Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
Advertisements

© 2007 E.ON Nexus AQ Requirements To support the current business processes We need to maintain performance and enable market operation as is using current.
Mod 232 Anna Taylor Pricing Manager. 1 Mod 232 An alternative methodology for allocating unidentified energy Currently allocated by RbD entirely in SSP.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
144A – Calculation of Value at Risk (VAR) Simon Trivella – 24 th May 2007 Distribution Workstream.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
21 May 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Mod 115 An alternative view Phil Broom Gaz de France ESS.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.
Modification 0410 questions Gareth Evans on behalf of Total Gas & Power.
Credit Scenarios – Modification 0335 Joanna Ferguson.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Feb 07 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Nexus Workgroup CSEP Transition Topic June
UNC Review Group 0178 National Grid Distribution “Reclassification of SSP to Domestic only” Review Group Meeting – 22 February 2008 Chris Warner.
LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 April 2010.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
Shrinkage Forum Tuesday 8 March 2011, 31 Homer Road.
Mod 270 Potential Options Rob Hill 15/02/2009. Six potential options following discussion at last months Development Workgroup OptionNameDescription 1Elective.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
1 To re-define the Aggregate Reconciliation Period to reflect the period to which the charge relates.
1 Project Nexus Approach to modelling costs and benefits Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 15 May 2012.
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
RbD Subgroup Dean Johnson 8 th April 2008 RbD Subgroup Dean Johnson 8 th April 2008.
Gas Distribution Transportation Charging What are the Risks to Pricing predictability? Stephen Marland Pricing Manager
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous.
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Meter Error – NTS Revenue Flows Gas TCMF – 2 nd December 2010.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
DN Interruption Reform Transmission Workstream Mark Freeman 5 th April 2007.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
Background Current balance of LDZ System and Customer charges
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Capacity/Commodity Split Impact on Suppressed reconciliations
Review Group 178 SSP as Domestic only.
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Orifice plate meter error resolution – cash flows
Modification th July 2008.
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Modification 0117 – Additional Considerations
Project Nexus Workgroup
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Connected System Exit Points - Update
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
Daily Metered Supply Points
Overview of RbD Risk Modelling 31 March 2008
Modification Proposal 136
Meter Reads.
Modification 440 Project Nexus iGT Single Service Provision
Unidentified Gas (UIG)
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Development Work Group 194
Presentation transcript:

Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam

1 Agenda  Background  Principles  Inputs  Sources  Shares  Sectors  Calculations

2 The RbD Concept  Meter point reconciliation would not be cost effective for 20 million SSPs  Larger Supply Points (AQ>73,200 kWh) are reconciled on actual meter reads  Smaller Supply Points (AQ<73,200 kWh) are subject to Reconciliation by Difference  Britain’s distribution Network is divided into 18 LDZs  Total daily energy consumption in each of the LDZs is known  Any reconciliation charge in one sector must have an equal and opposite effect on other sectors, so that total LDZ consumption is unchanged  Reconciliation consists of a gas charge/credit and transportation charge/credit to User for both NTS and LDZ transportation

3 RbD Basic Concepts - 1  If you know the RQ (Reconciliation Quantity) for Segments 1 to 4, from reading all the meters in them, then…  The RQ for Segment 5 must be equal and opposite to the Sum of the RQs for Segments 1 to 4.  Therefore, you don't need to read any meters in Segment 5 to calculate the total RQ for the Segment. Just apply the equal and opposite rule: Source Charges

4 Energy Allocation - Summarised LDZ Input Energy Allocation of Measured Energy input into LDZ, after deducting Shrinkage and DM measurements, to all NDM Supply Points in the LDZ DM NDM Large NDM Small Shrinkage The allocation process drives the shippers’ energy balancing imbalance and transportation commodity quantities

5 Reconciliation by Difference (Smaller Supply Points) LDZ Input Energy DM NDM Large NDM Small Shrinkage  DM   NDM Small + NDM Large = -

6 RbD Basic Concepts -2  As all SSPs have:  AQs calculated on the same basis  Energy deemed to them on the same basis  Comparable actual consumption patterns  Then:  They will have comparable RQs  And:  CSEP sites are no different to Directly Connected, they are affected by the same weather/social/economic factors, so their behaviour is comparable to directly connected

7 RbD Basic Concepts - 3  If:  All SSPs in an LDZ are comparable, and  Their RQ is directly related to their AQ  Then:  Shipper's total SSP RQ is proportional to their total AQ in an LDZ  Thus:  We can allocate RQ on the basis of each Shipper's Share of the total AQs for an LDZ  For this purpose, CSEP AQ ranks equally with Directly Connected

8 The Matching Concept  Group LSP RQs by Meter Read Frequency  RbD Sectors  Give each Sector an Incurred Period of same length as Meter Read Frequency (specifically: Monthly, 6 Monthly, Annual)  Slice RQ into equal amounts for each incurred month in the incurred period  Apply appropriate shipper share to the RQ slice for each incurred month

9 RbD Sectors and Sources  1 Month Sector (M)  Sources:  DM Estimate to Actual  NDM Monthly read meters  Adjustments to Monthly read meters  Reconciliation of LSPs on CSEPs  Adjustments to LSPs on CSEPs  Adjustments to SSPs of <1 month duration  LDZ Measurement Sector (L) (Special case 1 month sector)  Sources:  LDZ Measurement Errors  6 Month Sector (6)  Sources:  NDM Non-Monthly read meters  Adjustments to Non-Monthly read meters  Adjustments to SSPs of 1-4 months duration  12 Month Sector (A)  Sources:  DM Annual Resynchronisations  Adjustments to SSPs of >4 months duration

10 Monthly and LDZ errors sectors 6 monthly sector Apportion over last month Apportion over last 6 months 12 monthly sector Apportion over last 12 months Apportionment of RbD sectors - 1

11 Apportionment of RbD sectors - 2  Matching of RQ to Shipper Shares Current Month Month -11 Sector A Sector 6 Sector M Sector L

12 RbD Charges – Which prices?  Energy – daily System Average Price – no calculation required – inherit from “primary” reconciliation  Transportation – applicable daily rates of:  NTS Exit Commodity  LDZ Commodity  Customer Commodity (for applicable periods)  CSEP sites  Same energy prices  Same NTS commodity prices  LDZ commodity prices reduced to reflect average scheme SOQ in the LDZ  No Customer Commodity charges  Primary Reconciliation energy is broken down into periods of consistent transportation prices, and prices are applied to a single figure for each source

13 Calculation of Market Shares - Principles  Market share is based on share of all the days in a particular month  Live AQ on the day  Isolated/isolated & withdrawn excluded (same as for allocation)  CSEP sites count equally with Directly Connected sites for energy apportionment

14 Calculation of Market Shares - Example DayShipper AQ - KWhLDZ Total AQ – kWh Day 120,00032,000 Day 219,95032,000 Day 320,05032,200 Etc. Day 3120,15032,500 Total for month600,0001,000,000 Shipper market share for the month: 600,000 ÷ 1,000,000 = 60%

15  Let's Assume:  Reconciliation on a non-Monthly-Read meter, from 15/03/2006 to 15/10/2006  Initially suppressed, approved in December 2006, to be included on December 2006 invoice (issued January 2007)  Imaginary 3-Month Sector Applies  Reconciliation values  RQ: 120,000 kWh  GRE: £9,000  NRE:£200  ZRE:£600 RbD Apportionment – Worked example

16 Monthly Cumulative Daily Aggregate AQs For an imaginary LDZ with four Shippers RbD Calculations - Cum AQs ShipperMonth 1Month 2Month 3 ONE600,000700,000800,000 TWO250,000200,000150,000 THREE050,000 FOUR150,00050,0000 LDZ Total AQ1,000,000

17 RbD Calculations – UARQ (User Aggregate RQ) Sector Q RQ (kWh) ARQ (kWh) Shipper Share(AQ): One Two Three Four LDZ Total AQ RbD UARQ: One Two Three Four Total RbD UARQ Sources Incurred TotalMonth 1Month 2Month 3 120,00040, ,000-40, ,000700,000800, ,000200,000150, , ,00050,000 1,000,000 Total -84,000-24,000-28,000-32, ,000-10,000-8,000-6,000 -4,0000-2,000 -8,000-6,000-2, ,000-40,000

18 RbD Calculations - UARCV/RBG Sector Q Sources Incurred TotalMonth 1Month 2Month 3 GRE9,0003,000 ARCV-9,000-3,000 Shipper Share (AQ): One 600,000700,000800,000 Two 250,000200,000150,000 Three 050,000 Four 150,00050,000 LDZ Total AQ 1,000,000 RBG Charges: Total One-6,300-1,800-2,100-2,400 Two-1, Three Four Total RBG Charges-9,000-3,000

19 RbD Calculations – contd.  Identical process calculates:  UARCV: User Aggregate Reconciliation Clearing Value  Energy cost of Reconciliation Energy (“RBG”)  UATCA: User Aggregate Transportation Charge Adjustments  Commodity Transportation costs  Since Sale of Networks, split between NTS, LDZ and Customer Commodity Reconciliation

20 RbD Supporting Information  Breakout of Charges by:  LDZ – Directly connected  Energy – RBG  Transportation – RBN/RBZ/RBC  - Sector  LDZ – CSEP  Energy - RCG  Transportation – RCN/RCZ  - Sector  Breakout of Shares by:  LDZ  Incurred Month  - Calendar Day

21 Worked example for Shipper One for Dummy Sector Q  Shipper One’s RBG records for Month 1,2 and 3:  J13, , RBG, AB, 10, 2006, Q, , , , , , ,  J13, , RBG, AB, 11, 2006, Q, , , , , , ,  J13, , RBG, AB, 12, 2006, Q, , , , , ,  [record type, record no, chg type, LDZ, billing month, billing year, sector code, total LDZ AQ, Shipper total AQ, % market share, energy, financial value, invoice no]  J14, AB, Q, RBG, ,  [record type, LDZ, sector code, total energy, total financial value]

22 Role of the RbD Audit  Calculations are performed within mainframe systems  Large volume of data  500,000 LSPs  20,000,000 SSPs  Confidentiality of each Shipper’s LSP Reconciliation values  SSP Shippers can’t check the whole calculation process  RbD Audit checks the following:  Aggregation of Primary Reconciliation sources and allocation into sectors  Extraction of SSP aggregate AQs  Allocation of RbD energy and charges to Shippers