© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFS Workshop on the use and visualisation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFC Science Meeting, Washington, 20.
Advertisements

© Crown copyright Met Office Use of GRIB hazard forecasts in flight planning Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office WAFS Science meeting, Washington,
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC turbulence and Cb hazard verification Recent results and future plans Dr Philip G Gill WAFSOPSG 7/14, 30 th April 2013.
GRIB Visualization of data
© Crown copyright Met Office Scientific background and content of new gridded products Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office WAFS Workshop.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor University of Reading, UK What is the half-life of a cloud forecast?
WAFS Workshop on the Use and Visualisation of Gridded SIGWX Forecasts, Paris, New WAFC Gridded Products = New Visualisation Opportunities.
WAFS Workshop on the Use and Visualization of Gridded SIGWX Forecasts September 2009.
History of IATA requirements for gridded ICE, TURB and CB Cloud Products.
© Crown copyright Met Office Verification of forecasts of Cbs Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office WAFS Science meeting, Washington, April.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
© Crown copyright Met Office SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, ECMWF, January 2008 SRNWP Interoperability Terry Davies Met Office.
© Crown copyright Met Office Pass the baton: Verification and the NCOF product chain Andy Saulter, Business Support and Waves.
Translating verification experience from meteorology to space weather Suzy Bingham ESWW splinter session, Thurs. 20 th Nov.
Verification of WAFS Global Icing Products Jennifer Mahoney 1 and Sean Madine 1,2 1 NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory 2 Cooperative Institute for Research.
© Crown copyright Met Office Improving forecasting of disruption due to convection within UK airspace Paul Maisey and Katie Brown ECAM, European Meteorological.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
Verification has been undertaken for the 3 month Summer period (30/05/12 – 06/09/12) using forecasts and observations at all 205 UK civil and defence aerodromes.
FAA International Activities
© Crown copyright Met Office Operational OpenRoad verification Presented by Robert Coulson.
© Crown copyright Met Office Forecasting Icing for Aviation: Some thoughts for discussion Cyril Morcrette Presented remotely to Technical Infra-structure.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
An Overview of the UK Met Office Weymouth Bay wind model for the 2012 Summer Olympics Mark Weeks 1. INTRODUCTION In the summer of 2012 a very high resolution.
April 24, 2007 Nihat Cubukcu Utilization of Numerical Weather Forecast in Energy Sector.
Impact study with observations assimilated over North America and the North Pacific Ocean at MSC Stéphane Laroche and Réal Sarrazin Environment Canada.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson, COSMO Annual Meeting September 18-21, 2007.
Five techniques for liquid water cloud detection and analysis using AMSU NameBrief description Data inputs Weng1= NESDIS day one method (Weng and Grody)
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
Heidke Skill Score (for deterministic categorical forecasts) Heidke score = Example: Suppose for OND 1997, rainfall forecasts are made for 15 stations.
Severe turbulence cases NOMEK Aviation requirements ICAO Annex 3 – “The objective of meteorological service for international air navigation shall.
1 Discussion of Observational Biases of Some Aircraft Types at NCEP Dr. Bradley Ballish NCEP/NCO/PMB 7 September 2006 “Where America’s Climate and Weather.
© Crown copyright Met Office Regional Temperature and Precipitation changes under high- end global warming Michael Sanderson, Deborah Hemming, Richard.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
61 st IHC, New Orleans, LA Verification of the Monte Carlo Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update John A.
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecast in the Alps Verification.
© Crown copyright Met Office GA Met provision, UK Met Office Jonathan Dutton, Operations Centre, Met Office, UK.
MeteoExpert workstation.Visualization of new gridded forecasts MeteoExpert workstation. Visualization of new gridded forecasts.
TOULOUSE (FRANCE), 5-9 September 2005 OBJECTIVE VERIFICATION OF A RADAR-BASED OPERATIONAL TOOL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HAILSTORMS I. San Ambrosio, F. Elizaga.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office Verification -status Clive Wilson, Presented by Mike Bush at EWGLAM Meeting October 8- 11, 2007.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The use of an intensity-scale technique for assessing operational mesoscale precipitation forecasts Marion Mittermaier and.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
1) Verification of individual predictors Development of improved turbulence forecasts for aviation Debi Turp © Crown copyright Met Office and the Met Office.
Using TIGGE Data to Understand Systematic Errors of Atmospheric River Forecasts G. Wick, T. Hamill, P. Neiman, and F.M. Ralph NOAA Earth System Research.
Gridded WAFS Icing Verification System Matt Strahan WAFC Washintgon.
© Crown copyright Met Office Verifying modelled currents using a threshold exceedance approach Dr Ray Mahdon An exploration of the Gerrity Skill Score.
Strategic Convection Products at the AWC - Review of P/CCFP experiments Presentation to Friends & Partners of Aviation Weather Jack May, Director.
Part II: Case Studies and Statistical Results
Impact of AMDAR/RS Modelling at the SAWS
LEPS VERIFICATION ON MAP CASES
Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
Background Decisions leading to the development of gridded forecasts of CB clouds, icing and turbulence Olli Marius Turpeinen Chief MET/AIM Section, ICAO.
Verifying and interpreting ensemble products
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
Testing the assimilation of highly sampled aircraft wind observations (GADS) in the ECMWF global model Workshop on Wind Profiles and Mesoscale Data Assimilation,
forecasts of rare events
Probabilistic forecasts
Quantitative verification of cloud fraction forecasts
COSMO-LEPS Verification
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
Increasing Adoption of Weather & Turbulence Observations
Can we distinguish wet years from dry years?
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFS Workshop on the use and visualisation of gridded SIGWX forecasts, Paris, 14 September 2009

© Crown copyright Met Office Contents This presentation covers the following areas Introduction SIGWX forecast comparison Aircraft data Verification methodology Verification results Summary Further improvements

© Crown copyright Met Office Introduction What – Objective verification of gridded binary (GRIB) and significant weather (SIGWX) Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) forecasts Where – Global verification When – November 2008 to May 2009 Why – To demonstrate the quality of the new GRIB forecasts using objective verification. How – Verification against aircraft observations from the Global Aircraft Data Set (GADS)

© Crown copyright Met Office Manual SIGWX BUFR and GRIB CAT forecasts Manual SIGWX chart Example field from new GRIB forecast

© Crown copyright Met Office Comparison of SIGWX BUFR charts UKUSUK&US

© Crown copyright Met Office SIGWX BUFR CAT forecast comparison One month UK-US comparison (January 2009) Average coverage of globe UK ~6%, US ~3% Percentage overlap of all forecasts between UK and US ~20% Areas forecast by both UK and US Areas forecast by UK but not USAreas forecast by US but not UK

© Crown copyright Met Office GRIB forecast comparison produced by HKO

© Crown copyright Met Office Global Aircraft Data Set Archive of aircraft data set up by Joel Tenenbaum (State University of New York) British Airways fleet of Boeing aircraft Global coverage, but flights mainly over northern hemisphere Automated aircraft observations every 4 seconds Indicator of turbulence derived from vertical acceleration, aircraft mass, altitude and airspeed called the derived equivalent vertical gust (DEVG).

© Crown copyright Met Office GADS Data coverage 10-day sample of GADS data

© Crown copyright Met Office Verification methodology

© Crown copyright Met Office Forecast assessment Turbulent/non turbulent event defined on 10min aircraft track ~120km - approx grid size Forecast turbulent event – CAT potential >= Threshold Observed turbulent event – Slight or greater turb (DEVG>=2m/s) Moderate or greater turb (DEVG>=4.5m/s) Construct 2x2 contingency tables for each threshold Sum entries in contingency tables over the verification period Produce a Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve by plotting the Hit rate against False alarm rate for each threshold. Turbulence observed No turbulence observed Turbulence forecast HitFalse alarm No turbulence forecast MissCorrect rejection 2x2 contingency table

© Crown copyright Met Office Results UK GRIB and SIGWX moderate or greater turbulence ~500,000 events ~300 turbulent events (devg>=4.5m/s)

© Crown copyright Met Office Variation with forecast range ~ events Devg>=2m/s

© Crown copyright Met Office Latitudinal variation UK GRIB moderate or greater turbulence 20S to 20N ~60,000 events ~100 turb events 90N to 50N ~200,000 events ~50 turb events 20N to 50N ~200,000 events ~200 turb events 50S to 20S ~12,000 events ~10 turb events

© Crown copyright Met Office Latitudinal variation US GRIB moderate or greater turbulence 20S to 20N ~30,000 events ~50 turb events 90N to 50N ~280,000 events ~200 turb events 20N to 50N ~100,000 events ~100 turb events 50S to 20S ~6,000 events ~3 turb events

© Crown copyright Met Office UK and US Nov 2008 and Jan 2009 ROC curve ~ events Devg>=2m/s

© Crown copyright Met Office UK GRIB and SIGWX ~ events Devg>=2m/s SIGWX automated object - UK automated SIGWX chart production system based on GRIB data

© Crown copyright Met Office Summary of results Both UK and US GRIB products show more skill than the manual SIGWX products. Global UK and US GRIB CAT forecasts score similarly Slight difference in scores as forecast range increases Some differences in scores at individual latitude bands – best performance between 20N and 90N. UK CAT coverage on manual BUFR SIGWX charts greater than the US

© Crown copyright Met Office Further improvements Automate verification process Improve consistency of forecasts by analysing verification data and altering production systems. Use verification to test future model upgrades and re- tune algorithms

© Crown copyright Met Office Questions and answers