Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August 12 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
- Environment - Climate - Landscape - Land use - Local Population (animals and humans) Depends on…
Advertisements

2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Red Lake River Farm to Stream Tile Drainage Study - Red Lake Watershed District –
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
The Study on Water Quality of the Return Flow in Lower Tap Salao Irrigation Project Hungspreug N. 1 Chooaksorn W. 2 and Sudcha P. 3 Department of Environmental.
The Great Miami Loramie Watershed Neelu, Jasmine, and Cassie.
Water Monitoring Lab. Why Test Water Quality? Water testing allows scientists and citizens to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream.
Health of water determined by the balance between physical, chemical and biological variables. Physical variables=temperature, turbidity, and water movement.
Watershed Assessment Analysis of Data. Q Values Raw data values are NOT Q values. We need to convert the raw data/observations into “grades” (Q values)
Rapid Bioassessment for Volunteers SALMON RIVER WATERSHED.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Biotic indices and Indicator species. Remember about canaries in coal mines? Indicator species – Use of a living organism that is sensitive to certain.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
SELF-HELP MONITORING — A WISCONSIN LAKE — Mary Jane Bumby Green Lake Green Lake County Wisconsin.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Water Quality.
Compliance Monitoring─Ensuring Effective Results Jim Younk Idaho Power Company.
Temperature of Stream Site (upstream to downstream) Temperature ( °C )Average ( °C ) °C °C °C °C °C °C According to.
Temperature and DO Temperature  A measure of heat Dissolved Oxygen (DO)  The concentration of oxygen (gas) which is dissolved in water. Both are important.
Measures of Water Quality. Introduction  The United States Geographical Survey monitors waterways all over the country, tracking all of the most important.
Part II: Water Quality Water quality refers to the condition of the water: Is it clean or is it polluted?
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
REDUCING OUR FOOTPRINT Unit 3-1b How To Measure Water Quality
Bellwork: 09/05/2012 1)Change 10 to 25% of the water within your tank. 2)If you are not helping your group change water, you need to be finishing the fish.
Water Chemistry Project In order to evaluate water changes, we need access to reliable information on current and past conditions. If changes are already.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Water quality and indicators are measurements of the substances in water beside water molecules that determine the healthiness of the water or its level.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
What is a Watershed? An area of land, from ridge top to ridge top, that collects, stores, and releases water to a common point, such as a river or a lake.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Napa Plant Site Central Unit.
What’s in Your Creek? Results of the 2009 Clackamas Basin Volunteer Monitoring Effort.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Type Your Poster Title Here School name and Watershed name (e.g. Sand Hill River Watershed) Date Insert school logo up here Picture of team? Natural Resource.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Effects of Unsafe Levels. pH Safe levels: Safe levels: Between 6.5 and 9 Sources: Sources: decaying matter causes acidic conditions Effects of Unsafe.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Water Quality Indicators.
Water Quality Trends and Threats in Northern Ireland Donnacha Doody Acknowledgement: Water Framework Directive Data Provided by NIEA.
Warm Up Complete the text dependent questions for the Water Scarcity text. Do your own work. Homework: Read 16C-21C answer ?’s 1-3, 5 p22C Read 24C-31C.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.
Water Quality Is it safe and healthy?. ● Certain substances can affect the taste or color of water, but are harmless unless present at very high levels.
Site # 11.5: Middle Fork Feather River above confluence with Grizzly Creek Sierra Valley Dissolved Oxygen Study Summer 2008 Update Upper Feather River.
NCSCOS 3.0 Science 8.  What factors indicate the QUALITY of Water?  How do we know if the water in lakes, ponds, streams, etc., is healthy or not? 
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Warm up: Describe the features of a river basin.
WATER QUALITY.
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
8.E.1 Understand the hydrosphere and the impact of humans on local systems and the effects of the hydrosphere on humans. 8.E.1.3 Predict the safety and.
EVALUATING WATER SYSTEM HEALTH
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
Keeping your water safe
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
_________: the measure of how _________ water is due to _______________ ____________________. Turbidity cloudy suspended particles Definition:
Water quality.
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Physical Variables of Water Health
Core Lab 1: Water Health Test
Presentation transcript:

Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August

Background The Clackamas Watershed What influences Water Quality? PSU and the Student Watershed Research Project

Study Area: The Clackamas River Basin

Parameters Tested Temperature Dissolved Oxygen Turbidity pH Nitrogen (Ammonia and Nitrate) Phosphorous Macroinvertebrates

Water Temperature & Quality Standards Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act Surface Water Spawning pH 6.5 – 8.5 Temperature (°C) < 17.8< 12.8 DO (mg/L)> 6.0> 11.0 DO (% sat)> 90%> 95% Turbidity (NTU)< 5 NTU Phosphorus (mg/L) < 1 Nitrate (mg/L)< 10 All waters64°F (17.8°C) Salmon spawning and emergence 55°F (12.8°C) Bull trout50°F (10°C) Columbia River to RM °F (20°C) Willamette River to RM 50 68°F (20°C)

Methodology Samples were collected on-site and tested for Temperature, DO, Turbidity, and pH in the field Water samples were tested for Soluble Reactive Phosphorous, Ammonia Nitrogen, and Nitrate Nitrogen in the lab Each parameter was tested using three replicates, but in the event of extreme outliers two more replicates were tested Macroinvertebrate analysis included the EPT, Pollution Sensitive/Tolerant and OWEB Level 2 metrics.

Results by Sub-basin: Eagle Creek With few exceptions the sites at Eagle Creek have favorable water quality conditions ECK001 had slightly green water and smelled of Chlorine EGL001 & EGL002 had ammonia readings above the upper limit Turbidity at EGL002 was above the upper limit Macroinvertebrate data indicated that the Eagle Creek sub-basin is not impaired and supports adequate macroinvertebrate populations

Results by Sub-basin: Rock Creek RCK002 had a turbidity measurement significantly above the upper threshold Ammonia levels exceeded the upper threshold for RCK001 & RCK002 and were at the top of the safe range for RCK000 & SEB002 RCK001 had a DO measurement close to the minimum threshold for safety and has shown lower DO over time

Results by Sub-basin: Rock Creek Macroinvertebrate analysis of the Rock Creek sub-basin indicates moderate impairment due to the absence of Trichoptera (Caddisfly), a pollution-sensitive organism

Results by Sub-basin: Deep Creek NFD001, NFD003, NFD004 show higher nitrate levels from last year All sites had DO levels above the minimum recommended level The past few years NFD002, NFD003, & NFD004 exceeded safe phosphorus levels, but this is no longer true as of 2010 In the past Deep creek has been above the upper threshold of safety for ammonia This year all sites show lower levels of ammonia, but only NFD001 & NFD003 were at acceptable levels

Results by Sub-basin: Deep Creek Macro data from Boring Trail Station showed signs of severe impairment and was limited in sensitive and tolerant species

Results by Sub-basin: Lower Goose and Clear Creek For GCK001 water temp, turbidity, and ammonia levels were slightly high CLE019 was within standards except for slightly high ammonia levels Water temp for CLE000 exceeded the standard for a healthy stream DO for CLE00 and CLA024 was within limits for the time data was collected, but not optimal for spawning conditions

Results by Sub-basin: Lower Goose and Clear Creek Macroinvertebrate analysis of the Clear Creek sub-basin shows stream quality to be moderately impacted due to the absence of Trichoptera (Caddisfly)

Results by Sub-basin: Richardson Creek The upstream sites RCH003 & RCH004 had ammonia levels above the limit of 0.03mg/L A few samples had phosphorus levels above the DEQ mandate of 0.10mg/L. RCH001 was at 0.14mg/L in 2008 and 0.11 mg/L in 2010 indicating some improvement is still needed Data for RCH001 in 2009 and RCH003 in 2010 indicate higher levels of turbidity

Comparison of Data Across Sub-basins: Turbidity

Comparison of Data Across Sub-basins: DO

Comparison of Data Across Sub-basins: Temperature

Recommendations to Maintain or Improve Water Quality Increase the frequency of monitoring Keep septic tanks well maintained Remove invasive plants Keep yard debris, garbage, & chemicals away from streams Reduce fertilizer and pesticide use

Special Thanks to: Land Owners Clackamas River Water District Water Environment Services Clackamas County