA305 week 51 Two-Factor Fixed Effects Model The model usually used for this design includes effects for both factors A and B. In addition, it includes.
Psych 5500/6500 Other ANOVA’s Fall, Factorial Designs Factorial Designs have one dependent variable and more than one independent variable (i.e.
Design Of Experiments With Several Factors
Intermediate Applied Statistics STAT 460 Lecture 17, 11/10/2004 Instructor: Aleksandra (Seša) Slavković TA: Wang Yu
1 G Lect 11a G Lecture 11a Example: Comparing variances ANOVA table ANOVA linear model ANOVA assumptions Data transformations Effect sizes.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 8 Analysis of Variance.
Analysis of Variance (One Factor). ANOVA Analysis of Variance Tests whether differences exist among population means categorized by only one factor or.
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 18 Random Effects.
N318b Winter 2002 Nursing Statistics Specific statistical tests Chi-square (  2 ) Lecture 7.
ONE WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE ANOVA o It is used to investigate the effect of one factor which occurs at h levels (≥3). Example: Suppose that we wish to.
Two-Way (Independent) ANOVA. PSYC 6130A, PROF. J. ELDER 2 Two-Way ANOVA “Two-Way” means groups are defined by 2 independent variables. These IVs are typically.
Chapter 4 Analysis of Variance
IE241: Introduction to Design of Experiments. Last term we talked about testing the difference between two independent means. For means from a normal.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.
The Mixed Effects Model - Introduction In many situations, one of the factors of interest will have its levels chosen because they are of specific interest.
Chapter 9 More Complicated Experimental Designs. Randomized Block Design (RBD) t > 2 Treatments (groups) to be compared b Blocks of homogeneous units.
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
The p-value approach to Hypothesis Testing
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent.
1 G Lect 13b G Lecture 13b Mixed models Special case: one entry per cell Equal vs. unequal cell n's.
Two-Factor Study with Random Effects In some experiments the levels of both factors A & B are chosen at random from a larger set of possible factor levels.
Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.
Statistics Used in One-way Analysis of Variance BUSI 6480 Lecture 2.
Repeated Measures Designs
Comparing Three or More Means
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Ch. 14: Comparisons on More Than Two Conditions
More Complicated Experimental Designs
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
More Complicated Experimental Designs
More Complicated Experimental Designs
Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Chapter 13 Group Differences
Presentation transcript:

1 G Lect 13a G Lecture 13a Power for 2 way ANOVA Random effects Expected MS Mixed models Special case: one entry per cell

2 G Lect 13a Effect sizes and power Cohen’s f (Howell’s  ) is the square root of the effect variance divided by within cell variance Suppose we wanted to replicate H-K&N results: f a =.10 f b =.21 f ab =.02 –Clearly the obtained interaction is smaller than H-K&N expected

3 G Lect 13a Example: H-K&N –Suppose the expected results were –f a =.10 f b =.14 f ab =.14 –To have 90% power for interaction sample would have had to be MUCH larger Interactions that look reasonably large may have small f values –The interaction looks much smaller once adjustment for main effects takes place Power for Interactions

4 G Lect 13a Interaction, continued McClelland and Judd have written about the challenges of showing power for interactions Krantz and Shinn have an unpublished manuscript that suggests that tests of interaction need a sample size about 4 times as large as tests of main effects Rosenthal and Rosnow, among others, have suggested abandoning the factorial ANOVA interaction framework, and instead focus on planned contrasts of the predicted effects Note that interactions that are ordinal can sometimes disappear with a transformation of the dependent variable (and hence are less convincing)

5 G Lect 13a Expected mean squares for the fixed effects model Model: X ijk = µ +  i +  j +  ij + e ijk The fact that  i,  j and  ij sum to zero across rows and columns makes the expected mean squares very easy for balanced, fixed effects ANOVA –The resulting expected mean squares are:

6 G Lect 13a Random effects example Suppose that a memory researcher is interested in how memorable different words are across university settings She samples five universities and 40 words and tests recall using a common protocol across sites –Both words and universities can be viewed as random effects –Variation between the five universities suggest what variation would be like if more universities were sampled –Variation between the words suggest how difficult different words can conceivably be

7 G Lect 13a Random effects example Factor A: Words Factor B: Universities Suppose that recall is tested as follows: for each of the 5 universities and each of the 40 study words, n students are sampled and asked to recall the study word after they have been exposed to it in a crossword puzzle. This design would allow each cell of the 40x5 design to have an independent sample. We can calculate the overall recall of each of the 40 words and the level of recall for each of the five universities using means.

8 G Lect 13a Random Effects Models The statistical model for the random effects model is as before: – However, instead of assuming that Assume that –The expectation operator,, states that the average across all hypothetical instances of  is zero. –It implicitly acknowledges that the average of the sample of  values in this study may not be zero. The marginal and grand means become

9 G Lect 13a Expected MS under Random Effects The expected mean squares for the main effects of A and B include a term for the variability of (  ). The F ratios used to test the main effects must use in the denominator instead of –Effect A: –Effect B: The test for the interaction still uses MS E in the denominator: –Effect AB:

10 G Lect 13a Mixed Models: One Factor Fixed and one Factor Random Suppose A is fixed and B is random The Expected MS The F ratios are thus: –Effect A: –Effect B: –Effect AB:

11 G Lect 13a Notes on Defining Effects as Random Sometimes studies are carried out in different sites or at different times E.g., Suppose a college friend and you collaborate to test a fixed effect A with 4 levels. Each of you randomly assigns 25 subjects to each level. You pool your data and plan to call study site factor B. Your total N is 200. If you treat B as fixed, the F for factor A is F(3,192). The denominator MS is MS E (within cell). If you treat B as random, the F for factor A is F(3,3). The denominator MS for the fixed effect A is MS AB. One wants to generalize across all sites, but the cost in power is very high.