05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge 20061 True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Advertisements

14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Bob Jacobsen July 22, 2003 From Raw Data to Physics From Raw Data to Physics: Reconstruction and Analysis Introduction Sample Analysis A Model Basic Features.
Track Timing at e + e - Linear Collider with the Silicon Drift Detector Main Tracker R. Bellwied, D. Cinabro, V. L. Rykov Wayne State University Detroit,
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Status & Update of track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Cluster finding in CALICE calorimeters Chris Ainsley University of Cambridge, UK LCWS 04: Simulation (reconstruction) parallel session 20 April 2004, Paris,
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
PFA on sidloi3: update Ron Cassell 4/27/10. 2 Proposed changes Calibration Tracking Extrapolation Subcluster finding Muon finding Structure.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
1 Software tools in Asia Akiya Miyamoto KEK 18-March-2005 Simulation and Reconstruction Session LCWS2005 Representing acfa-sim-j activity M.C.Chang 1,K.Fujii.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Status of SiD/Iowa PFA by Usha Mallik The University of Iowa for Ron Cassell, Mat Charles, TJ Kim, Christoph Pahl 1 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas,
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, July
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Mark Dorman – UCL/RAL – Calibration Workshop Talk Update on ND Strip-to-Strip Calibration Work Mark Dorman Calibration Workshop Fermilab, September 7-9.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.
PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
Track Finding.
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Recent attempts to use so far implemented reconstruction software for detector optimization have shown unacceptable performance at higher center of mass energies Some uninformed people have even tried to question concept of Particle Flow Through this talk I will try to show you that the resulting performance is result of approach and implementation imperfectness WW only fully lepton ones ! - small statistics (10% of the sample) but easy to find the flows Simplest possible case at higher energy

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge ClusteringTracking Track-Cluster matching Rudimentary particle ID Algorithm at the moment Reconstructed particles two measures that will be used

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge RMS 38.7GeV !? track cheater ( option FIT true tracks ) Track wise Clustering Wolf

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge RMS 28.9GeV !? track cheater ( option NO FIT – MC momentum copied to track parameters) Track wise Clustering Wolf

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge with fit no fit x3 RMS 38.7GeV => 28.9GeV but the wings are still too large something is still wrong !! => check the tracking

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge In further analysis I’ll use the distribution with no fit – in yellow

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Position of the kink point - before any hit ( on the beam tube ) – fit should remedy this on the layers of silicon ( VTX or SIT ) - hard for a real tracking within the TPC - should be no problem Distance at the front face of calorimeter - Usually very small for high energy tracks MC truth stored at starting point of the particle ! NO real true information at the point of gamma emission – but also no place to store LCIO problem ?? Kinks

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Kinks - from bremsstrahlung only ( E  >1GeV) events in which this happen are in red

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge RMS 38% !! Distribution of for the WW lepton events (muons excluded)

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Mismatch of track momentum and energy in the cluster ( muon clusters excluded) events are in blue !

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Mismatch of track momentum and energy in the cluster ( muon clusters excluded) events are in green !

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge All together Wings almost fully covered by these two types of mistakes – kink+ mismatch

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge TMP solution for kinks 1. take momentum from MC particle at starting point and convert to track parameters 2. Propagate the helix up to the gamma vertex and calculate momentum at this point 3. Subtract photon momentum from propagated one and assign to the “blue” part of track 4. If there is another one loop through the steps again with

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Now the tracking is fixed we can look again at distributions It's not getting better !! so there is additional source of error => maybe clustering ?

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge kink corrected track cheater ( option NO FIT for true tracks ) true clusters Wolf RMS 12%

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge ClusteringTracking Track-Cluster matching Rudimentary particle ID Errors from the clustering propagate to the stage of the track cluster matching Track cluster matching makes additional errors even in case of true tracks + true clusters Reconstructed particles

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge kink corrected track cheater ( option NO FIT for true tracks ) true clusters true matching different calibration !! think before you put If(A<B) in your code Mean -0.6 RMS 2.21GeVMean 1.0 RMS 3.17GeV

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge real true need for more detail geometry description

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge true real  Ghost cluster

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge truereal hadron

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge Whole event resolution – fully hadronic events Partial relative resolutions in percents

05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge We are ready for GigaZ option Clustering decoupled from tracking will not give the desired performance There is a need both to restructure the algorithm and to improve it in several parts There is urgent need to solve some “technical” questions –geometry, storage of full true information … If the performance is not what you have hoped for it’s not the concept - you have done something wrong Conclusions